RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Fang reports: "After a conservative-led revolt against the Farm Bill, a five-year congressional funding program for agricultural and hunger programs, a deal will reportedly reach the president's desk on Friday."

David Koch, executive vice president of Koch Industries, attends an event at The Economic Club of New York. (photo: Mark Lennihan/AP)
David Koch, executive vice president of Koch Industries, attends an event at The Economic Club of New York. (photo: Mark Lennihan/AP)


Farm Bill Cuts $8 Billion in Food Stamps, Preserves Handouts to Koch Industries

By Lee Fang, The Nation

08 February 14

 

fter a conservative-led revolt against the Farm Bill, a five-year congressional funding program for agricultural and hunger programs, a deal will reportedly reach the president's desk on Friday. The final iteration of the bill cuts $8 billion from food stamps, a key demand made by Americans for Prosperity, which aired advertisements and organized opposition to the initial Farm Bill because of the supposed waste of providing food assistance to needy families. Americans for Prosperity is controlled by the billionaire Koch brothers and their cohort. Koch groups claimed the Farm Bill serves "special interests and powerful corporations" over the taxpayers.

Yet, the final funding package contains a number of giveaways that benefit Koch Industries' bottom line:

� Biomass Subsidies: The Farm Bill preserves $881 million in mandatory spending for biomass energy, a program that Koch Industries' timber subsidiary Georgia-Pacific has used to to extract government subsidies. Georgia-Pacific applied and qualified for the Biomass Crop Assistance Program for its facilities in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Georgia, Oregon and Florida. Lobbying reports from Koch Industries show that the company has pressured Congress on the Farm Bill, specifically on the BCAP program. Records also show that Koch Industries executive Deborah Baker asked Department of Agriculture officials to expand BCAP forestry eligibility.

� New Clean Water Act Exemption: The Farm Bill enacts a measure that ensures runoff of pesticides and other chemicals from forestry sites may not be regulated under the Clean Water Act as industrial pollution. The Farm Bill includes an amendment that would define the "EPA's treatment of forestry operations as non-point sources of pollution under the Clean Water Act." A bipartisan group of legislators sponsored the forestry amendment, which Wild Oregon warns will overturn "a recent court ruling that found that pollution originating from active logging roads be treated similarly to other industrial activities." The group says the amendment poses "a serious risk not just to the [Nestucca River], but to countless other rivers and streams in Oregon that have been damaged by poor logging and road building practices." Koch Industries' Georgia-Pacific signed on with other companies in lobbying for this amendment to the Farm Bill.

Koch Industries was also joined by other energy and timber corporations in lobbying for the expansion of biomass energy programs. Timber companies and their trade associations, particularly in the Pacific Northwest, came together to demand the Clean Water Act exemption.

Recipients of food stamps, also known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), had few resources to influence Congress. Although several grocery and convenient store industry groups pushed back against cuts on SNAP, defenders of food stamps were largely outgunned during the debate. Anti-poverty activists say the deep cuts in the food stamp program will amount to a $90 monthly reduction for many families.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+6 # phrixus 2013-03-30 09:11
" In reality, the FDA, the drug companies and the psychiatrists are all working in collusion, knowingly pushing dangerous, deadly drugs onto families for the sole purpose of generating profits. While children suffer and die, they cash in on the ADHD delusion, first by promoting a fictitious disease and then later through high-profit pharmaceutical quackery."

These are VERY serious accusations of criminal misconduct. The article also presents itself with some rather hysterical overtones. I would like to see significant amounts of empirical data supporting your statements before drawing any conclusions.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." ~ Carl Sagan
 
 
+9 # D Duran 2013-03-30 10:15
If you Google "The Citizens Commission on Human Rights" you will find towards the top a link to Wikipedia. The first few sentences say enough: The CCHR was founded in 1969 as an arm of Scientology to fight psychiatry and psychiatrists.
 
 
-5 # shraeve 2013-03-30 14:04
So what? Are we supposed to automatically assume anything associated with Scientology is evil? Psychiatry has done far more damage to human beings than has Scientology.
 
 
+4 # phrixus 2013-03-31 20:26
"CCHR also blames psychiatry for school shootings, the 9/11 attacks on America, the German Holocaust, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Jonestown massacre."

So much for their credibility.
 
 
+7 # 666 2013-03-30 16:29
Frankly this article is a total load of crap; they get RSN to run an anti-ADHD article every 6mos or so (so much for editing). I took these meds, my kids took/take them. If you don't have ADHD, you wouldn't understand (like this author). For many kids, it's the difference between 1) being labelled a disruption and finding oneself on the public-school expressway to prison and 2) living a productive and meaningful life. People who don't have ADHD and who aren't specialists involved with it (and not on the take of religious groups or big pharma) ought to shut up and not criticize those who do and know. I thank god every day that my kids have these meds. it would be interesting to find out how many 3-strikers are suffering something like this...

That said, are there mis-diagnoses? abuses? sure. Is it easy to get these meds? absolutely not. Every year they get more tightly controlled. I'm probably on a watch list just because I get these for my kids (no shit)... (and that's from a pharmacy with an rx)...
 
 
+4 # JJS 2013-03-31 18:50
THank you 666. "Mom, it is so much easier to behave now. I can think." Said by my then 8 yr old son after his first dose of Ritalin. Now 6'2", twenty something. Smart but has issues with attention. He decided to stop Ritalin during middle school years but we maintained counselling
 
 
+8 # DaveM 2013-03-30 10:35
Given the choice between an organization founded by Scientology and the modern psychiatric/pha rmaceutical complex, which is crazier?
 
 
+3 # pamelawy 2013-03-30 11:19
That's not a choice I'd like to have to make. Can I have a third please?
 
 
-7 # shraeve 2013-03-30 14:22
The psychiatric establishment has far more power and does far more damage. I suspect most homeless people are victims of psychiatric drugs.

In previous eras of American history we had dire economic conditions, but we didn't have huge numbers of people being homeless for decades like we have in the modern era. Don't say it is the result of de-institutiona lization. State mental hospitals with large patient populations were a relatively short-lived phenomenon of the first half of the 20th century. Where were all these homeless people (who were supposedly born with "bad brains") before then?
 
 
+11 # ghostperson 2013-03-30 12:12
Having an adopted child with true ADHD and deferring medication until it could not be avoided, we were prescribed medication that I didn't previously believe in by a very conservative physician. I also didn't believe in ADHD.

Medication controls but does not prevent symptomatology. We hung on for years before resorting to medication. Without it, my child would be non-functional academically and failing in school.

She goes off medication in the summer. We see the doctor every 3 months to monitor dosage and effectiveness as well as side effects which are none to date.

I want to see the studies, who the study group was and the conditions under which the studies were performed, before I walk away from the obvious personal benefits she gets from the medication.
 
 
+1 # karlseidel 2013-03-30 13:38
@phrixus - here's a good link with the facts organized by researcher I've read & trust: http://robertwhitaker.org/robertwhitaker.org/Depression.html

I find it interesting to see people commenting on Scientology and their efforts against psychiatry. Is the fact that Scientology seems zany and dangerous any worse than philandering pastors in the Catholic Church? How about corrupt legislators taking your money and the money of corporations but only serving corporate interests?

Stick to the facts - they are abundant - Big Pharma kills - they're corrupt and their corruption affects doctors and psychiatrists which in turn harm your children.

Get a reality check - stop drinking the Kool-Aid charade called Health Care - it's neither healthy or caring!
 
 
+7 # phrixus 2013-03-30 20:57
I don't see how the existence of pedophile priests and corrupt legislators in any way validates the broad, unsupported charges levied against psychiatry in this rant of an article.
BTW: For my money anyone that believes in Scientology NEEDS a psychiatrist.
 
 
+4 # DerHermanator 2013-03-30 15:31
By the pricking of my thumbs
The stench of Scientology this way comes.
[With apologies to Macbeth]

In over 30 yrs of prescribing Ritalin I havent had a patient's parents alert me that their child had dropped dead.

Its dysinformation like this article from a journal I've never heard of, Natural News, which keeps parents frightened and treatment withheld resulting in less medication prescribed [there are several others] than the occurance of the disabling condition merits.

Boo hiss. Its flattering that RSN relies in the sophistication of their readers to assign this to the dump heap of medical meddling.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN