RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Parry begins: "Americans sometimes wonder how the nation's political process got so unspeakably nasty with vitriol pouring forth especially from right-wing voices like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Michael Savage, to name just a few. Yet, whenever called on this ugliness, conservatives insist that they are the real victims, picked on by the Left."

Richard Nixon gives his trademark salute at a California rally just before the 1968 election. (photo: Dirck Halstead/UT Center for American History)
Richard Nixon gives his trademark salute at a California rally just before the 1968 election. (photo: Dirck Halstead/UT Center for American History)



How the Right's Smear Machine Started

By Robert Parry, Consortium News

09 March 12

mericans sometimes wonder how the nation�s political process got so unspeakably nasty with vitriol pouring forth especially from right-wing voices like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Michael Savage, to name just a few. Yet, whenever called on this ugliness, conservatives insist that they are the real victims, picked on by the Left.

This destructive and whiny dynamic has existed at least since the late 1960s when angry passions spilled over from the Vietnam War and grew worse after Richard Nixon exploited Democratic dissension on the war to win the White House in 1968 � and then continued the war for another four nasty years.

Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States

As president, Nixon also responded to the fury splintering American society with wedge issues, appealing to the "silent majority" and denouncing anti-war protesters as "bums." He rode that divisive formula to a landslide victory in November 1972 but soon ensnared himself in the Watergate political spying scandal that drove him from office in August 1974.

Out of all that anger emerged an American Right that believed, as an article of faith, that the Democrats and the "liberal press" had turned Nixon�s run-of-the-mill indiscretions in Watergate into a constitutional crisis to undo Nixon�s overwhelming electoral mandate of 1972.

So, over the next two decades � with Nixon in the background egging on Republican politicians � the Right built an attack machine that was designed to defend against "another Watergate" but also was available to destroy the "liberal" enemy.

Which is why, in retrospect, the decision by President Lyndon Johnson and his top aides to withhold from the public their evidence of Nixon�s sabotage of the Vietnam peace talks in fall 1968 proved to be the opposite of their stated intention: to hide the dirty secret for "the good of the country."

As Johnson�s national security adviser Walt W. Rostow observed in 1973 as the Watergate scandal was unfolding, Nixon may have dared undertake that domestic spying program because he had gotten away with his 1968 skullduggery unscathed.

Because the Republicans had not been held accountable, Rostow noted, "There was nothing in their previous experience with an operation of doubtful propriety (or, even, legality) to warn them off, and there were memories of how close an election could get and the possible utility of pressing to the limit � and beyond." [To read Rostow�s memo, click here, here and here.]

Indeed, if Johnson had revealed Nixon�s peace-talk sabotage in 1968 � or if Rostow had released the evidence after Johnson�s death in 1973 � the public�s perception of Nixon and Watergate might have been dramatically different. Instead of a one-off affair that could be blamed on some overzealous subordinates, the break-in at the Democratic headquarters might have been seen as part of a larger pattern.

If the American people had seen the evidence that Johnson had regarding Nixon keeping the South Vietnamese government away from the Paris peace talks in 1968 � with promises of a better deal if he got elected � it would have been difficult for even the most die-hard conservative to believe that Nixon�s resignation was undeserved.

Wall Street Disgrace

And that might have gone double if Americans had read the internal memos about how Nixon�s Wall Street friends were using their inside knowledge of Nixon blocking the Vietnam peace talks so they could place their bets on stocks and bonds. [See Consortiumnews.com�s "Profiting Off Nixon�s Vietnam �Treason.�"]

The image of these Wall Street supermen sitting around a table discussing how to profit off a prolonged war � while a half million American soldiers were sitting in a war zone � might have been hard for even the most ardent Ayn Rand enthusiast to stomach.

But Johnson chose to stay silent in November 1968 and took the secret to his grave in January 1973. It was then up to Rostow to decide what to do with the file that Johnson had entrusted to him, what Rostow called "The �X� Envelope." [See Consortiumnews.com�s "LBJ�s �X� File on Nixon�s �Treason.�"]

Rostow apparently struggled with the question until June 1973 when he sealed the file with a note to the LBJ Library that the envelope should stay secret for a half century and possibly longer. (It was eventually opened in 1994, beginning a long process of declassifying some of the secret and top secret documents that described what Johnson called Nixon�s "treason.")

Johnson, Rostow and other senior Democrats who were privy to the secrets apparently thought that � in their silence � they were doing what was good for the country.

"Some elements of the story are so shocking in their nature that I�m wondering whether it would be good for the country to disclose the story and then possibly have a certain individual [Nixon] elected," Defense Secretary Clark Clifford told Johnson in a conference call on Nov. 4, 1968. "It could cast his whole administration under such doubt that I think it would be inimical to our country�s interests."

However, by not trusting the American people with such vital information, these Democrats set the stage for the depressing drama that has played out over the ensuing four-plus decades. With the evidence of Nixon�s "treason" kept under wraps, Republicans could fancy themselves the real victims in the Watergate scandal and thus could justify doing whatever was necessary to protect some future GOP president from similar treatment.

From then on, whenever some major scandal threatened Ronald Reagan or George H.W. Bush or George W. Bush, the right-wing attack machine would fire up and mow down anyone who got too close to the truth.

Some examples include evidence of another October Surprise dirty trick in 1980 (with Reagan�s campaign frustrating President Jimmy Carter�s efforts to free 52 American hostages in Iran), the Iran-Contra sequel (as President Reagan traded more arms to Iran for more U.S. hostages in 1985-86), the Iraq-gate scandal of secretly arming Saddam Hussein (which put President George H.W. Bush on the spot after the Persian Gulf War in 1991), or the Plame-gate affair (which involved George W. Bush�s administration leaking the identity of a covert CIA officer to get back at her husband for exposing a lie behind the Iraq War in 2003). [For more on this history, see Robert Parry�s Secrecy & Privilege or Consortiumnews.com�s "New October Surprise Series."]

Whitewater Revenge

The Right�s attack machine was there, too, to take down Democratic presidents over even minor "scandals." For instance, in the 1990s, Rush Limbaugh and other right-wing operatives pounded President Bill Clinton over murky questions about an old real-estate deal known as Whitewater.

A dark eminence behind the assault on Clinton was none other than Richard Nixon, who even in his disgraced retirement continued to counsel Republicans on how to play hardball politics. Ironically, Nixon plotted to destroy Clinton even as Clinton was extending a hand of friendship to Nixon.

As Monica Crowley reported in her book, Nixon Off the Record, Clinton called Nixon seeking advice on everything from foreign policy to time scheduling. The first contact - a 40-minute conversation - was made on March 2, 1993, barely a month after Clinton entered the White House "and their unexpectedly close relationship was born," wrote Crowley, a personal aide to Nixon who recorded many of the ex-president's commentaries in his final years.

After the first call, Nixon sounded genuinely touched that Clinton had reached out. "He was very respectful but with no sickening bullshit," Nixon told Crowley. "It was the best conversation with a president I've had since I was president."

Six days later, Nixon traveled to Washington for an announced public meeting with Clinton in the White House, an honor that Nixon had not received from Clinton's Republican predecessors who had snuck Nixon in the back door for unannounced private meetings. Again, Nixon seemed sincerely moved by Clinton's gesture.

"Clinton is very earthy," Nixon told Crowley. "He cursed - 'asshole,' 'son of a bitch,' 'bastard' - you know. He's a very straightforward conversationalist." Nixon also acknowledged, in an edgy tone, that the formal White House meeting with Clinton "was more than either Reagan or Bush ever gave me."

But typical of Nixon, he was soon scheming to undo the Democratic president who had reached out to him. Nixon exploited his personal knowledge of Clinton to offer back-channel political advice to Sen. Bob Dole, whom Nixon correctly considered to be the likely Republican nominee in 1996.

Nixon also privately hoped that the Clintons' troubled Whitewater investment would turn into a second Watergate that would humiliate both Clinton and his wife - and somehow settle an old score Nixon felt toward Democrats and anti-war demonstrators.

In one such comment on April 13, 1994, four days before the stroke that led to his death, Nixon called Crowley and chortled about the surging Whitewater scandal. "Clinton should pay the price," Nixon declared. "Our people shouldn't let this issue go down. They mustn't let it sink."

Nixon said he had even called Dole to make sure that aggressive questioners were put on the Whitewater committee.

Later that month, at Nixon's funeral, Clinton paid tribute to the Republican president. "May the day of judging President Nixon on anything less than his entire life and career come to a close," Clinton wished, apparently not knowing what that full-scale assessment would reveal.

In the succeeding months, the Republican strategy of pummeling Clinton over Whitewater and other personal indiscretions dominated the headlines. Clinton was driven deep into debt over lawyer fees and was left little choice but to seek hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions to save his political life. Not surprisingly, that fundraising merged into the larger flow of "Clinton scandals."

The endless string of "Clinton scandals" helped Republicans win control of Congress in 1994, with Limbaugh made an honorary member of the House GOP majority as thanks for his relentless assaults, three hours a day, against Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Eventually, after the Whitewater probe expanded to include disclosures about Clinton�s sexual indiscretions with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, House Republicans voted to impeach Clinton during a lame-duck session in 1998, representing payback for the Democrats pressuring Nixon to resign 24 years earlier.

After a humiliating trial in the U.S. Senate, Clinton survived to finish his term. But the right-wing attack machine that arose to prevent "another Watergate" and came of age by exploiting the "Whitewater scandal" was now a permanent part of the American political landscape.

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com. His two previous books, Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & �Project Truth� are also available there.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+1 # Saberoff 2017-05-10 17:47
"Leave aside whether you thought it was time for James Comey to go. It was time for him to go last July, when he called that unprecedented press conference."

Wrong.

I have considered James Comey a good public servant in past.
 
 
-24 # CDMR 2017-05-10 18:08
Comey was a key player in the "get-Trump" campaign being run by democrats. Why he was playing this role is a total mystery to me. It clearly was a violation of the duties of his office. And his role in the Clinton email affair was too very bizarre. He seems to have wanted to be the controller of politicians in the way Hoover was. Hoover was able to make or break anyone in Washington. No one dared cross Hoover. But those were different days and Hoover played a lot dirtier. Comey was just bad at playing this game and it backfired on him.

Now he will be on the million dollar speakers circuit like Obama. He'll get a big book deal.
 
 
-13 # RNLDaWy 2017-05-11 13:27
Right On! Good point to history and Hoover .. Shoe on opposite foot the Dems would have done the very same! And the speaking tour .. now for the big money opportunities .. speaking lobbyist .. paid to sit on boards and do nothing etc .. for cess pool $corrupt$ American Politics as usual ..
 
 
+33 # Anonymot 2017-05-10 18:44
When you put the driver of Cadillacs behind the wheel of a Formula One, sooner or later he's probably going to wreck the car, but until he does he's in charge of it. It's misleading, wishful thinking to promote the idea that Trump will go away or get impeached. Hillary stuck us with him for at least 4 years.

The only hope is that Bernie and Tulsi leave the Democrats to form a Third Progressive Party. Otherwise all scenarios are nightmares.
 
 
+55 # elkingo 2017-05-10 18:50
Alice in Wonderland by way of Gilbert and Sullivan by way of Moliere by way of Franz Kafka. The situation is so evil that I believe the brain can't comprehend it. Absurdity fatigue. But this could well end the planet, and that is quite literally unthinkable.
 
 
+39 # Citizen Mike 2017-05-10 18:55
Although I dislike Pierce's self-indulgent style of smarmy gonzo journalism, I must say that I agree with him as to the substance of this essay. What will save us from a fascist coup is the incompetence of the fascist. Hitler was quite bright and had a coherent plan. We are fortunate that Trump is no Hitler, though he'd like to be. The man is too arrogant and stupid to realize he must cover his tracks, or do so effectively.
 
 
+17 # Jim Rocket 2017-05-10 19:14
I think Joe Arpaio is looking for work.
 
 
+3 # markovchhaney 2017-05-10 19:20
Charles, if Trump fired Comey in the first month of his administration, we'd be hearing about how he acted precipitously and without due diligence. Regardless of why Comey was fired, you and many others would be screaming for investigations and impeachment. That is undeniable.

If you buy the "Russia, Russia, Russia" whine fest, promoted by HRC & Company, then Trump has to be attacked relentlessly until there are articles of impeachment from the House.

I spoke with a rabid supporter of Hillary who thinks that if Russia is proved to have meddled in the election, then either Hillary wins or there's a new election! I suspect she's not alone. Of course, the reality is that we get POTUS Pence or POTUS Ryan: who isn't thrilled at the prospect?
 
 
+7 # lfeuille 2017-05-10 22:06
Or Trump anyway, at least until the Dems. take back Congress. The bunch there now just won't impeach him. No one really cares about the Russia thing but Hillary and McCain and the CIA. It's all posturing. But Trump really isn't fit to be president. He can't keep his temper under control even to save his administration. This may be his dumbest move yet.
 
 
+32 # economagic 2017-05-10 19:29
"Holy hell, what a blunder."

Yes, and this would be a good time to reread the story of the similar blunder by the Cox sacker. But unfortunately, despite how much things stay the same, things also change. It would not be wise to assume that this blunder will have an outcome similar to that of the blunder by another Republican president 44 years ago. In those days there were still enough people in this country who could read, ask pertinent questions, and draw reasonable conclusions -- and who actually DID so -- that the paranoid, overreaching president sealed his own doom. Today it's anybody's guess, The Mouseketeers' Anything-Can-Ha ppen Day.
 
 
-20 # banichi 2017-05-10 19:36
AAAannd,down the rabbit hole we go! Through the looking glass! Story on Facebook said he was offered a job with Wikileaks, no less. And with Tweets to back it up! Do I believe it? This is a very badly written script on a par with the Democrats' whining about the Russians hacking the election, right after they lost.

Is any of this true? Other than Trump firing Comey, that is?

Who do you really really trust?
 
 
+19 # ericlipps 2017-05-10 21:13
Trump and the GOP Congress may allow the appointment of a special prosecutor (though they'll do rhetorical cartwheels to avoid calling him/her that), but any prosecutor they pick will be so deep in the tank for the Rump he or she will need scuba gear.
 
 
+20 # Charles3000 2017-05-10 21:21
Very well stated and so very reminiscent of those dark Watergate days. I suspect we will even have a replica of Dean spilling the dirty beans. Hold on! It could be a very rough ride.
 
 
+10 # Wise woman 2017-05-10 22:09
It's already a rough ride. What Nixon did almost pales in comparison with what's going on now. And I really hate saying that. At least Nixon had some redeeming qualities especially where the environment is concerned. Trump, et al are so deep in the swamp that I'm surprised they're still breathing. If the dems don't do anything to get all of these bastards gone, there's no hope for that party ever recovering.
 
 
+6 # CurtW 2017-05-10 22:42
Regime Change. Now's the time.
 
 
+14 # relegn 2017-05-11 05:53
It will be interesting to see how big trump's blunders will get before a Republican controlled Congress starts doing it's constitutional duty.
 
 
0 # Cassandra2012 2017-05-14 23:49
Quoting relegn:
It will be interesting to see how big trump's blunders will get before a Republican controlled Congress starts doing it's constitutional duty.

And stops being consummate cowards whose only loyalty is to party rather than to country and democratic principles!
 
 
+12 # Realist1948 2017-05-11 07:00
The huge ruckus over Comey has largely drowned out the story of another Trump/Russia connection that was revealed a few days ago. Speaking as a guest on Bill Littlefield's "Only a Game" radio program, golf journalist James Dodson recalled a 2014 conversation with Eric Trump. Eric bragged to Dodson that the Trumps didn't have to deal with American banks when borrowing for their golf projects. That was because they got all of the funding they needed from Russia.

A podcast of Dodson's conversation with Littlefield is in the "Only a Game" section the WBUR website. WBUR is the Boston NPR station.
 
 
-1 # kyzipster 2017-05-12 08:26
I find it odd that nobody is talking about this. Some people on the left want to insist that the Russia thing is nothing but a smear campaign against Trump, at least here at RSN. I think we have a right to know about Trump's financial ties. He's probably in debt so deep he's a billion dollars in the red. I don't believe there was any calculated scheme to throw the election.
 
 
+8 # mikeandnettie 2017-05-11 07:22
Stress the society. Promote confusion at the top. Keep everyone in a tizzy. Encourage violence. Disparage values. Flood the media with distractions. Appear leaderless. Emerge as savior. Declare martial law. Arrest top opponents. Scare the rest. Turn on your masters. Ruin the world.
 
 
-2 # RNLDaWy 2017-05-11 12:13
Comey last holdover from Obama et al. He like a good republican did his job and took one for the Gipper (The Apprentice) with disting Hillary. Left wing media especially MSNBC think they are over seeing a Watergate in regards to Russia. Waste of time and taxpayer money investigating The Donald further .. looking for impeachable data .. they will find none .. and again mislead us all playing into the hands of those in power .. they should 24/7 be rallying and stirring the hornets nest around the Repukes latest 'Health Care' plan .. and do something functionally worthwhile for a change ...
 
 
+4 # jwb110 2017-05-11 12:45
If the GOP were smart, and I think that questionable, they would everything possible to lose the mid-term elections and let the Dems hobble this idiot in the White House and his staff. Impeachment would lead to more rabble rousing and more investigations and who knows what. If the Dems could hobble the guy for the rest of his term the Nation would be safe from a Russian Fellow Traveler. This whole thing stinks to high heavens and it is a matter of National Security. If another election has to happen, then so be it. In my heart of hearts the GOP giving the Congress back to the DEMS is the best solution.
 
 
0 # CurtW 2017-05-17 22:37
There is something called the Dunning-Kruger effect, which illustrates how an incompetent is too incompetent to recognize his own incompetence. Sounds like our Emperor Orange Face alright.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN