RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

McVeigh writes: "The US Department of Justice has launched an investigation into revelations that the Drug Enforcement Agency uses surveillance tactics - including wiretapping and massive databases of telephone records - to arrest Americans, amid growing concerns from lawyers and civil rights groups over its lack of transparency."

How much of the NSA domestic spying data is being shared with law enforcement? (illustration: TIME)
How much of the NSA domestic spying data is being shared with law enforcement? (illustration: TIME)


NSA, CIA Share Data on Americans With DEA

By Karen McVeigh, Guardian UK

09 August 13

 

Civil rights groups express concern after revelations that secret unit conceals use of wiretaps and telephone records

he US Department of Justice has launched an investigation into revelations that the Drug Enforcement Agency uses surveillance tactics - including wiretapping and massive databases of telephone records - to arrest Americans, amid growing concerns from lawyers and civil rights groups over its lack of transparency.

Reuters on Monday detailed how the Special Operative Division - a unit within the DEA comprising representatives of two dozen agencies including the FBI, CIA, NSA, Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Homeland Security - passes tips from wiretaps, informants and a database of telephone records to field agents to investigate and arrest criminals. Reuters reports that, although such cases rarely involve national security issues, the DEA agents using the tips are trained to "recreate" the source of the criminal investigation to conceal its true origin from defence lawyers, prosecutors and judges.

The revelations, which follow the Guardian's recent disclosures of the National Security Agency's wholescale collection of US phone data, have raised concerns among judges, prosecutors and civil rights lawyers over a lack of transparency. Many said the SOD practice violates a defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial.

James Felman, vice-chair of criminal justice at the American Bar Association, said the DEA story "connects the dots" over the government's potential abuse of phone records collected by the NSA.

Felman, an attorney in Tampa, said: "By the sound of it, this is a routine practice of using masses of information on Americans, in an erosion of constitutional protections of our citizens. This is clear evidence of things that people have been saying they are not doing. Collecting data on ordinary citizens and then concealing it officially. It is indefensible."

"I don't think that most people would believe that our government would be using these measures and using this excuse when they want to investigate heavy offences," he said. "What is upsetting is that it appears to be policy and practice to consensually conceal information that should be disclosed."

While the NSA data collection is aimed at thwarting terrorists, the SOD programme is focused on criminals such as drug dealers and money launderers.

One former federal agent who received tips from the SOD described the process to Reuters. He told how he would instruct state police to find an excuse to stop a certain vehicle on which they had information, and then have drug dogs search it. After an arrest was made, agents would then pretend that the investigation began as a result of the traffic stop, and not because of the information the SOD had passed on.

A training document quoted by Reuters described the practice whereby agents would "recreate" the source of the investigation, as "parallel construction". A dozen current or former federal agents interviewed by Reuters confirmed they had relied on parallel construction.

Nancy Gertner, a Harvard Law School professor who served as a federal judge from 1994 to 2011, described the practice of "parallel construction" as "a fancy word for phonying up the course of the investigation". It was one thing, she said, to create special rules for national security, but creating rules for ordinary crime threatened to undermine the bill of rights, set up as a check against the power of the executive.

"The best way to describe it is the government is saying 'trust us'," said Gertner. "The bill of rights is clear that we don't."

Gertner said that defence attorneys had a right to know and examine the source of the information against their clients.

"Even if a judge approved a wiretap, it doesn't mean there wasn't exculpatory or tainted evidence," she said. "If the judge does not know the genesis of the information there cannot be judicial review. When the DEA is concealing what the source of the information is and pretending it came from one place rather than another, there can be no judicial review."

Gertner and other legal experts said that there was no need to conceal such information in court, as there are already procedures by which judges can examine sensitive information in private to determine whether it is relevant.

The implications for existing cases, Gertner said, were difficult to assess. "There needs to be an investigation and disclosure about the extent to which this information was used in previous investigations."

Civil rights campaigners said the latest revelations about surveillance programmes were an indictment of how easily the NSA data collection can be abused.

Ezekiel Edwards, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's criminal law reform project, said: "With the uncovering of this massive surveillance programme, the government are reassuring people that they are very selective, that they are not using it on ordinary citizens.

"The opposite case is one of our concerns.

"What you have here is the DEA tapping into the vast NSA spying programme and using it to launch criminal cases on Americans. Not in national security cases, but other cases."

Edwards said it was a case of "mission creep", after the shift in the balance between civil liberties and security that happened in the US in the aftermath of 9/11.

He said that the concealing of information about the source of an investigation was unconstitutional because it did not allow defendants their right to confront and examine the evidence the government has against them.

"Evidence can be flawed, people can lie, innocent people can be convicted," Edwards said. "The reason we have trials is to determine whether evidence is reliable, but if you don't know the source of that evidence - that email or that phone call, it is impossible to argue that it wasn't me on the phone or that person is an invalid witness."

In a statement, the NSA said: "If a law enforcement agency thinks they have a valid foreign intelligence requirement, they can pass that information to the [intelligence community], which treats it as they would any other nomination. NSA works closely with all intelligence community partners … This co-ordination frequently includes sanitising classified information so that it can be passed to personnel at lower clearance levels in order to meet their operational requirements."

The statement added: "If the intelligence community collects information pursuant to a valid foreign intelligence tasking that is recognised as being evidence of a crime, [it] can disseminate that information to law enforcement, as appropriate."

Henry Hockeimer, a former federal prosecutor, said: "For the system to work, criminal cases should be built with a high degree of transparency. Not built through covert means. To use this in cases not involving national security and in routine drug cases is troubling.

"Now it's getting into the realms of a law enforcement tool, which is not what the normal person would have any degree of tolerance for. What other cases could be potentially built in the dark?"

The Department of Justice confirmed it was looking into the revelations, but declined to provide details. In an email to the Guardian, a spokesman said they were "looking into the issues raised by this story. We'll decline to comment further at this time."

The SOD played a major role in a DEA sting in Thailand against Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout in 2008. He was sentenced in 2011 to 25 years in prison on charges of conspiring to sell weapons to the Colombian rebel group Farc.

The SOD also recently coordinated Project Synergy, a crackdown against manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers of synthetic designer drugs that spanned 35 states and resulted in 227 arrests.

  • This story was updated on 7 August 2013 to include a statement from the National Security Agency.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # Walter J Smith 2013-08-08 08:38
This says it all: "The US Department of Justice has launched an investigation...."

Sure.

Another Obama Administration campaign designed by Madison Avenue to prove every Wall Street criminal is an angel.

Next?
 
 
+9 # 666 2013-08-08 11:39
the irony of all this is in their claim about using this info to catch viktor bout -- yeah, he's the guy in "Lord Of War" (if you haven't seen it, do, it was endorsed by amnesty international). When he was finally busted, it's the US MIC that sets him free. Anyone care to bet just how much time he'll serve for this arrest?

wake up folks, this isn't mission creep--it's not like someone spilled beer on their homework--if the dea is using NSA surveillance info so are other federal and state (& many local) "police" agencies. We'll just have to speculate about the extent until someone leaks the documents or comes forward.

Once it's clear what is happening, I think we'll begin to get a better sense of how the govt is targeting activists and dissidents. How far into totalitarianism we've slid.
 
 
+10 # Todd Williams 2013-08-08 09:07
More fallout from Bush's Patriot Act that was supposed to protect us from those scary Muslims but instead is being used for all kinds of nefarious purposes. I feel this all is coming to a rapid head.
 
 
+3 # CandH 2013-08-08 17:37
It's worse than that. This DEA SOD has been in operation since 1994. Yes, 1994, before Oklahoma City, before Clinton BJ, before Citigrp merger eviscerated Glass-Steagall/ CFTA, AND before 9eleven/Anthracts.

As 666 above said, "we'll just have to speculate about the extent (of what they are ACTUALLY using this for,) until someone leaks the documents or comes forward."
 
 
+7 # engelbach 2013-08-08 09:20
Agencies in a position to push the nation towards a police state will always do so, whether they are conscious of it or not.

This includes government departments as well as police departments, at every level.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN