RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Hightower writes: "In more and more areas across America, families are discovering to their astonishment that their 'water' has turned combustible. Rather than metaphysical, however, the force behind this fiery phenomenon is all too human."

Texas' progressive political curmudgeon, Jim Hightower. (photo: JimHightower.com)
Texas' progressive political curmudgeon, Jim Hightower. (photo: JimHightower.com)



What the Frack!?!

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown

11 July 12

 

hether you're religious or not, seeing flames coming out of your kitchen faucet would be enough to make you fall to your knees, fearing that a cosmic force of incomprehensible evil is loose on our land.

In more and more areas across America, families are discovering to their astonishment that their "water" has turned combustible. Rather than metaphysical, however, the force behind this fiery phenomenon is all too human, and we can even put a name on it: Dick Cheney. His is, after all, the picture-perfect face of snarling political evil, and while you had probably hoped that we'd seen the last of him when he left office three years ago, his presence still looms--including in the form of flaming faucets.

Those flames come straight from behind-the-scenes maneuvers that Cheney began right at the very start of his vice presidency to achieve a personal legislative goal, which he finally did by inserting this arcane bit of language into the 2005 Bush-Cheney energy policy bill: "Paragraph (1) of section 1421(d) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300h (d)) is amended... [to exclude] the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities." With that, Dick Cheney fracked us.

Hydraulic fracturing--commonly known in the natural gas drilling industry as "fracking"--is as coarse as it sounds. It's a mining technique for forcing gas (or oil) out of underground rock formations, in particular gas contained within layers of shale rock that generally lie from 5,000 to 20,000 feet beneath Earth's surface. Here's how it's done: (1) a borehole is drilled down to the shale; (2) a pipe is then cemented into the hole to allow millions of gallons of fracking fluid (water and sand slurry laced with nearly 600 chemicals; of those, 71 can cause 10 or more ailments) to be shot under extremely-high pressure straight down the pipe into the shale rock to crack it apart and prop it open; (3) with the shale fractured, the gas that was trapped in it will naturally seek the easiest path to the surface. Drillers intend for that path to be up the drill hole into their storage tanks, but the gas can have a mind of its own, often escaping like a fugitive into local aquifers or into the air. Stuff happens.

"When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty." ----Dayne Pratzky, an Australian resident whose life was turned upside down by corporate gas frackers, turning him into an inspirational anti-fracking leader.

Stuff like gas ending up in the area's drinking water--leading to such unpleasant surprises as faucets of flame. This tends to upset people, prompting them to action. Thus, to save gas drillers from pesky regulators and bothersome legal liabilities under our Safe Drinking Water Act, the ever-helpful Cheney simply exempted them from the law. Neat.

[FLASHBACK: Aside from his general snarliness and autocratic wickedness, one reason for the Veep's hand-holding attentiveness to the industry is that he has been a central player in it. Prior to becoming George W's vice, he was CEO of Halliburton--a conglomerate that pioneered fracking and is now the industry's number one fracker, hauling in $1.5 billion a year for such destructive drilling work. Halliburton honchos were on Cheney's secret industry task force that he convened in only his second week in office to rewrite the national energy policy. Even while serving as VP, Dick continued drawing annual paychecks from the giant, totaling more than a million dollars from 2001 through 2005! So, not for nothing is his little amendment to our water safety law dubbed "The Halliburton Loophole."]

Maybe you think this doesn't affect you, because you don't see any fracking where you live, but there's a good chance that you soon will, because profiteering drillers have caught a gold rush fever over shale gas. Huge swaths of our landscape are above known deposits--from Los Angeles to New York State (see map)-- and more are being found as corporations go for the gold. President Obama and assorted governors have gone all-in to back this wealth of gas (and the tax revenues it might produce), with Obama gushing in a January speech that the US is "the Saudi Arabia of natural gas."

A fracking Obamination

Despite losing their trusted Washington friend Dick Cheney, gas frackers are doing awfully well these days with their supposed "enemy" Barack Obama. ... [read more]

Fracking operations (benignly called "plays" in industry parlance) are already underway in 34 states, not only in remote rural areas, but also in suburbs and cities. Drillers are now pushing technologies to cause larger fractures in the subterranean rock, intending to extract more than half of America's natural gas from shale plays by the end of this decade.

Problems

Natural gas is being touted by the industry and its tail-wagging politicos as clean and cheap--the "magic bullet" for our energy problems. Before we swallow such hype, however, let's just note that the process is named "fracturing" for a reason--it's inherently destructive, dirty--and way more costly than the market price of the fuel admits.

WATER. Up to seven million gallons of water are needed to frack a single well. In areas of shortages and drought (increasing in scale and frequency all across our country), this volume alone is a problem, taking a precious resource away from public use so a few profit-seeking corporations can shatter underground rock. Also, getting water to the wells from distant sources requires trucking or pipelines, which create their own sets of environmental, public nuisance, and other costs. Then there's wastewater. One well can recover more than a million gallons of the water shot down its pipe. It comes back up contaminated not only with heavy doses of chemicals that were added to the fracking fluid, but also with cancer-causing chemicals and radioactive elements that occur naturally deep in the Earth, surfacing as a result of the fracking process.

Where does this radioactive mess go? Some of it leaks from the well and gets into drinking water supplies. Some is spilled on-site. Some is actually sprayed on roads as a de-icer--and at least half is merrily trucked to municipal sewage plants that are ill-equipped to purify it, meaning the nasties are discharged into our rivers and lakes.

CHEMICALS. The industry makes light of the chemical cocktail in frack- ing fluid, saying that the toxic stuff is a mere one-half of one percent of the mix, with the rest consisting of water and sand. Sounds benign--except that the 0.5 percent figure equals 20 tons of chemicals per million gallons of fracking fluid (again, up to seven million gallons of fracking fluid per well).

Okay, scoff the frackers, but those "scary" chemicals are substances like guar gum, an emulsifier used in ice cream--so worry not. Yeah, ice cream from hell! To keep microbes earthborne from devouring the guar gum, it has to be dosed with poisonous biocides. Then, to thin the emulsifier later in the process, it is treated with a form of extremely toxic kerosene (a substance that families in fracking areas say they smell and taste in their air and water--and a possible source of those pyrotechnic faucets).

Among the cancer-causing and environmental toxins mixed into fracking fluid are acrylamide, benzene, naphthalene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene. In addition, the deep-earth contaminants brought to the surface in wastewater include arsenic, lead, chromium, barium, and strontium (plus radium-226 and other radioactive materials). A 2011 scientific analysis of 632 chemicals used in natural gas operations found that 25 percent can cause cancer; 37 percent can disrupt the endocrine system; more than 40 percent can affect the brain (as well as nervous, immune, and cardiovascular systems); and more than 75 percent can impair the eyes, intestines, and respiratory system.

The total horror of this river of toxics is not known, because (1) our state and federal "regulators" consider the concoction used in any particular frack job to be secret corporate property, and (2) many of the chemicals used have not even been tested for their health and environmental risks, and the corporations themselves don't bother tracking all of the proprietary components they use. Also, as the New York Times reported last year, the EPA and some state regulators have ruled that [prepare to gasp] since many sewage plants are unable to cope with the radioactive elements in fracking wastewater (some of it containing more than 1,000 times levels considered safe), the plants should simply not test the wastewater for radioactivity. Voila, problem solved!

"Fracking" by Any Other Name...

You'll be pleased to know that academics at such public-spirited institutions as Louisiana State University are dealing with the problem of fracking. The problem with the word, that is. ... [read more]

HEALTH. In heavily fracked locations--from Pennsylvania to Wyoming --repeated "no-drink" warnings have been issued by the EPA and other agencies because of such sickening by-products as methane and fracking fluid migrating into water wells. Also, methane releases from drilling not only add immensely to the global increase in climate change, but they pollute the air with asthma-causing smog. For example, a six-county region of Texas with heavy fracking has a startling 25 percent asthma rate for young children. "It's ruining us," says a mother who has two children severely affected by chemicals from a gas well near their home. "I'm not an activist, an alarmist, a Democrat, environmentalist, or anything like that," she told the Times. "I'm just a person who isn't able to manage the health of my family because of all this drilling."

Then there are blowouts and explosions, as well as euphemistically phrased "micro-seismic events" (otherwise known as earthquakes). Messing so massively with geological formations literally turns out to be earthshaking, including in such normally stable places as Youngstown, Ohio, Oklahoma (50 events), and Arkansas.

ECONOMICS. "Picky-picky," barks the industry. Such troubles are merely the price of economic prosperity. But prosperity for whom? When entering a region, fracking flimflammers specialize in Enron-style lies, grossly overstating the number of jobs that will be created and just as grossly understating the economic losses.

To start with, not many jobs come with fracking. Those that do are short-lived (lasts about a year), and the high-paying jobs go to transient, out-of-state workers with specialized skills, not to locals. On the other side of the ledger, such reliable industries as farming and tourism suffer severe bodyblows--polluted air, water, and soil are not a plus for growing and marketing crops or livestock, and the whang and blight of gas wells are not attractive lures for travelers seeking scenic places for recreation and relaxation.

Also, there's a dirty little secret hiding behind all the fast talk about America's boom in natural gas: It's a bust waiting to happen. Extractable deposits may be less than ballyhooed, the costs are increasingly intolerable, and rising public opposition can make politicians and regulators skittish about rolling over for frackers. In addition, America is hardly the only player--corporations are all over Argentina, Australia, Poland, South Africa--and, of course, China--pushing big plays. China anticipates overtaking the US in shale gas production as soon as 2015. Amazingly, our government is helping them, having signed a US-China Shale Gas Initiative in 2009 to help foster China's technical expertise in fracking.

Who's Who?

There are some 14,000 natural gas companies, but more than half of US production is controlled by the 40 biggest corporations, and a third of it is in the hands of the top 10. More than 90 percent of the gas wells in our country are fracked.

Biggest of all is Exxon Mobil, the $486 billion-a-year colossus that is America's most profitable corporation. In 2010, Exxon swallowed XTO Energy (then our nation's second-largest gas producer) to become Number One, with 50 percent more drilling production than its nearest competitor. Other brand-name biggies fracking America are BP, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips.

In various regions, however, local folks find themselves confronting so-called "independents," with names most of us never heard of. Industry PR materials portray these as mom-and-pop drillers--but while they're not Exxon-sized, they're huge corporations, including Anadarko ($14 billion), Chesapeake Energy ($11.6 billion), EnCana ($8.5 billion), Southwestern Energy ($2.9 billion), and Williams ($7.9 billion). Add to this trillion dollar-amalgamation of corporate power the massive outfits that do the fracking and that profit from providing other services to the top 10, such as Halliburton ($24.8 billion), and the reliable polluting profiteer Koch Industries ($110 billion).

These same brutes are energetically fracturing America's governmental landscape, using high-pressure bursts of toxic corporate dollars to bust up the system so public mining policy flows their way. Common Cause reported last December that the fracking industry had invested $20.5 million in campaign donations to current members of Congress and spent almost three-quarters of a billion dollars on national lobbying during the past decade.

They have poured many millions more into front groups and PR campaigns, including creating their own fracking front dubbed "Energy In Depth." Pretending to be a spontaneous outpouring of grassroots folks concerned about overzealous regulators trying to shackle poor, beleaguered energy producers, EID was formed in 2009 by the two biggest lobbying consortiums of oil and gas giants and funded by such "folks" as Anadarko, BP, Chevron, EnCana, Halliburton, Shell, and XTO (Exxon).

EID and other flacks for the fracking industry specialize in ruthless attacks on aggrieved homeowners, public interest advocates, critical journalists, and anyone else who raises a peep of protest. At a November 2011 conference of gas-driller PR agents, an Anadarko executive advised them to "Download the [military's] Counterinsurgency Manual, because we're dealing with an insurgency." A spokesman for Range Resources, a big Pennsylvania fracker, told the same conferees that his corporation employs former military psy-ops specialists, because their experiences combatting Middle East terrorist networks help the company overcome angry citizens in America's fracking fields.

It's Everyone's Fight

The fracking of America is a health, environmental, economic, and natural-resource issue rolled into one --but it's really much bigger than all of these. It poses the fundamental issue facing our society today: WHO RULES? Moneyed corporations... or the people? Are we to be a democracy of, by, and for the many, or a plutocracy of a bullying, profiteering few?

At present--unbeknownst to the great majority of Americans who've been kept in the dark about this assault on our communities and democracy-- the moneyed corporations (and their purchased politicians) are ruling. Both the injury and insult of fracking diminishes who we are and what our country represents. That's why this is everyone's fight, whether or not your water faucet has yet caught on fire.



National radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the book, "Swim Against The Current: Even a Dead Fish Can Go With the Flow," Jim Hightower has spent three decades battling the Powers That Be on behalf of the Powers That Ought To Be - consumers, working families, environmentalists, small businesses, and just-plain-folks.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+81 # ER444 2012-07-11 12:22
Does this scare you as much as it scares me? God help us!!!
 
 
+20 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-11 17:46
Look on map and see if you are in the shale area It should scare you it has been happening for almost 20 years and we have been fighting it...where have ya'll been?
 
 
-111 # chirostv 2012-07-11 13:16
Another 4 years of Obama scares me more
 
 
+61 # readerz 2012-07-11 15:05
Fracking didn't start under Obama; you want the alternative Rummy who will take off every regulation of chemicals there is?
 
 
+28 # Todd Williams 2012-07-11 15:10
Give it a break. We all know by now that you hate Obama, Big news.
 
 
+31 # unitedwestand 2012-07-11 18:33
Quoting chirostv:
Another 4 years of Obama scares me more
Why didn't the slimy, sleazy, repugnant (and much more) Cheney/Bush scare you? This is all Cheney's doing. We still to this day don't know who was in that room two weeks after Dick became VP and made these dangerous energy policy deals that enriched him personally..
President Obama has not done enough to thwart some of this and has made concessions I wish he hadn't.
Instead of throwing stones, help up stop this insaneness.
 
 
+20 # dovelane1 2012-07-12 01:26
Cheney is just another symptom of the problem. There would be no Cheney if we didn't have a culture that supported, rationalized, or ignored this kind of behavior.

As long as the only consequence the people in power mainly have to deal with is getting richer, why should they change. At present, any negative consequences are in the future, unless we the people change.

Here's a quote from the Sun magazine: "How would you describe the difference between modern war and modern industry - between, say, bombing and strip mining, or between chemical warfare and chemical manufacturing? The difference seems to be only that in war, the victimization of humans is directly intentional, and in industry, it is accepted as a trade-off."

Fracking is just another form of violence, first to the earth, and eventually to humans. It is based on having power-over others, not having power-with others. To my knowledge, none of the corps mentioned will allow anyone to have power with them. Again, why should they? There are no negative consequences to their decisions.

They rationalize their decisions by focusing on their intentions of bringing more energy to the country, and deny or ignore the consequences, and most peole allow this to happen because we need the energy. Until that changes, nothing else will.
 
 
+1 # Cassandra2012 2012-07-16 13:08
Yes, but it was not 'Obama's' greed but Cheney's and his pals' that got us into this disgusting, repulsive mess!! Credit where credit is due!
 
 
+69 # jlohman 2012-07-11 13:27
This is due to one thing; political corruption. Get used to it, or fix it! Only public funding of campaigns... think it through.
 
 
+55 # Lowflyin Lolana 2012-07-11 13:54
I used to live in Tejas and besides Anne Richards (rest her sassy soul), Jim Hightower is another state treasure.

Hey Jim. Over here in CA they've been fracking for decades and there are no laws about it, no one keeping track of it....people are starting to notice but it's already been going on for years. Plus the frackers have a clever way of saying there's hardly any oil fracking in CA...but it's the natural gas they're fracking here and the method is the same.
 
 
+6 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-11 17:49
We did all read about it years ago and questioned esp when states in North were affected and families having homes blow up.
California I hoped would have been more 'in' against but with Schwarzie lucky you are safe.
Is it near Wine Districts?
 
 
+56 # Lisa Moskow 2012-07-11 14:02
This is the most comprehensive article about fracking that I have ever read.

Thank you!
 
 
+17 # unitedwestand 2012-07-11 18:36
The devil gave us a Dick, the Angels gave us Jim Hightower. This article is a keeper for future info and argument.
 
 
+39 # paulrevere 2012-07-11 14:11
Thank you Jim Hightower for the concise breakdown on this unbelievable practice.

After reading it I felt like I had jumped into some crazy movie written by Rosemary's Baby and directed by Wes Craven.

SHEESH!!
 
 
+57 # Alternative 2012-07-11 14:16
Also note that the world's biggest PR company, Hill & Knowlton, the very same company that worked for the tobacco industry to promote smoking as safe and then the Bushes to promote the Gulf war with it's fictitious incubator babies story, is now working it's magic to promote fracking.

Hill & Knowlton, Monsanto and Goldman Sachs are the real axis of evil.
 
 
+11 # KittatinyHawk 2012-07-11 17:51
Perhaps they should drink the water with the Politicians whose pockets are rich from this
 
 
+1 # Cassandra2012 2012-07-16 13:11
Someone needs to MAKE them drink this water! as in Erin Brockovitch!
 
 
+8 # paulrevere 2012-07-11 20:34
Don't forget the company that has rep'd dictators world wide Burson-Marstell er and whose major exec Mark Penn was a big time strategy advisor of Hillary's.

We live in a money and greed sick country folks...
 
 
+45 # chrisconnolly 2012-07-11 14:31
This terrifies me. Thanks to those republicans that far out strip the mafia or the drug cartels for ruthless policies, egregious actions and law exempting legislation. We the people are going to be poisoned to death for their profit. How can anybody who makes less than $250k a year ever think voting republican will do anybody with a heart any good. How can those who are lucky enough to make $30k a year think republicans are anything but vicious self promoting monsters. Please vote democrat and save our country for another day.
 
 
+52 # genierae 2012-07-11 14:34
Mr. Hightower forgot to mention that the sand needed for fracking is a special kind, and I read recently that much of it is being dug out of the Wisconsin sandhills. This is a beautiful part of Wisconsin, where the famous sandhill cranes are located, and one lady in particular, who bought a lovely farm right before the fracking boom is now surrounded by a wasteland. No one told her that this was coming, and now she can't sell her property, not even to the frackers. We have lost our country to corporations aided by bought-off politicians, and it's not going to be easy to get it back. People don't take kindly being left with polluted air and water, without a cent to show for it. We may be facing something like the old range wars we had in the 19th century. It may be just a matter of time before the shooting starts.
 
 
+36 # readerz 2012-07-11 15:09
It's being dug out of ancient sand quarries in Ohio too: these won't be replaced... ever.

We also have a drought this year in Ohio because the rain is far to the south of us. But fracking is taking millions of gallons of desperately needed water from streams and Lake Erie, away from farms, away from drinking water.
 
 
+35 # readerz 2012-07-11 15:03
I live in Ohio, which is being sold out from under us by the Republican governor Kasich, including parks. Friends in Youngstown have already had an earthquake under their house that cracked many houses in the area; the fracking there wasn't supposed to do that. And there will be more and more fracking in Ohio, and it is exempted from all sorts of regulations. Sure this is scary, we are living it and its consequences already.
 
 
+9 # genierae 2012-07-12 14:18
I too live in Ohio, readerz, I didn't know about the sand being dug here, it must be in a different part of the state. Kasich is a corporate shill that got slapped down once already by Ohioans, but he's opened up state parks for drilling, leased our rest areas to commercial interests, and sold our liquor stores to private business. He's now trying to figure out whether we will sit still for his refusal of Obama's Medicaid plan, I don't think we will. In any case, he has plans to cause us a lot more trouble if he isn't stopped.

The city where I live gave a fracking company a permit to map the ground within the city limits, using those thumper trucks that cause a lot of shaking. Well no one was told, and many people thought it was an earthquake, and one lady got cut by falling pottery. The best part of the story is, the sewer line in the municipal court bldg. ruptured because of it, and sewage flooded the basement where the court records were being temporarily stored. This caused quite a ruckus, as you might guess, with some irate, while at least one took the part of the frackers. I guess he must have some land somewhere outside of town, and is hoping to increase his bank account.

I guess it's better to laugh than cry, but when I think of all that we are losing, I do cry sometimes. We've got to stop these madmen, we cannot allow them to win. You young people had best take heed if you want any kind of future.
 
 
+18 # opit 2012-07-11 15:09
That's a far more comprehensive view than most have. The unreported BP Deepwater Horizon - Corexit horror is being improved by fracking the zone...already unstable sea floor unable to contain the results of Haliburton cementing capped wells. The deepwater oil drilling is still stimulated by tax exemptions on resource depletion. You might have a look at these fracking information resources http://www.ernstversusencana.ca/
http://www.texassharon.com/
http://opitslinkfest.blogspot.com/2009/09/energy.html
http://opitslinkfest.blogspot.com/2009/07/water-wealth-power.html
 
 
+15 # Bigfella 2012-07-11 20:27
THANKS FOR THE RESOURCES WE IN aUSTRALIA ARE RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS FRACKING WAR AND OUR IN LAND IS UNDER THREAT BY IT DUE TO RELIANCE ON GROUND WATER 2/3 OF OUR COUNTRY IN DRY.
 
 
+24 # DurangoKid 2012-07-11 15:12
Feel free to panic. We're in Kunstler's "long emergency". Corporations are going to greater lengths, and expense, to bring to market all the goodies of industrial culture. Yes, it's making quite a mess of your tap water, but hey, isn't it worth it to keep those corporate profits flowing? Cheer up, Bunky! As resources get more scarce and difficult to exploit, Mother Earth will start the healing process with or without us. The plastics will UV degrade, the metals will corrode, the skies will clear, and wildflowers will sprout through the cracks in the interstate highway system. It may take a few centuries, but the Earth will bounce back. All the holes in the ecosystems will be filled in with returning or replacement species. It may be up to a frog or squirrel to say if a skyscraper falls and there's no human to hear it, does it make a sound?
 
 
+7 # Observer 47 2012-07-11 18:52
Assuming that there are any frogs or squirrels left. The way we're going, we'll take all the innocent creatures with us1
 
 
+10 # Bigfella 2012-07-11 20:21
fROGS WORLD WIDE ARE DIEING, SORRY BUT WE ARE ALREADY IN THE S.....
 
 
+32 # michelle 2012-07-11 16:00
The mother of two sick children said, "I'm not an activist, an alarmist, a Democrat, environmentalis t, or anything like that," she told the Times.

It's that mentality that keeps us knee deep in this mess. I wonder if she is comfortable with her position of social apathy. It is time for this woman to step up and be an activist, sound the alarm, work to protect the environment and stop voting for republicans.
 
 
+20 # Susan W 2012-07-11 16:27
I can't believe that I live in a country that thinks it is all right for drinking water to flame!! What kind of unspeakable, greedy, immoral,sub-hum an cretins could think this is acceptable on any level?

And Obama thinks it is fine? Good grief how evil does that man have to be before the scales fall off and the Obots see the light? Maybe they need the illumination of flaming drinking water to light up the dark. Incredible,
 
 
+8 # mdhome 2012-07-12 07:58
Well, do NOT expect Mitt to do anything to harm the energy companies, Obama may not be the best of all possible candidates, BUT the alternative is many times worse.
 
 
0 # Cassandra2012 2012-07-16 13:12
No, Obama doesn't think it's 'fine' (do you work for Faux News or soemthing?) but he sure does not seem to have the power to stop it! If you vote for the Repugs who support this kind of pollution you deserve what you get.
 
 
+29 # MindDoc 2012-07-11 16:32
Best not to forget the other scary and nasty reality, speaking of "flaming faucets" and the pure evil of Cheney & Co. Guess where would-be King Romney is headed to be blessed as the keeper of the faucet flame, his "real people" who can afford $30,000 lunches. Yes, he's heading right to the Cheney ranch! Has Romney no shame (rhetorical) ?
Would he actually deal with the devil? Has he, already?

indeed we should be *very* scared about lurching back to the future feudalism, frisking world of tracking and attacking, the world envisioned by Romney/Cheney, a Frick and Fracking team if ever there was one.

"The company you keep" (or divest overseas where you hide your wealth")? If only people were able to focus, and remember...
And make sure the people awake *resoundingly* to demand that representatives represent their (living, breathing) constituents.

Watch the money. Watch the votes. Know the history. Seek and share the facts. G-d help us all!
 
 
+1 # Bigfella 2012-07-11 20:19
wELL HE'S GOT A NEW HEART!
 
 
0 # Cassandra2012 2012-07-16 13:14
Yes these Repugs lile the Roimbot worship ionly one thing ---MONEY! They do not care about this coutnry or its people , send their money to the Caymans and Bermuda, send American jobs overseas, and do not think they should pay their FAIR SHARE of taxes.
 
 
+18 # Jude Moriarty 2012-07-11 19:18
I lost all respect for MSNBC Dylan Ratigan when he called Josh Fox "Unpatriotic" referring to his documentary film Gasland (on line) which shows the horrors of this environmental assault.


NOTE how all of the corporate owned media are SILENT . Betcha fracking isn't taking place in their exclusive environments.

Once peaceful little towns have HUGE trucks thundering through town day and night. T. Boon Pickens (big investor) LIED on TV about how safe/ this was going on for over a 100 yrs. NOT. Fracking ( I grew up in PA) was vertical - NO massive chemicals.

Entire water tables are being destroyed. I was so disappointed thinking that Pres. Obama would immediately put a STOP to this destruction. Instead he's been on TV praising this practice which I don't think he has a clue about.

You can't repair a poisoned well - or aquifer. This is the BEST article. SEE YOUTube - dangers of fracking - Gasland - Earthquakes where fracking is being done.

Google your state and see (they'll never tell you) if FRACKING is taking place. Imagine this is FREE from ALL Clean Water/Air regulation or oversight.

They will destroy the entire nation(minus land owned by elites). Today massive drought was announced on news (all over nation) yet millions of gallons of water are being taken / FREE. Who do you call. NOT Washington - not your local politicians / ALL are corrupted.
 
 
+3 # mdhome 2012-07-12 08:01
Not all are corrupt, just a majority.
 
 
+13 # Bigfella 2012-07-11 20:18
CSG or Coal Seam Gas is now a world wide problem (Which it wouldnt be if they used old coal mines or dangerous mines for gas) Around the world fracking is destroying ground water and polluting the water tables and artsian basins.
In my area we have above ground open cut coal mines now they want to frack the rest for gas.
This we are told is for clean energy BUT it is being piped 1200kms to a port then frozen into liquifid gas and exported!
THIS IS ENDAGERING THE GREAT BARRIER REEF DUE TO DREDGING AND INCREASED TRAFFIC INSIDE THE REEF ALONG WITH INCREASING THE GREEN HOUSE GASES PRODUCED.
wE MUST UNITE ACROSS THE WORLD AND SLAP THE OIL , GAS, CARBON AWAY FROM DESTROYING OUR PLANET.
IT IS ONLY A STOP GAP MEASURE ANY WAY!
 
 
+9 # dovelane1 2012-07-12 01:33
Sorry to hear about your problems. Wish I/we could do more. It's been written that when one is up to one's ass in alligators, it's hard to focus on one's intention of draining the swamp.

Given the increase in the heat problem, most people that aren't used to it are getting air conditioners, which use way more energy than a fan. They just don't get it - yet.

Most people's attitude is "let there be peace and change on earth, and let it begin with - someone else, say that guy or group over there. But not me, I don't have to change anything.
 
 
+15 # BeaDeeBunker 2012-07-11 22:44
The name Jim Hightower is what makes this expose' of the fracking war so important to us as a nation. Make no mistake, it is a war, and the war is between the frackers and the American people, and they are winning.
I'm surprised that so few comments mention Josh Fox and his film "Gasland."
To those of us who have been keeping up with this issue from the beginning, all the facts presented by Jim are already known. Jim did a great job of writing them all down, and his renown makes them more acceptable to the general public, because, he is indeed a national treasure.
The one thing that I am still confused about is why the Cheney amendment hasn't been fracked out of the freaking Energy bill! I mean if you've got malware messing up the works, you get rid of the malware, right?
To quote: 2005 Bush-Cheney energy policy bill: "Paragraph (1) of section 1421(d) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300h (d)) is amended... [to exclude] the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities."
Why the hell has that been on the books since 2005?
All New Yorkers, send this article to the Governor once a day, every day of the week, because we have one of the few remaining natural aquifers left in the nation, and if NY is fracked, we won't get it back!
 
 
+12 # jlohman 2012-07-12 06:01
The frackers are winning because they own the politicians.
 
 
+10 # tuandon 2012-07-12 04:10
The people who are experiencing this are of the 99%. They, according to Rightwing philosohy, CHOOSE to have their water light up, CHOOSE to live where such things are happening, and CHOOSE not to have enough money to move to the Hamptons or Montgomery County, Pa. where fracking is banned. So too bad for them. Join the 1% or CHOOSE to have flammable water.
 
 
+13 # amiex 2012-07-12 05:50
Thankfully I live in the 'green' state of Vermont! We have it on our books that there will never be any fracking done in our state. Of course, why wouldn't you expect that from the state that sends Bernie Sanders to Congress regularly? I'm SO lucky!
 
 
+5 # mdhome 2012-07-12 08:05
I lovermont.
 
 
+14 # jwb110 2012-07-12 07:38
For example, a six-county region of Texas with heavy fracking has a startling 25 percent asthma rate for young children. "It's ruining us," says a mother who has two children severely affected by chemicals from a gas well near their home. "I'm not an activist, an alarmist, a Democrat, environmentalis t, or anything like that," she told the Times. "I'm just a person who isn't able to manage the health of my family because of all this drilling."

Maybe it is time to change your affiliations in Texas. Become n activist, a Democrat and an environmentalis t if your children's health really mean something to you.
 
 
+5 # Beverly 2012-07-13 10:15
Dear Mr. Hightower --

BRAVO FOR YOU!!! Molly Ivins is up there smiling her great big smile, because she's the one who led me to you!!!! And I know she is now SO PROUD of introducing us!!!
Beverly Smith
 
 
0 # anchor 2012-11-19 06:32
I would like to see more of the benefits of this technology at the pump and on my heating bill. Has any one checked the geology of the mile + which over lies the production zone (the zone being fractured)? This is a huge cushion, and therefore, I don't see why we are wasting our breath and time fighting about hydraulic fracturing (a technology which has been in use for nearly 60 years). If it were a problem we would certainly be seeing many more issues. We are safe using this technology. What may be unsafe and not just for the fracturing part of well construction is the assurance we get that well bore itself is safe. We are relying on the industry for self regulation with independent verification of the integrity of the soundness of the concrete job in the well. This job often gos (in some cases) to the low bidder. We could ask for another independent check to make sure the well bore is indeed sound. If the well bore concrete job is unsound in the upper part of the well then we have problems. Some are blaming this on hydraulic fracturing and not really understanding what is really happening. Hey, maybe a little education wouldn't hurt. Even I don't have all the facts.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN