Excerpt: "Repeal Obamacare and replace it with the much more efficient single-payer, everybody in, nobody out, free choice of doctor and hospital."
Ralph Nader. (photo: unknown)
21 Ways Canada's Single-Payer System Beats Obamacare
01 December 13
Canadian style single-payer healthcare is simple, affordable, comprehensive and universal�dream on, America.
ear America:
Costly complexity is baked into Obamacare. No health insurance system is without problems but Canadian style single-payer full Medicare for all is simple, affordable, comprehensive and universal.
In the early 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson enrolled 20 million elderly Americans into Medicare in six months. There were no websites. They did it with index cards!
Below please find 21 Ways the Canadian Health Care System is Better than Obamacare.
Repeal Obamacare and replace it with the much more efficient single-payer, everybody in, nobody out, free choice of doctor and hospital.
Love, Canada
Number 21:
In Canada, everyone is covered automatically at birth � everybody in, nobody out.
In the United States, under Obamacare, 31 million Americans will still be uninsured by 2023 and millions more will remain underinsured.
Number 20:
In Canada, the health system is designed to put people, not profits, first.
In the United States, Obamacare will do little to curb insurance industry profits and will actually enhance insurance industry profits.
Number 19:
In Canada, coverage is not tied to a job or dependent on your income � rich and poor are in the same system, the best guaranty of quality.
In the United States, under Obamacare, much still depends on your job or income. Lose your job or lose your income, and you might lose your existing health insurance or have to settle for lesser coverage.
Number 18:
In Canada, health care coverage stays with you for your entire life.
In the United States, under Obamacare, for tens of millions of Americans, health care coverage stays with you for as long as you can afford your share.
Number 17:
In Canada, you can freely choose your doctors and hospitals and keep them. There are no lists of �in-network� vendors and no extra hidden charges for going �out of network.�
In the United States, under Obamacare, the in-network list of places where you can get treated is shrinking � thus restricting freedom of choice � and if you want to go out of network, you pay for it.
Number 16:
In Canada, the health care system is funded by income, sales and corporate taxes that, combined, are much lower than what Americans pay in premiums.
In the United States, under Obamacare, for thousands of Americans, it�s pay or die � if you can�t pay, you die. That�s why many thousands will still die every year under Obamacare from lack of health insurance to get diagnosed and treated in time.
Number 15:
In Canada, there are no complex hospital or doctor bills. In fact, usually you don�t even see a bill.
In the United States, under Obamacare, hospital and doctor bills will still be terribly complex, making it impossible to discover the many costly overcharges.
Number 14:
In Canada, costs are controlled. Canada pays 10 percent of its GDP for its health care system, covering everyone.
In the United States, under Obamacare, costs continue to skyrocket. The U.S. currently pays 18 percent of its GDP and still doesn�t cover tens of millions of people.
Number 13:
In Canada, it is unheard of for anyone to go bankrupt due to health care costs.
In the United States, under Obamacare, health care driven bankruptcy will continue to plague Americans.
Number 12:
In Canada, simplicity leads to major savings in administrative costs and overhead.
In the United States, under Obamacare, complexity will lead to ratcheting up administrative costs and overhead.
Number 11:
In Canada, when you go to a doctor or hospital the first thing they ask you is: �What�s wrong?�
In the United States, the first thing they ask you is: �What kind of insurance do you have?�
Number 10:
In Canada, the government negotiates drug prices so they are more affordable.
In the United States, under Obamacare, Congress made it specifically illegal for the government to negotiate drug prices for volume purchases, so they remain unaffordable.
Number 9:
In Canada, the government health care funds are not profitably diverted to the top one percent.
In the United States, under Obamacare, health care funds will continue to flow to the top. In 2012, CEOs at six of the largest insurance companies in the U.S. received a total of $83.3 million in pay, plus benefits.
Number 8:
In Canada, there are no necessary co-pays or deductibles.
In the United States, under Obamacare, the deductibles and co-pays will continue to be unaffordable for many millions of Americans.
Number 7:
In Canada, the health care system contributes to social solidarity and national pride.
In the United States, Obamacare is divisive, with rich and poor in different systems and tens of millions left out or with sorely limited benefits.
Number 6:
In Canada, delays in health care are not due to the cost of insurance.
In the United States, under Obamacare, patients without health insurance or who are underinsured will continue to delay or forgo care and put their lives at risk.
Number 5:
In Canada, nobody dies due to lack of health insurance.
In the United States, under Obamacare, many thousands will continue to die every year due to lack of health insurance.
Number 4:
In Canada, an increasing majority supports their health care system, which costs half as much, per person, as in the United States. And in Canada, everyone is covered.
In the United States, a majority � many for different reasons � oppose Obamacare.
Number 3:
In Canada, the tax payments to fund the health care system are progressive � the lowest 20 percent pays 6 percent of income into the system while the highest 20 percent pays 8 percent.
In the United States, under Obamacare, the poor pay a larger share of their income for health care than the affluent.
Number 2:
In Canada, the administration of the system is simple. You get a health care card when you are born. And you swipe it when you go to a doctor or hospital. End of story.
In the United States, Obamacare�s 2,500 pages plus regulations (the Canadian Medicare Bill was 13 pages) is so complex that then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said before passage �we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.�
Number 1:
In Canada, the majority of citizens love their health care system.
In the United States, the majority of citizens, physicians, and nurses prefer the Canadian type system � single-payer, free choice of doctor and hospital , everybody in, nobody out.
For more information see Single Payer Action.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
It's not like he wasn't using the power of his position to take advantage of the poor around the would. You can be naive all you want, but that bartard had to go. Because of his money and power, it took the powerful and their money to take him down. I hope they keep on doing it to each. I assume you don't think what we have elected is the MAFIA.
Christine Lagarde, is highly educated and has held VERY BIG positions both in France and also here in America. She was head of a big US corporation a short time ago. She was called back to France to become Finance minister.
I have seen her both on Charlie Rose's program and also on Fareed Zakaria's several times. She is one very smart likable lady, and of course extremely intelligent. Before too long she may be President of France.
This confirms my feeling that we should have more cabable women in these high positions. There would be far less stupid scandals like the DSK, for women who are in high position don't behave in the way men in similar positions do.
These men feel entitled to go after any woman just because they are powerful.
The list of them is too long to write here. But we all know an awful lot of them.
So send in the women.
of
The list of them is too long to write here. But we all know an awful lot of them. So send in the women."
The powerful women seem to be immune to an illness that has afflicted so many men: The Alpha Male Syndrome". It is not just like those men feel entitled to go after any woman, they cannot abstain from it. Testosterone takes over the brain. That's why I call it a disease.
"ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY"
It is a WOMAN, who may very well save Europe from total financial disaster... Angela Merkel.
And our own secretary of state, Hillary is certainly doing a fine job...as well as any man. Madeline Albright was extremely cabable when she was sec. of state. Not to mention a number of smart female governors.
Chritiane Amanpour is only one of a long list of bright courageous, intelligent reporters.
So can the talk of eunuchs, Call in the women. Boy it is obvious I am the only woman commeting on this article.
You obviously have done some readen, for you are right, some of them eunuch were conniving little,some not so little schnooks....Tha t was funny.
You know John I pertnear called you a male chauvenist pig, in my "righteous"ange r. But I thought better of it and contained myself.ha,ha.
The New York hotel where the Dominique Strauss-Kahn was accused of trying to rape a chambermaid on Sunday issued a point-by-point denial of claims that the former French presidential favourite was set up as part of a grand conspiracy to discredit him. '
----------------------------------------
Well, maybe we have more than one conspiracy going on here. The conspiracy to try an repair this pig dirty little legacy. Trying to prove there was a conspiracy to discredit DSK is going to be harder than trying to prove the rape case against him.
I always thought that DSK was kind of an egomaniac. That said, he lives in a world of egomaniacs and his brand of egomania would stem the tide of Sarkozy ideologies. The world is not black and white. To believe it is is naive and makes every persons life a potential political football.
The "Inconsistensie s" in MS Diallo's testimony were many more than the couple of very minor ones mentioned here. She had lied about a lot of things. Great sums of money in her bank account, and a lot of lies, that made it hard for the police to believe her. (I followed it)
Something else is a little difficult to understand. MS Diallo is a tall woman, 5' 10 and strongly built, Kahn is a small man and he was naked. I would think she would be able to, either escape or fight him off,
I do not think, as some do, that a woman "asked for it" I am just puzzled for the reasons I just mentioned.
DSK was always a rutting porker!
Besides, even les socialistes would have
had a most difficult campaign explaining why they would allow a pig dedicated to destroying social safety nets all over the planet as IMF policy to represent them. And if it had been a plot I can assure you the French are smart enough to have waited until he was the annointed candidate before springing a trap knowing full well the fat old satyr would provide ample opportunities