Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says Iran is laying the groundwork for making nuclear weapons someday, but is not yet building a bomb and called for continued diplomatic and economic pressure to persuade Tehran not to take that step."

U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks on CBS's 'Face the Nation' in Washington on Sunday. (photo: Chris Usher/AP)
U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks on CBS's 'Face the Nation' in Washington on Sunday. (photo: Chris Usher/AP)



Panetta Says Iran Not Building a Nuclear Weapon

By Douglas Birch, Associated Press

09 January 12

 

efense Secretary Leon Panetta says Iran is laying the groundwork for making nuclear weapons someday, but is not yet building a bomb and called for continued diplomatic and economic pressure to persuade Tehran not to take that step.

As he has previously, Panetta cautioned against a unilateral strike by Israel against Iran's nuclear facilities, saying the action could trigger Iranian retaliation against U.S. forces in the region.

"We have common cause here" with Israel, he said. "And the better approach is for us to work together."

Panetta's remarks on CBS' Face the Nation, which were taped Friday and aired Sunday, reflect the long-held view of the Obama administration that Iran is not yet committed to building a nuclear arsenal, only to creating the industrial and scientific capacity to allow one if its leaders to decide to take that final step.

The comments suggest the White House's assessment of Iran's nuclear strategy has not changed in recent months, despite warnings from advocates of military action that time is running out to prevent Tehran from becoming a nuclear-armed state.

Iran says its nuclear program is only for energy and medical research, and refuses to halt uranium enrichment

Several Republican candidates have called for a tougher line against Iran, saying they believe it is committed to building the bomb. "If we re-elect Barack Obama, Iran will have a nuclear weapon," said Mitt Romney. "And if you elect Mitt Romney, Iran will not have a nuclear weapon."

Rick Santorum has said that the U.S. should plan a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities and "say to them that if you do not open up those facilities and close them down, we will close them down for you."

Iran has opened two dozen of its facilities to international inspectors, but has refused in defiance of the U.N. Security Council to suspend its uranium enrichment.

A leading hardline Iranian newspaper reported Sunday that Iran has begun uranium enrichment at a new underground site well protected from possible airstrikes.

Kayhan daily, which is close to Iran's ruling clerics, said scientists have begun injecting uranium gas into sophisticated centrifuges at the Fordo facility near the holy city of Qom.

In a talk at a Brookings Institution forum in December, Panetta said an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities would "at best" delay Iran's nuclear program by one or two years. Among the unintended consequences, he said, would be an increase in international support for Iran and the likelihood of Iranian retaliation against U.S. forces and bases in the Mideast.

Panetta did not discuss the issue directly on Sunday's "Face the Nation." But Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey, appearing with the defense secretary, said that he wanted the Iranians to believe that a U.S. military strike could wipe out their nuclear program.

"I absolutely want them to believe that's the case," he said.

Panetta did not rule out launching a pre-emptive strike.

"But the responsible thing to do right now is to keep putting diplomatic and economic pressure on them to force them to do the right thing," he said. "And to make sure that they do not make the decision to proceed with the development of a nuclear weapon."

Panetta said if Iran started developing a weapon, the U.S. would act. "I think they need to know that - that if they take that step - that they're going to get stopped."

Dempsey also said that Iran has the military power to block the Strait of Hormuz "for a period of time" if it decides to do so, but that the U.S. would take action to reopen waterway. "We can defeat that," he said.

Panetta said closing the strait would draw a U.S. military response. "We made very clear that the United States will not tolerate the blocking of the Strait of Hormuz," he said. "That's another red line for us and ... we will respond to them."

A number of experts say Iran is unlikely to close the strait, through which Gulf oil flows, because the action could hurt Iran as much as the West.

But a second Iranian newspaper, the Khorasan daily, on Sunday quoted a senior commander of the powerful Revolutionary Guard force as saying Tehran's leadership has decided to order the closure of the strategic oil route if the country's petroleum exports are blocked.

Iranian politicians have issued similar threats in the past, but this is the strongest statement yet by a top commander in the security establishment.

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+11 # colvictoria 2012-01-09 09:19
Just one more reason for our government to wean itself from Middle East oil. Haven't heard too much from our President to create or tap into the green energy market. Another war for oil simply because our leaders do not have the vision to move forward on alternative fuels.
Who suffers? Clearly a war with Iran will be eerily similar to Iraq. It took the US ten years to demolish and colonize Iraq. The Iranian people dream for freedom but absoultely want freedom on their terms not the U.S & Israel's.
Imagine what we Americans would do if we were being colonized by force through sheer genocide. I think most of us if we could would fight till the end.
 
 
+12 # MidwestTom 2012-01-09 09:23
Iran has a rich cultural heritage, a democratically elected government, and millions of young people who like America.
 
 
+6 # Todd Williams 2012-01-09 09:52
I can guarantee a war with Iran if a Rethuglican is elected. This is a no-brainer. And this will most likely be accompanied by a military draft. Folks we are done for if this happens.
 
 
+5 # angryspittle 2012-01-09 10:07
Words. Meaningless words. Remember that Colin Powell and Condi Rice said that Saddam was no threat to us or any of his neighbors. They said this at the outset of the W debacle in January or February 2001. Boy howdy did they change their tune or what? So whatever Panetta says will be meaningless as soon as the drones begin raining down on Tehran.
 
 
+16 # reiverpacific 2012-01-09 10:10
Much as I dislike the idea of a theocratic country like Iran being nuclear armed (but then so is Israel, which is hardly any better under LIKUD) , I can't get past the ultimate irony and hypocrisy of a hugely over-armed nation with nuclear and worse weaponry which could end all life on the planet, presuming to bully and threaten one which isn't even close to having that capability (but backs Israel, which has in spades).
And imagine that arsenal in the hands of Romney, Gingrich and their ilk with the "New American Century" and Koch types behind them!
Not a word on getting rid of the damn things completely and forever, except for a few sane voices like Kucinich, DeFazio and Sanders, from the wilderness.
 
 
-2 # Activista 2012-01-09 10:21
Panetta will be replaced (wants to be replaced?) - how he dares to oppose our ONLY dear friend in the Middle East!
 
 
+3 # Activista 2012-01-09 10:30
Iran war is based on worse lies than Iraq was. It is just passing blame around - political scheming - look at Obama sanctions - this is what counts.
 
 
+12 # jwb110 2012-01-09 10:59
Lets send Romney and Santorum to Iran with a sledge hammer and a shovel and see how far they get closing down the Iranian Nuclear Facilities. Every time one of those idiots opens his mouth another American life, other than their own, is put on the line. No job is impossible for the man who isn't going to actually do it.
 
 
+3 # Holyone 2012-01-09 16:51
There is one way to stop Iran from building a nucular weapon. Give them one of Israel's.
 
 
+1 # Activista 2012-01-09 18:49
Good idea - give Iran half (100 nuclear bombs) that Israel has - and all the fighting stops - mutual deterrence.
Or even better - make middle East nuclear free zone.
We are deploying thousands of soldiers to Israel - let Navy Seals do the job .. more useful than killing old sick man in bed.
 
 
+3 # RMDC 2012-01-09 17:27
Maybe Panetta is just tamping down the hysteria of the Republican candidates who are foaming at the mouth to get Iran. Clearly, the US is not ready for a war with Iran. The American people are against is, as is proved by the popularity of Ron Paul. No one in the world believes Iran is building a nuclear bomb other that the American regime's puppet masters in Israel and the colonialist wannabees in the UK and France. Panetta is buying time. When the time comes, he'll completely forget what he just said. It is like Orwell's 1984. Reality changes from day to day and the past goes down the memory hole.
 
 
+3 # ABen 2012-01-11 08:42
Iran's military and political leaders know that the existence of their state ends about ten minutes after they launch a nuclear strike against anyone. This "attack Iran before they attack us" nonsense is just the nationalistic/business wingnuts in the Military Industrial Complex trying to push the "Fear" button. Effective, hard-nosed diplomacy doesn't make them any money.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.