Tomasky writes: "Republicans have questioned the patriotism of Democrats for nearly a hundred years. But now, at long last, Barack Obama is turning the tables on the GOP."
Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Bowling Green, Ohio, 07/18/12. (photo: Evan Vucci/AP)
Mitt Romney, Un-American
21 July 12
Republicans have questioned the patriotism of Democrats for nearly a hundred years. But now, at long last, Barack Obama is turning the tables on the GOP.
ohn Sununu opened the "American" door the other day, and now the Romney campaign is barging through it, plotting attacks on Barack Obama's "biography," which will inevitably include veiled accusations about his alleged alien cast, his lack of American-ness. So now that it's open, let's stroll through it ourselves. What's taking place in the room on the other side of that door? Republicans and conservatives are bouncing off the walls because they face a serious risk for the first time in a generation that their definitions of patriotism and Americanism are losing. And not just losing - losing to, of all people, Barack Hussein Obama!
The Republican credo that theirs is the party of patriotism goes back a long, long way, at least to the 1920s. The Democrats then as now represented society's so-called rabble - immigrants, wets, cosmopolites of that gin-soaked decade when the urban population for the first time overtook the rural. Over time, Democrats added blacks, new immigrants, liberated women, gays. The Democrats have been the party of the Other. Impugning their patriotism to the target audience is so easy it can hardly even be called work. In doing so, of course, Republicans tied the concept strongly to their, um, values: the all-conquering free market, mostly; a good war now and then; the occasional (actually, more or less constant, now that I think about it) campaign against subversives real and imagined (the vast majority). Thus have things ever been.
You will find, as you scan our modern electoral history, say since 1968, that the Republican candidate has laid some Americanism-related charge at the Democrat nearly every time, but that the reverse has never occurred. Richard Nixon sent Spiro Agnew out to accuse Hubert Humphrey of being soft on communism and compare him to Neville Chamberlain, even while Nixon was committing treason by submarining the Paris peace talks. Democrats can't, and don't, peddle this merchandise, because it's pointless: they know it won't stick to the party that has owned the issue for decades.
Then comes Obama. I don't have to rehearse for you all the things that were said in 2008. More salient is the fact that the Republicans are still saying them now, after the man has been president for three-and-a-half years and after he executed Osama bin Laden. Obama apologizes for America. If we give this man four more years, Romney has warned repeatedly, the America we've come to know and love will no longer exist. Health care, higher taxes at the top of the income ladder - these aren't just bad ideas. They're un-American and threaten the very body and blood of Uncle Sam. Romney said just two days ago in Pennsylvania: "The course we're on right now is foreign to us. It changes America."
That's the script. But then the patriotism party nominated a man who has for a quarter-century practiced a brand of capitalism that respects no known flag or borders. He ran a company that created some jobs but sent others overseas, he finagled himself a way to get paid a lot of money for doing (by his own admission) no work for a few years, and he appears to have retained a battery of lawyers to help ensure that he pays a far lower tax rate than the working people he's trying to whip into a state of fear about Obama. And there's only one reason people have Swiss bank accounts, and it's to avoid making their otherwise mandated contributions to the national treasury.
I originally had mixed feelings about Obama's "America the Beautiful" ad, the one that uses Romney's wobbly warbling of the song as backdrop for text that read: "He had millions in a Swiss bank account... Tax havens like Bermuda... And the Cayman Islands." It seemed, and maybe was, a little bit churlish to use Romney's singing, which wasn't what you'd call good but more or less followed the tune. But the ad succeeds marvelously at making Romney's career not just about rapacious pursuit of profit, but about patriotism. I don't ever recall a Democratic campaign implying that a Republican's behavior was unpatriotic. So consider my hat tipped, in a big way. It's as if Obama changed the directional flow of a mighty river.
Now Romney is going to scramble to reset things to normal. But we're supposed to own the label "America"! We decide what's patriotic! That's just how it's always been, that's why! I'm sure Romney is absolutely staggered at the idea that his life's work is being calumniated as, of all things, unpatriotic, and by - as I said earlier, of all people - Barack Obama. I luxuriate in the thought that right-wingers across the country are tearing their hair out over this as if in a nice hot bath. But that's what is happening, and it's resonating because it's true. He has done all of these things.
It may be legal to take every tax break you can, to try to claim a $77,000 deduction for your horse. But it is not right. Being a good American means doing what's right in civic terms, not what you and your team of lawyers figure you can get away with. By this definition Romney is the un-American, and it would be a glorious thing indeed if he became the pivot on which we turned to a definition of patriotism that rendered behavior like his opprobrious.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Arrest this man now! Someone in power, please, find the evidence, get it out in a way that is irrefutable, and get this "suit" off the streets of America, for he IS as un-American as they come.
N.
Can hatred be so compelling that one will sacrifice his or her own family's well being for spite. Guess so. To me it is dumbfounding. The litter of carnage caused by the S & L, Milliken and Boeske, Enron, Tyco, the tech bubble, the subprime implosion, LIBOR is out there for all to see. Our ersatz regulators in bed with crooks. It must be a case of ignorance as classically defined, "refusal of knowledge." The low information voters are blinded by the fire in their bellies that produces smoke in their brains.
Not implying any sympathy for Romney in my comment. Just some sarcasm about acting being a useful skill if you want people to believe your lies. But I must dispute your comment about "The government does not control the stock market; private enterprise does." That is not true. In 1998, the Federal Reserve (Government), under Greenspan, gave Citigroup (Business) a waiver to go around the Glass Stegall Act (Government) and approved their purchase of Travelers Group. Sam Weill of Citigroup said "that over that time the legislation will change...we have had enough discussions to believe this will not be a problem". And then the Gramm-Leach-Bli ley Act was passed in November 1999. Once the Glass Stegall act was dismantled the Greedy Banksters went on their full court press, the laws holding them back were gone, all bought and paid for by the banking industry. A combination of paid for government with private enterprize is very enterprizing!
There's nothing "patriotic" about a very rich person who is running for president of the US keeping substantial amounts of money stashed abroad. If he were smarter Romney would have brought it home months ago and then touted how patriotic he was paying more tax than he otherwise would have to. That it either didn't occur to him or thought it wouldn't matter tells us all more about his character than he wants us to know. Clueless - not good quality in a would-be leader.
What are they thinking?
John Kerry, a good man but not a fighter, sat still for the outrageous lies spread about him and that instance of not punching back helped him to lose the election. Barak Obama on the other hand is throwing rights and combinations at Romney that obviously has the man reeling as his own party is publicly in agreement, for different reasoning, about him releasing more tax returns. Romney's financial statements have to be dripping with scandalous entries from offshore banking accounts, tax dodges and who knows what. I get the feeling that they are being scrubbed clean as I type this post, dirty trickery not uncommon to the Radical Right Insurgency.
Irrelevant!
It's easy for to steal legally when you own enough of the people who make the laws in the first place to make sure you act "legally". Millions of people who "worked hard and played by the rules" got shafted.
It's all about Congress in 2012!
that he has not deserved a second term !
Indefinite detention,
tarsand pipeline
and you can add your favourite.....!
The problem is too many freeloaders who contribute nothing to sustaining that capitalism and those freeloaders go by the title of corporations. Did you know that just before and just after WWII individuals paid 53% of all income taxes in the United States while businesses paid 47%. now, individuals pay more than 90% of the income taxes and businesse less than 10%. And what have we gotten for making such a shift in taxation?; financial problems, massive debt, out-of-control deficits, jobs moving overseas, wages suppressed, poverty rising, the middle class disappearing, education deteriorating, our infrastructure crumbling. But the GOP always protects the freeloaders.
To reverse these trends we need more spending, not less, and the political right has damaged the ability of most Americans to spend for the betterment of the nation.
Obama has halted the massive increases in spending and put it on a level course, but massive cuts in spending would plunge us into depression. It always has, always will.
If Obama could make our problems go away by waving a magic wand, why didn't George Bush wave that wand or Ronald Reagan, who started our descend into crapola with his "voodoo" economics?
Who wants a President who's dumber than both Bush & Quayle put together?
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2012/07/2012722145418435676.html
Remember the old adage as well, patriotism is the last refuge for scoundrels!
RSS feed for comments to this post