Intro: "Times are good for the six largest oil companies, with profits easily surpassing the figures from before the 2008 financial meltdown."
ExxonMobil and the other 'super major' oil companies reported huge fourth-quarter profits. (photo: Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images)
Big 6 Oil Companies Complete a Trillion-Dollar Decade
06 March 12
imes are good for the six largest oil companies, with profits easily surpassing the figures from before the 2008 financial meltdown. In 2011 ExxonMobil led the way with profits of $41.1 billion. Shell was in second place at $28.6 billion, followed by Chevron at $26.8 billion and BP at $23.9 billion. Total was back at $15.9 billion and ConocoPhillips trailed at $12.4 billion. All six showed stronger profits than in 2007.
Overall it's been literally a trillion-dollar decade for the oil and gas giants. From 2002 to 2011, ExxonMobil gained $310.6 billion, Shell $203.9 billion, Chevron $151.8 billion and BP $146.9 billion despite its loss year because of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
Although oil industry advocates, such as Jack Gerard, the CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, have recently whined about "discrimination" against the oil industry, Taxpayers for Common Sense has called attention to at least a dozen different subsidies that favor the industry. Brian Siu, a policy analyst for the Natural Resources Defense Council, told Roll Call that one subsidy, allowing companies to deduct intangible drilling costs, has been available to the industry since 1916.
To Learn More:
Big Oil Tops $150 Billion in Profits in 2011 (Taxpayers for Common Sense)
Financial Performance of the Major Oil Companies, 2007-2011 (by Robert Pirog, Congressional Research Service) (pdf)
Petroleum Industry Claims Cutting Its Tax Breaks is "Discriminatory" (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)
U.S. Use of Gasoline is Down, Yet Pump Prices are Up as Speculators Move In (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)
Senate Retains $2 Billion in Annual Tax Breaks for Big 5 Oil Companies (by Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky, AllGov)
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
One can complain about the oil companies greed but the real profiteers here are the government bureaucrats who collect the taxes.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
That's donning blue-colored glasses if ever I read it.
WHo the Hell d'you think OWNS the "representative s" who employ the bureaucrats and dispense favors to their corporate masters on high via lobbyists or "burrowers" largesse in the other direction, skimmed off before it even gets near the treasury?!
I'm perfectly open to hearing new facts. What subsidies are you talking about?
To the best of my knowledge the "subsidies" are what Washington calls "tax expenditures" -- money that is earned by the taxpayer that the government allows the taxpayer to keep. But if there is more to it, I'd certainly be interested in finding out any details you have.
Until I hear otherwise, I will maintain that the primary financial benefits of oil production go to government bureaucrats rather than to the workers and managers and stockholders of oil companies.
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
RSS feed for comments to this post