RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Memmott reports: "Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, who was responsible for the largest leak of classified information in U.S. history, was sentenced by a military judge to 35 years in prison."

Bradley Manning receives verdict from Col. Denise Lind. (art: K. Rudin/RSN)
Bradley Manning receives verdict from Col. Denise Lind. (art: K. Rudin/RSN)


Army Hands Down 35 Year Sentence to Bradley Manning

By Mark Memmott, NPR

21 August 13

RSN Special Coverage: Trial of Bradley Manning

rsn fr splash promo

Scott Galindez for RSN reports Manning will be eligible for parole after serving one third of his sentence. With time served that could mean roughly 10 years.

ACLU Comment on Bradley Manning Sentence

"When a soldier who shared information with the press and public is punished far more harshly than others who tortured prisoners and killed civilians, something is seriously wrong with our justice system. A legal system that doesn't distinguish between leaks to the press in the public interest and treason against the nation will not only produce unjust results, but will deprive the public of critical information that is necessary for democratic accountability. This is a sad day for Bradley Manning, but it's also a sad day for all Americans who depend on brave whistleblowers and a free press for a fully informed public debate."
Simple Picture Slideshow:
Could not find folder /home/marcash/public_html/images/stories/manning_art

rmy Pfc. Bradley Manning, who was responsible for the largest leak of classified information in U.S. history, was sentenced by a military judge to 35 years in prison Wednesday, according to reporters covering the trial at Fort Meade, MD. He'll get about 3 1/2 years' credit for time he's already spent behind bars.

More details (added at 10:30 a.m. ET):

  • Manning is also to be dishonorably discharged.

  • The maximum sentence possible was 90 years.

  • Prosecutors had asked that he be given 60 years.

  • Manning's defense asked for a 25-year sentence.

  • Manning's lawyer plans to speak to the news media at 1:30 p.m. ET.

Also: "Manning's sentence will automatically be sent to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals," The New York Times adds. "Before the next phase can begin, the entire court-martial proceedings must be turned into an official transcript, which both the defense and prosecution, as well as the judge, must approve; that process is expected to take considerable time. Pretrial hearings started in 2012, and the trial itself began in early June."

Our original post follows.

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, the former intelligence analyst responsible for the largest leak of classified information in U.S. history, is to learn Wednesday just how many decades he'll be sentenced to serve behind bars.

Manning faces a maximum sentence of 90 years in prison for the crimes he committed in 2010. Prosecutors, as the Associated Press reports, have asked that he be put away for at least 60 years. "The defense," adds the AP, "has suggested a prison term of no more than 25 years, so that Manning, 25, could rebuild his life. Defense attorney David Coombs asked for a sentence that 'doesn't rob him of his youth.' "

Earlier this week, Manning told the military judge at Fort Mead, Md., that "I'm sorry I hurt people. ... I'm sorry that I hurt the United States. I'm apologizing for the unexpected results of my actions. The last three years have been a learning experience for me."

The judge has said she plans to begin spelling out Manning's sentence at 10 a.m. ET. We'll watch for that news and update this post.

Manning was convicted in July of most of the charges he faced, including multiple counts of espionage. But he was acquitted of the most serious: aiding the enemy. As we've previously written, he admitted that in early 2010 he gave WikiLeaks "more than 700,000 documents, including battlefield reports and U.S. Embassy cables."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-7 # davehaze 2020-09-25 13:41
Utterly disgusting and fair warning what a sick "I am not a socialist!" chief executive he would make...

...prepared to lead the world into perdition and war.
 
 
+2 # revhen 2020-09-26 06:51
O contraire. Trump is up to what he is doing: destroying our government, our nation in favor of Russia, big business, and the very wealthy.
 
 
-3 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-09-26 08:00
 
 
+2 # Freddy 2020-09-26 09:40
"Vote 'none of the above'" - Sounds pretty much like advice straight out of Putin's playbook. What a coincidence.
 
 
-1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-09-26 16:07
Fred -- I thought Putin wanted Trump. Has he changed his mind. Why did he tell you and not tell me? Is Putin switching teams. Maybe he's moving over to Biden now?
 
 
-3 # laborequalswealth 2020-09-26 10:53
Yep. The Deep State can't wait for more wars.

Ah! But we have such a vibrant democracy that now we get the "choice" of voting for a corrupt, war-mongering, demented political hack, or a corrupt not quite as war-mongering demented political idiot. (I will allow readers to decide which is which.)

This is like having to chose between small pox and cholera.
 
 
-1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2020-09-26 16:18
 
 
+1 # bardphile 2020-09-26 17:46
More like between small pox and an annoyingly persistent case of bronchitis. Our democracy would survive Sleepy Joe, but not another 4 years of the Donald.
 
 
+1 # davehaze 2020-09-26 15:23
Ask yourself if you were one of the 70% of Americans who were fooled into believing in 1 Iraq having WMD 2 Sadam Hussain was aleigned w Al Qaida 3 he was an existential threat to the US 4 involved in 9/11 and 5 that we should invade Iraq before they invade us.

Sounds silly now because none of it was true. I might cut you some slack that you believed the lies because you were just one of the hundred million unsuspecting TV-watching gullible. You are not one of those 500 national security experts who did the lying.
 
 
+1 # Colleen Clark 2020-09-27 16:29
I hope I'm in the majority in enough states voting for Biden. Trump is self-centered and ignorant which are terrible qualities in any candidate for office, much less one running for election or re-election as POTUS. He'll be fine back in Trump tower. He can continue lying but it won't matter to the rest of the country any more.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN