RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Hightower writes: "Being branded as 'serious' means never having to admit you're a flim-flam man. Thus, the widely ballyhooed Ryan Budget is called 'honest' and 'responsible' by insiders who obviously haven't run the numbers on it."

GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney introduces his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney introduces his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)


The Ryan-Romney Flim-Flam Ticket

By Jim Hightower, Creators Syndicate

22 August 12

 

et's talk budget! Yes, the wonky wonderland of the federal budget, with page after page of numbers - what fun, eh?

No. Most people would prefer a root canal to a budget discussion (indeed, I've heard that some dentists use a recording of budget numbers to anesthetize their root-canal patients - everything from the neck up quickly goes numb). But Paul Ryan is different.

The GOP's vice presidential nominee is touted as Mr. Budget, a guy who gets excited by running his fingers through fiscal things. That's why the Washington cognoscenti have declared him to be "serious," rather than just another political opportunist riding the right-wing wave of tea party ridiculousness.

Being branded as "serious" means never having to admit you're a flim-flam man. Thus, the widely ballyhooed Ryan Budget is called "honest" and "responsible" by insiders who obviously haven't run the numbers on it.

The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, however, has tallied Ryan's budgetary giveaways to the rich and take-backs from the middle-class and the poor. Far from balancing the federal budget, as the self-proclaimed deficit hawk claims, the analysts found that Ryan's plan increases the federal deficit. And not by a little, but by about $2.5 trillion! So, yes, he is serious - serious as a snakebite.

Then there was Ryan's explosive admission recently that the budget plan of his presidential partner, Mitt Romney, is also a con game. Despite Romney's repeated assertion that - by golly - his nifty plan will balance the federal budget in only eight years, Ryan confessed that they don't really know that, because "we haven't run the numbers on that specific plan."

Say what? What? Hello - a budget is nothing but numbers - numbers that have, in fact, been run! Otherwise, it's just a political hoax.

During his run in the presidential primaries this spring, when he was trolling for votes in the shallow waters of the Republican fringe, Romney embraced the Ryan budget, calling it a "bold and exciting effort" that is "very much needed." And, hoping to glom onto Ryan's "wow" appeal to the hyper-energized right wing, Romney brought Mr.

Budget onboard for the fall run - with one interesting condition: The veep candidate has had to jettison his budget.

That document, which Ryan had rammed through the U.S. House in 2011, would have provided another gold mine for the one-percenters, with millionaires-and-up averaging around $300,000 a year in tax breaks. The rest of us would've gotten the shaft, including tax increases, privatization of Medicare, deep cuts in student aid and job training programs, and federal abandonment of food stamps and health care for the poor.

Yet Ryan is on the Republican presidential ticket specifically because his budget whackery has enthralled the GOP's far right. Anti-government guru Grover Norquist, for example, has gushed that the six-term Wisconsin congress-critter would be the Dick Cheney of economic policy. Sheesh - that's not a threat to be taken lightly!

But the very bauble that got him to the GOP's No. 2 political slot turns out to be so widely and wildly unpopular with voters in the deeper waters of the general election that it's already been trashed by the party's No. 1. "I have my own budget plan," Romney backpedaled the day after he knighted Sir Ryan, "and that's the budget plan we're going to run on." Yes, the budget with no numbers.

That aside, it's kind of strange (and a bit unsettling) to see a candidate for president straining to explain that he's the one in charge, not the young ideologue. Romney even went on national TV to tell us that, while Ryan would certainly be among the people he asks for advice, "I have to make the final call in important decisions." Sure, Mitt - you da man! But was he trying to convince us ... or himself? Or Ryan?

Embarrassingly, at the staged event where Romney introduced his VP selectee, he bungled his line, presenting Ryan as "the next president of the United States." Was that just another Romney gaffe? A Freudian slip? Or an eerie moment of candor?

After all, Romney has no unwavering principles or solid commitment to any policy except, "Elect me, and I'll lower my taxes." Republican leaders are now trying to downplay Ryan's extremism, but if they were honest with voters, their bumper sticker would read: "Ryan-Romney in 2012."

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.



National radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the book, "Swim Against The Current: Even a Dead Fish Can Go With the Flow," Jim Hightower has spent three decades battling the Powers That Be on behalf of the Powers That Ought To Be - consumers, working families, environmentalists, small businesses, and just-plain-folks.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+25 # CAMUS1111 2012-08-22 16:29
The Adolph-Benito ticket for our time. Pathetic. It's time the gop was called out for the dangerous reactionary [ok, "fascist"] party it is. It is beyond redemption.
 
 
+13 # Ralph Averill 2012-08-23 00:50
Romney indeed seems to have an aversion to publishing numbers; his numbers; the numbers on his budget, the numbers on his tax returns. There are no numbers on the former, his fantasy federal budget, and the key number on the latter is zero; paid no federal taxes.
 
 
+15 # ER444 2012-08-23 01:47
The photo alone is enough to scare the hell out of anybody who is even half way informed. Can you really imagine these two egotistical clowns in the White House?! The hair is literally standing upon the back of my neck. This election is going to be the most important poll of the last 50 years. Where are the Democrats??? I have been reading that the "safe" candidates are hording their treasures instead of helping their fellow candidates in more dangerous races. This shouldn't even be close !!! BUT it apparently is. WHY? Come on Dems... get loud, get in their faces, be brave, shout and scream about the unbelievable selfishness of these two men. Obama will miost likely win, but this election ai about the Congress and the Senate. Fight team fight!!
 
 
+12 # RMDC 2012-08-23 02:56
I remember that when Bush-Cheney first took over the regime, they said that the budget surpluses built by Clinton should be returned to the people. They should not pay off debt. So the surplusses were given back -- but only to the very rich.

We are living in a period in which governments are transferring huge amounts of wealth to a few people. We are deliberatly re-creating feudalism. In all the articles about the debt crisis in Spain, the key point was that the European Central bank would give money directly to Spanish banks but the people of Spain would have to pay back the debt.

Romney and Ryan are 100% behind this transfer of wealth to the Feudal overlords. Obama is 80% behind it. That's why wall street campaign funds are going to Romney.
 
 
0 # FDRva 2012-08-23 20:20
Gotta agree.

But I think Obama's is also a Wall Street flim-flam candidacy.

And that flim-flam will only work once.

Pres. Obama was Wall Street's preferred Dem (over those stubborn not-as-Wall-Str eet oriented Clintons) in 2008.

Every economic indicator suggests that this pro-Wall Street Pres. Obama will lose an honest election.

Will I get sent to Guantanamo for saying so???

Oh, I forgot the Pres. promised to close that facility--but never got around to doing it.

Will I get sent to Guantanamo for saying so???
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN