RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Intro: "Federal authorities ended two investigations into the actions of Goldman Sachs during the financial crisis, handing a quiet victory to the bank after years of public scrutiny."

[S.E.C. and Justice Dept. end mortgage investigations into Goldman Sachs. (photo: Salon.com)
S.E.C. and Justice Dept. end mortgage investigations into Goldman Sachs. (photo: Salon.com)


Feds Drop Mortgage Investigations Into Goldman Sachs

By Ben Protess and Azam Ahmed, The New York Times

10 August 12

 

ederal authorities ended two investigations into the actions of Goldman Sachs during the financial crisis, handing a quiet victory to the bank after years of public scrutiny.

In a rare statement late Thursday, the Justice Department said there was "not a viable basis to bring a criminal prosecution" against Goldman or its employees after a Congressional committee asked prosecutors to investigate several mortgage deals at the bank. Federal prosecutors are typically loath to acknowledge the closing of a case, doing so publicly in only a handful of instances over the last several years.

The Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations had examined troubled mortgage securities that Goldman sold to investors, who later sustained steep losses during the crisis. The subcommittee also suggested prosecutors investigate whether the chief executive of the bank, Lloyd Blankfein, had misled lawmakers during public testimony.

Separately, Goldman Sachs announced early Thursday that the Securities and Exchange Commission had ended an investigation into a $1.3 billion subprime mortgage deal, taking no action. The move was an about-face for the commission, which notified the bank in February that it planned to pursue a civil action.

"We are pleased that this matter is behind us," a bank spokesman said Thursday.

The moves closed a difficult chapter for the bank, whose missteps became emblematic of Wall Street's excess. But for all the public criticism of the bank, the only law enforcement case to have surfaced against Goldman was a civil case that the bank settled for $550 million in 2010 over a mortgage investment that investigators said had been intended to collapse.

The announcements were also the latest indication that federal investigations into the financial crisis were petering out as the deadline to file cases approached. While the S.E.C. has brought more than 100 financial crisis-related cases, the agency was looking to take on a big case aimed at punishing Wall Street for its role in the crisis.

After President Obama announced the creation of a special task force in January to investigate the residential mortgage mess, the S.E.C. and other authorities vowed to hold the banks accountable. Wall Street packaged and sold subprime mortgages, including to the government-owned mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that suffered billions of dollars in losses.

The subcommittee, led by Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, focused on a group of mortgage deals that Goldman had arranged and sold. Mr. Levin further suggested that Mr. Blankfein might have misled lawmakers when testifying about the deals.

But in a statement on Thursday, the Justice Department said it "ultimately concluded that the burden of proof to bring a criminal case could not be met based on the law and facts as they exist at this time." The agency said it would pursue the case again if new evidence emerged.

The S.E.C.'s inquiry into Goldman involved a package of subprime mortgages in Fremont, Calif., that the bank sold to investors in 2006. The S.E.C. was examining whether Goldman had misled investors into believing that the mortgage securities were a safe bet.

The S.E.C. in February sent the bank a so-called Wells notice, indicating that the agency 's enforcement team planned to recommend an action against the bank. At the time, Goldman said it would fight to convince regulators that they were mistaken.

On Monday, the bank learned that it was successful. Goldman was "notified by the S.E.C. staff that the investigation into this offering has been completed," the bank said In a quarterly filing released on Thursday Goldman said the agency's "staff does not intend to recommend any enforcement action."

Goldman's Fremont deal, known as Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-E, was one piece of a broader investigation into the mortgage-backed securities. Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase have also received warnings of potential action by the S.E.C.

"Mortgage products were in many ways ground zero in the financial crisis," Robert Khuzami, the agency's enforcement director, said at a news conference for the task force.

The agency, along with other federal regulators and the Justice Department, is also pursuing an array of other cases stemming from the financial crisis. And Goldman is not yet off the hook for its part in the Fremont deal.

Last year, the regulator overseeing Fannie and Freddie filed suits against 17 financial firms that sold the mortgage giants nearly $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities that later soured. In its action against Goldman, the Federal Housing Finance Agency cited the Fremont investment.

Still, the announcement on Thursday is welcome news for Goldman, allowing the bank to avoid another major battle with the S.E.C. over the mortgage crisis. In 2010, Goldman paid $550 million to settle accusations that it sold a mortgage investment that was intended to collapse. The bank, the S.E.C. said, failed to disclose to investors that the hedge fund manager John Paulson had helped create - and bet against - the deal.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+23 # CoyoteMan50 2012-08-10 07:03
Yup I figured Goldman-Sachs would get off free!
Now we know who is in whose pocket.
The thought of that isn't comforting to those who lost there houses, jobs and lives.
 
 
+24 # paulrevere 2012-08-10 07:53
As Justice Stevens noted in Citizens United, 'a democracy cannot survive if it's participants believe the laws are being bought and sold'...I paraphrase.
 
 
+9 # HowardMH 2012-08-10 11:27
Until there are two hundred thousand really, really pissed off people on Capital Hill (all at the same time) raising some serious hell absolutely nothing is ever, ever going to happen to these totally bought and paid for by the richest 50 people in the world that are becoming more and more powerful with each passing rigged election thanks to the stupid people.
 
 
+15 # usedtobesupermom 2012-08-10 08:21
This is CRIMINAL! Goldman Sachs are FINANCIAL TERRORISTS! Anyone who allows them to get away with this are accomplices in the crimes! That includes the Justice Dept who are LYING & probably paid off!
Goldman Sachs WAS RESPONSIBLE IN LARGE PART for the 1929 stock market crash too!
 
 
+2 # Stephanie Remington 2012-08-10 21:01
A lot of people use the fact that the banking industry is currently putting more money into the Romney campaign to conclude (wrongly) that it's because Obama is tougher on banks than Romney. It has nothing to do with that.

The banks were putting money into Romney so that Obama would feel forced to 'earn' back their support.

A lot of people use the fact that the banking industry is currently putting more money into the Romney campaign to conclude (wrongly) that it's because Obama is tougher on banks than Romney.

It has nothing to do with that.

The banks were putting money into Romney so that Obama would feel forced to 'earn' back their support.

Ironically, I doubt they'll give Obama more money no matter how much he shields them from any kind of accountability. They don't care who wins because they'll do equally well with either candidate. All they want is for the person currently in a position to benefit them most to do take extreme measures on their behalf.

Unfortunately, Obama will probably give them anything they want in a desperate attempt to regain their support.
 
 
+15 # dkonstruction 2012-08-10 08:45
the lesson from all of this has to be that ranting about how Goldman or other "too big to fail" criminal financial institutions or calling for "more regulation" is never going to be sufficient to reign in these guys. The only answer is to call for public banking institutions (look at the model in North Dakota that other states are now looking at) that begin to look at Finance as a public utility and not just as a vehicle for making money. You are never going to be able to regulate these guys sufficiently so why not call instead for public financial institutions which is where public monies are deposited so that "we" don't have to use these private banking institutions at all to either deposit public monies into or go to in order to borrow for public projects (North Dakota borrows from themselves via their state bank and does not have to go to the wall street bond markets at all). And, public employee pension funds should also be moved into these public banks (here in NYC the just the public employee pension funds are valued at more than $100 billion...imagi ne what "we" could do with $100 billion deposited into a publicly owned community development bank). We need to start being a whole lot more creative and learn to demand taking control over "our" money by taking it out of private banks and moving them into publicly owned ones that we can keep accountable.
 
 
+15 # reiverpacific 2012-08-10 08:52
"For Thirty Pieces of Silver he was betrayed"!
Now we all know what it's like.
 
 
+13 # jwb110 2012-08-10 09:34
To investigate Goldman-Sachs would lead to investigating the Fed and that is not going to happen in anybody's lifetime. They are all tarred with the same brush.
 
 
+9 # RLF 2012-08-10 09:52
The good ole administration lets of the good ole boys.
 
 
0 # paulrevere 2012-08-10 10:23
the Zer-'0' stumbles again...bad baton pass by WETHEPEOPLE.

Sadly brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department Department.
 
 
+9 # grouchy 2012-08-10 09:56
Oh golly gee, could it be that all this time the fix was in? Shocking thought.

With all the financial crap that went on, exactly how did the committee not find a single case to send someone(s) to prison?
By this time there should be any number of these guys living in the same prison other crooks are housed in! Oh, and not one of those country club gigs either!
 
 
+10 # erogers 2012-08-10 10:00
Not surprised by this announcement. If any truly legitimate and serious investigation by the Justice Dept. were to take place, not only the Fed would be involved but also the stinking path would lead to Congress. The entire stinking deck of cards would be threatened. A damned shame Justice has no guts but I am sure the decision came from far higher up the feed chain. The only thing the public can do is never do business with these greedy bastards.
 
 
+11 # Kootenay Coyote 2012-08-10 10:19
Well, that really reassures us all about the authenticity of US justice, doesn’t it?
 
 
+3 # ghostperson 2012-08-10 14:57
The government damn well pursue those bastards in civil litigation like the hounds of hell and I don't want to hear about any settlements that serve as a slap on the wrist. Maybe it will be up to the populace to publish a list of financial fraud offenders on the order of the sex offenders list so that there can at least be social repercussions. Like pedophiles who proclaim that child love isn't wrong, financial fraudophiles denial culpability for wrongdoing. Apparently, they cannot see the human carnage littering the Anerican landscape or if they do, try to blame the victims, a common tactic in rape prosecutions.

It is clear as a bell that justice in this country is an illusion. In China, they execute defrauders. They also did so in the times of Hammurabi and 19th century Europe. Our government, the bought and paid for one, rewards financial criminals with taxpayer bailouts and does nothing for those bilked. The so-called leadership of this country has lost the ability to govern. The right rules. The left plays defense. No one is minding the store for the people. We have what amounts to a dysfunctional quasi-theocrati c oligarchy. I am sure that is not what the frames had in mind.
 
 
+10 # SMoonz 2012-08-10 15:06
"After President Obama announced the creation of a special task force in January to investigate the residential mortgage mess, the S.E.C. and other authorities vowed to hold the banks accountable. Wall Street packaged and sold subprime mortgages, including to the government-owne d mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that suffered billions of dollars in losses."

The task force was a joke from the beginning. When Goldman Sachs people are sitting in the Obama Cabinet, how in the world are we going to get a fair investigation?

It won't happen.
 
 
+1 # DPM 2012-08-10 16:48
Any other outcome would have been unthinkable.
 
 
+2 # Michael_K 2012-08-10 18:06
"Change you can believe in"

Isn't it about time he was shown the door? This blatant corruption is intolerable.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN