Tomasky writes: "There are three fronts - gas prices, jobs, and the budget - on which we should keep our eyes open for signs that the Republicans are trying to achieve Mitch McConnell's No. 1 goal for America."
Speaker John Boehner (with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell) has suggested Republicans may renege on last year's debt-ceiling deal. (photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
GOP Plans to Sink the Economy
13 March 12
Every month brings improved job news - and bleaker prospects for the Republicans in November. Which is why they're contemplating economic sabotage as their only hope.
e're just under eight months away from Election Day now, which means that the GOP is starting to run out of time to think up new ways to ruin the economy so that Barack Obama doesn't get reelected. The Republicans have to do this delicately, of course; they can't be open about it lest it become too obvious that harming the economy is their goal. But they have to be aggressive enough about it for their efforts to bear some actual (rotten) fruit. There are three fronts - gas prices, jobs, and the budget - on which we should keep our eyes open for signs that the Republicans are trying to achieve Mitch McConnell's No. 1 goal for America.
Let's take them in order. The Republicans received joyous news Monday in the form of the Washington Post poll that showed Obama's numbers sinking in inverse proportion to rising gas prices. The gas situation is perfect for the GOP for two reasons. First, there's very little a president can actually do about gas prices. Second, even though those prices don't really tell us much about the more general economy, most people have the impression that they do, so for the out-party, it's just a free whack.
No one can blame Republicans for using Obama as a piñata on the issue. But here's what they can be blamed for. What is causing these high prices? Not low supply and high demand, which is what they teach you in school. In fact, supply is high - domestic oil production is at its highest point in years, higher under this allegedly business-hating president than under oilmen Bush and Cheney. And demand has been low because of the economy, although it's now picking up.
No, experts blame a lot of the increase on fervid speculation in the oil markets, and a chief reason for a lot of that speculation is anxiety in those markets about a possible war with Iran. Said anxiety, in turn, is heightened every time a politician blusters about how we have no choice now but to go start that war. So this kind of rhetoric is a nice little two-fer for Republicans, who get to sound like tough guys and can also take comfort in knowing that the more they talk up attacking Iran, the more they're doing their small part to keep prices high.
Now let's look to jobs. As you may know, while we've been getting these hopeful job reports these last few months, there is one sector that's been lagging notably: the public sector. In fact, during 2011 the public sector across the country - state and local governments, in addition to the feds - laid off massive numbers of people. Public-sector job losses averaged 22,000 a month in 2011. State and municipal governments are laying people off mainly for two reasons: the economy, which means they're bringing in less revenue, and the drastic cuts in federal aid, which have forced the layoffs and firings of nearly half a million public-sector workers in the last two years.
True, Republicans want smaller budgets on ideological grounds. But they also know very well that the more domestic discretionary spending cuts they can force, and the more public employees they can make states and cities shave off their payrolls, the greater the negative effect on the overall employment picture. If those nearly half-million people were still working, what would the unemployment rate be? Maybe down to a flat 8 percent.
Lately, though, things are starting to look worrisome on that front for Republicans. In February, the public sector cut just 6,000 workers, well down from last year's average. This indicates that the party might not be able to count for long on the public-sector numbers dragging down the private-sector ones. Hmmm. What to do about that?
Interestingly and conveniently, exactly what the Republicans on Capitol Hill are doing right now! They have been signaling lately that the budget numbers they agreed to with Democrats last year in the debt deal need to be revisited, and the cuts must be even deeper. Speaker John Boehner is open about the possibility of reneging. He has sent some mixed signals - he's also talked about trying to get the House to accept a transportation bill that the Senate has already passed by the eye-poppingly bipartisan margin of 85–11. New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer says the bill can create 3 million jobs. The House returns to Washington next Monday. Where would you put the odds that this House of Representatives will vote, less than eight months before the election, to support a bill that Chuck Schumer boasts can produce 3 million jobs?
Every out-party does a little discreet cheering for the economy to be weak. But the GOP has put itself in a unique position. By opposing everything Obama wanted with such ferocity; by saying all those thousands of times that he had no clue about the economy; by sending out a parade of presidential candidates, from the semi-serious to the clown posse, all of whose central criticism of Obama is that he killed the economy - in all of these ways the party has more invested in economic failure than any out-party I can remember in my lifetime. Its best hope for now is gas prices, but even they eventually get lower, usually by late summer. Beyond that, all the GOP has to rely on is Mitt Romney's unstoppable charisma.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Sure they can. I do. It's dirty and deceptive.
About the only thing Obama can do to influence gas prices without mouunting a major campaign to frezze prices like Nixon did is calm down the talk about attacking Iran, which he has done to an extent. In other words, there is nothing subtle he can do, adjusting this or that a little: he would need to unsheath a vorpal dragon slayer and decapitate many monsters, including the Republicans, the rich, and the jabberwocky of capitalism itself. Republicans had better be careful about what they say they wish for -- although if Obama actually did reify FDR we would all be better for it.
As for the Republicans sinking the economy, we should be very worried about that -- they have so much practice at it and have done it so well.
There are things Obama could have and can do. He could oppose any more QE in any of the forms it has been delivered. He could oppose the TBTF institutions and their using client funds or QE funds to gamble/speculat e with as this money is what has driven up the commodity prices. He could have E. Holder actually do his job and prosecute some of those in the banking cartel who have used fraud and fiduciary violations to profit from the rest of us.
The reason oil and commodity prices are up and rising is due to excessive liquidity which is going towards gaming the commodity sector after it left gaming the housing sector. But that would put a squeeze on speculation, which has become the real economy.
Obama won't do that because they are his biggest campaign supporters..
The well heeled repugnants do NOT give a rat's turd for the economy of our nation nor do they giver a fiddler's farthing for our military service personnel. The contemporary concern of modern day Repugnicans is a preoccupation with the power of the Powerful which they feed off of like the "bottom feeders"which they are. Double entendre intended.
Carter did price controls which caused shortages and long lines at the pumps. He had said that we only had enough world oil supply to last 6-8 years....
We don't have enough oil in the reserves to have much effect on world prices. We do have enough oil (and natural gas and coal) in the ground however to take all the speculators off the market in a flash if Obama agreed to open resources for exploration and production. Obama probably won't do this because our available resources are all fossil fuels which produce greenhouse gasses.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
billy bob
USA, Earth
I'd like to see a scholar who knows these things weigh in.
A blurb here:
http://www.econreview.com/events/wageprice1971b.htm
The politics might get nasty -- but what the heck -- how much nastier could they get?
TW -- just saw this by retired Republican House and Senate staffer. Powerful writing.
http://www.truth-out.org/why-republicans-need-remedial-math-their-budget-plans-explode-deficit/1331573876
Tuesday 13 March 2012
by: Mike Lofgren, Truthout | News Analysis
I'm not sure but I think the President has to declare a national emergency in order to freeze gas prices. He would need the cooperation of Congress which the Republicans assuredly would not give him. It would be a bad move politically for Obama anyway. The Republicans would scream about government interference in the "free" market instead of "drill, drill, drill!"
They would call it "socialism", deride how the guy's "out of touch with the realities of the market" etc. This could be a stiff political price to pay.
Leaving aside for now why (supposedly perfect) markets (i.e. competition / zero-sum games) are always considered better that (supposedly evil) socialism (i.e. cooperation / win-win games), this was easier for Nixon because at the time because of a few reasons:
(1) The major economic crisis of the time was all blamed on gas prices (conveniently forgetting the Mexican debt default in the public discourse) and therefore acting about petroleum made poitical sense.
(2) There was still a USSR and soft power was still part of the US arsenal: you didn't want capitalism to look too crude and some dose of "socialism" in the government was sound propaganda.
(3) For the same reason Nixon could extend a hand to China, he could act in a more socialistic way without being branded a traitor.
Look at gas prices. The increasing costs are due to 1) speculation about disruptions in supply, 2) devaluation of the dollar, and 3) worldwide demand which is increasing because of China and India.
The portion attributable to supply and demand, cannot be eliminated but it can be ameliorated by freeing up American turf to exploration and development -- something that Obama has been dragging his feet on presumably because he is concerned about global warming.
The portion attributable to the devalued dollar is not Obama's fault (both Rs and Ds have contributed to this problem over the years), but Obama could stop it today by issuing orders to the Fed. Perhaps he doesn't want to do that because of the fragile economic recovery.
The portion attributable to speculation is driven both by Republican frontrunners tough talk and Obama's tough talk. He sounded every bit as hawkish as any Republican, Ron Paul excepted, at the AIPAC meeting.
Obama simply doesn't want to address the gas price issue. Maybe his reasons are good and maybe not, but he is being disingenuous by claiming that he cannot do so. Where is the frankness and honesty that we all expected of him?
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
At the very least, tax it at the same rate as that earned by people in the same income brackets.
When it comes to "Obama could stop it today by issuing orders to the Fed", hey, wake up. Ever heard of the "independence" of the "Central bank", which happens to be a cartel of private banks?
Well said Franselr! My question is why do these evil incarnate bastards continue to refer to themselves as "Americans," when they continue to act like they HATE this nation? Truth of the matter is, THEY HAVE BECOME THE COMMUNISTS AT HEART, THAT THEY CLAIMED TO HAVE DESPISED. The Greedy One Percenters have taken jobs overseas, stashed cash in offshore accounts, send our sons and daughters into wars based on lies, have laws in place to keep their kids out of war zones, and practice inside-trading with few consequences & virtually NO JAIL TIME!! All this has happened while most of the nation slept; many are still asleep!
WAKE UP AMERICA AND VOTE IN 2012!! THEY HAVE MADE THEIR PLAN KNOWN, SO VOTE 'EM OUT! VOTE EARLY; VOTE ABSENTEE!! GIVE A SENIOR A RIDE TO THE POLLS OR BRING THEM BALLOTS. OUR FUTURE IS AT STAKE!!!
You are correct to call the housing bubble a travesty but you are incorrect to blame it on the republicans. Both republicans and democrats over several decades poured trillions of dollars into housing and fueled the bubble. The ONLY effort to curb this abuse of american homeowners and taxpayers was made by George W. Bush when he tried to limit subprime lending at Fannie and Freddie. Unfortunately, the Democrats thought that Bush was attacking poor people and protected the mortgage giants from reforms. My own congressman, Barney Frank, led the calls to reject reform telling us that Bush efforts were an attack homeownership and the poor and adding that Fannie and Freddie were in fine financial shape.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
You are correct but that fact does not affect my argument.
But now that you've raised the issue, the high gasoline prices came down quickly and precipitously as soon as Bush opened up a lot more oil leases for exploration and production. Obama may object to this strategy based on his concerns about global warming, but the Bush strategy was very effective in reducing gasoline prices. The markets are anticipatory and if they see that more oil is coming, speculators back off and prices decline well before any of the oil hits the consumer marketplace.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
Note that approximately 60 cents of the cost of every gallon of gasoline that we buy at the pump is the result of speculators. The actions of these individuals is NOT controlled by our President, although the regulators could put a stop to much of this by requiring higher margins (amount of money that they have to put up) than are presently required. Price freezes rarely work except to limit supply and discourage distribution of product.
Our Republican "buddies" keep touting the great "free-market" system. If the free market actually worked, then gasoline prices would be lower due to decreased demand and relatively abundant supply.
Like everything else these days, much of the problem has been manufactured to increase the wealth of the 1% and negatively affect the rest of us.
I don't know where you get the cost of speculation from (seems high to me since gas prices have increased very little when one considers the devaluation of the dollar over the last 20 years) but an easier to accomplish break for consumers might be to cut back on the 50 cent per gallon tax that is levied on gasoline. At least that seems more feasible than trying to institute a surtax on the roughly 7 cents per gallon in profits that the oil companies are able to pass on to their shareholders.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
Huh? The Republicans only control the House and have been unable to get much of anything done. The Democrats in the Senate usually refuse to consider anything proposed by the house (such as a budget).
As for overspending, Bush did indeed overspend but the Obama Administration has added more than 50% to our debt -- far more than Bush ever dreamed of. US debt went from $5.8T to $11.9T during Bush's eight years in office. During Obama's first three years in office, the debt has now risen to nearly $17T. And under Obama our annual deficits are far in excess of a trillion dollars a year so there is no end of debt growth in sight.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
Now - please tell me why the Ds are so lame about putting this (real) story together and telling it like it is while at the same time telling the story about how we can create jobs, grow the economy and lower gas prices for real and for the long term in the U.S. We must support massive national and regional energy and resource efficiency initiatives and reduce our voracious appetite to waste energy. We can easily reduce our use by 40-50% in 5-10 years, thereby reducing demand and increasing supply. That is well within our reach. While becoming far more productive in our use of diminishing resources, we build out (as in INVEST) the renewable energy infrastructure so that within 1 generation the sun, wind, oceans and other completely clean, safe, renewable resources provide us with very cheap and inexhaustible sources of energy, forever. Imagine - we will NEVER have to send our young men and women to war for oil or other energy sources, nor will we send our hard earned dollars overseas to buy oil.
And they've just gotten many times worse since then but the same forces are at work to combat anything progressive!
I would now categorize them as "Medievalists", especially well represented by the current crop of wannabes -but that's just me.
It is more and more obvious and verifiable that the current gas price spike can be laid at the feet of over-speculatio n -Wall Street again. I've listened to several economists stating this on the alternative radio stations here in Oregon, so why the Hell doesn't the owner media -and I include PBS in this category now, come right out and tell it like it is thereby getting the word out to the "Average" American, who is hard to move in any direction but whom this is hitting pdirectly, especially the big truck and SUV crowd. But then they are in the thrall of those whose ONLY objective is to unseat Obama.
If there was a realistic alternative out there fine but the true progressives don't have a chance and they know it, so far to the right has the US become.
If the truth makes us free, this might be a good place to start.
Vote DEM Vote OBAMA -- and get out there and VOTE 2012 (drag anyone who needs a ride and / or tell them to get absentee ballots to miss the crowds)
RSS feed for comments to this post