Intro: "In an action called Occupy Wall Street, thousands of activists took to the streets of Lower Manhattan on September 17. The protests are continuing, with demonstrators camped out on the Financial District's Liberty Street in support of US democratization and against corporate domination of politics. But you wouldn't know much about any of this from the corporate media - outlets that seem much more interested in protests of the Tea Party variety."
OCCUPYWALLSTREET is a people-powered movement for democracy that began in America on September 17 with an encampment in the financial district of New York City. Inspired by the Egyptian Tahrir Square uprising and the Spanish acampadas, they vow to end the monied corruption of our democracy. (photo: Collin David Anderson)
What If the Tea Party Occupied Wall Street?
24 September 11
Corporate media skip anti-corporate protests.
n an action called Occupy Wall Street, thousands of activists took to the streets of Lower Manhattan on September 17.
The protests are continuing, with demonstrators camped out on the Financial District's Liberty Street in support of US democratization and against corporate domination of politics (Adbusters, 9/19/11).
But you wouldn't know much about any of this from the corporate media - outlets that seem much more interested in protests of the Tea Party variety.
The anti-corporate protests have been lightly covered in the hometown New York Times: One piece (9/18/11) largely about how the police blocked access to Wall Street, and one photo (9/22/11) with the caption "Wall Street Protest Whirls On."
The protests have been treated with brief mentions on CNN, like this one from host Wolf Blitzer (9/19/11): "Protests here in New York on Wall Street entering a third day. Should New Yorkers be worried at all about what's going on?"
From the ABC, CBS and NBC network news, we could find nothing at all in the Nexis news database. On the PBS NewsHour (9/19/11), the protests got a brief reference, tacked on to the end of the stock market report:
Away from the trading floor, some 200 protesters marched for a third day, charging the financial system favors corporations. At least six people were arrested.
Some voices in the media have noted the lack of coverage. On the Rachel Maddow Show (MSNBC, 9/19/11), Michael Moore said, "People are down on Wall Street right now, holding a sit-in and a camp-in down there - virtually no news about this protest."
At the top of his Current TV show (9/21/11), Keith Olberman said:
So five days of clogging downtown Manhattan, protesting corporate control of the economy, and you haven't heard a word about it on the news?
He later remarked, "If that's a Tea Party protest in front of Wall Street about Ben Bernanke ... it's the lead story on every network newscast."
The media preference for Tea Party gatherings over progressive activism is well-documented. A September 2009 Tea Party rally in Washington, DC, garnered far more coverage than a similar gay rights rally the following month (Extra!, 12/09). Thousands of activists at the US Social Forum in Detroit in June 2010 did not merit anywhere near the coverage accorded to 600 attendees at the Tea Party Convention in Nashville (Extra!, 9/10). The One Nation Working Together rally (10/2/10) brought thousands to Washington - but little media attention (FAIR Media Advisory, 10/6/10).
And even the size of a given Tea Party gathering does not seem to much matter. When about 200 Tea Partiers gathered in Washington earlier this year (FAIR Blog, 4/1/11), an account in Slate (3/31/11) noted, "There was at least one reporter for every three or four activists."
The answer to the problem of non-coverage would seem to be simple: If the people occupying Wall Street want more media attention, they should just call themselves Tea Party activists.
ACTION:
Ask the nightly newscasts why they have decided to give little to no coverage to the Occupy Wall Street protests - especially given their interest in Tea Party demonstrations.
CONTACT:
NBC Nightly News
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
212-664-4971
ABC World News
Feedback form
CBS Evening News
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
212-975-3247
PBS NewsHour
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
703-998-2138
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |














Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
But my real question is: why aren't there more protests in NYC against the corporate media itself?
By the way, had half a dozen tea party drones protested there would be 24 hour live coverage on all the national--corpo rate owned--networks .
Why did they not Start a Campaign against Wall Street Indeed.
Well, answered that question...Hypo crites. They are the problem not the solution. Each of these Campaigns are Political Junkies, wanna bes or those who foolishly ended up elected.
None of these people ever would have Marched against anything, daddy would have disemboweled their Checking and Savings Accounts.
Then they could declare Wall street un-American; that would confuse people enough to bring in the media to explain things.
RSS feed for comments to this post