RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "In a Louisiana public school, female students who are suspected of being pregnant are told that they must take a pregnancy test. Under school policy, those who are pregnant or refuse to take the test are kicked out."

Delhi Charter School, in Delhi, Louisiana, a school of 600 students does not believe its female students have a right to education free from discrimination. (photo: Rosmarie Gearhart)
Delhi Charter School, in Delhi, Louisiana, a school of 600 students does not believe its female students have a right to education free from discrimination. (photo: Rosmarie Gearhart)



School Forces Pregnancy Tests

By Tiseme Zegeye, ACLU

07 August 12

 

n a Louisiana public school, female students who are suspected of being pregnant are told that they must take a pregnancy test. Under school policy, those who are pregnant or refuse to take the test are kicked out and forced to undergo home schooling.

Welcome to Delhi Charter School, in Delhi, Louisiana, a school of 600 students that does not believe its female students have a right to education free from discrimination. According to its Student Pregnancy Policy, the school has a right to not only force testing upon girls, but to send them to a physician of the school administration's choice. A positive test result, or failure to take the test at all, means administrators can forbid a girl from taking classes and force her to pursue a course of home study if she wishes to continue her education with the school.

This is in blatant violation of federal law and the U.S. Constitution.

Today, the ACLU of Louisiana and the ACLU Women's Rights Project asked Delhi Charter School to immediately suspend this discriminatory and illegal policy.

The policy's complete disregard for Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education programs and activities, is astonishing. Title IX and its regulations explicitly mandate that schools cannot exclude any student from an education program or activity, "including any class or extracurricular activity, on the basis of such student's pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy or recovery therefrom."

Besides violating Title IX, the policy is also in violation of the Constitution's due process right to procreate, and equal protection: it treats female students differently from male students and relies on archaic stereotypes linked to sex and pregnancy.

Approximately 70 percent of teen girls who give birth leave school, due in part to illegal discrimination. Schools should be supporting pregnant and parenting teens that face numerous barriers to completing their education, not illegally excluding them from school. The ACLU's Women's Rights Project protects the rights of pregnant and parenting teens through advocacy, education, and litigation, working to combat the push-out of pregnant and parenting teens from school.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+10 # Susan1989 2012-08-07 07:46
This sounds pretty horrific. Equally troubling is that ourb country has such a high rate of teenage pregnancy which robs them of choices early in life..and leads to poverty for them and their children. More time needs to be spent educating young women regarding birth control...as well as the consequences for them if they become teenage mothers. I suspect that many of these young women view pregnancy as some form of statis in a world where they don't see much of a future for themselves. Possibly the school is attempting to stop the tendency in high schools for pregnant teens in high school to become role models.
 
 
+25 # Citizen Mike 2012-08-07 08:56
Don't you understand, pregnancy is your punishment for having sex! This is ORWELL'S ANTI-SEX LEAGUE come true. In the novel 1984 they went door to door asking folks to sign a celibacy pledge.

Why have we not clearly labelled and targeted for ridicule the ANTI-SEX REPUBLICANS? Their objections to Choice, obstruction of women's health care services, demands for Abstinence Education, campaign against Planned Parenthood, and attempts to restrict access to contraception are all on one thread. It is ANTI-SEX-ISM and if we clearly identify it as such, the public will reject it because...peopl e like to have sex!

Time to unravel it and expose this entire anti-sex campaign for what it is, PURITANISM. And to link it with all that other nonsense, the science denial and free-market myths, out there in the Alternate Reality of the Far Right.
 
 
+16 # jwb110 2012-08-07 09:02
The Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of religion. Unfortunately it doesn't guarantee the freedom "from" religion.
 
 
+12 # MJnevetS 2012-08-07 12:08
Actually, it does guarantee freedom FROM religion in the 'establishment clause'. In Everson v. Board of Education (1947) Justice Hugo Black held the "establishment of religion" clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the federal government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion. Neither a state nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect "a wall of separation between church and State."

So YES our CONSTITUTION DOES PROTECT us FROM RELIGION (despite what some right-wingers would like to profess!)
 
 
+13 # 666 2012-08-07 09:36
The author writes "Schools should be supporting pregnant and parenting teens ... not illegally excluding them from school."

Well, this assumes that the purpose of school is "education"... unfortunately it's not: the purpose of school is to enforce conformity and obedience to the ruling elite and -- if kids stay in school -- to get the minimum amount of education needed for their minimum wage jobs...

Remember "the tallest blade of grass [in this case, perhaps, "the roundest"] is the first one cut down."

Repeat after me students: "I pledge allegiance to the lords of the Wall Streets of America, and to the fascists with whom they stand, neglecting reason under god with slavery and injustice for all."
 
 
+19 # Glen 2012-08-07 09:47
It is always the girls! Always. It is the girls who get punished and humiliated publicly, while the guys walk, unless one of them just happens to be from a home that taught responsibility, which usually would mean he would make sure there would be no pregnancy.

Until societies train their boys, as well as girls, to be responsible rather than indifferent, this humiliation will continue, and girls will always carry the burden of not only raising the child but also attempting to rid herself and her conscience of that humiliation.

We are speaking about minors here, so why aren't the parents involved other than mentioning home schooling? Certainly, not all these girls have good parents, but surely most would be notified according to law.

Some serious education should be called for, but yes, religious folks would rather humiliate a girl than assist in her learning to take care of herself.
 
 
+7 # MJnevetS 2012-08-07 12:10
Quoting Glen:
It is always the girls! Always.

Not true. I'm sure the school policy applies to any boys who get pregnant as well. That IS equal protection!

(P.S.: This IS humor, see my legal comments, above)
 
 
+3 # Glen 2012-08-07 15:55
Ha. I gotcha. It would truly be funny if it weren't so serious for girls. I do think this will be challenged.

Guys getting pregnant would be great for a real lesson, however. Some schools issue robot babies that cry to be fed at various times during the day and night or cry to have the diaper changed. My school was one of them. It is a true test of infant care. The crying stopped only when the bottle was applied or diaper changed. BUT only girls were given the babies. Never the boys. Typical.
 
 
+12 # panhead49 2012-08-07 13:48
And how about paternity tests for all the guys at this school - seems only fair. When their football teams all get benched for a season this policy will change so fast you'll get whiplash.

Yeah, yeah, I know - pregnant cheerleaders are easy to replace. But now you get yourself a big ol' corn fed line backer (or 6) and it'll be 'well heck, they was just a sowin' their wild oats - and your daughter is a ho'.
 
 
+4 # 666 2012-08-07 19:33
panhead - good idea, but maybe those mandatory paternity tests ought to include the teachers, administrators and preachers
 
 
0 # Glen 2012-08-08 03:54
And very often fathers and uncles.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN