FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Japanese government officials took little notice of up-to-the-minute high radiation measurements provided by the U.S. Energy Department. ... The data was provided to Japanese government officials, but not released to the public."

Results of airborne radiation monitoring by US Energy Department in March 2011. (photo: US Dept. of Energy/The Asahi Shimbun)
Results of airborne radiation monitoring by US Energy Department in March 2011. (photo: US Dept. of Energy/The Asahi Shimbun)



Japan Ignored US Radiation Monitoring Data

By Hiroo Sunaoshi and Kazuyuki Kanai, The Asahi Shimbun

18 June 12

 

ven as thousands of residents pondered the implications of the nuclear disaster in Fukushima Prefecture last year, Japanese government officials took little notice of up-to-the-minute high radiation measurements provided by the U.S. Energy Department.

The Energy Department used its Aerial Measuring System (AMS) between March 17 and 19, 2011, and compiled a detailed map of radiation levels on the basis of 40 hours of flight time over Fukushima Prefecture.

The data was provided to Japanese government officials, but not released to the public.

The map clearly shows an area of high radiation levels extending in a northwesterly direction from the crippled Fukushima plant.

Thousands of Fukushima residents living near the plant, unaware of the danger they faced, evacuated in the direction of those high radiation areas.

This is not the first time the Japanese government has been shown to be slow to respond to the unfolding disaster at the Fukushima facility following last year's Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami.

The central government also failed to quickly release forecasts of radiation spreading in Fukushima and beyond made by its System for Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information (SPEEDI).

A major difference between the SPEEDI forecast and the Energy Department observations is that the U.S. data concerns actual radiation measurements taken over an area with a radius of about 45 kilometers from the Fukushima No. 1 plant.

The monitoring showed that communities in a northwestern direction from the plant, including Namie and Iitate, had radiation levels exceeding 125 microsieverts per hour over an area as wide as 30 kilometers.

Exposure to that level of radiation for eight hours would exceed what is deemed by the government to be safe over the course of a year.

According to Foreign Ministry officials, the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo twice provided data through e-mail messages. The radiation maps based on the results of the AMS were provided on March 18 and 20.

The Foreign Ministry immediately forwarded the data to the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) and the science ministry, which is in charge of carrying out radiation measurements.

According to several science ministry officials, including Itaru Watanabe, the deputy director-general of the Science and Technology Policy Bureau, the science ministry and NISA not only failed to publicize the data, but neglected to pass it on to the prime minister's office or the Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC).

The U.S. Energy Department released the monitoring data on March 23.

A department official noted that the information had been shared with the Japanese government.

When asked by The Asahi Shimbun why the information was not used to implement evacuation plans, Watanabe said: "While I now feel that the information should have been released immediately, at that time there was no thought given to using the provided data for the benefit of evacuating residents. We should have also passed on the information to the NSC."

Even though 15 months have passed since the data was passed on by the U.S. government, officials of NISA's Nuclear Safety Public Relations and Training Division said they were still looking into whether they obtained the information in response to repeated requests for interviews from The Asahi Shimbun.

The central government designated five municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture for evacuation on April 22. That decision was made after science ministry officials measured radiation levels on the ground and carried out joint airborne monitoring with the Energy Department.

In this way, they confirmed that areas of high radiation existed to the northwest of the plant.

Tokushi Shibata, professor emeritus of radiation management at the University of Tokyo, said: "It was a fatal error in judgment. If the data had been released immediately, the situation of residents evacuating in the wrong direction and becoming exposed to radiation could have been avoided."

The first hint that the science ministry and NISA had obtained the radiation maps from the Energy Department came in late October. However, uncovering what actually transpired ran into months of bureaucratic stonewalling.

In explaining why existence of the radiation map was not passed on to not only the prime minister's office and NSC but even the top officials of the science ministry, Watanabe said, "At that time, we did not even know how accurate the measurement data was."

Uncertainty about the accuracy of the SPEEDI forecast was also a key reason its existence was not made known to Naoto Kan, prime minister at the time, and his Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano.

When Watanabe was further pressed on why the actual measurement data was not released, he said, "At that time, the biggest issue we faced was to conduct radiation monitoring ourselves."

Although NISA officials will not publicly admit it, several government sources said the radiation map information was passed on to NISA.

One former high-ranking NISA official recalled that a large map of radiation levels was posted on a whiteboard in a NISA office used at the time as the central government's emergency response center.

While admitting to being impressed by the high technological level of the radiation map, the former official said, "At that time, we were doing everything we could to control the reactor cores at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant. There was the thinking that monitoring was the responsibility of the science ministry."

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+2 # Kootenay Coyote 2012-06-18 09:10
So much for Japanese efficiency & expertise.
 
 
+5 # John Locke 2012-06-18 11:15
So much for the lives of multiple thousands of people!

But, oh well, lets build more of these lethal chambers!
 
 
+9 # Buddha 2012-06-18 09:26
Let's not get all superior on this, our government is also clearly enforcing a restriction on informing Americans of the increased radiation fallout that we've put into our food-stream, and hence our bodies. They don't want the public freaking out on something that at this point there is little we can do about it...and as well demanding a shut down of our current reactors and moratorium on new reactors.
 
 
+1 # John Locke 2012-06-18 11:17
There is something that can be done about our radiation contamination, which is more serious then we know, radiation can be eliminated from the body, but you have to know you are contaminated firt.
 
 
+1 # Buddha 2012-06-18 19:01
It depends on the isotope and the location in the body that it is taken up. One of the locations Cesium is uptaken is bone, and isn't turned over. Get a significant pick up there, and your marrow (where your blood stem cells are) will be getting irradiated 24/7 for the rest of your life.
 
 
+4 # AndreM5 2012-06-18 09:55
"...deemed by the government to be safe over the course of a year."

No, it is an all too-common error by the media but the word "safe" is not used in this context. The level referred to is the maximum permissible yearly amount for a member of the general public.

Unfortunately, NISA and the science ministry did not hesitate to instantly raise this maximum permissible amount so the air Kerma values were below it.

Clearly the Japanese were not prepared for an "incident" of this magnitude. It's shameful in the context of their elderly nuc plants, their coastal locations, extensive knowledge of tsunami danger and the frequency of large earthquakes. Sounds like the USA.
 
 
+2 # John Locke 2012-06-18 11:18
Its called government by the incompetents
 
 
+7 # jwb110 2012-06-18 10:12
Why didn't the Energy Dept. put these findings one the Internet and on the front page of every newspaper on the planet!?!?
 
 
+5 # James Marcus 2012-06-18 11:14
Silenced Information IN THE USA, TOO.
(Lest Americans demand a halt to new Nuclear Construction here, and also a replacement of Currently Operating Stations!!)
Shhh! Quiet!! There are 'investments' to protect..
(...who cares, .... about 'The Humans?' )
 
 
+2 # Street Level 2012-06-18 14:25
And they are restarting 2 reactors! Yes, silence the information, can't make Tepco and GE look bad.
And, our Govt. shut down monitoring our shores after a couple of weeks so we wouldn't know what was falling on us, washing up on our shores or what we were eating out of the ocean.
There's a group that's been doing ongoing monitoring in San Diego. I'm sure the Govt. will silence them too.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN