RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "In secret, he [Reagan] collaborated with some of the Western Hemisphere's most brutal neo-Nazis, including Argentine generals just convicted in a grotesque baby harvesting scheme," reports Robert Parry.

Former Argentina's dictators Jorge Rafael Videla, left, and Reynaldo Bignone wait to listen the verdict of Argentina's historic stolen babies trial in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Thursday, July 5, 2012. (photo: Natacha Pisarenko/AP)
Former Argentina's dictators Jorge Rafael Videla, left, and Reynaldo Bignone wait to listen the verdict of Argentina's historic stolen babies trial in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Thursday, July 5, 2012. (photo: Natacha Pisarenko/AP)



Did Reagan Know About Baby Thefts?

By Robert Parry, Consortium News

09 July 12

 

n Argentine court has convicted two of the nation's former right-wing dictators, Jorge Rafael Videla and Reynaldo Bignone, in a scheme to murder leftist mothers and give their infants to military personnel often complicit in the killings, a shocking process known to the Reagan administration even as it worked closely with the bloody regime.

Testimony at the trial included a videoconference from Washington with Elliott Abrams, then-Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs, who said he urged Bignone to reveal the babies' identities as Argentina began a transition to democracy in 1983.

Abrams said the Reagan administration "knew that it wasn't just one or two children," indicating that U.S. officials believed there was a high-level "plan because there were many people who were being murdered or jailed." Estimates of the Argentines murdered in the so-called Dirty War range from 13,000 to about 30,000, with many victims "disappeared," buried in mass graves or dumped from planes over the Atlantic.

A human rights group, Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo, says as many as 500 babies were stolen by the military during the repression from 1976 to 1983. Some of the pregnant mothers were kept alive long enough to give birth and then were chained together with other prisoners and pushed out of the planes into the ocean to drown.

Despite U.S. government awareness of the grisly actions of the Argentine junta, which had drawn public condemnation from the Carter administration in the 1970s, these Argentine neo-Nazis were warmly supported by Ronald Reagan, both as a political commentator in the late 1970s and as President once he took office in 1981.

When President Jimmy Carter's human rights coordinator, Patricia Derian, berated the Argentine junta for its brutality, Reagan used his newspaper column to chide her, suggesting that Derian should "walk a mile in the moccasins" of the Argentine generals before criticizing them. [For details, see Martin Edwin Andersen's Dossier Secreto.]

Reagan understood that the Argentine generals played a central role in the anti-communist crusade that was turning Latin America into a nightmare of unspeakable repression. The leaders of the Argentine junta saw themselves as something of pioneers in the techniques of torture and psychological operations, sharing their lessons with other regional dictatorships.

Cocaine Coup

Argentina also took the lead in devising ways to fund the anti-communist war through the drug trade. In 1980, the Argentine intelligence services helped organize the so-called Cocaine Coup in Bolivia, violently ousting a left-of-center government and replacing it with generals closely tied to the early cocaine trafficking networks.

Bolivia's coup regime ensured a reliable flow of coca to Colombia's Medellin cartel, which quickly grew into a sophisticated conglomerate for smuggling cocaine into the United States. Some of those drug profits then went to finance right-wing paramilitary operations across the region, according to other U.S. government investigations.

For instance, Bolivian cocaine kingpin Roberto Suarez invested more than $30 million in various right-wing paramilitary operations, including organizing the Nicaraguan Contra rebels in base camps in Honduras, according to U.S. Senate testimony in 1987 by an Argentine intelligence officer, Leonardo Sanchez-Reisse.

Sanchez-Reisse testified that the Suarez drug money was laundered through front companies in Miami before going to Central America. There, Argentine intelligence officers - including Sanchez-Reisse and other veterans of the Cocaine Coup - trained the fledgling Contra forces.

After becoming President in January 1981, Reagan entered into a covert alliance with the Argentine junta. He ordered the CIA to collaborate with Dirty War experts in training the Contras, who were soon rampaging through towns in northern Nicaragua, raping women and dragging local officials into public squares for executions. [See Robert Parry's Lost History.]

A Happy Face

Yet, Reagan kept up a happy face, hailing the Contras as the "moral equals of the Founding Fathers" and heaping gratitude on the Argentine junta.

The behind-the-scenes intelligence relationship apparently gave the Argentine generals confidence that they could not only continue repressing their own citizens but could settle an old score with Great Britain over control of the Falkland Islands, what the Argentines call the Malvinas.

Even as Argentina moved to invade the islands in 1982, Reagan's U.N. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick joined the generals for an elegant state dinner in Washington. The Reagan administration itself was divided between America's traditional alliance with Great Britain and its more recent collaboration with the Argentines in Latin America.

Finally, Reagan sided with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher whose counterattack drove the Argentines from the islands and led to the eventual collapse of the dictatorship. It was in that time frame that Abrams apparently spoke with Bignone about identifying the children who had been taken from their mothers and farmed out to military personnel.

The idea of giving the babies to right-wing military officers apparently was part of the larger Argentine theory of how to eradicate leftist subversive thought. Gen. Videla, in particular, fancied himself a theorist in counterinsurgency warfare, advocating clever use of words as well as imaginative forms of torture and murder.

Known for his dapper style and his English-tailored suits, Videla rose to power amid Argentina's political and economic unrest in the early-to-mid 1970s. "As many people as necessary must die in Argentina so that the country will again be secure," he declared in 1975 in support of a "death squad" known as the Argentine Anti-Communist Alliance. [See A Lexicon of Terror by Marguerite Feitlowitz.]

On March 24, 1976, Videla led the military coup which ousted the ineffective president, Isabel Peron. Though armed leftist groups had been shattered by the time of the coup, the generals still organized a counterinsurgency campaign to wipe out any remnants of what they judged political subversion.

Videla called this "the process of national reorganization," intended to reestablish order while inculcating a permanent animosity toward leftist thought. "The aim of the Process is the profound transformation of consciousness," Videla announced.

Along with selective terror, Videla employed sophisticated public relations methods. He was fascinated with techniques for using language to manage popular perceptions of reality. The general hosted international conferences on P.R. and awarded a $1 million contract to the giant U.S. firm of Burson Marsteller. Following the Burson Marsteller blueprint, the Videla government put special emphasis on cultivating American reporters from elite publications.

"Terrorism is not the only news from Argentina, nor is it the major news," went the optimistic P.R. message.

Since the jailings and executions of dissidents were rarely acknowledged, Videla felt he could deny government involvement, giving the world the chilling new phrase, "the disappeared." He often suggested that the missing Argentines were not dead, but had slipped away to live comfortably in other countries.

"I emphatically deny that there are concentration camps in Argentina, or military establishments in which people are held longer than is absolutely necessary in this … fight against subversion," he told British journalists in 1977. [See A Lexicon of Terror.]

In a grander context, Videla and the other generals saw their mission as a crusade to defend Western Civilization against international communism. They worked closely with the Asian-based World Anti-Communist League and its Latin American affiliate, the Confederacion Anticomunista Latinoamericana [CAL].

Latin American militaries collaborated on projects such as the cross-border assassinations of political dissidents. Under one project, called Operation Condor, political leaders - centrist and leftist alike - were shot or bombed in Buenos Aires, Rome, Madrid, Santiago and Washington. Operation Condor sometimes employed CIA-trained Cuban exiles as assassins. [See Consortiumnews.com's "Hitler's Shadow Reaches toward Today," or Robert Parry's Secrecy & Privilege.]

The Baby Harvest

General Videla also was accused of permitting - and concealing - the scheme to harvest infants from pregnant women who were kept alive in military prisons only long enough to give birth. According to the charges, the babies were taken from the new mothers, sometimes after late-night Caesarean sections, and then distributed to military families or sent to orphanages.

After the babies were pulled away, the mothers were removed to another site for their executions. Some were put aboard death flights and pushed out of military planes over open water.

One of the most notorious cases involved Silvia Quintela, a leftist doctor who attended to the sick in shanty towns around Buenos Aires. On Jan. 17, 1977, Quintela was abducted off a Buenos Aires street by military authorities because of her political leanings. At the time, Quintela and her agronomist husband Abel Madariaga were expecting their first child.

According to witnesses who later testified before a government truth commission, Quintela was held at a military base called Campo de Mayo, where she gave birth to a baby boy. As in similar cases, the infant then was separated from the mother.

What happened to the boy is still not clear, but Quintela reportedly was transferred to a nearby airfield. There, victims were stripped naked, shackled in groups and dragged aboard military planes. The planes then flew out over the Rio de la Plata or the Atlantic Ocean, where soldiers pushed the victims out of the planes and into the water to drown.

After democracy was restored in 1983, Madariaga, who had fled into exile in Sweden, returned to Argentina and searched for his wife. He learned about her death and the birth of his son.

Madariaga came to suspect that a military doctor, Norberto Atilio Bianco, had kidnapped the boy. Bianco had overseen Caesarean sections performed on captured women, according to witnesses. He then allegedly drove the new mothers to the airport for their death flights.

In 1987, Madariaga demanded DNA testing of Bianco's two children, a boy named Pablo and a girl named Carolina, both of whom were suspected children of disappeared women. Madariaga thought Pablo might be his son.

But Bianco and his wife, Susana Wehrli, fled Argentina to Paraguay, where they resettled with the two children. Argentine judge Roberto Marquevich sought the Biancos' extradition, but Paraguay balked for 10 years.

Finally, faced with demands from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Paraguay relented. Bianco and Wehrli were returned to face kidnapping charges. But the two children - now young adults with small children of their own - refused to return to Argentina or submit to DNA testing.

Though realizing they were adopted, Pablo and Carolina did not want to know about the fate of their real mothers and did not want to jeopardize the middle-class lives they had enjoyed in the Bianco household. [See Consortiumnews.com's "Argentina's Dapper State Terrorist" or "Baby-Snatching: Argentina's Dirty War Secret."]

Another Argentine judge, Alfredo Bagnasco, began investigating whether the baby-snatching was part of an organized operation and thus a premeditated crime of state. According to a report by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the Argentine military viewed the kidnappings as part of a larger counterinsurgency strategy.

"The anguish generated in the rest of the surviving family because of the absence of the disappeared would develop, after a few years, into a new generation of subversive or potentially subversive elements, thereby not permitting an effective end to the Dirty War," the commission said in describing the army's reasoning for kidnapping the infants of murdered women. The kidnapping strategy conformed with the "science" of the Argentine counterinsurgency operations.

According to government investigations, the military's intelligence officers also advanced Nazi-like methods of torture by testing the limits of how much pain a human being could endure before dying. The torture methods included experiments with electric shocks, drowning, asphyxiation and sexual perversions, such as forcing mice into a woman's vagina. Some of the implicated military officers had trained at the U.S.-run School of the Americas.

The Argentine tactics were emulated throughout Latin America. According to a Guatemalan truth commission, the right-wing military there also adopted the practice of taking suspected subversives on death flights, although over the Pacific Ocean.

For their roles in the baby kidnappings, Videla, now 86 and already in prison for other crimes against humanity, was sentenced to 50 years; Bignone, 84 and also in prison, received 15 years.

Yet, as Americans continue to idolize Ronald Reagan - with scores of buildings named after him and his statue on display at Washington's Reagan National Airport - a relevant question might be what did the 40th U.S. President know about these barbaric acts and when did he know it.

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com. His two previous books, Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth' are also available there.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-23 # Archie1954 2012-07-09 08:35
They are now dealing with human beings who are more important than ideological positions. Do you really think it would be ethical and moral to suddenly tell a number of people that the parents they had always known were actually the murderers of their birth parents? What possible benefit would that be to anyone? I sometimes wonder at the despicable attitudes some so called "moralists" have. At least think before you act. As far as Reagan was concerned, if his Alzheimers hadn't fully manifested itself when this Argentinian horror was taking place then you can just put his moral and ethical failure down to his discredited and despicable Republican extremist right wing ideology!
 
 
+20 # Jerry 2012-07-09 10:13
Archie, do you really think that murdering the parent was the only aberrant behavior of the murderers? Knowing could explain other behavior that adversely affected the kids growing up. Most likely, the murderer modeled his moral values for the kids to absorb. What kind of adults did they become? The murderer didn't just take the mother's life. He irretrievably changed the lives of the kids - he eliminated whatever life they would have had. Notice that the kids didn't refuse to return because of love or loyalty, but because they didn't want to risk their station in life – one might wonder about their moral values. They didn't choose to know who their real parents were, or get to know their real father – perhaps because of fear and emotional turmoil that could be possible, and/or a lack of emotional development. The father may have been motivated by a desire for justice for his wife, but he may have yearned for his son, as well, probably with trepidation, knowing the moral values of the people that raised him were those of murderers and kidnappers. With such a quagmire, why would people afar want to make judgments about what’s right.
 
 
+14 # michelle 2012-07-09 10:23
Yes, far more ethical than leaving children with murderers and kidnappers. Far more respectful to their murdered parents.

I suggest you do a little research on the incidents in Argentina. Ask the grandparents and surviving fathers of these abducted children what they think. As one grandmother put it after finding her granddaughter, 'You don't leave a child with a murderer simply because that is the family they know.' Imagine it is your own child. Would you be content to leave your child, one you planned, searched for, with the murderer of your wife?

There are a couple of films in Spanish on the subject and one old Frontline on the Disappeared I recommend to get you started. The "Official Story" is fictional account based on the events and readily available.
 
 
+9 # reiverpacific 2012-07-09 17:19
Quoting Archie1954:
They are now dealing with human beings who are more important than ideological positions. Do you really think it would be ethical and moral to suddenly tell a number of people that the parents they had always known were actually the murderers of their birth parents? What possible benefit would that be to anyone? I sometimes wonder at the despicable attitudes some so called "moralists" have. At least think before you act. As far as Reagan was concerned, if his Alzheimers hadn't fully manifested itself when this Argentinian horror was taking place then you can just put his moral and ethical failure down to his discredited and despicable Republican extremist right wing ideology!

Look: his "Aw-shucks" attitude and ignorance of the world covered up so much evil-doing and made him the easy ear of the same "despicable" forces. Please don't tell me that you have forgotten Iran-Contra and Ollie North, who should be in Gitmo (go to Nicaragua sometime if you dare).
Also remember that R' was a fink for the McCarthyists in Hollywood, destroying many lives and careers like a termite in the woodwork. He was NOT a nice person and could have given a shit about you, me or "Them" whoever and wherever "They" were or if they seemed to be an impediment to the Corporate-Milit ary-Imperialist -Socialist, exceptionalist "City on a Hill"!
I believe he knew and didn't care about the subject-they were not in his world and of no consequence.
 
 
+7 # Majikman 2012-07-09 19:39
Archie, your position condones, perpetuates and hides lies and atrocities and you call that ethical and moral? As to the stolen children, they have a right to know the reality and truth of their birth. Your position further robs them of their birth right.
What they choose to do with the information is a different matter entirely, and not to be determined by any government.
 
 
+1 # Glen 2012-07-10 15:29
Your concern for the now adult children of this horrible era, Archie, is understandable. Questions must be asked about the lives of those children as adults, and the parents that raised them, in spite of the fact that those "parents" were perhaps part of the heinous crimes. Some may not have been, but instead welcomed a baby they may not have had on their own.

We will never know. On the other hand many of those children could easily have their suspicions. Many may totally eschew any notion of having another life from what they now know. It is a sensitive subject. Having worked with children of all ages, I can understand your concern of what impact it could have on any human being.

One case at a time. One at a time.

Reagan, however, more than likely could have cared less about these issues. It was obvious during his era as governor and president that his character and morals were rather flat lined.
 
 
+25 # Texas Aggie 2012-07-09 09:32
You read this and you think to yourself, this same mentality not only still exists in the US, but it is even stronger now than before. The US military has people no different at all from the Argentine generals as was fully disclosed in our Iraq/Guantanamo adventure.

How do we get these people out of positions of authority and keep them out?
 
 
+11 # brux 2012-07-09 09:50
They have the guns, and the will to use them if they need to.

I think the first step is to find out specifically who they are, and who their kids are (legitimate and illegitimate) and where their money is and what it has gone for.

This is the direct result of allowing psychopaths to prosper at the expense or decent hard working citizens, or people who would be decent hard working citizens if the psychopaths had not closed the franchise to anyone who does not dance to their tune.
 
 
+14 # cordleycoit 2012-07-09 09:36
This was a time when great fortunes were made in the United States and the Narcoshpere. Names like Bush and Stroessnor and Milton Friedman and the minions of the Chicago School all became rich on the sale of cocaine while death visited cops and reporters in North and South America. Names like Donnar Annon Handson and some of the staff of the Rocky Mountain News and later Gary Webb. The gun fights and bombings in Aspen. The Dirty War was awash in bodies of women and men who got in the way of the Bushes and Streossnors and Milton Freidmen are honored and the bodies pile up all the way to Mexico today.
 
 
+10 # JSRaleigh 2012-07-09 09:38
Did the Roman Catholic Church participate in this the way they did in Francoist Spain?
 
 
+10 # angelfish 2012-07-09 09:51
Did Reagan KNOW? Probably not because he wasn't clued in by his "handlers". The man was a blank script for most, if not all, of his term in Office. THIS is why a ReTHUGlican must NEVER again in our lifetime gain the Oval Office! Until the mindset of the Mega-Wealthy Greed-Meisters who are running their Nazi/Fascist Regime is changed and they are brought BACK to reality from the Wonderland Tea Party they live in, it will NOT change. In the meantime, Vote them OUT in November! The People, UNITE, will NEVER be defeated!
 
 
+13 # chrisconnolly 2012-07-09 13:20
I hate that my taxes are used to fund the School of the Americas. How do we call ourselves Christians while funding torture schools and camps and defunding public education. We the people need to wake up. We are not the great society we profess to be. Where is our shame?
 
 
+3 # giraffee2012 2012-07-09 19:06
How quickly the GOP (I know) forget how angry they were when the S & L went down under this moron. And, his supporting so many dictators who cleansed their population is also ignored. Reagan was the reason I switched from Republican party to Dem (and now I wonder why I ever was a GOPer - ==== ignorance)

VOTE and get many many registered and vote for President Obama and NO GOP/TP
 
 
+3 # Trueblue Democrat 2012-07-11 07:37
In this as in any other event that unfolded during Ronald Reagan's life, you may be excused for wondering just what part if any of it registered on his radar. Reagan was totally incapable of distinguishing fiction from reality. Place a script in his hands, be it a screen play for one of his B movies or notes for a presidential press conference, it was all one to "the great communicator." He was adrift in a fantasy of his own making, with few facts ever at his command.

It is revealing to remember that just six months after he left the White Office, Reagan (the President who brandished the military instrument of national power like it was his personal scepter), when asked a question about General John Vessey, Chairman of the JCS for four of Reagan's years, said: "Boys, you need to help me out here. Who is Vessey?"
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN