Mathiason reports: "Some of these banks have been labeled 'too big to fail' following the financial crisis. But ... there is compelling evidence to suggest they are also 'too big to be true.'"
Between 1980 and 2010, incomes of the top 1% in the United States doubled and the top 0.1% tripled. (photo: Issei Kato/Reuters)
The World's Super-Rich Have Stashed $21 Trillion in Offshore Accounts
26 July 12
nvestigative economist James Henry exhaustively trawled through financial information held by the IMF, World Bank, Bank for International Settlements, central banks and national treasuries to come up with the most definitive report ever written on the super-rich and offshore wealth.
Henry’s Price of Offshore Revisted report, commissioned by Tax Justice Network, shows:
- between $21 trillion and $32 trillion of financial assets is owned by High Net Worth Individuals in tax havens. This does not include real estate, art or jewels.
- a conservative 3% return on that $21tn taxed at 30% would generate $189bn – a figure easily eclipsing what OECD industrialised nations spend on overseas development aid.
- the top 50 private banks collectively managed more than $12.1tn in cross-border invested assets for private clients, including their trusts. This is up from $5.4tn in 2005.
- fewer than 10 million members of the global super-rich have amassed a $21tn offshore fortune. Of these, less than 100,000 people worldwide own $9.8tn of wealth held offshore.
Accompanying the Price of Offshore Revisited is a separate paper (which I co-wrote). It reveals that data used by individual countries to assess the gap between rich and poor is inaccurate. And as a result, inequality is far more extreme than policymakers realise.
This is because economists calculating inequality fail to include the vast majority of offshore cash in their findings. So the wealthy are far better off than the studies suggest.
In Inequality: you don’t know the half of it, eight of the world’s leading economists were asked whether offshore wealth was largely excluded from inequality studies. Ranging from the World Bank’s acting chief economist to academics at the Paris School of Economics and the Brookings Institute in the US, they all confirmed this was the case.
This is because the wealthy do not disclose their true incomes. They also rarely participate in surveys. Academics do compensate for non-particpation but they admit, official data vastly underestimates the true picture.
Trickle Up
Combined, the two papers published by TJN end any notion that trickle down economics – the Thatcher/Reagan doctrine that suggests tax breaks for the rich benefits all society – works.
We already know that in the US between 1980 and 2010, incomes of the top 1% doubled and the top 0.1% tripled while the bottom 90% saw their incomes fall 5%. But the TJN studies show this wealth disparity would be statistically even worse if offshore cash is included in official studies.
Perhaps most tellingly, the reports bring into sharp focus how global banks – so-called ‘pirate banks’ – have enabled the super-rich to avoid unimaginable sums of tax while at the same time enjoying taxpayers cash through government bank bailouts. A true double whammy of dark proportions.
Some of these banks have been labelled ‘too big to fail’ following the financial crisis. But after the Libor scandal, HSBC’s key role in laundering Mexican drug cash and the subprime bank disaster, there is compelling evidence to suggest they are also ‘too big to be true’.
Which brings us to an issue that is fast troubling global financial regulators: the so-called ‘London disease’. It has not gone unnoticed that many of the financial scandals in recent years have a Square Mile connection. Never mind Libor, it was the London offices of AIG, Lehman Brothers and Bernie Madoff that helped destroy them. The JP Morgan and UBS rogue traders who lost billions were both London based.
The UK is also arguably the centre of the offshore world. It is one of the biggest private bank centres and Britain’s non-domicile tax rules allow the global super-rich to legally avoid taxes on their overseas income while residing here. In addition, many of the UK’s overseas territories and crown dependencies such as Jersey, Isle of Man, the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands are major offshore centres. This perhaps explains why the British government, for all its rhetoric, has failed to clamp down on the shadow financial system.
It has taken the painstaking work of TJN’s Henry to bring to light the true price of offshore. That the IMF, World Bank or OECD has not done this work is troubling especially as their lack of effective oversight contributed to the economic crisis that has caused significant hardship for hundreds of millions of people.
A good way to atone is to start deploying their thousands of economists to implement measures that will introduce transparency to the financial system instead of policies that facilitate secret offshore hoarding by a tiny elite.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Ah, yes; we've heard a little something about that!
Oligarchic paranoia strikes deep...into your life it will creep.
The enn essssss aayyy Utah facility for US here in the good ol land of the free home of the brave.
I think you mean including Bushes reign of error, his whole presidency was an error from how he got selected and on from there. Because president Obama had to budget the wars Bush and Cheney started on a credit card. It all has to be accounted for now. Those two idiots (W and Dick)are the real errors of terror. Obama has to fix the damage these two stooges did in the real 8 years of true terror. What your spouting is just Fox news propaganda.
W and Dick the true morons that enabled the rich to stock pile their money outside of the US (how unamerican can you get?), that are basically unaccountable by you and all the other right wingers. Because Fox News doesnt talk about them anymore they never exsisted in right wing world...it all would be laughable if it wasnt the truth.
Quit acting like George W Bush never exsisted, and blaming Obama for everything! Bush ruined this country and was an idiot. Obama is not an idiot, and has tried to work with republicans, it didnt work. They have discredited him on every level. Most of it was not deserved, if they would have put Bush under the same microscope they are putting Obama under he would have been the joke of the century that he was, just that most people would be able to see he crippled this country more then any past or present president ever could. I dont think Obama is perfect, but you dont give him credit for anything hes done, which is more then Bush ever did to make this country better.
Answer me this one question while your trashing Obama to high heaven...do you honestly think Mitt the etch-a-sketch Romney will do better? If you do, then your the one with the blinders on not me.
keping the Bush advisors around him and following ALL of Bush's policies...Obam a could be said to be Bush's puppet!
Oh boy a big 3 years ago since Bush ruined the country...but I bet you wont hesitate to throw Clintons name out there every chance you get LOL. Dont talk about Bush but keep trashing Obama. Romney will do nothing but continue the ruin Bush started.
I have my opinion and I couldnt care less if you agree with me or not.
i am going with a third party! as any intelligent person is doing this election!!!
Obama can't even get out of his own way...
Sunday, July 29, 2012
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows Mitt Romney attracting 47% of the vote, while President Obama earns support from 45%. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided.
I strongly criticized and protested against the unconstitutiona l acts, power grabs, and corruption of GWB and – unlike those of you who ignore or praise Obama when he does the same things, and worse – I speak out against those policies regardless of who commits them.
Arguing that Obama’s heinous continuation and expansion of GWB lawlessness, violence, and protecting big corporate donors at the expense of the rest of us is good, because – astoundingly – Romney’s plans for the country are even worse make no logical sense.
We’re going to be stuck with one of these ticking-time-bo mbs-for-democra cy until a majority of us reject the implicit threat they both make – that voting for someone outside the two major parties will destroy the country because it will cause the ‘other’ guy to win.
If you’ve decided that there’s no standard below which you won’t accept, as long as the other one is worse, that’s your business. Falsely accusing me of wearing blinders because I reject that choice is no more reasonable than the many bizarre accusations that get hurled at Obama by birthers, etc.
I know its hard to accept, but NDAA is not a very good law and the Health care program is actually going to leave more people without coverage!!!
But, I know, I know... Obama is the best of the evils you have to choose from...I prefer not to vote for any evil, I guess that makes me a renagade!
1) Pushing the National Defense Authorization Act that now gives the US gov't the authority to detain (permanently) anyone it wants to (including US citizens) anywhere in the world and hold them forever without ever even charging let alone trying or convicting them of anything
2) Putting Social Security "on the table" (accorging to John Conyers it was Obama and not the repubs) in the deficit reduction talks evn though SS contributes not one penny to the deficit
3) Taking the health care public option "off the table" before the health care reform fight even really began
3) Overthrowing the democratically elected President of Honduras (he was flown out of the country on a US military plane)
4) Demanding that former democratically elected Haitian President, Arristide's Lavalas party (the most popular political party in the country by far) be prevented from participating in the recent elections.
There are many other examples to be sure (as well as some things for which he should be commended e.g., supporting gay marriage, ensuring that those with "pre-existing conditions cannot be denied coverage). So, we'll agree to stop blaming Obama for Bushes crap if your side will agree to start blaming (thuogh it's really not about "blame" but about being critical and exerting political pressure to change)Obama for his own crap. Deal?
Well if you agree he was a holdover from Bush then you acknowledge his misjudgements and bad advice go way waaay back to the Bushera. I agree Obama made a mis-step in taking him on; But that whole deregulation got started decades before Obama came into office we all know that.
The kind of smarmy, weak kneed, excuse making, overnurturing, refusal to admit hard facts about 0's behavior that goes on with 0'bots here and in the MSM is just frustrating and unconscionable.
ADMIT the dude is a shill and get on with the reality of REAL political judgement and activity...SHEE SH!
The line of truth is...'wish n hope in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up faster.
Who is being PRACTICAL in that regard?
Even if they - and everyone else - have to lose for them to to win it for Obama.
antemedius.com/content/obama-shoe-2012-re-election
Yes; too idealistic, too full of hope for change; too innocent and trusting. Who but the most cynical would not think it could be so; I so remember the excitement, the hope for change of that election night. That the repubbies snubbed his best efforts makes if totally sick. This is goling to be continued into the future; It is a devastatiing blow to our political scene and will pull us all down into the slime and the mud.
It is all upsetting; we with kids of 35 - 40 know right now that their lives are lost. Nothing will help them, and terrible and frightening, without jobs, as their lives are - God help them later.
Holy cow! As if that's a really thorny issue.
How about anybody who WASN'T involved in bringing about the crisis? Maybe even someone who had warned it would happen? Somebody who wasn't linked at the hip to the big bankers? How about someone with a track record of success instead of failure?
A few names: Joseph Stiglitz, Brooksley Born, Dean Baker, Sheila Bair, Robert Johnson, Simon Johnson, James Galbraith, Elizabeth Warren...
I agree with pernsey here. I strongly recommend that all read Russ Baker's book, Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, the Powerful Forces That Put It in the White House, and What Their Influence Means for America (only $12 on Amazon). Baker connects a lot of dots from the public domain together with his own research to make a strong case that the Bush dynasty, beginning with the grandfather working through the CIA and other secret societies (e.g., Yale's Skull and Bones), worked rather successfully to take over the US Government for the benefit of their fellow oligarchs. For example where have the billions of dollars "lost" in Iraq gone? Who have they benefited? Who appointed most of the members of the Supreme Court?
Though as a U.K. resident, I feel some responsibility, to help put the home of the "square mile", down the tubes first.
Not surprising that this transglobal chicanery is centered in London. Not surprising that Romney is there now.
But I doubt they will even get that.
Use NDAA, Bernie Sanders' ag bill amendment and DISCLOSE as your litmus tests. If YOUR representatives voted for the former and to kill the other two, DO NOT VOTE FOR THEM IN NOVEMBER, regardless of party. If your Senator or House Rep is a Dem and supported either NDAA, Monsanto or hiding rich people's political contributions, then YOU vote for the Republican. If your Senator or House Rep is a Republican and supported NDAA, Monsanto, or hiding rich people's contributions, vote for the Democrat. Not only vote but email all your friends and show them the actual vote tallies to prove that the sobs HAVE been corrupted.
The FIRST thing we have to do is get rid of the bought and paid for people in Congress. Without THEM, the President will not be able to cater to the oligarchy, whether his name is Obama or Romney.
And then I would suggest you go have a good, long, close look at the Green Party.
They have not been a force to be reckoned with in the past but they have made some impressive strides across this country. They probably won't be ready to be a third party in the upcoming November election, but they make a very attractive group to support afterwards. They don't take corporate contributions and they are working for the best interests of suffering human beings, not the money addicts.
Follow the money... So true.(Especiall y as dollars are now super-citizens with unbridled, unaccountable "free speech".) The best of times (for 2%) and the worst of times.... Imagine if everyone voted (once, and without being prevented by vote-rigging, poll taxes, etc.).
Bernie Sanders definitely had it exactly right in his passionate speech to the committee. When will our representatives represent We the people of America - those of us who breathe and work, and invest in the US, and pay taxes all our lives for the few social benefits our society has, reflecting American ideals of opportunity, and a government of, by, and for the people.
What K. Marx had predicted the directionof runaway or unchecked capitalism is indeed happening before your very eyes in America! PLEASE wake up to this unfortunate but urgend fact!
What is needed is not the old CCCP or present Chinese form of 'socialism' as that really isn't! TRUE socialism is a democratic value system that involves ALL people, not only the .01 percent or the like! I am a greem democratic socialist, more to the true word of Karl Marx. If you haven't actually sat down and read any of Karl Marx's words, it might be a good idea to actually take some time and do so!
thanks!
Thank you!
If that fantasy ever is understood by most people to be what it really is - simply a fantasy on about the same level as the easter bunny or the tooth fairy or santa claus that no one is under any obligation to accept - then they'll have a serious problem as they watch their fantasized "wealth" evaporate.
In recent weeks, Theodoros Mavridis has bought fresh eggs, tsipourou (the local brandy: beware), fruit, olives, olive oil, jam, and soap. He has also had some legal advice, and enjoyed the services of an accountant to help fill in his tax return.
None of it has cost him a euro...
Tems has been up and running for barely 18 months, said Maria Choupis, one of its founder members. Prompted by ever more swingeing salary cuts and tax increases, she reckons there are now around 15 such networks active around Greece, and more planned. "They are as much social structures as economic ones," she said. "They foster intimacy and mutual support."
-- http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/16/greece-on-breadline-cashless-currency
there is also the Pittsboro Plenty, and the Ithaca Hour.
Maybe "Occupy Reserve Notes" would be a good idea too...
--> Google "Local Currency" Images
I guess those who see the common good of paying their fair share are just plain stupid in Romneys view-or are some of the "You people" in his wifes....
Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative".
She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.
I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."~ Albert Einstein
RSS feed for comments to this post