FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Beckhusen reports: "The combination of tons of cash from advanced military projects and excessive secrecy is a dangerous one - it fuels corruption and graft in defense industries around the world."

General Atomics' MQ-1 Predator drone. (photo: US Air Force)
General Atomics' MQ-1 Predator drone. (photo: US Air Force)



7 Big Defense Companies with Transparency Problems

By Robert Beckhusen, Wired

31 January 13

 

he combination of tons of cash from advanced military projects and excessive secrecy is a dangerous one - it fuels corruption and graft in defense industries around the world. This week, Transparency International released its summary of corruption in the defense world, and broke down which countries scored an "F" on the watchdog's rankings for openness. The group has also been going after specific vendors of death and destruction that haven't been upfront about measures to stop corruption.

To come to its conclusions, the watchdog group surveyed companies using several criteria: whether the companies have anti-corruption programs in place, whether the companies require ethics training for employees, whether firms keep an eye on graft by their suppliers and contractors, and whether the firms prohibit - or at least regulate - political contributions and influence-buying from employees, among many other questions.

Here are seven of the worst offenders.

Above:

General Atomics

General Atomics got its start, per its name, in the nuclear industry. But the company's MQ-1 Predator drone has vaulted it to the forefront of defense firms involved in fighting the war on terror. It's also the most prominent American company to score at the bottom of Transparency International's rankings, as General Atomics did not provide information on its anti-corruption polices to the watchdog. General Atomics has also been adept at greasing its political wheels, having contributed more than $600,000 on trips for key congressional legislators during the Predator's nascent years.

For the watchdog's analysis of the U.S. defense industry as a whole, it comes off looking okay, but not great. (The U.S. gets a "B.") "The [U.S.] has extensive legislation in place to regulate defence procurement," the watchdog notes. Now wait for it: "evidence suggests that defence acquisition decisions are often political in nature." Big surprise.

Photo: Air Force

 

Aviation Industry Corporation of China

 

 

For a sense of where China is moving ahead with aviation, a good start would be keeping up with the massive state-run Aviation Industry Corporation of China, or AVIC. It's only one of the largest defense firms in China by employees. The company makes missiles, heavy-lift helicopters, and is developing the J-20 stealth fighter. Even AVIC's planes are huge: the AVIC-built long-range military transport plane, the Y-20, recently flew for the first time.

The company is also getting into the drone business, with subsidiary Chengdu Aircraft Industry Corporation developing a drone called the Pterodactyl, which closely resembles the U.S. MQ-9 Reaper. The company also makes a whole slew of commercial airplanes and parts, and has partnerships with many of the world's leading aircraft firms. AVIC hasn't been so great, however, at revealing what it does to stop corruption. Transparency International has not only listed AVIC at the bottom of its list for transparency for refusing to participate in the watchdog's surveys, the group also published findings that labeled China's defense sector to be at "high-risk" for corruption, owing to military purchases being made with little (if any) independent oversight along with "almost no scrutiny and little transparency."

 

Navantia

 

 

¡Ay no! The pride of Spanish shipbuilding is in the red for transparency, keeping its anti-corruption policies secret. Navantia, which built the Spanish aircraft carrier Principe de Asturias and the Royal Thai Navy carrier Chakri Naurebet, has also been the focus of corruption allegations in recent years. In September, allegations surfaced in the Spanish press that Navantia paid $55 million in kickbacks to Spanish and Venezuelan officials. The reason: to win a $1.5 billion shipbuilding contract for eight patrol vessels wanted by Hugo Chavez.

County-wide, though, the Spanish defense industry fares better. The defense budget is "largely transparent" and the military stays out of the private sector. "However, whistle-blowing is not recognized to be actively encouraged," the watchdog reports.

 

Pakistan Ordnance Factories

 

 

This is the big daddy of the Pakistani small arms, ammunition and artillery industry. If there's one of these types of weapons produced in Pakistan and used by the Pakistani military or around the world, odds are that Pakistan Ordnance Factories (POF) produced it. But POF doesn't give outside observers much reason to believe it's not involved in a corrupt game with its military clients, avoiding questions about what it does to stop graft.

POF has also been targeted by Taliban militants. On Aug. 21, 2008, the gates to the company's sprawling main factory complex in the city of Wah was attacked by a pair of suicide bombers during a shift change. At least 70 people were killed and more than 100 injured in the worst attack by the Taliban at that point. (It's since been eclipsed.)

POF aside, Pakistan's defense industry altogether is at serious risk for corruption. According to Transparency International, "high levels of secrecy surround defence policy and budgets." Auditing of the military budget is low to nonexistent, prosecutions for corruption are rarely revealed, and investigations into corruption involving the defense trade are made "with little de facto civilian oversight."

 

Kawasaki Heavy Industries

 

 

Popularly known around the world for its sport bikes, Kawasaki is also a major player in global shipbuilding and aerospace, designing everything from the Soryu-class diesel submarines in service with the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Forces, to maritime patrol aircraft and missiles. Unfortunately, Kawasaki ranks low in terms of transparency, having declined to answer questions about its anti-corruption policies. Kawasaki isn't the only Japanese firm involved in defense to score badly (it just scores the worst). Mitsubishi ranks low on Transparency International's list, although Fujitsu ranks quite well.

Japan's defense industry as a whole also has several problems. Close ties "between the defence sector and organized crime" is a barrier to stopping corruption. And although "strict policies and mechanisms for oversight are in place," few defense spending scandals have reached the courts.

 

Avibras Industria Aeroespacial

 

 

Better days may be behind Avibras, a Brazilian firm which focuses largely on making missiles and artillery guns. During the Cold War, its ASTROS multiple-launch rocket launcher was one of Brazil's most successful military exports. (Saddam Hussein used them in the Iran-Iraq War and the Persian Gulf War.) But the company was forced into bankruptcy protection in the early 1990s with declining sales. Avibras is now starting to bounce back, as the Brazilian government has embarked in recent years on improving its military, while seeking to revive Avibras with several contracts for new missile launchers. But the government should probably be careful about doing business with Avibras, as the company declined to participate in Transparency International's monitoring surveys.

The way the Brazilian government goes about buying weapons gets a passing grade from the watchdog, though. But only barely. "There are few requirements" on defense firms, the watchdog notes, "to show that they have anti-corruption mechanisms in place." The good news is that Brazil is pretty hard-line about stopping no-bid contracts for weapons, which can otherwise reflect cronyism between defense lobbyists and politicians.

 

Damen Schelde Naval Shipbuilding

 

 

The good news is that The Netherlands is one of the most transparent countries in the world, according to assessments by Transparency International. The bad news is that Dutch shipbuilder Damen Schelde doesn't answer questions about what it does to stop corruption on the inside. Damen Schelde is also a major player in the world's naval industry, building frigates, tankers and the Dutch navy's new generation of ocean-going patrol vessels. Damen Schelde is also a major exporter: with several recent warship sales to Indonesia and Morocco. Oddly, Leiden, Netherlands-based European defense firm EADS, which makes the Eurocopter, scores much better.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+46 # jjj 2013-01-31 15:00
It is in everyone's best interest to call this what it really is instead of by the obfuscatory and sanitized label "defense". It is not defense. It is the war machine. It is (as you correctly identified it in the first paragraph) death and destruction. It's good practice to call things by their real names.
 
 
+27 # reiverpacific 2013-01-31 16:29
Quoting jjj:
It is in everyone's best interest to call this what it really is instead of by the obfuscatory and sanitized label "defense". It is not defense. It is the war machine. It is (as you correctly identified it in the first paragraph) death and destruction. It's good practice to call things by their real names.

Right on!
I've always said that the "Department of Defense" is a total misnomer and a prank on the taxpayer.
It should be renamed the "Department of Ours is Bigger Than Yours"!
But not a cent for universal healthcare.
 
 
+4 # X Dane 2013-01-31 22:03
riverpacific.
It is interesting that little Denmark, which has a small army due to the size of the population 5 1/4 Million people. (Denmark DOES have soldiers in Afghanistan)

And in Denmark the secretary IS called the secretary of war.....At least he was 50 years ago when I lived there.
 
 
+9 # X Dane 2013-01-31 22:18
riverpacific.
In regard to the transparency. We have NO idea about all the billions we spend on weapons,planes ships etc.

They keep on working and spending, spending, on projects that are downright faulty. I read about the Osprey. the vertical takeoff airplane. It has killed so many pilots, that it is called "the widow maker". Some years ago I read that it would be sent to Iraq. I wonder how that went, for I have not heard about since then.

I think the military would be better off if they scrapped all the stuff that doesn't work...We may be able to educate our young!!
 
 
+7 # RLF 2013-02-01 06:38
If they are educated, they won't join the military! No way!

Seems like these companies are plenty transparent to the Chinese.
 
 
+5 # Regina 2013-02-01 08:10
It used to be the War Department. Many wars ago.
 
 
+11 # Vardoz 2013-01-31 15:40
As our rule of law is thrown out the window and those in charge operate in secret, anything goes. We are livng in a time of corporate anarchy. Defense contractors are no different. Watch the documentary IRAQ FOR SALE: THE WAR PROFITEERS- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8l0m1_65aU on UTUBE - although is was awhile ago incredible corruption has been going on for a long time will blow your mind and it is only getting worse. I don't know how bad it will get because it's not just the military that is corrupt, it is all of the entities that are running things including our totally so out reps who think that brides override all principles and ethics.
 
 
+17 # James Marcus 2013-01-31 16:07
Well, DUH!
Where did you think 'ALL' THE MONEY was going?
Or the reason for all the wars.... (to prepare for, and then spend more on)...with 'cost over-runs' a-plenty. Enough to fill every Legislative-Mil itary-Industria l pocket. and then some.
No Audits allowed.
 
 
-11 # Martintfre 2013-01-31 20:39
Thank God the Democrats are in charge to receive all that graft rather then the evil republicans.
 
 
+10 # Smokey 2013-01-31 20:56
Hmmmmm..... Smells like fascism to me.

Big government and big corporations are locked together - with the big money folks in charge - and everything is very mysterious.

A left-wing conspiracy? No, not really. Because the people making the big money call themselves "capitalists."
Eventually, even the libertarians will start to understand the problem.
 
 
+7 # mdhome 2013-01-31 21:52
Maybe we need a department of peace. The defense word is bull$hit, last time it could rationally be called defense was WWII.
 
 
+1 # tomtom 2013-01-31 23:18
Did I get that right, Michael Moore is defending Zero Dark Thirty? It's all right to be a homicidal maniac in the fight for freedom and the American way? Mikey, stay with us!
 
 
+1 # FDRva 2013-02-01 03:36
And the Obama White House always tells the truth.
 
 
+2 # FDRva 2013-02-01 04:01
President Obama has a British Intelligence problem.

Saudi Prince Bandar ought to tell his Al-Qaeda friends to back off in Syria.

Or maybe the Prince will tell the truth about 9-11-01.
 
 
+7 # oakes721 2013-02-01 11:36
Just as the War Department was renamed the Defense Department, the War OF Terror suggests the opposite of its true mission, keeping wars and hate and retaliation alive to sell weapons to both sides of every conflict, following the business motto to create the need.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN