RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Never mind a second term, Barack Obama's pivot on the drug war has already begun."

President Barack Obama speaks during a campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa. (photo: AP)
President Barack Obama speaks during a campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa. (photo: AP)



Obama Deescalating the War on Drugs

By The Daily Beast

05 July 12

 

hile Marc Ambinder’s much discussed, scantily-sourced GQ report of a second-term “pivot” runs through the murderers’ row of complaints against the Drug War—the cocaine/crack disparity; mandatory minimum sentencing; property-seizure laws and the fattening of the corrections industry—he doesn’t report that the president’s “aides and associates” have identified any of these as a starting point for Obama to “tackle” first.

“Don’t expect miracles,” Ambinder cautions, and that’s where he gets it wrong. The miracle has already happened. Here’s the answer that Ambinder’s anonymous sources failed to leak to him: the pivot point for Obama’s new direction is homegrown marijuana, and it’s already started.

The presidential request for the FY13 budget deals a mortal blow to the helicopter-powered marijuana eradication umbrella. It does so by cutting in half the funding for the U.S. National Guard Counterdrug program, the Defense Department’s contribution to the marijuan-eradication effort that has, for the past 20 years, limited the size of domestic marijuana patches and increased the demand for “blood pot” imported by ultraviolent Mexican drug cartels—while doing nothing to stem the supply to anyone who wants to get high.

Until now, the DEA and state law enforcement could count on the National Guard to fly hundreds of helicopter hours over national forests and other public land, where growers became active following the passage of property-seizure laws in the Reagan years—but the FY13 budget changes that.

The 50-percent cut is not being apportioned evenly across the states—it’s a two-thirds cut in Oregon and a 70-percent cut in Kentucky, while the Southern border states are receiving less severe reductions in funding. It’s essentially a diversion of Defense Department assets away from the interior American marijuana fields to where the national-security risk is greatest: along our Southern border.

“We’re not going to have legalized weed anytime soon,” the president told late-night television host Jimmy Fallon in April. But there’s a lot a president can do to unwind the marijuana prohibition without going full-on Peter Tosh. After all, how effective is an umbrella with holes in it?

Without a fully functional eradication program, the feds cannot keep domestic pot production down. So even if it remains illegal, domestic production could boom during FY13, the first growing season of Obama’s potential second term.

The road map to pot decriminalization, an essential first step for any pivot on the drug war, can be found in the executive order President Obama issued on immigration to effectively implement components of the DREAM Act without the help of Congress by ordering his executive branch to de-prioritize enforcement of certain laws.

The simple fact that President Obama would even consider breaking the taboo of the marijuana prohibition is itself a miracle, given that our last president from the Democratic Party gave us the 1996 federal three-strikes law, which remains one of the most outrageous components of the pot prohibition, sending nonviolent marijuana growers to prison for life without parole for the offense of persistent criminal farming.

When Obama makes public his drug-war pivot, he will have 40 years of an abusive relationship between the Oval Office and marijuana to undo. When Ambinder says that drug laws in America “were created almost nakedly to marginalize disfavored groups,” what he’s talking about in part is how President Nixon doubled down on the already-in-place marijuana prohibition on the morning of May 26, 1971.

“I want a goddamn strong statement on marijuana,” Nixon told his chief-of-staff, Bob Haldeman. “I mean one on marijuana that just tears the ass out of them ... By God we are going to hit the marijuana thing, and I want to hit it right square in the puss ...”

President Reagan followed suit with a massive expansion of the federal government’s powers in matters of drug-related justice: eliminating federal parole; creating mandatory minimum sentences, and allowing federal agents to seize land and property from people merely suspected of being involved in “drugs,” whether those drugs were marijuana or heroin, in complete disregard of the suspect’s Fourth Amendment protections.

Any détente of the drug war that Obama might tackle in his theoretical second term must include, eventually, a massive legislative package that returns America to a pre-Nixon posture on pot; flattens the cocaine/crack disparity; eliminates mandatory minimum sentences; re-instates federal parole for nonviolent and victimless crimes; reins in property-seizure laws; grounds the fleet of pot-spotting helicopters; and grants blanket clemency for those currently serving federal prison time for trumped-up marijuana crimes.

In other words, in his second term, President Obama needs to kick Richard Nixon right square in the puss. In the meantime, by easing enforcement of domestic marijuana cultivation, thereby reducing demand for Mexican blood pot and freeing up Defense Department assets to send to the Southwest, the president can achieve another of his campaign promises: improving our border security.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+28 # Lisa Moskow 2012-07-05 08:52
Those of us who worked for him last election, not because he was perfect, but because he was certainly a ray of hope, will need some inspiration to support him this election. Of course he is the better of 2 evils--ssme old same old. My time is valuable.
 
 
+87 # LegendBert 2012-07-05 10:20
Just think how much you'll like a Romney presidency with a Tea Party Congress and I think you'll agree the choice is between pretty damn good and Armageddon.
 
 
-32 # paulrevere 2012-07-05 10:41
I can only shake my head in wonder...

LegendBert, no offense meant, just a counter to your claim to a crystal ball.

HOW IN THE WORLD do you know, using 0's past actions over 3+ years, that he will be ANY better than 'the other choice'?

Like starving dogs, the left, of which I claim a lifelong seat, gets a well knawed bone here or there, usually in some timely election fashion, and especially from this administration, and the left again waxes with the lesser of two evils, practical politics sell out of ethics, morals and a demand for our voice to be heard REALLY and not in some soundproof chamber.

Step up red thumbers...
 
 
+33 # soularddave 2012-07-05 12:52
If you think YOU've got a tough choice, think about the choices that Obama has had to make!!

I don't like the drones, but it seems like a worthwhile tradeoff to wind down the war and bring home thousands of troops without totally confounding the Pentagon. Healthcare? Someone mentioned the insurance industry and keeping something there to offset some of the other big losses. This is waaay more than a mere mortal should have to deal with, but we stuck Obama with the job, now we gotta let him do it.

For my money, the Rethuglican alternative would have been - and continues to be - incomprehensibl e. I continue to have HOPE, but in the world we find ourselves in CHANGE isn't as reliable as I had hoped it would be.

Good luck to ALL of us.
 
 
-23 # John Locke 2012-07-05 16:15
soularddave: I am perplexed by your comment, Obama didn't have tough choices to make he simply did as he was told!
 
 
+4 # soularddave 2012-07-07 06:42
Perhaps he was told what to do. I keep wondering WHO it is that's so powerful that "we the people" cannot prevail when WE tell him what WE want.
How do WE get at THOSE forces (of evil?) like THEY get at US? I'm really tired of being given second shrift for the PROFIT of others. I was raised to respect the people around me and to reflect their informed interests. I vote that way too.
 
 
+4 # John Locke 2012-07-07 06:57
soularddave: There has been a conspiracy to over through the US government going back to the beginning of the republic read about "Adam Weishaupt and the illuminitti", in 1934 there was an attempt to over through the US Government look of the "Business Plot!" It included JP MOrgan and The DuPonts.

American business interests backed Hitler and financed his rise to power and his war machine...also the Russian revolution that brought in communism!

This movement is a world wide one world movement, the phrase "New World Order? is their motto, but as that became known the stopped using the phrase...The Skull and Bones at yale are a part of the elite who are actually Fascists in their ideology...
 
 
+4 # RLF 2012-07-06 05:15
He had a really tough time putting all of those supply siders in his administration. He had a tough time putting pen to NDAA and getting nothing in exchange that was visible. Poor baby has had such a hard time collecting the big bucks for his friends like Jamie Diamonds.
 
 
+5 # soularddave 2012-07-07 06:54
My dad got his degree from the Chicago School of Economics too, and we'd argue all the time. His idea was to ratchet wealth from the bottom and converge it at the top. I never saw this as sustainable, given a finite supply of money.

I guess the supply siders knew that they could create money from nothing by imposing upon us the Federal Reserve, and not impose regulation on it. I had yet to learn the other factors like digital money, China, Eurozone, bank malfeasance, Housing bubbles, and manipulation of markets and interest rates, etc. When I was a kid, I had no idea that Congress could be bought, or that corporations were people.
 
 
-1 # John Locke 2012-07-10 12:01
soularddave I think most of us go through a period of naivety I was also naive about the government into my 20's I had believed government wanted to do the right thing for us...Boy did I learn...Now I don't trust anyone in government, that is called growing up to reality!
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:23
Wind down which War..to send troops to Gulf to protect Israel from their own selves?

Most people here cannot even organize their friends no less Community to get better Candidates, Voter Id to poor and so many other rants

Indeed Good Luck to all after all we will hear blame in Nov
 
 
-12 # John Locke 2012-07-05 16:13
paulrevere: As usual, my brother, I agree with you! So I will step up and take some of those thumbs down with you!
 
 
+6 # paulrevere 2012-07-06 08:49
Your consistent revelation of malfeasance on BOTH sides is commendable and I am happy to be green thumbed by you John Locke, thank you!

I agree with the idea here that 'practical politics' is necessary. But, I question how that works when the corruption is undeniable on BOTH sides.

Practical is the rule when politics is being practiced with some degree of civility, integrity, honor and TRUE concern for WETHEPEOPLE.

Distinguishing the actions of the 0 as somehow even on the edge of that description does no service to either WETHEPEOPLE nor to the spirit upon which this country was founded...and ESPECIALLY the latter.
 
 
+6 # Hey There 2012-07-06 19:40
I gave you a thumbs up too. Just because a person votes for someone as less damaging than another candidate doesn't mean that everything that person does is right. In fact isn't it an insult to think that Obama is powerless to do better? I have a lot of respect for Johnson on his War on Poverty but I still think the Vietnam War was a mistake so I don't understand when Obama is given a pass for Bank Bailouts, tax breaks for the rich appointing the same people in power etc.
 
 
+18 # myungbluth 2012-07-06 05:58
So predictably, the drug argument turns instantly to politics, missing the entire point. What aspect of the total failure of the "War on Drugs" don't you understand? Every administration and BOTH parties have been EQUALLY unsuccessful in stopping the increasing use of illegal drugs by Americans - for decades! Have we learned NOTHING from our comical experiment with prohibition? Do we NOT understand that the false equivalency of drug use with immorality and lax ethics has made the absolutely NO difference in the availability of drugs in this country? These modern day temperance fanatics - who have no understanding of the dynamics of addiction - have cost this nation millions of lives and billions of treasure. Still, they rail on, while the most socially and economically harmful of all drugs - ALCOHOL - isn't even brought up in conversation. But we don't believe in science any more, it seems. We don't understand that not everyone who enjoys illegal drugs becomes an "addict". (I doubt that most of the people who are convinced about the evils of marijuana, for instance, have never even tried it - or even given thorough study to the issue.) I am not suggesting that drugs - illegal or prescription - cause no harm. I just happen to believe that legalization would cause LESS harm than the ridiculous approach we take now - REGARDLESS OF WHICH POLITICAL PARTY IS IN POWER!
 
 
+3 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:32
However, the Bush Wars allowed the Goat Herders to herd the goats loaded with heroin thru those streets in front of Media who commented on it.
I am sure no Political Big Wigs make money on Illegal Drugs imported or home grown.

It is time we looked at the benefits to the ill, dying. It is time we stop paying prisons for pot smokers. It is time we make money on it...why shouldn't we, we promote cigarettes that cause cancer et al, alcohol that promotes drunk driving and liver disease, we promote mass chemical/pharma ceuticals that kill or destroy. So why not sell the stuff and make a profit?
Would certainly see a lower number of killings, prisons not so overcrowded, less stores being robbed, less children dying. What a win win. Marijuana ...another bunch of crap. Allow the drugs that you can buy legally that are putting our kids in prison, mental hospitals or suicides...gee I really understand that.
Time we review other Countries Policy and then see how we can actually improve on our Drug Policies. Personally I think anyone bringing powders in, selling any powders should be on frontlines... Many Countries kill them seems to work
 
 
+3 # John Locke 2012-07-07 07:19
KittatinyHawk: The legal community has been in favor of decriminalizing drugs for decades, it won't happen! There is just too much profit in drugs and in the property seizures, boats, homes, cars, airplanes, cash... and in imprisonemnt for profit institutions.

What you may not know, if a landlord rents to a drug dealer and he is busted that property is also seized and the mortgage goes away!
 
 
0 # John Locke 2012-07-07 07:13
myungbluth: THe war on drugs was an illusion...ther e was never a war to stop the flow of drugs into the US. If there was the CIA would have been shut down as that agency is at the forefront of the drug trade. Any time you hear the phrase a war on something, it is a ploy of deception, just like for an example, a war on terrorism... Terrorism is not an army nor is it a country! it is an ideology and you don't fight an idealogy with weapons... you fight the alleged but non existent war with teaching and understanding.. .we have already lost the war on terrorism, because for every man or woman we kill dozens come to take their place!

But our "intellectuals" haven't figured that out, or are to focused on the spoils of war in the middle east ...they just don't care and their ego's are so large they believe we can take on the entire civilized world...

And of course they won't be fighting, that is left to the peasants!
 
 
+1 # bmiluski 2012-07-09 07:42
Unfortunately, there is too much money to be made by the police, judges, politicians, corp.owned prisons that drugs will never be legalized.
 
 
+4 # NOMINAE 2012-07-06 18:37
@ paulrevere

You submit a perfectly logical and fair observation, and have, like anyone else, a perfect right to your opinion.

The many red thumbers you drew do not represent thoughtful disagreement with your view, but simply those interested in maintaining an "echo chamber" of their *own* beliefs and perspectives in these running commentaries at the cost of all other perspectives.

Thus the value of actually exchanging perspectives and ideas is subsumed to the mantra of the masses, and nullified by those frozen in fear.

These red thumbs, in re: your comment above, are the Left's equivalent of "Ditto Rush".

You dared to so much as question the dogma in the ethos of Leftie Rush whose spirit animates and moderates what is quickly becoming the leftie echo chamber here.

Your punishment, as you were obviously aware from you own finishing sentence, was preordained.

The closer we get to this election, the more frantic, fearful, and intolerant of other ideas the echo chamber will become.

Not particularly pleasant, but as predictable as sunrise.

BTW, I welcome the red thumbs as verification of what I've said above.
 
 
+2 # paulrevere 2012-07-07 07:57
Nominae...red thumbs (sometimes) = echo chamberish behavior = great observation!

I do persist for a number of reasons, first and foremost because I HAVE to and second because the truth is so obvious that to state anything else becomes speaking practical as the water hoses run dry and the city is raging in flame.

'practical politics' in times like these is out of the question for it amounts to either dithering or adding fuel to the fire...I'm no ditherer!
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:20
Keep your seat no one wants it.

I think another term or Reagun, Bush would be bad enough but Romney and with Christie as VP or say Bachman Perhaps Palin or Santorum ..that is not the bottom of the pond

I wish the people on all the 'intelligent sites' actually would have used their time to get a Candidate or you 'real rethugs' but alas here we are and you expect the good people with a Conscince to vote Mitt???? Pleas don't get up I'm leaving
 
 
+1 # Hey There 2012-07-06 19:22
I gave you a thumbs up. There are other liberals who agree with you.
 
 
+15 # noitall 2012-07-05 11:40
"Pretty damn good"? Seems like Armageddon or Armageddon lite (being an optimist). Recipients of drone bombs would argue the "lite". I'm voting for the liar ONLY because I'm hopeful that he'll pick a SC justice that isn't a TOTAL Fascist.
 
 
-10 # paulrevere 2012-07-05 12:39
Does a boat with so many holes in the hull sink slow or fast?

Is a boat with this many holes in the hull NOT going to sink?

The skipper left in the dingy a long time ago.

Oh...sorry...he was picked up by HMS Masters of the Universe much earlier...
 
 
+19 # John Locke 2012-07-05 16:18
paulrevere: You can always tell when the ship is sinking, the first thing that happens is the 1% begin moving off shore to live with their money!

We are seeing alot of movement out of the country!
 
 
+2 # paulrevere 2012-07-07 08:04
all the more reason to make the hammer bigger...when one considers how 'they' have abscounded with the media, the military, the money and the minds of a big chunk of WETHEPEOPLE, and how formidable that theft is and how the present administration is a five by sock puppet FOR 'them', all undeniable in my eyes, one is forced to consider politics as the lair of liars and scoundrels.

I don't have much difficulty in that consideration.. .I am all hopey changey that those who deny that view here, are from the left, and at least in their hearts mostly attempt to think about and then stand for what is right...which is NOT OFTEN what is practical...spe cially when the house is in full conflagration.
 
 
-4 # Smiley 2012-07-05 13:01
It's people who will vote for Romney or Obama who are the problem. "lesser-greater " big difference...Th ey will both do horrible "evil". Vote for someone you can believe in, not the democrat or republican corporatist empire lover. If enough of us had the guts to vote our conscience, we could save this country and maybe save a future for our children.
 
 
+15 # noitall 2012-07-05 15:07
Quoting Smiley:
It's people who will vote for Romney or Obama who are the problem. "lesser-greater" big difference...They will both do horrible "evil". Vote for someone you can believe in, not the democrat or republican corporatist empire lover. If enough of us had the guts to vote our conscience, we could save this country and maybe save a future for our children.

Fine, you'll be able to sit there and say "well I voted for the feel better candidate" but the reality would be the same. This "democratic" system that we 'enjoy' in the land of the free, home of the brave lemmings is a stacked deck for the two parties. No way in hell will a third party candidate win, even if they did. The rulers care not which of the two win but they aren't about to allow a third.
 
 
+6 # John Locke 2012-07-05 16:22
noitall: So you are pessimistic, the bright side to that is you don’t need to worry about being wrong!

One who never tries will never lose!
 
 
-2 # RLF 2012-07-06 05:18
Who cares who wins. Both major party candidates are Republicans!
 
 
+11 # David Heizer 2012-07-05 21:36
Study history, folks. People, by and large, tend to vote their party registration. The last time we had a successful third-party run, he had a successful third party behind him.

As long as the Greens, or the Libertarians, or who-have-you, are only 1% of the registered voters, no third-party candidate stands a snowball's chance.

It's not a matter of you or anyone else here having the "guts"; it's a matter of having enough registered members of a viable third party to even just possibly elect their candidate. You will know if this is the case well before November.

I've put my money where my mouth is: I am a registered member of the Green Party. If every single Green and other third-party member turns out and votes, it won't be nearly enough. Show me enough people registering for a third party to stand a chance of winning the election, and we can talk about "voting our conscience." Short of that, your third-party vote will go to waste, and the stakes are far too high for that luxury.

Hold your nose, and vote for the guy who put Sotomayor on the SCOTUS, because he may get another couple of vacancies coming up. Then, maybe we can undo Citizens United. To facilitate a Romney presidency giving us another couple of Scalias out of some sense of ideological absolutism is madness.

You have two options: The lesser of two evils, and the greater. Those are your only options this year. Choose one.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:35
Sad since all the snivelers and ranters didn't get any organizing together or candidates...ty pical of snivelers
 
 
+4 # John Locke 2012-07-07 07:31
David Heizer: I disagree, we now have multiple third parties registered through out the country, this demonstrates dissatisfaction with the two "main" parties and if the Independents, the green party and all the rest would come together we could have a very viable third party! With a good percent of the public supporting it! And contrary to your position many cross political boundaries to vote for someone not of their party affiliation! You will see this a lot in November, I personally know several democrats who are voting for Romney!
 
 
+3 # paulrevere 2012-07-07 08:09
Hear here! I live in a 60/40 repub county and watch the precinct numbers in the paper after each election...3rd party and independents OFTEN make up 15% sometimes plus of the vote count.

That implies to me that the number could easily double if the ideas of 'practical' and 'lesser' were taken to heart as no less than a sell out.
 
 
+25 # Vardoz 2012-07-05 13:54
Tell me about it! Man we have nightmares about this. Its simply our corrupt paid off reps from the liquor and drug companys lobbys that are stopping pot from being legal. In Spain every one can grow their own and they have cafes where you can relax eat a meal and have a smoke. It's like a nice glass of wine. And guess what no driving deaths, huge side affects, diseased livers or cancer like from smoking cigarettes that have many cancer causing chemicals in them. This has nothing to do with caring about the health, safety and welfare of the people of course.

We need to kick out the goddamn congress and flush Romney the loser from MA who I just read in the Nation, sold fetusues for a business! He is a lying, scumbag sellout. A big money schill and if he gets in we will all need more meds casuse it will be a very dark time for all of us!!!!
 
 
-5 # John Locke 2012-07-05 16:25
Vardoz: Well maybe this will be a zanax nation, and we can all chill out!
 
 
+6 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:36
That is already the problem...this is a pill popping Nation duh
 
 
0 # John Locke 2012-07-09 15:23
KittatinyHawk: did you ever stop to think there may be a good reason why people need to pop pills and drink, maybe just maybe its the stresses of trying to make a living or find a non existent job!
 
 
+7 # billeeboy 2012-07-05 19:18
Voting for Obama is the only way to avoid more Scalias on the Supreme Court. Whatever one's beefs with Obama should pale next to the thought of more Scalias!
 
 
+1 # RLF 2012-07-06 05:11
He is trying lots of popular things right before an election...I call that cynical and divisive. 'Pretty damn good'??? I don't think even close and voting for him allows Democrats to continue to act like republicans, kissing corporate butt, and never change. I don't want Romney but I will vote socialist or ??? and not care.
 
 
+2 # paulrevere 2012-07-07 08:15
A message has to be sent to the Wasserman-Schul tz's of the left...get a grip people, you are seen, your empty words obvious, as no more than shills, and the due to those empty words and far to often duplicitous actions, as hypocrits, liars and puppets.

Give it up and be an Alan Grayson, Bernie Sanders, Jill Stein, Rocky Anderson, Dennis Kucinich and tell US like it is...we know and reject those well knawed bones you toss so righteously onto this field of dead grass!
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:17
Your point is?? Perhaps you should start organizing your community, start actually doing something you believe in...wow what a concept.
I worked for him, all I found was a bunch of Dems4Change that were same as Tea partiers that wanted everyone to do everything for them...Sound familiar.
I don't get involved if i do not Believe, otherwise it is a fad or I would be a hypocrite
 
 
+34 # wipster 2012-07-05 09:06
Excellent... Just hope that he follows through the way that you describe.
 
 
+6 # RLF 2012-07-06 05:20
Keep dreaming...this is just for election year appearances.
 
 
+107 # jlohman 2012-07-05 09:22
The only people to benefit from these drug wars are the private prison corporations and guard unions who give massive campaign contributions and bribes to the politicians who pass minimum sentencing and three-strikes laws. Isn't our board of directors (congress) great or what?
 
 
+79 # nealjking 2012-07-05 09:36
You're forgetting about the big-time drug dealers. As a very conservative friend of mine pointed out decades ago, the DEA is a very effective barrier to market entry for the drug trade - ensuring very high profit margins for the folks who really "invest" in the business of importing banned drugs.
 
 
+10 # John Locke 2012-07-05 16:26
nealjking: Like George HW Bush and the CIA?
 
 
+44 # paulrevere 2012-07-05 10:43
...and you also forget the very nice cash flow county sheriffs create and receive in fed arming and funding largesse.
 
 
+13 # John Locke 2012-07-05 16:27
Paul also in profit sharing of the property and cash the Feds take down!50% goes to the state...
 
 
+8 # RLF 2012-07-06 05:21
We spend way more on prisoners than on old folks on Social Security. I know where I'd like my taxes spent!
 
 
-60 # Michael_K 2012-07-05 09:27
Good ol' Barry... He's so great with inspirational campaign rhetoric. If you believe and trust him, you're a complete fool. I know, I campaigned for the lying bastard last time. Never listen to what he says, look at what he actually does. The truth will set you free.
 
 
-18 # paulrevere 2012-07-05 10:44
Theleft prides itself on being hard core objective and able to take criticism and adjust accordingly...t he red thumbs on this site are a sore thumb to that idea.
 
 
-6 # John Locke 2012-07-05 16:33
Michael_K and paulrevere: The red thumbs are just the expression of a weak mind that can't face reality...who said the left was ever objective they have always relied on blind faith...Reality has always scared them...its so much better to live with your head burried in the sand where it is safe!

see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil about the Democratic nominee
 
 
0 # myungbluth 2012-07-06 06:53
Apparently not in your case.
 
 
-1 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:38
You do the campaigning on Yahoo or some other site
 
 
+49 # noitall 2012-07-05 09:57
So far, you preface it with a "war on..." and that is a guarantee to expect status quo until the cows come home. War on drugs, war on terror, war on...you name it. All "war on" seems to mean is the doors open for the private sector to reap a harvest. Unfortunately, few of us are the recipient of any of the war chest but instead are the recipient of over enthusiasm and greed by the "soldiers".
 
 
-39 # Noni77 2012-07-05 09:57
Buying more votes...
 
 
-16 # Texas Aggie 2012-07-05 10:33
Say what?
 
 
-4 # paulrevere 2012-07-05 10:45
why is this 'buying more votes' ploy so murky to ordinarily critical thinking folks here abouts?
 
 
+47 # NeoGeo 2012-07-05 10:03
The Daily Beast seems to have forgotten the about face done by the Department of Justice AFTER Attorney General Eric Holder issued his memo saying the feds wouldn't prosecute citizens in states that had legalized medical marijuana.

That turned out to be a bald-faced lie.

In Montana, Draconian feds busted dozens of facilities and citizens who were in compliance with state law on growing and distributing medical marijuana. That action has ruined hundreds of lives already, with more to come. Bankruptcies, prison terms, felony records and all for what? Well, according to the feds, such charges as "money laundering" because the medical marijuana providers charged for their work and then used the money to pay power bills, rent, and related costs.

Hundreds of medical marijuana outlets have been shut down under threat of federal busts in California.

Or how about the feds threatening to prosecute municipalities that allowed medical marijuana facilities and dispensaries that were legal under state law? Holder's team of drug warriors told cities they would withhold federal grant funds unless the cities shut down the medical mj businesses by denying them business licenses, locations, etc.

Obama has made a lot of promises -- and broken most of them. To somehow regard this budget PROPOSAL as a "pivot" on the War on Drugs" is simply delusional. Obama's Actions speak louder than his words.
 
 
+15 # Texas Aggie 2012-07-05 10:34
The same thought occurred to me. Before I put too much credence in this latest move, I need to see what the real results are.
 
 
+5 # paulrevere 2012-07-05 10:48
oh gosh...I'm trying real hard not to red thumb this very factually based piece of reality.

Thanks NeoGeo for these points...my emotions almost overcame my good sense!!
 
 
+1 # John Locke 2012-07-07 07:41
NeoGeo: Whats interesting here is that the FEDS don't have jurisdiction to make arrests in any state unless these drugs cross state lines!

They can not control purely intrastate actiivity unless they can demonstrate impact on another state!
 
 
+41 # John Escher 2012-07-05 10:15
Good. Now he should de-escalate the wars against Afghanistan and Iran and American immigrants while escalating the war against Romneyite fanatics of free enterprise-- people who can't understand that balance between private and public service is a good thing.
 
 
+42 # MarjG 2012-07-05 10:17
Anyone else see a mountain of legislation from the House, only to get it filibustered in the Senate, to the next two years of non-stop abortion single focus in the House? Obama has to move a lot of very stupid and short term thinking voters, who don't understand this or many other issues beyond knee-jerk morality and punishment.
 
 
+19 # lnason@umassd.edu 2012-07-05 10:31
The Obama Administration has escalated the War on Drugs to unbelievable levels -- closing down legal and respectable dispensaries, encouraging civil forfeitures of property owned by people who have had nothing to do with drugs, forcing drugs back into the streets, and arresting young people and giving them felony records for doing exactly what he did as a young man.

Now that he needs the votes of young people we are supposed to naively believe his pandering?

His record speaks for itself. Obama is a more intent drug warrior than George Bush ever was.

Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
 
 
+10 # MJnevetS 2012-07-05 13:02
OK Lee, but we know for sure where your candidate stands. Romney opposes the legalization of marijuana, even medical marijuana. He stated:

“People talk about medicinal marijuana. And you know, you hear that story that people who are sick need medicinal marijuana. But marijuana is the entry drug for people trying to get kids hooked on drugs. I don't want medicinal marijuana; there are synthetic forms of marijuana that are available for people who need it for prescription. Don't open the doorway to medicinal marijuana.” July 25, 2007, Romney speaking at a town hall meeting in Bedford, New Hampshire

As a former Prosecutor in the 3rd largest prosecutor's office in the country, I can tell you that decriminalizati on (at a minimum) is needed with regard to marijuana on a Federal level along with the acceptance of medical marijuana as a form of treatment for certain conditions. Too many minority youth are receiving jail sentences (along with the loss of future potential and stigma associated with prison terms) for non-violent drug offenses, while similarly situated whites are not even charged. (statistically, according to the 2003 NSDUH, 38.2% of White young adults 18 to 25 years of age in the U.S. reported any illicit drug use in the past year, followed by African-America n (30.6%) and Hispanic (27.5%) young adults.) Therefore, while there are a higher percentage of whites using marijuana, the convictions are HIGHLY disproportionat e. CONT'D.
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:47
I know of people around the world who use the MM for their disease. The Pain pills for cancer wear out, the pain increases, more pain pills good for corporations and Political Lobbyists
MM keeps the mind from centering on pain. Helps people living with disease, eye problems, live day to day, hour to hour.

We are wasting lots of money in Court system and Prison on infractions. Not to mention a first time offender that may have a mind and desire to use it that erred. Okay to get drunk under age and perhaps kill someone driving under influence Or how about those legal drugs but the MM Users should be hung Nice
 
 
+12 # MJnevetS 2012-07-05 13:14
CONT'D. Looking at the numbers in NYC, as reported by the National Institute for Public Health (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2561263/), the following statistic is horrifying: "In 2000, black adults comprised less than one quarter of the resident population (23%) of NYC but more than half of MPV (marijuana possession in view) arrests (52%). The percentages are more in line for Hispanics, who comprised 25% of the population and 32% of MPV arrestees. However, this too represents a disparity when contrasted with the figures for whites, who comprised 38% of the population and only 15% of MPV arrestees. This disparity was not limited to the year 2000; blacks and Hispanics combined always comprised 74% to 91% of MPV arrests in every year from 1980 to 2003." This is despite the fact that there are numerically more whites and a statistically greater number of whites use drugs than their minority counterparts. The numbers are outrageous and show how racism is still a very great part of all of our present drug laws starting with Nixon's punch in the (black) puss. (Don't hold your breath on seeing a change in the laws, however, because the alcohol lobby and Big Pharma have no desire to see a safe cheap alternative to medicine/recrea tional drug use that they currently have a monopoly upon.) FYI, see also: http://www.4autoinsurancequote.com/uncategorized/reasons-why-marijuana-users-are-safe-drivers/ which cites foreign studies that pot smokers are safer drivers.
 
 
-2 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:43
Afraid that crap started in Bush Administration. ..Then the Feds per usual thought they would continue However there are more legal greenhouses, local ones for MM going up Get facts
 
 
+13 # okie_mule 2012-07-05 10:53
The "War on Drugs" and all rhetoric attached to it is such a worn out discussion. I remember every election starting in the early 60's having the "drug issue" drug out (no pun intended), dusted off, and used as a vote getter and then put away for the next election for the same purpose. And as the old saying goes, "After everything is said and done, a lots gets said and little gets done." The drug issue is more of a political issue to politicians than a social issue. It's one of those old, "How can I capitalize on this and keep on capitalizing on it?"
I don't know the solution(s) to the issue of illegal drugs and drug cartels, but I suspect it lies somewhere in the domain of the things politicians want least to do. i.e. legalize certain high consumption, high profit drugs
 
 
+5 # soularddave 2012-07-05 13:11
The profits are so high, and there's so much money to be made, that it will be very hard to just shut down the "war on drugs". Lots of people, influential people, are into this up to their eyeballs.... Banks that handle the money, doctors writing prescriptions, car dealers and TV salesmen who profit from the cash flow (drug profits and replacement of stolen merchandise), criminal 'justice' hacks, growers of coca and poppies, jail builders, - the list is endless.

So to start with refocusing America's marijuana habit is a step in the right direction, and hopefully annoy the opposition as little as possible.

I say, GO FOR IT, but don't expect me to start using the stuff again.
 
 
+14 # David Starr 2012-07-05 11:04
"Legalize it, and don't criticize it."

Both Repubs and Dems should listen to this Peter Tosh song over and over until it makes them habitually act for legalization.
 
 
+32 # Emmanuel Goldstein 2012-07-05 11:22
The War on Drugs has expanded the US prison population from 300,000 to over 2,000,000, largest in the entire world. And there's a huge racist aspect to it. As Michelle Alexander documents in her 2012 book, The New Jim Crow, "No other country in the world imprisons so many of its racial or ethnic minorities. The US imprisons a larger percentage of its black population than South Africa did during the height of apartheid."

It's long past time to stop this insane, immoral War on Drugs.
 
 
+1 # Hey There 2012-07-06 20:02
I read her book and it is one of the most readable ones on why the prison population has increased. She also gives the agencies that support keeping Marijuana illegal pure from a profit motive.
What's that old saying? "Follow the money and you'll find your answer."
 
 
+17 # grouchy 2012-07-05 11:26
Just think of what would come from this and total legalization; the price would go down, the profit margins would put masses of people involved in the enterprises out of business, the guy standing outside the playground selling would make about as much as he would selling chewing gum sticks, we could save all that money being blown on prisons and courts and lawyers which essentially amounts to job security for those folk, and we could evolve to taxing sales and use some of those funds for treating addiction for those who wanted to get rid of the problem should they want to! FANTASTIC!
 
 
+16 # cordleycoit 2012-07-05 11:39
Time to bury Nixon's War on Drugs next to Nixon.I just wonder with all the back and forth with the lying Mr. Holder, the Lying Congress who do we believe: Obama is been really squirrely of recent, his Justice Department is in need of honest leaders. It is past time to release the POWs from the failed war, Legalize and on with being America. If we fire all the drug warriors maybe their churches will feed them.
 
 
+11 # D12345 2012-07-05 11:47
Good comment from Neo Geo.

This article is an embarrassment. What Obama has done is

1. Attack medical marijuana distributors
2. Falsely claim that he can't do anything to change policy, when in fact it is all possible by executive order.

The only thing promised in this article is that more marijuana may...may be growing.

1. Budgets change all the time...the Congress could vote to restore all that money.

2. More importantly...t here is nothing said about less arrests.
This could actually mean more arrests, more convictions, more money for private prisons.

There is nothing good about this whatsoever.

I'm all for an array of opinion. But this is unworthy of being reprinted from its original source.
 
 
+14 # She Cee 2012-07-05 12:13
I don't recall hearing of anyone dying or killing anyone over being stoned. There have not been, to my knowledge, any deaths due to driving while stoned either.

I agree with jlohman. Those benefitting from the drug arrests are the prison corporations and also, perhaps the alcohol purveyors. And alcohol is such a nasty drug that kills thousands per year. Why aren't we cracking down on them? That should make the prisons happy by bursting the prison populations.

Using marijuana is a victimless crime. The only ones who might be harmed are those who use it, but the benefits are many.

Decriminalizing marijuana will also create the opportunities for many jobs in industries who can use hemp products.

What a strange world we live in. Oh.... sigh.
 
 
+5 # noitall 2012-07-05 15:10
A friend of mine almost ate himself to death.
 
 
+1 # The Voice of Reason 2012-07-06 20:21
Jobs selling dope. Well, alcohol is legal on the same arguments, and look how improved the world has become. And by improved I mean 'a nation of alcoholics'.

What is the real purpose behind drugs and dope? Just to lose your mind for a period of time.

It would seem that the human mind is the first thing we try to waste. Amazing, such a great gift and all we do is try to fiddle with it so we can better enjoy the sex act, which we engage in for no particular purpose either. Well, besides recreation.

Such enlightenment. Such visionary, futuristic thinking. And by 'futuristic' I mean complacent and pointless.

Ah the emptiness of life. Whatever you do, don't fill it with meaning.
 
 
+8 # MendoChuck 2012-07-05 12:24
As stated previously with some minor changes . . . .

Like starving dogs, the left, of which I claim a lifelong seat, and the dogs on the right, each get a well gnawed bone here or there, always around election time. Both administrations , are considered "the lesser of two evils".

Right or Left when it comes to politics they both sell out when it comes to ethics and morals.

As the saying goes . . . . Why do people keep voting for the same thing and "Hope For Change." Change will only come when the voters change their votes. Casting the same ballot and "Hoping for Change" has not worked yesterday and it will not work for tomorrow.
 
 
+2 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:50
Amen you got to go out there and do something...
 
 
+16 # Buddha 2012-07-05 12:27
This isn't how you go about "deescalating the war on drugs". People growing huge patches of pot fields on public land certainly aren't peaceful hippies, as all too many innocent victims have found out after stumbling across these fields and being met with a hail of gunfire. Many of these fields are operated by drug syndicates, and don't fool yourself otherwise. Furthermore, these fields tend to be very harmful for the environment itself. I have no problem continuing to interdict them. But if you want to make a good first step, then decriminalize people growing on their OWN property for personal use. Heck, after SCOTUS' Obamacare ruling reigned in the Commerce Clause being used to regulate "inactivity", how is someone growing on their own land for their own use thought of as "commerce" in the first place? Seems to me that the Feds have no real Constitutional basis for regulating THAT! But ultimately, ending Prohibition for pot is the real answer. Ending alcohol prohibition ripped out the mafia's chief revenue source, ending pot prohibition will go a long way to doing that to the US and Mexican Drug syndicates as well. This multi-trillion- dollar Drug War boondoggle has claimed too much in lives wasted, treasure spent, and created a Gulag State where we incarcerate 1 out of 100 Americans, a higher rate of incarceration than that of many dictatorships, and needs to come to a close asap.
 
 
+1 # PastorScott 2012-07-05 13:30
There is no doubt that OB1 and Holdover have been crafting their new MMRx policy over breakfast at the Waffle House. But short of Tosshing prohibition altogether, given the patch work of state laws and the quilt-work of municipal implementation and obstruction within each patch (particularly in California) and the circus of Mom and Poperators hanging their medical shingles, a coherent federal policy short of rescheduling and well regulated prescriptive access is gonna be a Frankenstein in its best incarnation. Those calling themselves compassionate caregivers should at the very least read the laws they are purportedly following.

And before anyone gets too smitten about the shift in the Coast Guards helicopter resources, I've got just two words for you: Google Earth. The DEA no longer needs primitive and indiscreet helicopters in order to run a camera up your ass.

I happen to believe a big shift in drug policy is unfolding. There is no choice because what we've got now is utterly unsustainable, but disingenuousnes s and wishful thinking only muddy the waters and do nothing to further the policy making process.

We'll get there a lot faster if folks on all sides will focus on implementing the laws that have been passed rather than the laws they wish had been passed. To do any less merely lets Washington off the hook for meaningful reform.
 
 
0 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:52
With the Satelite usage why do they not have the cartels? Answer is the same as one for terrorists...th ey are one and the same
 
 
+4 # Majikman 2012-07-05 13:53
I have an 11 mo old German Shepherd who is excelling in scent detection training & tracking. My goal is to use her for search and rescue....and maybe morels. Since I live in a border town (Canada)the place is crawling with BP agents. My trainer told me that they scout the classes for talented dogs to use as drug detection and pay the owner upwards of $4,000. They had their eye on my dog until I said, quite strongly, NFW ...just doing my part.
 
 
+5 # noitall 2012-07-05 15:14
If your dog can sniff out morels maybe he can sniff out morals...in that case you'd be doing us a favor and making yourself a solid 4 large.
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:56
Dog can become worthless after a while many get problems health wise. Growers leave more than plants out there. Lot of bad people grow pot for lots of money...Let the Satellite catch them.
Dogs can smell out lot of stuff that may not kill them. Love your animal, think of your animal
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:54
And the bad growers, kill the dogs. In many cases the owners.
Use your dog for search and rescue do not skrew up the dogs scent on weed...seriousl y. Drug sniffing dogs can get side affects...really.
Love your dog, got a good nose..use it wisely
 
 
+4 # reiverpacific 2012-07-05 14:29
The "War on drugs is a myth, a joke, a failure and another indicator of how out of touch the White House et al have been with the street and it's ways, especially since Mr. "Sleep Walking through History" Raygun and Mrs "Just say no"!
All the news from south of the border about the Cartels is like saying "yes but look at who they are supplying and who is enabling them, including the CIA and FBI.
It's all smoke and mirrors, unfortunately, the wrong kind of smoke.
A few years ago, I watched a neighbor and client with an incurable degenerative disease helped off of this mortal coil assisted by a daily dose of marijuana and a final dose of something else which spared him much humiliation and pain as the disease and final collapse of his functions progressed and I hope that someone would do the same for me in such a case.
Ironically, during prohibition, you could smoke all the "Gage" you wanted (the heavy smokers were nicknamed "Vipers") but couldn't buy alcohol, which the domestic cartels led by Capone and Co were only too happy to supply.
Now it's turned around into a bit of a deadly cross-border lark.
As Shakespeare's King Lear said to Gloucester; "Hark, in thine ear: change places; and, handy-dandy, which is the justice, which is the thief?" and a later asides by Edgar; "Oh, wisdom and absurdity mixed up together! Reason in madness!".
We're well down THAT road, what!?
 
 
+9 # Stephen 2012-07-05 15:00
Have you heard the rumors? In his second term Obama will close Guantanamo, release the whistleblowers, arrest the banking fraudsters, end the executive assassination program, work toward a single-payer health-care system, pardon Assange, end the war on pot, end domestic wiretapping, end the robot-wars, fund education and infrastructure, end oil-industry subsidies and fund alternative energy; what's more, if re-elected, he'll be able to stand up to the GOP, the Koch brothers, the military industrial complex, the corporate media, and the banksters!
 
 
+1 # 2lilluc 2012-07-06 05:24
You may jest but think about the alternative. We are all frustrated but an America with Romney and Tea Partiers at the helm? Terrifying prospect!
I'm an optimist and I hold out hope that an Obama, unfettered by re-election concerns and sick and tired of the Republican B.S.will pull off the gloves, get down to bare-bones, hard knuckle punches....bett er to think positive 'cause what you put out, comes right back at you! That's the collective "you" I'm talking about!
 
 
+8 # jwb110 2012-07-05 16:27
Politics is now and always has been "the art of the possible". The 'Left" may have wanted more but without looking at where this Administration started you cannot measure the movement of the debate. Democrats have to stop hating their own candidates and get behind them. The Republicans stay behind their party members no matter how stupid and corrupt they are. At least staying supportive of Obama has a possible good result.
 
 
+2 # Doubter 2012-07-05 19:32
If only he didn't do so many GOP things!
His policies and the way he gives away his bargaining chips sure make him look like a Corporatist. He is seen as Hitler and Stalin and Adi Amin! (maybe he's a sunburned Martian!?)
DOES kinda sound like "change we can believe in." Who wuda thunk.
It must be difficult to oversee the apotheosis of Empire while catering to your backers. He has Kennedy's example to ponder on and is probably instructed on what to do.
DON'T BLAME the puppet or each other. We are systematically being divided and conquered; distracted and manipulated with "dumb down" education and information. (propaganda)
If the president is a mere pawn; what are we? Ants, or at the best cattle to be milked and exploited - with the police as our cowboys.
 
 
+4 # PastorScott 2012-07-06 08:16
. . . And he'd go the way of the Doh-Doh somewhere between "whistle blower" and "single payer." The Presidency after all, despite our collective quadrennial imaginings is NOT about change. It's about continuity -- and that will never change. I think your pint about Obama being "instructed what to do"is quite salient. I have a friend whose father was a CIA Station Chief and in his day participated in setting up the Post-WWII National Security State apparatus. One of his jobs was the post-election and post inaugural National Security briefings that every new President MUST attend. The first occurs within 48 hours of being elected, the second on a President's first full day in office. It seems to me that the second Briefing left Obama daze and confused. Lord knows what they told him, but whatever they scared it was the living crap out of him and he hasn't been the same since. But you'll recall that his first public announcement in the wake of the 2nd briefing was that there would be NO INVESTIGATION of the Bush Administration, which he had promised for some sixteen months if not longer. And within two weeks, what's happening, Obama is debating fuck'n Cheney over the airwaves about the draw-down time-table in Iraq. Elected overwhelmingly to bring change, the having promised to get to the bottom of Bush / Cheney corruption and within 24 hours of taking office "change" is out and "continuity" is in.
 
 
0 # 2lilluc 2012-07-10 05:22
THANKS SO MUCH FOR SAYING THAT! IT'S SO EASY TO CRITICIZE, VOICE ALL OF OUR SAD DISSAPOINTMENTS AS THOUGH WE'VE SOMEHOW BEEN BETRAYED.ONE REALLY DOES HAVE TO LOOK AT WHERE THIS ADMINISTRATION STARTED, A HEAVY LOAD FOR ANY MAN TO BARE, AND WE,AS A WHOLE,BEGAN WHINING AND COMPLAINING FROM THE START. NO, IT AIN'T CAMELOT BUT I'M NOT SEEING US EN MASSE OUT ON THE STREETS, RAISING OUR OWN VOICES, FIGHTING FOR WHAT WE BELIEVE. I HAVE TO BELIEVE IN "THE ART OF THE POSSIBLE" AND KEEP THINKING POSITIVE THOUGHTS. THE ALTERNATIVE IS NOT AN OPTION.
 
 
+1 # James Marcus 2012-07-05 21:42
Obama, a proven compulsive liar, cannot be trusted or even quoted. Who cares what liars 'say, declare, decree,.....'. It has no reliability or exactitude.
Liars,,,deserve to be ignored, not quoted or interpreted.
Following Grouchy, though, a bit further.
Legalization of Marijuana would not only crash that market entirely (and empty the prisons) but WOULD CRASH MOST OTHER DANGEROUS DRUG MARKETS TOO!
Why?
Many folks (not already addicted) would 'druther' what is cheap, legal, and available, to anything else!
NO MORE COCAINE, ICE etc, OR ...... the Drug Cartels that sully them....
 
 
+1 # Califa 2012-07-05 22:08
Un-huh. Yeah, right. Maybe I'll believe it when I see it.
 
 
+8 # 2lilluc 2012-07-06 05:05
That pot is still illegal, that we spend billions of dollars trying to eradicate it, police it, jailing people because of it, and that pot remains at the top of the "War On Drugs" folly, is something I can only continue to remain thoroughly perplexed about. It's plain old stupidity! The horrific violence that seems to escalate daily,caused by the Mexican Cartels pot trafficking could be wiped out. The"War on Drugs" keeps those ruthless killers in business and in billions, and holding all that power. Yet we persist...maybe there's a plus side that I'm just not seeing that makes the DEA think that it's all worth it? What are they so afraid of...what makes pot so frightening to them? Marijuana has untold benefits medicinally! Aah!Could it be that the Pharmaceutical behemoths prefer it this way? Lots of lobbying and big political bucks for sure. Also, I can't remember the last time someone was attacked by a joint wielding maniac...
 
 
+1 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-06 19:59
Sad thing is it is not pot that cartels care about it is the powders. Pot is an exhibit the powders are the money
DUH
 
 
0 # 2lilluc 2012-07-10 05:27
You don't think they are making big money from pot? Yes, of course we all know that they make big money from cocaine and heroin but check again if you don't think that they are making plenty from trafficking pot. And I do mean plenty.
(DUH?)
 
 
+2 # Valenc 2012-07-07 02:33
There is one thing Mr. Obama has been consistent about throughout his career: his ability to use rhetoric and propaganda, political or otherwise, to great effect.

One thing is for certain, he is a consummate politician. That explains why, despite his pitiful and shameful shortcomings, people continue peddling his rhetoric—includ ing people in the Drug Reform Movement.

I have been tweeting about Obama’s dishonesty, cynicism and cowardice for quite a while. These are some of them:

• To call Obama's support for #WarOnDrugs hypocritical is a gross understatement. It's dishonest, cynical & cowardly!
• Had Obama been convicted, forget being elected president, he would not even have been able to find a decent job.
• Obama is best proof that when it comes to foreign policy it does not matter who is elected president of the US!
• #Drones, #DueProcessDeni al, #MilitaryCommis sions, #WarOnDrugs 2 mention a few: Obama's made a travesty of democratic values
• #WarOnDrugs, #Drones, #IndefiniteDete ntions, #DueProcessDeni al: Obama has become the laughing stock of any truly democratic person.
• What cruel a joke 2 award Obama the Nobel Prize. He should apologise & return it right now, interests included.
• I believe the Nobel Committee do have enough evidence to sue Obama for bringing Nobel Peace Prize into disrepute!

Gart Valenc
Twitter: @gartvalenc
 
 
+2 # granny6 2012-07-07 14:36
Obama is not the first to have that "oh S..."look on his face after they took office. Romney scares the hell out of me. He has no more clue as to what the average person does in this country than what is going on on Venus. His wife may have been a stay at home mom but I'll bet she never cried when she sent her kids to school because she knew she did not have enough food in the house to feed them supper and breakfast too. She did not depend on the school to fed her kids lunch. And I bet she can't plant a garden either. Most of us have tough times. We had friends who helped us through just as we have helped others. I want a President who has some knowledge of hard times. Not one who needs multiple mansions and hired help to staff them.
 
 
+1 # Gevurah 2012-07-07 16:17
(cue heavy irony)

Hey Mr. President! You said the country needs jobs. Well just look at all the jobs you're doing away with! (heavy irony OFF).
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN