Excerpt: "Republican-controlled chamber also limits president's attempt to reduce nuclear weapons in version at odds with Senate bill."
A detainee from Afghanistan is carried on a stretcher before being interrogated by military officials at Camp X-Ray at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Saturday, Feb. 2, 2002. (photo: AP)
House Defense Bill Blocks Obama's Plan to Close Guantanamo Bay Prison
15 June 13
�
Republican-controlled chamber also limits president's attempt to reduce nuclear weapons in version at odds with Senate bill
he House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a sweeping, $638bn defence bill that would block President Barack Obama from closing the US detention facility at Guant�namo Bay, and limit his efforts to reduce nuclear weapons.
Ignoring a White House veto threat, the Republican-controlled House voted 315-108 for the legislation � which also authorises money for aircraft, weapons, ships, personnel and the war in Afghanistan. It must be reconciled with a Senate version before heading to the president's desk.
Despite last-minute lobbying by Obama counter-terrorism adviser Lisa Monaco, the House soundly rejected Obama's repeated pleas to shutter Guant�namo. In recent weeks, the president implored Congress to close the facility in Cuba, citing its prohibitive costs and its role as a recruiting tool for extremists.
A hunger strike by more than 100 of the 166 prisoners protesting against their conditions and indefinite confinement has prompted the fresh calls for closure. Obama is pushing to transfer approved detainees � there are 86 � to their home countries and lift a ban on transfers to Yemen. Fifty-six of the 86 are from Yemen.
The House voted down an amendment to close the naval detention centre by 31 December 2014 by 249 votes to 174. It also backed an amendment � by 236 to 188 � to stop the president from transferring any detainees to Yemen.
The restrictions in the House bill put it at odds with the Democratic-controlled Senate.
The Senate armed services committee's bill gives the defence department additional flexibility to transfer Guant�namo detainees to the US and other countries, with the objective of closing the detention facility there.
But, in a move that reflects deep divisions in Congress over Guant�namo's future, the committee did not hold votes on the provision in the bill, opting instead to have that debate when the legislation moves to the Senate floor.
In its current form, the Senate committee's legislation would permit transfer of terror suspects to the US if the Pentagon determines that doing so is in the interests of national security and that any public safety issues have been addressed, the committee said Friday in a statement detailing the bill's major provisions.
Detainees could be moved to foreign countries if they are determined to no longer be a threat to US security, the transfers are pursuant to court orders, or the individuals have been tried and acquitted, or have been convicted and completed their sentences.
Transfers to third countries also could occur if the Pentagon determines the move supports US national security interests and steps have been taken "to substantially mitigate the risk of the detainee re-engaging in terrorist activities," the committee said.
The defence policy bill also bars the Pentagon or the National Nuclear Security Agency from spending any money to implement the new Start treaty with Russia that the Senate ratified in December 2010 until the defence secretary provides certain information on reducing the US nuclear arsenal to Congress.
The bill also imposes new punishments on members of the armed services found guilty of rape or sexual assault as outrage over the crisis in the military has galvanised Congress.
Obama backs the measures, which would require a mandatory minimum sentence of two years in prison for a member of the armed services convicted of rape or sexual assault in a military court. The bill also would strip military commanders of the power to overturn convictions in rape and sexual assault cases.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
The problem is that science, especially at pre-college levels, is often taught as a collection of settled, undisputable facts, while it is better understood as a process or method of uncovering and validating new knowledge, if not necessarily verifying it once and for all. The National Defense Education Act of 1958 generated some much better curricula, which when implemented by properly trained teachers produced citizens with much more sound grasps of what science is and what its findings mean. Unfortunately a great many teachers were not prepared for the new approach, and within a couple of decades it almost completely disappeared. Efforts to revise such curricula have been made. But the general chaos in education created in the past 30-40 years by politicians with no background in teaching and no interest in anything but their personal and ideological opinions and beliefs, along with TV and other screens, has made meaningful education almost a dodo bird in this country.