Excerpt: "Michael Bloomberg, you have now, indeed, become the symbol of the Occupy movement. You are ready to take your historic place with Mayor Daley and Governor Wallace and Senator McCarthy and Prime Minister Grenville and every other idiot who has made the fateful and fatal mistake of thinking that - just because he had power and money - that this was a nation in which everything has a price tag on it."
Keith Olbermann's 'Countdown' on Current TV, 06/02/11. (photo: Current.tv)
Occupy Wall Street Needs Michael Bloomberg
17 November 11
EITH OLBERMANN: First, as promised, a special comment on the events of Monday night at Occupy Wall Street at Zuccotti Park:
For the entirety of the life of our nation, democracy has been protected -- not merely by the strenuous efforts of those of us who cherish it, but mostly, and most profoundly, by the limitless stupidity of those who would ration it, keep it for themselves and themselves alone, or destroy it.
The protests that ended the war in Vietnam reached critical mass only in 1970, when Governor James Rhodes of Ohio pounded on a desk at a news conference and called the student protesters at Kent State University un-American. They were not un-American, they were unarmed. And the next day, four were shot and killed by the National Guard and 10 days later, two more were killed at Jackson State.
Those protests had themselves only gone mainstream 20 months earlier, when Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago overreacted with mindlessness and sadism to the massing of demonstrators outside the 1968 Democratic convention and the whole world watched.
A century of the institutionalized, codified, legalized, pseudo-slavery that followed the real thing was fatally stricken only Governor George Wallace of Alabama used his inaugural address to promise, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." Within two years came the marches on Selma and the atrocities at the Edmund Pettus Bridge. And ten weeks after the first violence, the president had proposed the Voting Rights Act to Congress.
The mounting paranoia of three decades of scapegoating of -- and fear mongering about -- liberals, only ended when its last white knight self-destructed on the national stage of televised hearings, when Joe McCarthy questioned the loyalty of the US military and -- towards one junior attorney -- he revealed the depths of his cruelty and megalomania. And he revealed that -- at long last -- he, indeed, had no shame.
Pick any moment in our history -- our history as a country founded by and invigorated by and re-invigorated by protests -- and you will find men like George Wallace and Joe McCarthy and Jim Rhodes and Richard Daley. Go back further -- to men like the owners of the Triangle Shirtwaist Company or the officials who sent the police to the Haymarket Square and the troops to the Pullman town or John Brown or George Grenville, the British politician who had a bright idea about the American colonies, an idea called the Stamp Act.
American freedom has not flourished in spite of these morons of history, it has flourished because of them -- because they overreacted, because they under-thought, overreached, under-understood. We owe them our traditions of protest. We owe them our freedoms. We owe them our very independence. None of them ever understood that -- around these parts anyway -- suppression always creates the opposite of the effect desired.
Such a man is Michael Rubens Bloomberg, mayor of New York City and -- as of today -- the most valuable, the most essential, the most irreplaceable man inside the Occupy movement.
Who else but a clich� like Bloomberg could take a protest beginning to grow a little stale around the edges and vault it back in the headlines, complete with mortifying scenes of police dressed as storm troopers, carrying military weapons, using figurative bazookas to kill figurative mosquitoes?
Who else but an archetype like Bloomberg could claim a group of protesters was making too much noise in a residential area and then choose to try to disperse them by bringing out LRAD audio cannons, machines that send painful waves of sound indiscriminately over the very same residential area?
Who else but a cartoon like Bloomberg could have become rich creating a multi-billion-dollar media and news company and then authorize illegally preventing reporters from witnessing police actions he claimed were utterly legal, and then authorize the arrests of four reporters at a church?
Who else but a human platitude like Bloomberg could have just gotten back from Jerusalem -- and the dedication of a ten-million-dollar medical facility for which he generously paid -- and then enabled the image of policemen seizing 5,500 books from the Occupy Wall Street library, and throwing them in a Dumpster as if the cops were book burners?
Who else but a hypocrite like Bloomberg could have overridden -- by a backroom deal with the New York City Council -- the results of two separate referendums, limiting those in his office to just two terms as mayor, so he could serve a third term? And then had police arrest, beat up and incarcerate a member of the New York City Council?
Who else but a putz like Bloomberg could have insisted protesters were not above the rule of law and yet -- when the courts ruled he could not sees the protesters' tents and sleeping bags, nor kick them out of Zuccotti park, nor keep them from returning with their tents and sleeping bags -- who else could have stalled for hours until he could find another judge to give him the ruling he insisted upon?
Who else but the epitome of tone-deafness that is Bloomberg could have better illustrated the fundamental issue of Occupy, when he puts the entire weight of the most people-driven city in the history of the Earth behind already-crushingly rich and their efforts to grab themselves still more advantages from those people and he, himself, is the 12th richest man in America?
Who else but a publicity addict like Bloomberg could have enabled the arrest of 700 protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge and yet, two months later, frozen 20 square miles of New York City in gridlock traffic over two days, so somebody could film another goddamned Batman movie on the 59th Street Bridge? Leading to the inescapable conclusion that -- if you want to tie up a little traffic during a protest for equality and freedom from corporate domination on a bridge in New York City -- you will be arrested. But -- if you want to tie up all of the traffic during a goddamned movie shoot for the financial benefit of corporate domination -- the city of New York will embrace you and give you tax breaks.
Michael Bloomberg -- no such a figure, no such a living, breathing embodiment of all that is wrong and all that is stupid in the establishment in this country could be ordered up from the works of fiction, or the casting calls of that goddamned Batman movie they filmed the weekend before he ordered the raid on Occupy Wall Street.
Obviously, Mayor Bloomberg, you should resign and your little bully of a police commissioner, Raymond Kelly, should go with you. You have overstepped all reasonable interpretations of your rights and responsibilities and you have made Americans and people around the world realize that you are simply smaller, more embarrassing versions of the tin-pot tyrants who have fallen around the globe in the past year.
But -- as some of us first thought you might be, back on that fateful afternoon that sadistic cops pepper-sprayed four women who had already been trapped inside a police overreaction, and as we thought again the following weekend during the arrests on Brooklyn Bridge -- Michael Bloomberg, you have now, indeed, become the symbol of the Occupy movement. You are ready to take your historic place with Mayor Daley and Governor Wallace and Senator McCarthy and Prime Minister Grenville and every other idiot who has made the fateful and fatal mistake of thinking that -- just because he had power and money -- that this was a nation in which everything has a price tag on it.
We need you, Michael Bloomberg. We need you to keep making these mistakes -- tone-deaf, sensibility-offending, world-changing mistakes -- like the pepper spray and the Brooklyn Bridge and the paramilitary assault on Occupy Wall Street last night.
Hell, Mike, the freedoms of this wonderful and transcendent nation-- corrupted by the endless greed of you and the other dozen richest people in it, and the corporations who nevertheless have still managed to own you somehow -- these freedoms will not be restored to us in just the next two years. I am endorsing you for a fourth term! Your nation needs you, Mr. Mayor! Occupy needs you!
Bloomberg now! Bloomberg tomorrow! Bloomberg forever!
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Look at the GOP candidates -- supported by the Supremes' "person hood" decision - I only have evil thoughts for the future of Scalia/Thomas - the biggest crooks/mafia pigs that do NOT belong in the high court.
We're a nation gone stupid.
Vote DEM/ Vote Obama -- and VOTE in 2012. Get all Dems and non GOP/TP in your areas OUT TO VOTE.
If your rep/Senator votes for anything that takes our rights away - vote him/her OUT.
NEVER EVER vote TP/GOP (Unless the TP/GOP rig the election - there is really no way they can win the W.H. - but the Koch Brothers etc could buy their way in)
Little is said about China's investment in health, medicine, education and superstructure in a region that not so many years ago was a brutal theocracy, where the people spent their time doing little more than spinning prayer wheels.
The Dalai Lama is a puppet owned and operated by outside influences and he is no friend of the Tibetan people. Underlying everything to do with Tibet, do not underestimate the extent of American activity to create unrest in the region as another front to divert China.
Tibet is very remote and for many years the vast majority of its people had no contact with the outside world.The Church saw to it that those few who were educated, were taught a very narrow and religious based doctrine. Unfortunately, it is possible that some of these very sincere and dedicated people can be easily swayed by skilled, manipulative operatives to show defiance - sometimes extreme - against China.
If the US CIA were to stay out of this, I'm sure that the Chinese and Buddhists would resolve the problems quite well. After all, Buddhism is a major religion in China -- it is not the same as Tibetan Buddahism but they are sister faiths.
There are actually a lot of Tibetan Buddhist practitioners in China, mostly among the more educated class.
China claims sovereignty over Tibet dating back to about 1300 - seven hundred years ago. America has become interested in Tibet more recently, to foment trouble to distract China, and because of their interest in recently discovered Tibetan resources. The CIA's role cannot be dismissed so lightly. In this instance and many others, it is intent on exploiting and perverting hints of nationalism or discontent around the world to further America's national interests - resources and global domination. America's real interest in the Tibetan people (or any other people other than American) is zero.
We don't just disagree, Richard. As someone else points out in this conversation, this sort of propaganda is tantamount to holocaust denial. I consider it truly foul. If you intend to continue spreading this sort of disinformation and were honestly offended by my bland response, I can only suggest you grow a thicker skin.
People who discuss human rights abuses should often look in their own backyard. In America, for example, they still have capital punishment, which has been known to quite markedly detract from some people's human rights. Then there's the over two million people incarcerated - more than China - and almost the entire population of Tibet!. The discrimination against black people is just an integral part of life in the USA.
Keep up the good work for human rights, John. I'd start closer to home if I were you.
Chinas 1959 invasion of Tibet caused the deaths of thousands of monks and nuns. My friend lost 10 familly members, including children killed durring the invasion. 600 monasteries containing ancients work of art and literature destroyed.
If you met the Dalai Lama and witness his care for the orphans of Tibet, rather then being influenced by third person conspiracy theorists you would know his sincerity.
Tibet was poor in science and technology but rich in art, philosophy and spirituality. Wether you agree with other s priorities is irellevent, peoples basic rights are trampled. I don't believe the CIA is forcing people to self immolate.
People are amazingly and perhaps wilfully unaware of the fact that most Tibetans were illiterate serfs prior to modern government by the Chinese, and were among other things subject to torture.
And it is a matter of public record that the Dalai Lama has received CIA funding, especially in the early years (google it---there are NYT articles about it).
This doesn't mean the Chinese or the Chinese Communist Party are perfect but many solutions will put Tibet in a much worse position (e.g., with a huge US base in them --- then we'll see how much attention Hollywood pays).
As earlymusicus writes, "Corporations don't give a rip about human rights...", which is the new governing mantra. Freedom and democracy are evaporating into history, as so many past concepts.
I have known personally many Tibetan people, both monks and laity. To suggest that they are engaging in violence in order to return to the 19th century is laughable. You may try to rewrite history, and misrepresent the Tibetans all you like, but the information is out there and available. This is not China yet, and we still have access to the truth.
No one had a lavish lifestyle in Tibet. Some lived better then others.Like everywhere. Monkhood has very strict rules.
Vows of poverty and chastity are taken seriously to this day.
You say monks caused unrest. Who invaded who? Tibetans of all classes only want the "Feudal Theocracy"reins talled, could it have been that harsh and unfair? Tibetans are spiritually oriented. At one time 75% of Tibetans were monks. This caused many material problems for Tibet.
$186,000 a year is chicken feed for International Aid. Get some perspective.
Wether the conditions in Tibet are manufactured or not there has been a massive amount of cultural destruction, much as happened in the Bush2 invasion of Iraq. The US let the museums and Universities be looted because to destroy a culture is to destroy its identity.
On the flip side of the argument, chins need only look at conditions regarding religious intrusion into Gov't to justify their actions. Like it or not the house cleaning must happen in each Gov't's house and not in the coercion of some other other country.
Be clear that China is not an ally of the US or much of the West and their incursion into Asia will not stop at Tibet.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/127184.htm
And the CIA has supposedly only ever acted most honourably when it interferes with the functions of sovereign countries around the world, killing millions of people in coups and other covert actions over recent years and putting their economies into eternal debt to the IMF and others (e.g Indonesia). Don't people know and understand the CIA's agenda?
Meanwhile others who contribute to this site are being accused of parroting Chinese propaganda or members of some anonymous "party" for holding a different view.
The fact is, America's activities and propaganda are subject to increasing scrutiny these days by people in the rest of the world, and what we see is lies and deceit on every front. Wikileaks, anyone?
What is wrong with allowing Tibetans to determine what type of government they want and if the choose a theocracy, so be it, it will have been their choice. Let's not be hypocritical and point the finger at the US for invading Iraq etc to "foster democracy" and then say that it's ok for China to occupy Tibet, since they brought progress to the region. Can we at least be internally consistent?
The truth in Tibet's case is probably neither what China says nor what the Dalai Lama says, but probably somewhere in between. Regardless, I think at this point the Dalai Lama has reached the higher ground: he has never denounced or attacked the Chinese, which cannot be said of the Chinese government.
Sixty years ago the Tibetans lived under a theocracy. Over 90% of people lived with no access to modern medicine, hospitals, schools or electricity, although they were well-versed in spinning prayer wheels. Over the last sixty years, Tibet has changed from a serfdom to a modern and even prosperous society. Life expectancy has changed from thirty years to seventy.
Tibetan "discontent" has been fanned by the American Government and its agencies, with an actively complicit church. It is the Dalai Lama, the monks and exiled Tibetans who promote what is largely the myth of an unhappy and oppressed Tibetan people.
Of course there has been friction as Tibet has been introduced to more Chinese people and modern-day China and the world at large. China spent $2.4 billion on the railway to Lhasa, and current plans involve a $50 billion expenditure on infrastructure. The old establishment of Tibetan monks don't want to see their power base stripped away.
Another myth suggests that there is no religious tolerance in China. There are 100 million adherents to Buddhism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism and Protestantism, some 85,000 places of worship and 300,000 clergy.
Finally if 1,000 years doesn't give any country the right to occupy, can the Indians have their land back, please?
Wow. Talk about propaganda, you've got it covered. If you're not actually a card-carrying member of the C IA you should be granted honorary status by them for happily buying into the dreck they peddle.
Bod Gyalo!