Lennon writes: "Surely the voice of the 'sensible center' would ask to stop all hydraulic fracturing so that our water, our lives and our planet could be protected and preserved for generations to come."
Sean Lennon and his girlfriend, Charlotte Kemp Muhl. (photo: NPR)
Destroying Precious Land for Gas
28 August 12
N the northern tip of Delaware County, N.Y., where the Catskill Mountains curl up into little kitten hills, and Ouleout Creek slithers north into the Susquehanna River, there is a farm my parents bought before I was born. My earliest memories there are of skipping stones with my father and drinking unpasteurized milk. There are bald eagles and majestic pines, honeybees and raspberries. My mother even planted a ring of white birch trees around the property for protection.
A few months ago I was asked by a neighbor near our farm to attend a town meeting at the local high school. Some gas companies at the meeting were trying very hard to sell us on a plan to tear through our wilderness and make room for a new pipeline: infrastructure for hydraulic fracturing. Most of the residents at the meeting, many of them organic farmers, were openly defiant. The gas companies didn't seem to care. They gave us the feeling that whether we liked it or not, they were going to fracture our little town.
In the late '70s, when Manhattanites like Andy Warhol and Bianca Jagger were turning Montauk and East Hampton into an epicurean Shangri-La for the Studio 54 crowd, my parents, John Lennon and Yoko Ono, were looking to become amateur dairy farmers. My first introduction to a cow was being taught how to milk it by hand. I'll never forget the realization that fresh milk could be so much sweeter than what we bought in grocery stores. Although I was rarely able to persuade my schoolmates to leave Long Island for what seemed to them an unreasonably rural escapade, I was lucky enough to experience trout fishing instead of tennis lessons, swimming holes instead of swimming pools and campfires instead of cable television.
Though my father died when I was 5, I have always felt lucky to live on land he loved dearly; land in an area that is now on the verge of being destroyed. When the gas companies showed up in our backyard, I felt I needed to do some research. I looked into Pennsylvania, where hundreds of families have been left with ruined drinking water, toxic fumes in the air, industrialized landscapes, thousands of trucks and new roads crosshatching the wilderness, and a devastating and irreversible decline in property value.
Natural gas has been sold as clean energy. But when the gas comes from fracturing bedrock with about five million gallons of toxic water per well, the word "clean" takes on a disturbingly Orwellian tone. Don't be fooled. Fracking for shale gas is in truth dirty energy. It inevitably leaks toxic chemicals into the air and water. Industry studies show that 5 percent of wells can leak immediately, and 60 percent over 30 years. There is no such thing as pipes and concrete that won't eventually break down. It releases a cocktail of chemicals from a menu of more than 600 toxic substances, climate-changing methane, radium and, of course, uranium.
New York is lucky enough to have some of the best drinking water in the world. The well water on my family's farm comes from the same watersheds that supply all the reservoirs in New York State. That means if our tap water gets dirty, so does New York City's.
Gas produced this way is not climate-friendly. Within the first 20 years, methane escaping from within and around the wells, pipelines and compressor stations is 105 times more powerful a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. With more than a tiny amount of methane leakage, this gas is as bad as coal is for the climate; and since over half the wells leak eventually, it is not a small amount. Even more important, shale gas contains one of the earth's largest carbon reserves, many times more than our atmosphere can absorb. Burning more than a small fraction of it will render the climate unlivable, raise the price of food and make coastlines unstable for generations.
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, when speaking for "the voices in the sensible center," seems to think the New York State Association of County Health Officials, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the New York State Nurses Association and the Medical Society of the State of New York, not to mention Dr. Anthony R. Ingraffea's studies at Cornell University, are "loud voices at the extremes." The mayor's plan to "make sure that the gas is extracted carefully and in the right places" is akin to a smoker telling you, "Smoking lighter cigarettes in the right place at the right time makes it safe to smoke."
Few people are aware that America's Natural Gas Alliance has spent $80 million in a publicity campaign that includes the services of Hill and Knowlton - the public relations firm that through most of the '50s and '60s told America that tobacco had no verifiable links to cancer. Natural gas is clean, and cigarettes are healthy - talk about disinformation. To try to counteract this, my mother and I have started a group called Artists Against Fracking.
My father could have chosen to live anywhere. I suspect he chose to live here because being a New Yorker is not about class, race or even nationality; it's about loving New York. Even the United States Geological Survey has said New York's draft plan fails to protect drinking water supplies, and has also acknowledged the likely link between hydraulic fracturing and recent earthquakes in the Midwest. Surely the voice of the "sensible center" would ask to stop all hydraulic fracturing so that our water, our lives and our planet could be protected and preserved for generations to come.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
You are entirely correct about the propaganda. It makes me ill to see the difference between the truth and the propaganda. J Goebbels, Hitlers minister of propaganda, said that if you tell a lie often enough... people will start to believe you.
For your own health and well being, see the film, "Gasland". You can pick it up off of Amazon.com for a song. Buy it and show it to as many people as possible. Arrange for a showing at your local library. This is a film that must be seen by everyone.
They're trying to rape our land.
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
It seems incredible that human beings could be so abysmally stupid and short-sighted. Unfortunately, Albert Einstein was right when he said "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." And Seneca, when he said that, for greed, all Nature is too small.
It's not all just about us, us, us, us. Or now, now, now, now. There is what has been bequeathed to us, but above all, there is our duty to our children, and to theirs.
Are we all slaves, that we should put up with the new feudal order imposed by corporate power? Where's this much-vaunted American freedom?
Underfoot??? Forgotten???
Our posterity will spit on our graves and curse our memory, and they will be right.
Bumper stickers? Anyone?
Our water, our lives, are in the balance.
Nice editorial Sean. We miss your father.
> Former Beatle John Lennon, one of the greatest icons of the 1960s peace movement, became a right-wing Republican and big fan of Ronald Reagan during the final years of his life, according to a man who worked as an assistant for Lennon and his wife Yoko Ono.
Most regular people in America seem completely taken in by the PR industry whose function it is to put a happy face on the 0.01%.
So, because you found something via a google search it must be true right?
You can find anything to "prove" any position these days by doing a google search. This proves nothing. For example, i did the google search as you suggested and came up with the following:
http://www.thenation.com/blog/161751/john-lennon-not-closet-republican#
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/19/1093011/-John-Lennon-a-Closet-Republican-Yeah-right
Why is this "source" any less reliable than something said by a guy who was convicted of stealing Lennon's stuff, including his diaries, with the intent to profit from his death? I guess you trust Fox News' "fair and balanced" sources as well. Sad.
Thank you for the work you're doing instead of yachting!
Does that make him more believable?
And this political activism is funny since it comes only a time when their own selfish interests are at stake, never mind anyone else. Their own little birch tree encircled property is going to have a big pipeline through it and now they want our help so we feel sympathetic, all the while this 0.01% group has been quiet and uncritical of fracking all over everywhere else.
I find this pathetic.
Do you guys really think all the people who make liberal sounds in the media are liberal? They do it to appeal to the 99% and have consultants and agents that they pay very handsomely to craft a positive image.
If you just want to be lied to fine, but do not think you are doing the liberal cause any good with your eyes closed and head in the ground! Please!
The system is the way it is because most of it is like this, hidden and psychologically crafted to fool the 99%. By giving me negative votes you are just proving my point.
Do you honestly believe that Sean Lennon selected the photo above the headline of this article? Now THAT kind of simplistic thinking is what I consider pathetic.
P
Winning against these monsters is what counts. Winning is done by research personal involvement, good planning, smart intelligible science and real good lawyers. There is danger all the way though a campaign. Physical by threatened workers whose bosses whip them into frenzies. This fear can be countered remember Judy Bari, Rachael Corrie. Stand firm. Energy companies lie constantly about the good effects of money in some outsiders pocket cause they never hire many 'locals' and most of the ones they do hire are spying on you. Remember if you are in an energy state they will black ball you if you win. They have the FBI DEA ATF Homeland Security and crime strike forces and they will be visiting so recruit local cops,they drink water. Elect suitable sheriffs who will not be bought off, we hope. Follow and know what their operators are up to photograph and publish their dirty dealings. Watch your county commissioners ensure one term for the people who sell you out. Don't trust the Media and hang onto your hair.
Anyone making bumper stickers?
People need to be educated ASAP about this
because these companies are working very aggressively AND convincing people that fracking is clean.
Im thankful that more people like Sean Lennon are speaking up about it and trying to make people fight it with everything they can.
Thank you Sean and all the Lennons.
Your story is very touching and calls to mind my late father, former editor of the NY Daily News, Micheal J. O'Neill, a great journalist and a great fan of your father's music as well. My dad would be mortified, if not at all surprised, to learn about the powerful bright people working at fooling the public about supposed net benefits of fracking, to see all the money driving misleading ads and twisted messages; but I think he'd also see a great story in the groundswell of opposition rising among the "hoi polloi" – not to mention your own story within all of this.
My path to this page has been an interesting journey and I hope I can be of help to you and your Mom and all the wonderful people coming together to try to slow and stop the powerful moneyed momentum continually extending our tiring age of pollution based economics and general ignorance of "Natural Capitalism".
I was lucky to have met you and your beautiful Mom, albeit briefly, separately, at Sun Studios in NYC, and now, conveniently, I work for an environmental technology company with high tech laser organic-substan ce sensors that may be useful to your mission at some point. I'll see if I can get some of our gear involved (on a charity basis) if it should prove, even potentially, to be of any help....
Cheers and good luck, Kevin
It is called "FLow"...
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-05-23/european-fracking-bans-open-market-for-u-dot-s-dot-gas-exports
The other problem, though, is that we should not be burning fossil fuels at all now. Natural gas is so 1990s. Assuming in 1992 that we had a coherent and sensible energy policy, I actually invested in a natural gas index fund (I didn't know about fracking), and then sold my shares when "mission accomplished" was announced in 2003. Figured the oil would start flowing...Anywa y, the people making our energy policy seem determined to burn all of the fossil fuels first, THEN develop renewable energy. Completely a$$-backwards.
RSS feed for comments to this post