Agence France-Presse reports: "Julian Assange remained holed up in Ecuador's London embassy Friday with police guarding its exits, after Britain warned that a diplomatic standoff over the WikiLeaks founder could go on for years."
Police officers gather outside the Ecuador embassy in west London, August 16, 2012. (photo: Olivia Harris/Reuters)
With Assange Inside, UK Police Surround Ecuador Embassy
17 August 12
ulian Assange remained holed up in Ecuador's London embassy Friday with police guarding its exits, after Britain warned that a diplomatic standoff over the WikiLeaks founder could go on for years.
Ecuador granted asylum on Thursday to Assange - whose website enraged the United States by publishing a vast cache of confidential government files - but Britain has vowed not to grant him safe passage out of the country.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague said his government was obliged under its own laws to extradite the Australian national to Sweden, where he is wanted for questioning over alleged sex crimes.
"No one, least of all the government of Ecuador, should be in any doubt that we are determined to carry out our legal obligation to see Mr Assange extradited to Sweden," Hague told a press conference on Thursday.
He admitted that the stalemate could continue for months or even years.
Some 20 British police were stationed outside the embassy Friday, ready to arrest 41-year-old Assange if he leaves the embassy premises.
WikiLeaks condemned the police presence as "intimidation tactics".
A handful of supporters of the former computer hacker camped overnight outside the embassy in London's plush Knightsbridge district in a bid to "guard" Assange against any potential attempt to arrest him.
"We'll stay here as long as we have to," 26-year-old protester Baba Gena told AFP.
A couple of activists brought a megaphone along and yelled at police: "Why aren't you doing your job properly?" and "Put your hands in the air if you believe in freedom of speech!"
Assange has not left the embassy since June 19, when he walked in and claimed asylum.
WikiLeaks said on Twitter that he would give a statement in front of the embassy on Sunday, though it did not specify whether this would involve leaving the premises and, if so, how he would do so without being arrested.
Under normal diplomatic procedures, embassies are considered the territory of the countries they represent and cannot be entered without permission.
Britain has angered Ecuador by suggesting it could invoke a domestic law allowing it to breach the usual rules and go in to arrest Assange.
This would challenge a fundamental principle of the diplomatic system, and the threat has left Britain in unchartered legal waters.
Baltasar Garzon, the renowned Spanish lawyer who is helping Assange's defense, has said the WikiLeaks founder will appeal to the International Court of Justice if Britain does not backtrack and guarantee him safe passage.
WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson told AFP that any bid to enter the embassy would "risk upsetting diplomatic relations all over the world".
"Hopefully, we will see the decision resolved in a civilised manner," he added.
A Foreign Office spokesman said Friday that Britain was "committed to working with the Ecuadorans to solve this matter amicably".
He added: "We will not be commenting on our meetings or contact with them."
Ecuador has called a meeting of foreign ministers from the South American regional bloc UNASUR on Sunday, while the Organization of American States is to decide Friday whether to call a meeting of its foreign ministers.
"Nobody is going to scare us," Ecuador's President Rafael Correa said on his Twitter account, minutes before the decision to grant asylum was announced.
In 2010, WikiLeaks published hundreds of thousands of US military documents on the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as diplomatic cables that deeply embarrassed Washington.
Supporters fear Assange could face the death penalty if sent to the United States, pointing to US authorities' treatment of Bradley Manning, the soldier on trial for allegedly leaking military files to WikiLeaks.
Hague said Thursday that Sweden was "a country with the highest standards of law and where his rights are guaranteed".
"We believe that should be assurance enough for Ecuador and any supporters of Mr Assange," he said.
Washington has also denied that it is lobbying Britain to take Assange into custody.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
While I am grateful to President Correa for taking a stand in this shameful matter, and recognize his unlimited potential as a leader, his record of jailing journalists for speaking against him is beyond dissapointing.
I see a trap in referring repeatedly to fears of the death penalty. The last political prisoners to be put to death in the USA (I think) were Julius and Ethel Rosenberg in the 1950s. Negotiations over Assange are mooted and the UK-Sweden-USA transfer could probably get the nod from the gutless Australian government if America promised not to execute him. Merely subject him to a kangaroo court and lock him up until he dies. That is the danger of the death penalty becoming a bargaining chip in face-saving negotiations for a "compromise". Assange must not be rendered to the USA for disclosing the truth, period.
There are no rules of evidence. All parties may say whatever they like. The lower courts have lay-assessors (nämndemän) as judges. Their principal criterion is 'trovärdighet' - credibility. Two Swedish women versus an Australian man. The scales of justice are heavily freighted against Assange. He could received a long prison sentence in Sweden, to begin with. And Sweden has ignored questions concerning the possibility of Assange being delivered to the US from Sweden. Indeed Assange is fighting for his life.
Prisoners of war in WW II were doing that, people do it in Gaza, and several
examples of people in jail who have been
doing that.
Once out, "blind" passenger on a
boat/yacht to Ecuador.
Good luck Assange ! We are all behind you.
But I do respect the 'notion' of asylum. Didn't we give the Shah of Iran asylum? Did anybody then like it? Probably not. But did we get to do it as a sovereign nation? Yes.
I don't see the UK government ending this. It is only doing what the Obama regime tells it to do.
What an embarrassment for the US and UK. Their opposition to their own citizens knowing the truth about their wars is really appalling.
Don't forget that the NYTimes, Guardian, and other papers also published the leaked documents. So why are their executives not also hounded by the police?
You make a good point about the NY Times, etc. Does anyone really still think the USA is the land of the free?"
Sad but true.
but the problem I have with the sex charges...
[two women think he 'oversold' his abilities??? If that's a crime half the men in the world would be under arrest!]
...is that it's so OBVIOUSLY a case of using the law to target 'somebody' an (un-named) 'government' is 'out to get'...
You'd think 'they' could AT LEAST be a little more SUBTLE about it!!! These 'sex charges' wouldn't fool a 2 year-old.
from vast empire to tawdry dame.
You were so very proud before,
now you are America's whore.
RSS feed for comments to this post