RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "It's not just women, seniors, budget hawks, the poor, Latinos, and gays who are catching on to the Republicans' extremism. Americans who don't fall into one of these categories are becoming alarmed, too - as they should."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)


The Fanatical GOP

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

23 August 12

 

e're witnessing the capture by fanatics of what was once a great and important American political party.

The Republican Party platform committee now includes a provision calling for a constitutional amendment banning all abortions, without an exception for rape or incest. This is basically Missouri senatorial candidate Todd Akin's position. (At least the GOP platform doesn't assert that women's bodies automatically reject "legitimate" rapists' sperm.)

Paul Ryan, Romney's selection for vice president, has co-sponsored 38 anti-abortion measures while in the House of Representatives, including several containing no exception for pregnancies caused by rape or incest.

But the GOP's fanaticism goes far beyond its growing absolutism about abortion.

Ryan's proposed budget, approved by almost all House Republicans, is also an exercise in fanaticism. It replaces Medicare with vouchers that won't possibly keep up with rising healthcare costs - thereby shifting costs directly on to the elderly.

That budget also harms the poor and rewards the rich, but does little or nothing to reduce the federal budget deficit. Over 60 percent of its spending cuts come out of programs for lower-income Americans. Its tax cuts for the rich reduce revenues by $4.6 trillion over the decade while saving the typical millionaire hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

The GOP's looniness doesn't even stop there. Republicans remain unwaivering in their support of state laws allowing or encouraging the profiling of Latinos. And unrelenting in their war against gay rights.

It's not just women, seniors, budget hawks, the poor, Latinos, and gays who are catching on to the Republicans' extremism. Americans who don't fall into one of these categories are becoming alarmed, too - as they should.

Although the GOP lurch to the right-wing margin of America may bode well for Democrats this coming Election Day, it bodes ill for America. The capture of one of our great parties by fanatics is nothing to celebrate. A democracy needs at least two sane political parties.



Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "Locked in the Cabinet," "Reason," "Supercapitalism," "Aftershock," and his latest e-book, "Beyond Outrage." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+64 # Linda 2012-08-23 07:19
Its past time the Republican party was shown the door and a new party with common sense replaces it !
Democrat's too might take a look back on their parties liberal ideology and stay true to it !
When Democrat politicians started calling themselves Progressives I knew there would be a shift in the Democratic platform and not necessarily for the better . IMO the Democratic party has distanced itself from its liberal base and moved further right !
Democrat's if you want your base to support your party then you need to stay true to what it used to mean to be a Democrat ! This is not the party I loved under John Kennedy !
 
 
+23 # BlueReview 2012-08-23 14:49
Quoting Linda:
Its past time the Republican party was shown the door and a new party with common sense replaces it !


The problem that I have with that statement is that doing away with the party itself will not solve the problem. The problem is greed, selfishness, and just plain evil run amok. Its current "incarnation" may be the Republican party--but it's everywhere, not just in the Republican party, not just in the United States. What we need is a better way of eradicating evil. We can start by not rewarding these self-righteous [self-edited here] to Congress where they get paid obscene amounts of money as a "salary" (which they get to vote on with no input from the American taxpayer who has to fork it over) and then take even more in the way of bribes and pay-offs not to mention insider trading while systematically perverting the Constitution in the name of "preserving" it; pandering to special interest groups who give themselves names like "Americans for Prosperity" while bilking the American consumer and cheating on their taxes/wives/cou ntry/pets/favor ite lackey/ and buying Supreme Court "justices" oh dear I seem to be ranting sorry I'll stop now. Anyway, hopefully I've made a valid point that actually makes sense: Eradicating the Republican party will not stop the evil. It'll just make the [insert your favorite epithet here] go infiltrate some other group, not that that isn't happening now . . .
 
 
+66 # waltben 2012-08-23 07:19
Just the beginning of the end - someone someday will write "The Rise and Fall of the United States". We are self-destructin g.
 
 
+86 # freeportguy 2012-08-23 07:30
When the uber rich go "It's us vs them", normal conservative people don't realize that they too are part of the "them" portion! Other than their votes, the uber rich couldn't care less about those regular folks, including GOP politicians who aspire to make it to the "club of privilege".

Normal people voting Republicans do in fact vote against their best interests! The 0.001% (which only includes highly wealthy) cares about ONE thing only: themselves. Not the country, not their businesses, neighbors, etc. THEMSELVES!
 
 
-97 # Robt Eagle 2012-08-23 08:37
freeport guy, you are so right!!! Bill Gates, Mitt Romney and the like give tens of millions of dollars annually to charity. The top earners in this country DO give a crap about America, but they do not believe they should be forced to give through taxes and bigger government which hurts all classes. Robert Reich is a fool who has given up on truthful reporting and assessment. Reich panders to the left and worships Obama as the ship is sinking and going down fast thanks to Obama's failed policies over the past four years and six years under Reid and Pelosi rule in both houses of Congess. That is fact, not Reich's BS that he spews to those who fear the truth!
 
 
+43 # BradFromSalem 2012-08-23 10:42
Robt,

See my post further down the page. You are certainly among those that see reality through a prism that distorts reality. Lets talk when you drop the fantasy that people on the left worship the President. When you realize that the President is the passable compared to Romney's bad (this is policy not personal) then I will know that you occasionally take off your carnival glasses.
 
 
+20 # carpepax 2012-08-23 12:48
Yeah, they give a crap about America which is why they pour millions into the political campaigns of politicians who will vote in their best interest at the expense of the many. Robt, you write as if you have your own elected official to vote in your interest. If you're spending time dishing your Fux News talking points here to ordinary Americans, I suspect you don't. Stop arguing against your own best interests. We are not convinced of anything but your delusion.
 
 
+30 # David Starr 2012-08-23 13:40
Robt Eagle,

Once again, all noise and no content. I wouldn't doubt that there are wealthy individuals giving to charity of course,includin g those who happen to be Left/Progressiv e. However, the clear ideological gap is there between those who perhaps put on a more or less "humnane" mask, but are more neck-deep in financial corruption, outright white collar crime, etc. a la disaster capitalism; and those, despite their wealth, being sincere about real, ideological change. Real change, not charity (it's been beneficial, but it perpetuates the poor as dependents, victims, where poverty will always exist. It's a big "band aid".) The few have too much, the many have too little; then inevitble consequences leading into more class/imperial wars. You think that the wealthy should be exempt from paying their fair share of taxes, they being "forced" by "bigger gov." This is an old cliche that has to be dropped. It definately serves the wealthy, acting as "victim, which is transparently pathetic, and not the common classes. You continue to be an Akin, were intelligence isn't prioritized. And, yeah, there have been disaster presidencies, the worst being the Bush regime. You actually think that Romney, or any other Repub, is actually better than Obama (I'm not a big fan.),and given that Akin has proved that a major requirement for political office is stupidity, you can't handle the truth.
 
 
+10 # rockieball 2012-08-24 05:27
But who did they give their charity too?
That is one question that is never asked of him.
Romney like all good Mormons give it to their church and little any where else.
 
 
+37 # BradFromSalem 2012-08-23 09:02
I believe John Steinbeck when asked why the poor voted against their own interests he replied with something like; "Because every poor person in America believes himself to be a rich person that is having a bad day"
 
 
-38 # wantrealdemocracy 2012-08-23 11:42
Normal people voting Democrat also vote against their own best interests. This article attempts to tell us that the Democrats are the lesser evil, and we must vote for them...WRONG! Democrats are funded by, and working for, the same 0.001% that the Republicans are. As the Republicans go farther to the right by proposing more cuts in all of our domestic programs, the Democrats move right to take the position of that the Republicans held last month. If you want to avoid further austerity and more wars, you must NOT VOTE for either of these two parties. There are other candidates on the ballot. Do some investigation and decide which of these will do what you want. Stand up and vote for what you want!
 
 
+23 # JCM 2012-08-23 15:56
If you don't vote for Obama and every Democrat you can you will get; the Paul Ryan budget plan, reducing the Pell Grant, deeper cuts in Social Security, deeper cuts in Medicare, cuts in the Department of Education, reduced regulation for the protection of the environment, reduced taxes for the very wealthy, reduced budget for clean energy, reduced regulation on the financial and petroleum industries and maybe all out war. Obama believes in a budget that would help restore the middle class, increased the Pell Grant, and believes in a budget with shared sacrificed. Believes in the environment, in education, in regulations for the protection of the working class and has tried to pass legislation to provide for that but “working” with the Republicans has made it impossible. This list can go on a long time and Obama is no neo-con for more war. Progressives and liberals need to fight for the Democrats with their vote and their rhetoric. If you don’t, you get the Republicans. There is no third choice for this election. If they try to tell you differently they are working for the Republicans. If you want to change politics prepare years before the election, otherwise get on board and fight for the Democrats. In addition, another conservative Supreme Court Justice will make positive change nearly impossible. And one of the biggest problems with Democrats are the people would rather punish them and let the Republicans win.
 
 
+24 # Billy Bob 2012-08-23 18:41
This is no longer just about current issues. It's about REPUBLICAN PLANS. Do you honestly think they'll rest on their past accomplishments (e.g. abu graib, guantanomo, Iraq, Afghanistan, the "Patriot" Act, tax cuts for the rich, etc.)? As scare-uh palin would say: HELL NO!

They have MORE ideas:

WAR WITH IRAN
END SOCIAL SECURITY
END MEDICARE
TAR SANDS PIPELINE
MORE OFFSHORE DRILLING
MORE FRACKING
MORE ACTIVE WAR WITH SYRIA
MORE SURVEILLANCE & LESS PRIVACY
MORE TORTURE

Things WILL get worse.

The people who think a 3rd party won't further empower the nazi right scare me more than anyone else in politics.
 
 
+8 # AMLLLLL 2012-08-24 12:54
Billy Bob, thank you for stating that so clearly! And Robt. Reich, keep it coming!
 
 
+11 # AMLLLLL 2012-08-24 12:55
ps. Women will become 3rd class citizens under the GOP plan.
 
 
+1 # JJS 2012-08-26 07:48
"by wantrealdemocracy....
If you want to avoid further austerity and more wars, you must NOT VOTE for either of these two parties. There are other candidates on the ballot...."

I would suggest that this is a good stradegy at the local level at this point in time.

Any other "party" or individual at the national level would not have any power to change things because they have no caucus (or power) in the US Congress. Even Bernie Sanders caucuses with the D's, as most Independents, Socialists, Greens,... do; even at the state or county level.

Taking control of local government is how the R's have slowly taken over a big chunk the political machine in the US. They have been getting their candidates in place for thirty some years by getting their "true believers" elected at the local level. They then appoint ideologues to positions of power in local government agencies.

It starts from the ground up and we are decades behind. One thing we might concentrate on is eliminating outside funding, ie. influence, of local elections.

Representative government is not perfect, but it is all we have. The extremely wealthy of this country and world have too much representation in our governence. It is unbalanced and needs a correction.
 
 
+36 # sapereaudeprime 2012-08-23 07:47
We will be lucky if we don't have another civil war. These people are the great-grandchil dren and grandchildren of yellow-dog KKK Southern Democrats, and their colleagues-in-f olly. I only hope that if it comes to another civil war, NATO comes in on the side of civilization and helps us stamp these fascist cretins out forever, genetically.
 
 
+83 # Barbara K 2012-08-23 07:50
I watch the Senate. About 12 or so years ago, they treated each side with respect and actually worked together, sometimes harder, to get legislation passed that would help the people. Then came along Bush and things began to change. Then when Obama came along, the only thing the Rs could think of was to do nothing, and Sen. McConnell made his infamous statement right away that their "Only goal is to make Obama a one-term president". They proceeded to do nothing, to stop all they could and the only laws the House worked on was to legislate our bodies. They worked on other Bills that were so outlandish they were DOA in the Senate. The House had to know they would not be passed. My how they've changed since I first started watching the Senate some time ago. The Greedy Old Pigs really got bad when Palin and the Tbaggers came along. They were the real downfall of the GOP and they are now just the Lunatic Party.
 
 
+27 # BradFromSalem 2012-08-23 09:10
Barbara,

Because I am a double Libra, I am astrally predestined to try to be fair. Mitch McConnell has no choice but to stonewall. The Republicans in the 90's did not pull out all the stops to prevent Clinton from putting in a more liberal tax structure. Their failure to prevent its passing led to Clinton's 2nd term. They have been hell-bent on preventing Obama from doing the same. It's about power first, not about America. You can be sure that I am correct since that is what the Republicans accuse the Democrats of doing.
 
 
+3 # Barbara K 2012-08-23 17:15
BradFromSalem: I'm just curious. I'm a Pisces, what does that make me?
 
 
+3 # angelfish 2012-08-23 18:49
Quoting Barbara K:
BradFromSalem: I'm just curious. I'm a Pisces, what does that make me?

Me too, Barb, but your Rising Sign (the sign that was in the ascendent on the day of your birth) determines your Rising sign. Mine is Libra, hence my never-ending battle for JUSTICE! You need to get an Ephemeris so you can calculate what your Rising sign is, you MIGHT be able to do it on line if you know the Time of your birth. Good Luck. I used to have a lot of fun with Astrology, not so much any more, but I DO think some things are just TOO real to be folly or coincidence.
 
 
+3 # BradFromSalem 2012-08-24 04:09
Angelfish and Barbara,

The rising sign is the same as your sun sign around sunrise. So, if you know your time of birth you can make a guess as to what it is.

My wife is a Pisces, she has incredible instincts regarding many things. And it is true about Libra's belief in justice and balance. It drives my wife nuts since she just knows and I get all caught up in being fair and just. We make a great team!
 
 
+1 # Barbara K 2012-08-24 14:04
angelfish & BradFromSalem: I was born around 5am on Feb. 27. Does that help? lol. Yes, BradFromSalem too, I do seem to just "know" things. Have strong instincts, etc. I just wondered what it had to do with politics, but just seeing what you've said and seeing it all in writing, I now know, I think. lol. Thanks for the info. Glad you are a fellow Pisces, Angelfish.
 
 
+12 # pbbrodie 2012-08-23 10:37
I nearly always agree with your comments and they are, for the most part, right on target. Unfortunately, you missed with this one, if only partially. The Senate hasn't been functioning anywhere near the way it should since the very unfortunate election of Ronald Reagan and has been going steadily down hill ever since. This is considerably more than the 12 years you stated.
If you don't believe this, just go back and luck at judicial nominations since Reagan was elected and you will clearly see that Republican obstructionism was in full force as long ago as then and had really begun even earlier. It was and is all part of their plan to take over all 3 branches of government and they have been enormously successful, especially with the judicial branch. The Democrats missed the chance to change Senate rules to modify the filibuster and eliminate the Republicans ability to stifle any and all attempts by the Democrats to enact any meaningful legislation when President Obama first took office and the had a super majority. This was an unforgivable error on their part, if it was indeed an error. Sometimes, you have to really wonder whether or not the Democrats deliberately left the filibuster the way it is!?
 
 
+13 # Barbara K 2012-08-23 11:51
I watched the Senate as they worked their way thru a Bill to change the Rules of the Senate. When it came time to debate and vote on it, an R Senator put a block on it. It is one of the more than 300 blocked Bills in the Senate.
 
 
+6 # BradFromSalem 2012-08-23 12:13
Thanks for the thumbs up. I don't totally disagree on your point since the Reagan years was indeed a revolution, but with horrendous results. I was opining they let Clinton slip one by them, possibly because they truly believed in Reaganomics or as is more likely they f-d up. Remember, I'm a double Libra!
 
 
+13 # Barbara K 2012-08-23 12:49
I hope you remember how great the Clinton years were. Anyone who wanted a job had one. The budget was balanced and there was a good surplus until Bush got his hands on the government, and ended up destroying the economy with his policies. As far as the Reagan years, I only remember the trickle-down economy that he tried to fool us with. Guess I was too young to pay that much attention then.
 
 
+5 # BradFromSalem 2012-08-24 04:14
The Clinton years were great, but unfortunately many of the seeds for Neo-cons coup were planted during his second term.
Repeal of Glass-Steagall, the original Patriot Act, a quieter war in Iraq. In many ways Obama is an improvement over Clinton, but you gotta admit Bill can sell you a car with no steering wheel by convincing you its not really needed.
 
 
+1 # JJS 2012-08-26 08:09
Barbara K
I think your post is excellent but I disagree as to when things began to change. I believe it was with Newt Gingrich, GOPAC and the "Contract with America".
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/6757.html
And this longer discourse:
http://www.civilpolitics.org/content/fight-club-politics-and-how-partisanship-poisoning-house-representatives

(Aquarian sun with a Scorpio moon)
 
 
+46 # mickeynow 2012-08-23 07:56
If you are concerned about the well being of your country, you will contact all of your friends, family, and others to encourage them to vote the crazies out of public office and attempt to restore a civil, rational dialogue in our ongoing debate about the direction of our local and national issues.
 
 
+73 # davidr 2012-08-23 08:08
They're not to the right, they're off the chart.

They don't believe in government. What kind of wing is that?

They don't believe in science, and they don't accept fact as the basis of assertion. On what wing of what spectrum is that?

Discussing the Republicans as a wing of something does a grave disservice to the serious matter of psychosis.
 
 
+36 # BradFromSalem 2012-08-23 08:09
I truly do not care that the Republican party has revoked their connection to reality. I am bothered more by Democrats and so-called Independents that still listen to these people with their insane concepts of governance. While most Democrats may disagree with these Bizzaro Republicans, they (myself included) don't just tell them that all discussion of public policy that is based on surreal ideas only drags us into their imaginary world.
This world of theirs ignores the rules of arithmetic and denies cause and effect. To discuss anything with them is to engage in a discussion with people incapable of even rhetorically explaining their viewpoint, let alone using appropriate debate tools such as historical precedence, true facts, accurate arithmetic, appropriate math models, and context. Instead they rely on a stream of unconnected statements which is intended to overwhelm the listener into a defacto hypnotic state where the appearance of connectedness becomes connected inside the mind, which of course is always trying to create a coherent comprehensible picture of the information.
Independents of course, believing that there are two sides to every story, are the most vulnerable to this onslaught of nonsense. Thus a majority of Independents vote Republican.
 
 
+7 # FLAK88 2012-08-23 13:04
Up until this past Primary season I was registered as a 'Decline to State', or Independent. I've always been a firm Democratic voter but I feel reserved toward the party because they lack guts. (Case in point; By now Holder should have rolled tanks into Ohio,PA and about 12 other states to enforce the Voters Rights Act. Given a reverse situation, what do you think a GOP A.J. would do if their re-election was being threatened ?) So, don't be too quick to judge Independents. We're not that simple !
 
 
+4 # BradFromSalem 2012-08-24 04:41
Flak88,

To put a finer point on my argument, Independents that usually vote Republican and/or are minimally informed on the issues. I think that would probably exclude you.
 
 
+4 # Michael Lee Bugg 2012-08-24 19:16
You all should read the book, "The Republican Brain"! It does a good job of explaining why they dogmatically stick to their fantasies regardless of the facts! It is not just their nurture; it is ingrained in their very nature. We can only hope to stiffen the spines of our like-minded friends with our factual arguments!
 
 
+19 # FLAK88 2012-08-23 08:26
In any other developed western nation, the likes of the GOP would have been tossed out a long time ago.
 
 
+18 # Buddha 2012-08-23 08:41
I don't have a problem with their fanaticism. I have a problem with them lying and covering it up, and pretending to believe in more moderate views when it is general election time, and their fanaticism then reasserts itself once in office. If such a dynamic on the Left was occuring, I would equally disagree with that too. I believe every politician should be clear and honest about their beliefs and what they will work on and support if they get elected to office, and shouldn't run from or deceive on what they did legislatively come re-election campaigning. And I expect our press to do their jobs, uncover when they are lying and deceiving, and proclaim it to the high heavens. I guess I live in a dream world, lol.
 
 
+21 # humanmancalvin 2012-08-23 08:46
The Republican party celebrates a culture of ignorance. Their denial of Global Warming is nothing they truly believe in but rather a bow & a scrape to the polluters that would rightfully have to pay to clean up the mess & keep it clean. Their intrusive foray into women's vagina's is based on Faux-Christian beliefs, made only to insure the Evangelical vote. The Ryan budget has been proven to actually raise the deficit over the cost of protecting the weakest & poorest among us. The politicians espousing these views do not actually believe a single one,but rather know which red meat to toss to the low information voter to garner their support.
These extremist radicals are the biggest threat to America today. Not the Muslim terrorists as their leadership has been effectively crippled by President Obama's use of singling out the leadership & eliminating them wherever they are. Agree or disagree with the way this war is being waged, fewer boots on the ground mean far fewer American deaths & a tremendous financial saving. This is just one of the ways President Obama is keeping this country safer. The man is the only sane choice with the GOP Flat Earthers throwing themselves over the crazy cliff.
Never, ever, ever vote for any Republican candidate & the Blue Dog Democrats can take a dive along with the Republican party.
 
 
+16 # Trish42 2012-08-23 08:49
As Lakoff has stated repeatedly, people vote their morals rather than their economic interests. That's why abortion has become such a big issue. Even if you think there might be a few gems in the Evil Ryan budget, what sane person wants the GOP in their bedroom or checking their "papers"??
 
 
+21 # Ellioth 2012-08-23 08:49
We are witnessing the dark partnership between religious fanatics (not very different from the Taliban) who are pursuing their own version shariah law and the business conservatives who are the most greedy and avaricious who walk the earth. They care about nothing but amassing as much money for themselves as possible, by any means possible, including purchasing politicians who will write tax laws favorable to them. Mitt Romney is a case in point.

So - religious fanatics and financial fanatics have joined forces to create an America run by and for their own form of fanaticism. They have fooled and dumbed down enough citizens / voters to have a reasonable chance of taking over the reigns of power in what was once the greatest democracy on earth. There just might be enough fanatics, greedy and ignorant voters to turn America into a wasteland. Let's hope these people are soundly defeated in November.
 
 
+17 # Inspired Citizen 2012-08-23 08:51
We have two parties, the Dems and the Party of Glenn Beck.

That would be GREAT were in not for Citizens United that allows the folks Beck shills for (corporatists and plutocrats) to pay as much as they want for ads that repeat lies over and over and over until gullible and politically un-involved folks start to believe the Tea Party/Romney/Ry an/Beck lies.
 
 
+15 # WolfTotem 2012-08-23 08:51
"A politician divides mankind into two classes: tools and enemies." Nietzsche

Fanatics are surely just the shock troops of oligarchy. Mere tools.

Should we not be more concerned with the strategists who stand behind the fanatics and the armies of lobbyists?

With the not-so-shadowy plutocrats and corporations, whose agenda goes far beyond subjecting America to the witchhunts and purges of the (supposedly) religious Right?

With those who aim to replace democracy by oligarchy and a permanent one-party State?

With those spineless, unresisting Democrats, who're more concerned for their seats than for their country?

With the supine, brainwashed masses who let this all happen?

As Adam Smith, one of GOP's Patron Saints, so aptly put it:

"The disposition to admire and almost worship the rich and the powerful is the great and most universal cause of the corruption of our moral sentiments."
 
 
+9 # Citizen Mike 2012-08-23 08:52
Welcome to Bizarro Amerika. Learn to walk backwards. Looks like this nation is self-destructin g, I plan to leave before this goes to completion.

A best-case scenario would be for the Red States to ask to secede and we let them do it in an orderly fashion.
 
 
+9 # brux 2012-08-23 10:20
Where are you going to leave to ... that the American Empire will not follow you ?
 
 
+17 # Vardoz 2012-08-23 08:58
They are a hateful, cruel, ruthless and barbaric bunch. It would not be the first time in history a corrupt group tried to take over a nation and steal it's wealth. We better be prepared for the worst because they call themselves right to life but they support death for the middle class and our nations most needy.
 
 
-8 # mgwmgw 2012-08-23 09:17
I repeat my advice that if you live somewhere that will not make a difference as to whether the Republicans or Democrats win the presidency, or control of Congress, please vote for a 3rd party candidate, probably Libertarian or Green Party. The highest priority for all of these politicians is to win elections. Only if they think that their views will risk not getting them elected will they change their views.

I sometimes wonder whether having a Republican party be so extreme risks allowing the Democrats to do things we would not normally let them get away with because there is no real alternative. Stronger other parties will remind the Democrats that we DO have an alternative to them as well.
 
 
+10 # Billy Bob 2012-08-23 18:32
Republicans have SO MANY MORE IDEAS in the works if only they GET ANOTHER CHANCE. For instance, they want ANOTHER WAR - this time WITH IRAN!!!

DO YOU WANT THAT?

Do you want to END MEDICARE?

THEY DO.

Right now, Democrats are THE ONLY THING standing in their way.

Vote for 3rd parties and fullfill their wildest fantasies by allowing them a free reign over Social Security, Medicare and the coming WAR WITH IRAN.

THINGS WILL GET WORSE.
 
 
+17 # bmiluski 2012-08-23 09:23
The problem with the people who consider themselves republicans is that they do no thinking on their own. I have been told several times that my political outlook is wrong by people with whom I have never discussed politics. They are told that we do not think like them and that we oppose everything they believe. The truth of the matter is that we are much closer together on the majority of issues then they think. But the republicans that I know refuse to discuss. They just keep telling me I'm wrong. When I ask them what I'm wrong about, they don't say anything.
 
 
+14 # DPM 2012-08-23 09:38
Remember. The people actually "pulling the strings" in the USA and around the world, are only interested in money as power. Their real interest is in ruling the world. They think they are above the "slime" they see as humanity. "They" are the only ones that can save us. And, they will kill us to do it, if necessary. It will be necessary, of course. But, they are better prepared than the rest of us. Fight now or surrender later.
 
 
+9 # mjc 2012-08-23 09:44
Agree completely. This is a ticket that comes right out of the Rush Limbaugh, Karl Rove, playbook. As far as I am concerned, this is the beginning of a Republican Party that will be recognized as ultra conservative, making no deals with the Democrats or with any of the groups that they have tried to woo in the past: women, Hispanics, blacks, and independents. It has always been the more acceptable to be a Republican: always. But think that the Party will be seen as quite different, a political party that boldly declares that the wealthy and the very wealthy are their main targets and that those of us under a million in income are not going to be given a place at the table in this country for any benefits. Period. Actually, I would even say that perhaps it is the beginning of an American fascist party. The safety net will be for the benefit of the corporate interests who go overboard on their hedge fund bets or have difficulty getting the doltish American consumer to spend money on their products. The military will continue to have the main job placements and will spread our empire to every corner of the earth. The propaganda for such a United States is already being promulgated.
 
 
+10 # in deo veritas 2012-08-23 09:54
neofascist doesn't begin to describe the Repukes. They are NIHILISTS. They believe in nothing except themselves. They are opposed to everyone else and all that this country has ever stood for. Their pretensions of being Christians is simply a sham. If they believed in Christ or even in God they would not be involved in the nefarious activities that they engage in every day with every breath. If they worship anything at all it is MONEY. Anyone who has any knowledge of modern history should be able to see the parallels with the Nazis. Both are funded by the rich whether it be Krupp, I.G. Farben or the Koch Bros. Both use fear, whether it be the Red Scare or Islamophobia to keep the people from realizing who the real enemy is. Both have worked to destroy labor unions. Both used and are using "legal" means to spy upon the people and create a police state: i.e. New York City. Both relegate women to worse than second-class status and the Repukes are as bad if not worse than the Middle East Muslims they decry in this respect. Propaganda built both groups and it will be their downfall once the people start to use what mental abilities their creator gave them. If we fail to stop these enemies of our country we will suffer the same fate as Nazi Germany and richly deserve it.
 
 
+8 # brux 2012-08-23 10:11
> If we fail to stop these enemies of our country we will suffer the same fate as Nazi Germany and richly deserve it.

OK, I get the thought here, but Germans did not deserve having Nazi Germany happen to their country and neither did any of the other countries and the rest of the world. If you think anyone deserved to be turned into a soldier, or forced to a concentration camp, worked to death and murdered you are really not thinking too straight.

When human beings start to go down that escalating road of greed and violence to never ends well, and so far I cannot think of a country or civilization that has escaped it.

The Republicans cannot seem to help themselves, and the Democrats do not know what to do in a system that seems to think they are just as bad for the most part.
 
 
+3 # in deo veritas 2012-08-23 16:08
perhaps deserved wouldn't apply to the situations you mention, but their misguided support for the regime and their anti-semitism led to their misfortunes. There can be no neutrality where evil is concerned-you either oppose it or become part of it. Obviously the countries that fell victim to them did not understand this in time.
 
 
+16 # Jaysson Brae 2012-08-23 10:17
Dems are not progressive enough, true, and that needs to be fixed. But the Ayn Rand-inspired GOP is akin to the European fascist movements of the 1930's.
What's ironic is that most Europeans learned their lessons about fascism, after we Americans saved them from their own folly in WW II. A party like the US Republicans could never become a MAJOR party in today's W. Europe -- just a nut-fringe party. The GOP now deserves to be seen for what it is, here in the US: a dangerous movement of psychologically ill elitists and extremists, not even worthy of "fringe" status.
 
 
+16 # JSRaleigh 2012-08-23 10:26
Once they've taken away your medicare, they'll come for your Social Security

... and if you're a veteran, they'll keep coming back again and again until they've taken all of your VA benefits.
 
 
+1 # MylesJ 2012-08-23 10:40
The old Goldwater comment, he's right, far right can be revived: simple, truthful, effective
 
 
+12 # Billy Bob 2012-08-23 11:41
It's very simple. If you want war with Iran, vote for a 3rd party so Romney can win.
 
 
-30 # jimattrell 2012-08-23 12:04
It's time all these bright people who write these stories started working on the serious problems our country is facing related to six years of liberal rule....
 
 
+15 # James Smith 2012-08-23 15:14
Those problems would be what? FYI, most of the things you like about the USA were first proposed by "liberals" and damned as being "socialist." Tell us, which of these are you willing to give up?

The truth is, the most socialist countries in the world right now are places like Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and perhaps Canada. All have democratically- elected governments, a happier population, better-educated citizens, a better standard of living, and better health care than the USA. For that matter, most of what you like about the USA was damned as "socialist" when liberals first proposed it.

Tell us, which of these are you willing to give up because they're "socialist"? Free paved roads, free public schools, police and fire protection, free public parks, clean and safe water food, and medicines, regulated workplace safety, mandated overtime pay, social security, medicare, child labor laws, and anything else where everyone contributes to for the benefit of all? An example would be sports stadiums. They are often partially paid for by tax money even though only about 15% of any nearby population will ever enter them even though 100% help pay for them. Socialist!

Again, which of these will you gladly give up?
 
 
+3 # Billy Bob 2012-08-25 10:20
I've never heard any conservative answer that question. I wonder why.
 
 
+2 # pernsey 2012-08-26 07:50
Quoting Billy Bob:
I've never heard any conservative answer that question. I wonder why.


Because Faux News only gives them slams against the other side to avoid telling them whats really going on...so they are virtually clueless except for Fox news lies and the bashing.
 
 
+12 # WallStWallFlowerGirl 2012-08-23 12:11
None of what we're experiencing would be happening if people in media, the outlet by which all citizens are informed, were not so blatantly biased w/souls sold to the the highest bidders.

I agree wholeheartedly w/Barbara K (I look forward to reading your posts!) and I go further to include the lack of an informed nation being reason why these Rethuglicans get away with what they do. It's mind-boggling to try & understand how people vote against their better interest; how ignorant smart people can be. I think of the German citizens that didn't do what they could to help the Jews. Yeah, fear plays a part but I just cannot fathom how the smell of burning flesh in tiny European towns that housed Hitler's concentration camps, didn't nauseate them enough to rise above fear.

Joe the Plumber, Larry the Cable Guy, all card-carrying members of NASCAR- the majority believe Rethugs when they spew their lies, which only robs them blind. But if just ONE member of FOX, et al, actually stood up and said: "Enough!" all those patriotic thumping citizens of propaganda might actually wake up.

When they scare brainwashed audiences to fear "socialists" who want to "raise our taxes," they have no clue that by giving the rich all the tax breaks, it's at our expense- which can only be by raising taxes ON US. Why doesn't the Common Man who votes Rethug, realize this?????
 
 
-3 # Okieangels 2012-08-23 15:36
I could see the day in which the dems are the conservative party, the Greens the progressive party, and there are a few Republicans in Congress just as a nod to old times. Vote Dem if you must, but register as a Green. Hope in 10 years time Greens are the majority in Congress, if the loons on the right keep being honest with us, they'll soon be history.
 
 
+7 # CAMUS1111 2012-08-23 16:54
the article is entitled "The Fanatical GOP--What other gop is there?
 
 
+9 # reiverpacific 2012-08-23 17:52
@ "Okieangels"
A very nice vision and I fervently hope you are right. I won't be living here then but for the sake of the Planet, it's a worthy vision and aspiration.
But remember that Hitler, when the Russian tanks were within blocks of his Berlin bunker, turned around and blamed the German people for "Letting him down and not doing enough for the Fatherland", -before doing himself and Eva Braun's to death, after which his his propagandist press secretary Goebbel's killed his wife and children then himself in blind and final tribute to their "Uncle Adolf".
These far-out-right people have that same "Everybody's wrong but me, even if you prove otherwise!" mentality and getting rid of them will entail much "collateral" damage to the planet and it's people.
And for anybody who thinks that the bulk of the rich who pay reluctantly, if at all, any taxes for the common good but give to "selective" charities for altruistic reasons -I've got some flood-seasonal lakefront property-----! Remove their carefully-calcu lated tax breaks and they'd be as mute and inactive as any extinct species.
 
 
+3 # Inspired Citizen 2012-08-24 07:31
Fanatical? Is that an overstatement? Not when the V-P choice is the "soulmate" of Glenn Beck.

http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2012/08/beck-is-ecstatic-over-romneys-choice.html
 
 
+3 # tm7devils 2012-08-25 10:42
Personally, I blame the media and those who control it. Without a factually and truthfully informed constituency voters will continue to elect nut jobs...sort of like GIGO in reverse.
If the Fourth Estate doesn't do what it was created for then democracy, and a workable society - in any useful form - is not attainable.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN