Excerpt: "Organizers said 'March Against Monsanto' protests were held in 52 countries and 436 cities."
GM foods are meeting increased resistance. (photo: Salman Muzaffar/AP)
Protesters Across the Globe Rally Against Monsanto
27 May 13
rotesters rallied in dozens of cities Saturday as part of a global protest against seed giant Monsanto and the genetically modified food it produces, organizers said.
Organizers said "March Against Monsanto" protests were held in 52 countries and 436 cities, including Los Angeles where demonstrators waved signs that read "Real Food 4 Real People" and "Label GMOs, It's Our Right to Know."
Genetically modified plants are grown from seeds that are engineered to resist insecticides and herbicides, add nutritional benefits or otherwise improve crop yields and increase the global food supply.
Most corn, soybean and cotton crops grown in the United States today have been genetically modified. But critics say genetically modified organisms can lead to serious health conditions and harm the environment. The use of GMOs has been a growing issue of contention in recent years, with health advocates pushing for mandatory labeling of genetically modified products even though the federal government and many scientists say the technology is safe.
The 'March Against Monsanto' movement began just a few months ago, when founder and organizer Tami Canal created a Facebook page on Feb. 28 calling for a rally against the company's practices.
"If I had gotten 3,000 people to join me, I would have considered that a success," she said Saturday. Instead, she said an "incredible" number of people responded to her message and turned out to rally.
"It was empowering and inspiring to see so many people, from different walks of life, put aside their differences and come together today," Canal said. The group plans to harness the success of the event to continue its anti-GMO cause.
"We will continue until Monsanto complies with consumer demand. They are poisoning our children, poisoning our planet," she said. "If we don't act, who's going to?"
Monsanto Co., based in St. Louis, said that it respects people's rights to express their opinion on the topic, but maintains that its seeds improve agriculture by helping farmers produce more from their land while conserving resources such as water and energy.
The Food and Drug Administration does not require genetically modified foods to carry a label, but organic food companies and some consumer groups have intensified their push for labels, arguing that the modified seeds are floating from field to field and contaminating traditional crops. The groups have been bolstered by a growing network of consumers who are wary of processed and modified foods.
The U.S. Senate this week overwhelmingly rejected a bill that would allow states to require labeling of genetically modified foods.
The Biotechnology Industry Organization, a lobbying group that represents Monsanto, DuPont & Co. and other makers of genetically modified seeds, has said that it supports voluntary labeling for people who seek out such products. But it says that mandatory labeling would only mislead or confuse consumers into thinking the products aren't safe, even though the FDA has said there's no difference between GMO and organic, non-GMO foods.
However, state legislatures in Vermont and Connecticut moved ahead this month with votes to make food companies declare genetically modified ingredients on their packages. And supermarket retailer Whole Foods Markets Inc. has said that all products in its North American stores that contain genetically modified ingredients will be labeled as such by 2018.
Whole Foods says there is growing demand for products that don't use GMOs, with sales of products with a "Non-GMO" verification label spiking between 15 percent and 30 percent.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
You, the longtime 'Independent', do most certainly have a great chance to, via huge turnouts, 1. get the nomination, and 2. get elected in '16. You are the real McCoy change we so desperately need - our current only hope of avoiding a bloody revolution, because it's true...
SANDERS PANDERS NOT, TO THE 1%
I would like to see Bernie woo THIS truly awesome woman: Jessica Tuchman Mathews, daughter of self-taught two-time Pulitzer historian Barbara Tuchman, whose very insightful books focused on what she referred to as we men's "wooden-headedn ess." Tuchman's book, The Guns of August (1914), detailed the male dominant insanity that sparked World War One. It probably saved our planet in 1962: JFK had read it, and during the American Missile Crisis (we started it with missiles in range of Moscow) when advisers were advocating a nuclear first strike, he slammed copies of it on their desks.
Check out Jessica Mathews' AWESOME resume in her Wiki bio. Mentioned last, but certainly not least, she is on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group - the Best of the West All Stars who created Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and chose Barak over Hillary in 2008 when they both were summoned to a Bilderberg meeting in Alexandria, VA. Two days later, Hillary withdrew her candidacy. Highlight and right click links.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Mathews
Portraits of Bilderberg Members:
http://www.danielestulin.com/wp-content/uploads/portraits_bilderberg.pdf
If the middle class doesn't pull out of it's nose-dive NOW, it will crash and burn in just 3-4 years, and that doesn't serve the purposes of the power elite, who only want it's suppression, not it's disintegration. It took two full generations to create the American middle class in the first half of the 20th century, and it will take two full generations to restore it... it is a long row to hoe, but the hoeing has to start NOW, and the power elite actually knows, this, I believe.
Jimmy Carter foolishly depended upon his "Georgia Mafia" advisers and Washington chewed them all up and spit them out in one term. Lincoln was wiser, bringing his opponents into his admin and thru the force of his mind made them STATESMEN.
Most Bilderbergers are quite familiar with, and are probably deeply invested in, the very successful Social Democratic Northern European nations that Bernie admires so much. These people and nations understand that capitalism can do very well in nations that embrace social economic equality to a great degree. Denmark has the world's most level personal incomes (basically one huge upper middle class) and takes it's unofficial motto of "No Dane is better than any other Dane" VERY seriously.
The key to their system is a fair and strong judicial system that is as hard on white collar crime as blue collar crime. Remember Rumsfeld telling us that the Pentagon could not account for $2.3 trillion taxpayer dollars on 9/10/2001? That could NEVER happen in Northern Euro nations that would throw corrupt generals and "defense" contractors in prison so damned fast their heads would spin off, I assure you.
Vote for him and he will win its that simple !
Bernie has been in Washingtoon long enough to know this. He also knows that every admin since Wilson's has had about 400 members of the Council on Foreign Relations in it for a REASON: The U.S. "Aircraft Carrier of State" is not a damned rowboat that one person can alter the course of by yanking hard on an oar.
If Bernie wants to reduce the influence of entities like the CFR (much less the CIA!), he will have to show power elite insiders that he can provide rational alternatives, which most certainly WILL require compromises by Senator Sanders.
He must convince them that he can STEER the Ship of State and be trusted not to DESTROY it. Otherwise, he has a snowball's chance in hell of being elected, my dear.
Celebrate asking the BIG questions.
You will work wonders if you do.
Many thanks!
--- Donate to and support the most progressive liberal candidates that you can find whether they be yours or in some other state (see Progressive Change Campaign Committee - PCCC - for info in locating them.) If we get enough of the real baddies out of there, the rest will see that the tide is turning and the handwriting is on the wall (just to mix my metaphors,) and they'd better be Jack and get over the candlestick before their pants catch on fire and they don't get re-elected. We need to remind these guys who they work for and that the real estate called "The United States of America" belongs to We the People (in writing) and not a pack of wild, paper pigs called corporations. We are still called The United States of America and not The United Corporations of America (yet). So let's get the lead out and do what we do best and get the best ones into office, for the good of all.
We have to only accept an open honest counting of votes. No more funny business behind closed doors or inside black boxes. As I see it, the R's are passing bills to do away with the estate tax, cut benefits to the working class, elderly, children, education, etc. because they feel they won't have to be accountable in the next election.
It was clear to me in 2002 that the Cheney/Bush administration was going ahead with their illegal war despite the public reaction because they knew they would be able to steal the next election. They weren't about to let anything or anyone stop them from doing it or getting caught. When Mike Connell was about to testify about the computer set up to change vote totals in Ohio his plane went down short of the runway days before his scheduled court date. A request for protection was ignored after receiving a tip that his life was in danger.
So until the election system is fixed, not rigged, congress will keep raping the people, planet and economy.
--- I don't have any qualms about his age, either. He meets the qualifications: he's standing, is warm to the touch, is a fighter and he hates injustice. He gets my vote and my donations, too.
--- Whatever works....
Or do you think those who scream against the science are committing a fraud?
Please clarify.
And, may I ask, what kind of scientist are you? I suppose one could call Rand Paul (a physician) a "scientist".
I am a nuclear scientist.
--- Nobody is "forcing" Elizabeth Warren to do anything (good luck with that; she's an independent woman with a mind of her own.)
We are only hoping and wishing for the best candidates we can get so we don't get stuck with either a Scott Walker (gag, choke, cough) or sHillary Clinton (or another brain-dead Bush who likes to spit on mothers and flip American citizens the bird... Jebbie)
But I totally agree we need to get behind Sanders and run with it.
I just happened to be listening to "Best of Car Talk" from NPR this morning (the only thing I catch from them any more). They played a clip from the next show "Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me" and it consisted of the announcer saying "Well last week at this time we had Hillary Clinton as the only viable Democratic candidate for the 2016 presidency, then Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont declared that he was running. So now we have --Hillary Clinton as the only viable Democratic candidate".
-Supposed to be funny in a snide but still revealing way.
Sadly and disappointing but predictably -THAT'S what he's up against already, and from a supposedly "Liberal (although not in my books), public" or at least centrist media outlet, partially financed by contributors funds -but of course REALLY funded by "Grants From" the same corporate monopolies -including US media- that Sanders (and Warren) have been attacking for years.
So PBS has written him off already and I'm now waiting on the first owner-media station or rag to accuse him of being a "Communist" -or perhaps some of his TeaThuglican opponents will be shoving each other aside to get to the closest mic and puke that out!
Hope so; but don't forget, he's preaching to the already-convert ed on RSN.
Can't wait until ol' Roland gives us his usual reactionary barf on Sanders.
'Nah.
It's already a 'fait accompli' (I call it infestation rather than invasion) and is handy to reveal up front, how the reactionary establishment power structure and their finks like R' and a his cowed but complacent ilk are thinking -if you can call it that.
After all, RSN actually practices free speech, which is always open to abuse by those who'd take it away from those who don't fall in line with their own boxed-in, blinkered world view.
You are correct to think that it is probably a result of the 'grants from' syndrome. Remember, the film Citizen Koch (which everyone should see, available among other places from Netflix) even though financed and produced on PBS in Boston was NEVER SHOWN on PBS because of undue influence from the Koch Bros., especially David Koch.
The offhand and denigrating unfunny remarks on WWDTM were disappointing and shocking, until one realizes that one of their newest people is Bill Curtis (those of us with long memories still see his ear-to-ear grins on CBS News as he showed us all the coffins and dead soldiers every night during the Vietnam war... .) He has in fact, turned out to be amusing....but the choice of Bill Curtis was at first unnerving, considering his history.
As for Bernie Sanders not being viable --- that does indeed remain to be seen; tens of thousands of small contributions and a lot of intelligent [and ACTIVE] support for him to counteract the right wing fascist/Faux Noise"socialist " = 'Communist' meme can go a long way to minimize the oligarchical Kochian /ALEC media takeovers. Bernie too must stand up and take down the ignorant comments along this line repeatedly and OFTEN.
So please explain.
I'm going to find their contact info, and point out to them that those kinds of statements are why they have no clout.
I don't listen to it -just heard that clip.
"Car Talk" on the other hand, cracks me up, especially the "credits".
I know it's off the subject but one of today's was a "stoatir" as we say in Scotland; "Our trans-gender specialist counselor is "Ben-hur" (Bin-her).
I don't think PBS has written Sanders off. Clinton has lots of baggage.
--- I wrote PBS off when they became the Public Broadcasting Corporation.
I finally wrote them off when Michael Powell (Son of Colin ditto) became FCC chairman and dictator.
I was a programmer (I dislike the expression "D.J.") doing World Music and Jazz on a local station at the time and was both slammed and applauded for groaning spontaneously into the main mic' "Oh Gawd, please tell me this ain't nuthin' but a joke"!
If the Clintons' perfidy gets any more publicity, the impossible may happen after all. And, I agree that Warren would be the perfect running mate. Go Bernie!!!
--- Thank you for taking the time to share this with us; especially about the reason he gave for why he isn't running as a Progressive. This information was straight from him with no spin in the middle and it gives us a clear view into the man. (Run Bernie run!)
--- We've got twenty-seven months to do something about this. People need to learn the value of the Absentee Ballot, even if they have to go visit the trees in another venue to get the job done.