Moyers and Winship write: "'Can 46 Rich Dudes Buy an Election?' almost all men, mostly white, 'and so far, the vast majority of their contributions have been made to conservative groups.' They want to own this election. So if there are any of you left out there with millions to burn, better buy your candidate now, while supplies last."
The gift that keeps on giving. (photo: PBS)
Campaign Cash Is the Gift That Keeps on Giving
15 June 12
f you’re visiting a candidate this summer and looking for a thoughtful Super PAC donors have money to spare, but it's democracy they're burning to the ground.house gift, might we suggest a nice Super PAC? Thanks to the Supreme Court and Citizens United, they’re all the rage among the mega-wealthy. All it takes is a little paperwork and a wad of cash and presto, you can have, as The Washington Post describes it, a “highly customized, highly personalized” political action committee.
It’s easy -- Super PACs come in all amounts and party affiliations. You don’t have to spend millions, although a gift that size certainly won’t be turned aside. Cable TV tycoon Marc Nathanson got a Super PAC for his friend, longtime Democratic Congressman Howard Berman from California, and all it cost was $100,000. Down in North Carolina, Republican congressional candidate George Holding received a handsome Super PAC that includes $100,000 each from an aunt and uncle and a quarter of a million from a bunch of his cousins. Yes, nothing says family like a great big, homemade batch of campaign contributions.
You can start a Super PAC on your own or contribute to one that already exists. Super PACs are available for every kind of race - presidential, congressional or statewide. But there are other ways you can help buy an election. Look at the Wisconsin recall campaign of Republican Governor Scott Walker. At least fourteen billionaires rushed to the support of the corporate right’s favorite union basher. He outraised his Democratic opponent, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, by nearly eight to one. Most of his money came from out of state. More than sixty million dollars were spent, $45 million of it for Walker alone.
Here are just a few of the satisfied buyers:
Wisconsin billionaire Diane Hendricks contributed more than half a million dollars on Scott Walker’s behalf. Her late husband built ABC Supply, America’s largest wholesale distributor of roofing, windows and siding. Fearful the United States might become “a socialistic ideological nation,” she’s an ardent foe of unions and, in her words, “taxing job creators.” True to her aversion to taxes, she paid none in 2010, despite being worth, according to Forbes magazine, about $2.8 billion dollars.
Before he launched his crusade against the collective bargaining rights of working people, Governor Walker had a conversation with Diane Hendricks, in which she asked, “Any chance we’ll ever get to be a completely red state and work on these unions… and become a right to work [state]? What can we do to help you?”
Walker replied, “We`re going to start in a couple weeks with our budget adjustment bill. The first step is, we`re going to deal with collective bargaining for all public employee unions, because you use divide and conquer.”
And so he did.
Walker also hauled in checks for nearly half a million from the Texas oligarch Bob Perry. He made his fortune in the home building business and is best known nationally for contributing four and a half million to the Swift Boat campaign that smeared the Vietnam War record of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry back in 2004.
In Texas, Bob Perry is known for his cozy relationship with the state’s Supreme Court. He once gave money to every one of its nine elected judges. And guess what? Those same nine judges later overturned an $800,000 judgment against his building company for faulty construction. Bob the Builder, who’s naturally eager for help in the cause of tort reform -- that is, making it hard for everyday people to sue corporations like his for malfeasance -- has so far given four million to the pro-Romney Super PAC, Restore Our Future, and millions to Karl Rove’s American Crossroads Super PAC.
Then there’s casino king Sheldon Adelson, who gave Scott Walker’s cause $250,000. That’s a drop in the old champagne bucket compared to the $21 million Adelson’s family gave to the Super PAC that kept Newt Gingrich in the race long after the formaldehyde had been ordered. According to The Wall Street Journal, Adelson did not long mourn Gingrich’s passing, and has now given at least $10 million to the Restore Our Future Super PAC supporting Romney. By all accounts, what he expects in return is that his candidate hold unions at bay and swear that Israel can do no wrong.
Next up on Scott Walker’s list of beneficent plutocrats: Rich DeVos, owner of the Orlando Magic basketball team and co-founder of the home products giant Amway, which, thanks to Republican leaders in Congress, once shared in a $19 million tax break after a million-dollar DeVos contribution to the Republican Party. He’s a long-time member of the secretive Council for National Policy, a who’s who of right-wing luminaries.
Let’s not forget cowboy billionaire and born again Christian, Foster Friess, Rick Santorum’s moneyman, who told us about the good ol’ days when womenwould “use Bayer aspirin for contraceptives. The gals put it between their knees and it wasn't that costly.”And Louis Moore Bacon, the billionaire founder of the hedge fund Moore Capital - which in 2010 was fined $25 million for attempted commodities manipulation. A big backer of Romney, he, too came to Walker’s aid in Wisconsin.
So did Dallas oil and gas wildcatter Trevor Rees-Jones, who’s given millions to Karl Rove’s American Crossroads, in anticipation of another administration as friendly to taxpayer subsidies for big oil as the Rove-Bush White House. Last year, Rees-Jones’ company, Chief Oil, and a partner sold to Chevron nearly a quarter million acres in northeast America’s Marcellus Shale - the epicenter of the raging controversy over fracking. Estimated price: one billion dollars.
We could go on and name more, but you get the picture. These are the people who are helping to fund what the journalist Joe Hagan describes as a “tsunami of slime.” Even as they and their chosen candidates are afforded respectability in the value-free world of plutocracy, they can hide the fingerprints they leave on the bleeding corpse of democracy in part because each Super PAC comes with that extra special something every politician craves: plausible deniability. When one of their ads says something nasty and deceitful about an opponent - when it slanders and lies - the pol can shrug and say: “Not my doing. It’s the Super Pac that’s slinging the mud, not me.”
And that’s how the wealthy one percent does its dirty business. They are, by the way, as we were reminded by CNN’s Charles Riley in his report, “Can 46 Rich Dudes Buy an Election?” almost all men, mostly white, “and so far, the vast majority of their contributions have been made to conservative groups.” They want to own this election. So if there are any of you left out there with millions to burn, better buy your candidate now, while supplies last.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Reminds me of when I asked an Argentine pilot what he thought of our 2010 "election." He said, "Election? It looked more like an auction."
Well, well said.
Until the Voting Public begins to USE the power of their Vote, I will stick with the ones who do the LEAST amount of harm to John Q. Public. Currently, the Democrats are a much better option!
Citizens United only allows an unfettered amount of money to be spent on elections by the 1%...The real problem isn't the money, its the lack of intelligence of the American Voter who can be persuaded to vote against their own interest!
We need:
Publicly funded elections.
No donations, gifts, trust transfers, etc, of any kind campaign or otherwise, to politicians.
Grass roots nomination/elim ination process.
Equal advertising for all qualified candidates.
REAL public debates amongst finalists.
Term limits.
Reduced salaries and Benefits. Political Office is a Public service job, not a 'Ticket-to-Ride '.
All current Office Holders, and the Supreme Court Justices, must stand for re-election/re- appointment.
All This, is neither expensive, unreasonable nor difficult.
Much would be healed by 'Infusing Integrity' into the system.
But, 'The Entrenched' will not undertake these changes themselves, vc
oluntarily
Politics seems to breed corruptable individuals!
Seriously .. Obama has held more fundraisers and raised/ spent more cash than any president should ... so let's be fair about this biased attack .. if you want to do a story on attacking Republicans .. DO a story attacking the fundraising and superpacs of Obama/ Democrats.
Or ... isn't this RSS News .. FAIR?
On the other hand .... see how much cronyism is going on Under the Obama Administration ... now there is a story that makes BOSS TWEED look like a small time bookie!
Michelle Obama's Brother Kept OSU Coaching Job Thanks to Stimulus Bribe by Obama his brother in law!
When I checked on it, it seemed Craig, despite pretty good prospects as a pro had been talked into business school and a very "financially" successful business career by his Princeton coach. Though financially successful, the family toll wasn't worth it, so he went back to what he most enjoyed, Basketball, at 1/10th what he used to make. I think he is like many of the Wall Street dissatisfied, far above average in intelligence and ability, who quit the street. It didn't matter what it paid, they put their talents to use in other areas that had been deprived of their talents by the Wall Street recruiters that recruited so much of our best talent into the often carelessly self-interested , high paying, but morally deficient easy money "profession."
I hope many more take a similar path.
Will we see another outrageous outcome with a plurality (even with voter suppression) nullified by a power grab through electoral college manipulation. Don't people wonder how Republican tactics change depending on whether they gain or lose by winner-take-all or proportional awards of electors?
One must have at least some ability to see objectively otherwise it is just more carping something we need no more of.
This article is about PACs; nothing more, nothing less.
The despicable Citizens United decision wasn't about party activity or candidate activity; it was solely about special interests ability to buy elections and throw democracy into the dustbin of history.
Americans -- maybe even a couple Supreme Court judges -- would be appalled if our trials (both criminal and civil) were decided on which side could spend the most money on lies, distortions, deceptions, character assassinations, slander, etc, etc. So why do we allow our elections to be decided that way?
The book "Saving America: Using Democratic Capitalism to Rescue the Nation from Economic Folly" (Algora Publishing of New York City) has a couple of solutions to this problem.
He has even pursued Bush's failed policies, and protected his financial backers on Wall Street, he gave the 1% the tax cut extension the wanted, and has pursued the secret eavesdropping of the Bush administration, he and Bush are closer then you think.
The Supreme Court is firmly far right,see: Bush vs. Gore, 2000 & Citizens United. Paving the way for 8 disastrous years of the biggest American tax money give away in history & green lighting the Super-Pacs that are now the true & real American voters. Democrats, go ahead & sit idly by 7 talk all the snap you want about President Obama & how you may sit this one out. Do so at your utmost peril though. 8 new years with Romney AKA Bush on steroids as he panders to every nut job right winged Tea Bagger that screams in his direction. Our president also needs democratic majorities in both houses to get bills passed via super majority. This is the most important election in perhaps all of this countries history. As screwed up as it is today, I am afraid to envision a Red tomorrow.
Of all people, Jeb Bush, the next link in the dynasty (45? 47?), is publicly speaking against these risible fools, The Jeb Bush who championed the cause in '03 of a comatose woman in a 13-year vegatative state and made an Orwellian state intervention into a private medical decision, simply to pander to "pro-life" interests rabidly supporting Terry Schiavo's parents against her husband and the courts. THIS Jeb Bush is challenging the current radical right-wing lunacy of his party, and being lauded as a welcome "breath of fresh air" by establishment Republicans who lost their cujones in the face of the tea party coup. These people have no shame, no institutional memory, no scruples other than the pursuit of money and power, and no future in this country.
Great comparison. There was an Inquisition before Torquemada but he took it to epic proportions. The consequences are still felt today. I was intrigued to learn that Linda Chavez (Bush nominee for Labor Secretary that withdrew her name)found out her "Catholic) background came from the Inquisition when her family became Converso (crypto-Jews, claiming to have converted). She became curious about why her grandmother kept turning the statue of Jesus to face the wall, which led to a "Finding Your Roots" segment that I saw recently.
It still amazes me to see the consequences of expelling talented people for "religious" or ethnic reasons. Most recently, I've met Volga Deutsch who are just now learning about the appalling numbers lost in Stalin's actions against them in WWII.
I used to take comfort that most politicians wouldn't actually be as extreme as their campaigns would have you believe (G.H.W. Bush was still a bit free of total control by his party). Now I'm afraid my old party will do even worse, as they sabotage our system with ALEC type tentacles at so many state and local levels. It seems to allow people like Grover Norquist to create vacuums in responsive government at federal, state, and local levels. As David Frum reported, Norquist outrageously claimed at CPAC, "We just need a president to sign this stuff. We don't need someone to think it up or design it. The leadership now for the modern conservative movement for the next 20 years will be coming out of the House and the Senate."
I don't need that type of unaccountable leadership.
Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative".
She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.
I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."~ Albert Einstein
The 99% of right-wing adherents don't understand what Fascism is and that a Fascist system of government demands loss of personal freedom.
These unenlightened dunderheads call Obama, "Fascist, Nazi, Communist," which truly shows they don't know what they're talking about. (Fascism demands some brainwashing.)
Fascism in brief: 1. any ideology or movement inspired by Italian Fascism, such as German National Socialism (deceptive euphemism); any right-wing nationalist ideology or movement with an authoritarian and hierarchical structure that is fundamentally opposed to democracy
2. any ideology, movement, program, tendency, etc, that may be characterized as right-wing, chauvinist, authoritarian, etc.
3. prejudice in relation to the subject specified.
Another Fascist indoctrination includes creating an intense fear of some "other." Ask any Jew who made it out of a WWII death camp or read their stories. Problem is, under the Romney Regime, we do not yet know who isn't to survive. I'm guessing, however, it's going to be 99% of us, political affiliation be damned. RIP, y'all.
RSS feed for comments to this post