RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Black and Chulov report: "Syria's uprising entered uncharted territory after rebels fighting the regime of Bashar al-Assad killed three of his top security chiefs in a devastating bomb attack in the heart of Damascus."

Bashar al-Assad, center, with Hassan Turkmani, right, in 2005. Turkmani died in the bomb blast today along with Assef Shawkat, Assad's brother-in-law; and Dawoud Rajha, the defense minister. (photo: Sana/AP)
Bashar al-Assad, center, with Hassan Turkmani, right, in 2005. Turkmani died in the bomb blast today along with Assef Shawkat, Assad's brother-in-law; and Dawoud Rajha, the defense minister. (photo: Sana/AP)



Syria Rebels Kill Top Chiefs of Assad

By Ian Black, Martin Chulov, Guardian UK

19 July 12

yria's uprising entered uncharted territory after rebels fighting the regime of Bashar al-Assad killed three of his top security chiefs in a devastating bomb attack in the heart of Damascus � the single worst loss for the government in 16 months of increasingly bloody struggle.

Mass defections of soldiers and a rampage by pro-regime militiamen were reported in the capital amid a swirl of rumours, including one that Assad's wife, Asma, had fled to Russia and another that troops were being issued with gas masks, raising fears of the use of chemical weapons.

The president's whereabouts was also unclear, with one unconfirmed report that he had been wounded and left Damascus for Latakia on the coast.

Reports from Damascus on Wednesday described loud explosions, gunfire in the streets, attack helicopters firing and clouds of smoke over residential areas.

Earlier, Syrian state TV confirmed the deaths of Assef Shawkat, Assad's brother-in-law and the deputy head of the armed forces, and his closest security adviser, as well as Dawoud Rajha, the minister of defence and the regime's most senior Christian figure. Hassan Turkmani, his crisis management chief, was also killed.

Other leading figures, including the interior minister, Mohammad Shaar, and the intelligence chief, Hisham Bekhtyar, were wounded and being treated in the capital's al-Shami hospital. Uncertainty about the precise circumstances of the attack immediately gave rise to feverish speculation about possible internecine killings which the regime could blame on its enemies.

Explosions were also reported from the headquarters of the army's 4th Division in Damascus � the regime's elite unit commanded by Assad's brother, Maher.

Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, said a "decisive battle" had begun in Syria. Lavrov also made it clear that Moscow would oppose a draft UN security council resolution threatening punishment if Assad did not implement the UN-backed peace plan promoted by Kofi Annan.

The US defence secretary, Leon Panetta, said Syria was now "rapidly spinning out of control".

In Syria, the Local Co-ordination Committees, an activist network, said 102 people had been killed in fighting across the country.

The morning attack on the headquarters of Syria's national security council in the al-Rawda area was the most audacious yet by anti-Assad rebels, who have been fighting sporadically in parts of the capital for the past four days. Syrian television said it was a suicide attack, and it was rumoured that the suspected killer may have been a bodyguard for Rajha or another member of Assad's inner circle. One pro-regime source in Damascus told the Guardian it was possible a bomb could have been planted on the premises.

The attack certainly appeared to be a deadly blow to the heart of the regime after two recent high-level defections � by a senior Republican Guard commander and Syria's ambassador to Iraq.

Syrian state television said foreign-backed "terrorists" had carried out the attack. The country's armed forces said in a statement that Syria was "determined to confront all forms of terrorism and chop off any hand that harms national security".

"The opposition has hit the jackpot," said Nadim Shehadi, a Middle East analyst at Chatham House in London. "The consequences are too big to digest. It may provoke more violence by the regime. Everyone is revising their calculations.

"People will be deciding whether to defect or not and the Russians will be wondering if they have backed the wrong horse," he said.

The attack was claimed by the Free Syrian Army, the main armed opposition group. "God willing, this is the beginning of the end of the regime," its commander, Riad al-Asaad, told AP in a telephone interview from Turkey. "Hopefully, Bashar will be next." An Islamist group called Liwa al-Islam also claimed responsibility.

Syrian state television, which was uncharacteristically quick to report the news, also said the military wouldcall up its reserve forces on Thursday morning. Replacements for the three dead men were quickly announced.

General Fahd Jassem al-Freij, Rajha's replacement, denied reports on Arab satellite television channels about military defections in Idlib and Damascus and explosions at 4th Division HQ.

Rumours spread wildly in the hours after the incident, though much information was impossible to verify. According to one pro-government source, FSA rebels began moving around in pick-up trucks to demonstrate that they controlled parts of the city. Ba'ath party members had been executed by FSA men, the source said.

Damascus residents contacted by the Guardian said there had been no audible blast or visible damage at the site. Other Syrian sources suggested � without offering any evidence � that the three security chiefs might have been killed by the regime to forestall a possible coup or remove potential replacements for Assad.

"Either the generals were preparing a coup or if not there must be an intelligence operation here," said one Syrian analyst.

There were also widespread reports of defections in central Damascus as well as in the cities of Homs and Hama. Activists reported that several tanks had been abandoned near the centre of the capital and that several combat units had defected en masse. These reports could not be confirmed.

One activist, Omar al-Dimashki, said large numbers of troops and plainclothes police were deployed in the streets after the bombing, with snipers taking up positions on high buildings.

Shawkat, married to Assad's sister Bushra, was one of the most feared figures in the president's inner circle and had won the support of the clan's influential matriarch, Anisa. He was one of three central figures in the regime crackdown, along with Assad himself and his brother, Maher. As Syria's overall security chief, he had key input into all military and intelligence operations. He is known to have survived an attempt to poison him in late May when a cook contaminated food that had been prepared for him and key members of the national security ministry.

Abu Hamza, of the Free Syrian Army, told the Guardian at the time that rebel forces were trying to recruit aides of regime figures to carry out future attacks. "We have had some success with this," he said. "Some have been with us for a long time and have not yet been given orders to move."

Shawkat had also been a key point-man with Iran and with Hezbollah. Since the uprising started he had chaired key strategy meetings and had driven the regime's uncompromising and aggressive military response to the escalating dissent.

Rajha, a former general and an Orthodox Christian, was appointed defence minister last year in an apparent attempt by the Alawite-dominated regime to appoint a minority figure to a key job.

Prospects for any kind of negotiations between the government and rebels, always slim, have now all but disappeared.

Pro-regime Syrians appeared deeply shocked. "A lot of pro-Assad people are really panicking," said an opposition activist. "Now they sound really nervous."

Assad supporters admitted the attack was a serious blow. "This will not be the end of the regime in any way," said a member of Assad's Alawite community. "But it is serious and people are traumatised at the fact that the opposition managed to assassinate these people. But government supporters want the government to be firm and show it is still in control. The Syrian government is not usually impulsive."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+23 # Walter J Smith 2013-06-23 08:19
Nancy Pelosi wants the rightwing bipartisan majority of elected politicians to profit from all the snooping, not just a few thousand corporations.

They want to put the big banks and big hedge funds and big insurance and big phrma and big agriculture in charge of everything we think, do, say, breathe, eat, drink, smell, hear, drive, sell, whatever.

Thank you to those patriots in that room who invited Nancy Pelosi the reactionary to reveal her true colors.
 
 
+3 # Walter J Smith 2013-06-23 08:19
Nancy Pelosi wants the rightwing bipartisan majority of elected politicians to profit from all the snooping, not just a few thousand corporations.

They want to put the big banks and big hedge funds and big insurance and big phrma and big agriculture in charge of everything we think, do, say, breathe, eat, drink, smell, hear, drive, sell, whatever.

Thank you to those patriots in that room who invited Nancy Pelosi the reactionary to reveal her true colors.
 
 
-15 # anntares 2013-06-23 09:55
From what I've read and heard on tv, Bush/Cheney admin did not work through courts and laws but Obama's has. And mercenaries/cor prate consultants, the Patriot Act, etc. are the real targets if we want to change the NSA situation.

I also wold choose being on the edge of warrant and free speech rights over not trying to find the people who want to blow up innocents.
 
 
+34 # gd_radical 2013-06-23 11:26
The lesser of two evils is still evil. I'm proud to say that since 2010, I have not donated to any political party or candidate or vote for anyone who supports this current corporatist fascist government.
 
 
+3 # Malcolm 2013-06-23 18:54
Quoting jgorman:
The lesser of two evils is still evil. I'm proud to say that since 2010, I have not donated to any political party or candidate or vote for anyone who supports this current corporatist fascist government.

Me too, but since 2000. And I became a pariah among my liberal friends for NOT swallowing obonbya's campaign rhetoric. My friends, most of them wt least ware finally seeing what a terrible mistake they made in supporting the murderer.
 
 
+19 # reiverpacific 2013-06-23 11:49
Another status-quo pastsy -always has been or she wouldn't be where she is!
She's no more leftist than Blair or Billy-Bob Clint' was.
 
 
+9 # Malcolm 2013-06-23 18:56
Quoting reiverpacific:
Another status-quo pastsy -always has been or she wouldn't be where she is!
She's no more leftist than Blair or Billy-Bob Clint' was.


So true. Please, everyone remember it was Pelosi who could have ended the Iraq invasion singlehandedly, but REFUSED TO DO SO!
 
 
+16 # geraldom 2013-06-23 12:00
The constituents that make up Pelosi's congressional district in California were given the chance to vote in a good person to replace Pelosi in 2008, Cindy Sheehan, and they once again voted in a politically-cor rupt person.

This only proves once again that the people deserve the government they choose. They voted for Pelosi instead of Sheehan in 2008 and they got what they deserved, the same old BS.
 
 
0 # Malcolm 2013-06-23 18:57
Quoting Harold R. Mencher:
The constituents that make up Pelosi's congressional district in California were given the chance to vote in a good person to replace Pelosi in 2008, Cindy Sheehan, and they once again voted in a politically-corrupt person.

This only proves once again that the people deserve the government they choose. They voted for Pelosi instead of Sheehan in 2008 and they got what they deserved, the same old BS.


You're absolutely correct, IF THE VOTES WERE NOT STACKED AGAINST SHEEHAN...
 
 
+1 # geraldom 2013-06-24 08:10
I'm sorry, Malcolm, if you're implying or suggesting that the election was stolen away from Cindy Sheehan by Pelosi in 2008, I have to disagree with you.

I live in Arizona and therefore could not have voted for Sheehan as much as I would have liked to, but the election was completely one-sided. Cindy Sheehan had no chance whatsoever of winning.

I would agree that Nancy Pelosi did her very best to keep Sheehan completely out of the public's eye as much as humanly possible, and Pelosi absolutely refused to debate her, but the voters in Pelosi's district clearly were stupid enough and naive enough in a reasonably honest election to vote Pelosi back into office for another term over Cindy Sheehan.

Therefore, as I have stated in my initial comment, they deserve what they are getting right now and since the 2008 elections.
 
 
+4 # socrates2 2013-06-23 13:41
Pelosi may consider herself a nice person and even a "liberal" one but as legacy politician from the democrat-side of the national and imperialist "War Party," I doubt she truly understands the destruction the War Party has visited on our once-proud Constitutional republic.
At this point all she does is deliver essentially meaningless platitude-heavy speeches. Her vote to stop the War Party's madness is what I demand, not reassuring and comforting speeches.
If I were so inclined, I would assume the fetal position and suck my thumb any time I chose. I certainly don't need Pelosi's Pavlovian-bell prompts to do it for me...
 
 
+7 # Farafalla 2013-06-23 14:15
"I doubt she truly understands the destruction the War Party has visited on our once-proud Constitutional republic".

Ahem, once proud? When was that? Was it when women could not vote? Was it before the voting rights act? The true mark of a conservative is to mythologize the once glorious past as the baseline from which modern departures can be gauged. Only problem is there is no glorious past. Empire is empire.
 
 
+8 # dbriz 2013-06-23 15:16
The "War Party", a genuinely bipartisan group, has been in charge since WWII.

It has been challenged only once, actually rather benignly, by JFK and we have evidence as to how they reacted to that. All the poor guy was proposing to do was bring the CIA and JCS under control.

Prior to this, old Ike, a willing participant during his two terms in office, had toward the end, second thoughts of his own. To his credit, he gave us a modest warning in his farewell address to the nation.

Ever since, it's been a pretty much a scam. National "security" utilized as rubber stamp for all sorts of money making mischief. Aided by the CIA/MIA shadow government, supported by their corporate sponsors by way of a bought and paid for government.

The idea that we can produce some politician or group of them, who will change things is merely an extension of the con game. The Kucinichs, Feingolds even the Ron Pauls of the world, will be allowed voice only so long as they're no where near the seat of power.

A placebo, to keep the illusion of "representative " government in the forefront of public discourse while the real powers behind the throne, that is the MIC/CIA and their corporate sponsored friends, call the shots.

The GOP sold their soul in 1952.

The Dems mortgaged theirs in 1964 and finally sold it in 1992.

The politically interesting question is, will either one rediscover it?

If so, when?
 
 
+9 # cwbystache 2013-06-23 14:23
"Balance on security"? Here's the balance on security: Give me liberty or give me death. It's an equation, meaning the "liberty" part can't be tweeked any more than the "death" part.
 
 
+6 # tigerlille 2013-06-23 15:09
Nancy Pelosi is such a hack, and so is Diane Feinstein.
 
 
+4 # Malcolm 2013-06-23 19:01
Quoting tigerlille:
Nancy Pelosi is such a hack, and so is Diane Feinstein.


In the good ol days we used to think Feinstein was the cat's Meow. Wonder who bought thwt woman?
 
 
+2 # Rick Levy 2013-06-23 19:15
Pelosi lost me when she supported Bush's Iraq war.
 
 
+2 # geraldom 2013-06-24 00:37
I give you the following article:

http://news.yahoo.com/pelosis-defense-nsa-surveillance-draws-boos-183845402.html

When Mac Perkel was forcibly removed from the audience because he dared to ask Nancy Pelosi a question during her Netroots Nation presentation after she condemned Edward Snowden & supported Obama & the illegal NSA spying, some in the audience shouted leave him alone.

This was the Netroots Nation political conference. The article also states that some in the audience got up & walked out in support of Perkel. The total shame of it all was that not every person in that audience, down to a man, didn't get up & walk out in support of Perkel.

To add insult to injury, after the few walked out, most stayed & continued to listen to Pelosi's political BS. As the article states, Pelosi's remarks criticizing the Republican majority in the House & encouraging powerful women brought applause, cheers & laughs as if they actually believed she was being sincere after openly supporting the illegal NSA activities because Obama supported it.

The behavior of the majority of the audience being so forgiving of Pelosi & hanging around to listen to the rest of her BS after one of their so-called compatriots was forcibly removed as if this was a Republican conference just shows how badly fractured our side is & their support for the hired thugs who were there to forcibly kick people out if they wanted to speak up.

This goes against the whole idea of Netroots Nation.
 
 
+4 # RLF 2013-06-24 05:03
"you may disagree with me, but he did violate the law in terms of releasing those documents"

Dumb person...he didn't violate the constitution like you did Ms. Pelosi!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN