Val Zavala interviews veteran journalist Bill Moyers ahead of his highly anticipated new show, Moyers & Company about the state of our economy, a broken government, and the changing body politic.
According to Bill Moyers, 'The growth of inequality in this country is the biggest story of our time.' (photo: Robin Holland)
The Biggest Story of Our Time
06 January 12
�
�
ranscript:
Living in the 2nd Gilded Age.
Bill Moyers: The growth of inequality in this country is the biggest story of our time. The "have-nots" now have less than they ever did. The "have-it-alls" now have more than they ever did. Since 1979, 40 percent of the growth of income has gone to one percent of the population. This is changing us radically.
You go back to the last part of the 19th century, the first gilded age. We're living in the second gilded age. The first gilded age, the industrial revolution, released enormous wealth at the top and excruciating misery at the bottom. It took the populist movement, the progressive movement, finally leading into the New Deal and the Fair Deal, before we began to correct those imbalances.
It's Not Money Anymore.
Val Zavala: Do they realize that greed is bad? Do they realize?
Moyers: No, they think greed is good.
Zavala: They really do?
Moyers: They think the more money they make, the more trickles down to everybody else. That's not true. Trickle-down economics has never worked. It just has never worked, despite what Ronald Reagan said in the early 1980s. If it trickles down, it trickles only down the leg, because that is what they are doing to us. No, you know, these are interesting people. They're very smart people. They're also monomaniacal people. That is, they see only one thing ahead of them, and that's making money.
You know, there has to be a moment when you have enough and more than enough. You take Warren Buffet has $13 billion. How can he even think about spending the interest? But they get into this world where the only defining standard of success is more money. No matter what they do with it.
Zavala: It's almost not money anymore? It's a like a game or points?
Moyers: It's not money anymore.
Zavala: It's not money anymore.
Moyers: It's not money anymore.
They Can Write the Rules.
Moyers: There's always been a tension in American life between democracy and capitalism. Democracy proclaims that we are essentially a political equal. You have as much potential to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. You have as much potential to have your voice heard as I do or anybody else. That's democracy, where you have a rough political equality trying to solve our common problems. Capitalism is about accumulating wealth. Nothing wrong with that, nothing wrong with capitalism. Nothing wrong with corporations within their sphere, but when they become so powerful that they can write the rules by which democracy operates, then you get not democratic capitalism, but crony capitalism. That's the kind of capitalism that's taking us down.
The Rules Can Be Changed Again.
Moyers: Since 1971, when the corporate and business community mounted what became really a class war on the middle class, the middle class had been shrinking. But they rewrote the rules of the economy, and they rewrote the rules of politics to give tax breaks and all kinds of advantages to the people with capital, the people with money. If those rules were rewritten, they can be re-rewritten. Rules can be changed again. It comes down to politics. You see, we talk about these people at Occupy Wall Street, and they say they don't know what they're doing and don't know why they are there. We know why they're there. They're occupying Wall Street because Wall Street has occupied the country.
He's Not a Fighter.
Moyers: The economy and the government was in sad shape when Barack Obama started running. He didn't have a policy for dealing with the financial collapse. It happened, as I say, in the fall of that year. I mean, it started before that, but it came, the bridge came down while he and McCain were nearing the end of it. But, and he was inexperienced. He had no experience to deal with this. Five years before Barack Obama was taking the oath of office, he was the state senator in Illinois. He, son of a white woman and black father; grandmother who was white and, by the way, a banker; grandmother, who had great influence on him, was a banker. He negotiated his way through a white man's world. And the lesson on him was "I'm not gonna be Jesse Jackson. I'm not gonna be Al Sharpton. I'm gonna be different. I'm gonna be a post-racial, post-partisan person because that's how I've gotten here; and he assumed that the other side wanted to play by the rules the way he did. They don't. Every time he put out his hand, they slap it way. He puts it out again, they slap it away. Then they start slapping his cheeks like in the movie - bang bang bang. He says, "Let's get along," and they � but he cannot come out of that negotiating posture that he thinks is the way you achieve your purposes in the world. And that's right if you're in a non-polarized world, but when you are in a polarized world, you gotta fight. You gotta be tough. You gotta be like Franklin Roosevelt. "My enemies hate me. And I welcome their hate." You know, you gotta talk about Teddy Roosevelt, about the "malefactors of great wealth." You gotta fight for the people. He's not a fighter. He's a good smart guy, but he's not a fighter.
If We Don't Do Something...
Moyers: When I was in Washington we passed the Civil Rights Act of '64, the Voting Rights Act of '65, and the Civil Rights Act of '66 � only took 51 votes. Nowadays, it takes 60 votes just to get the right to vote in the Senate. And you can never get 60 votes to break the filibuster. So that's paralyzing. It's making it impossible for any good thing, anything to happen, whether it's good or what, for any progress to be made towards solving these problems. So if we don't do that, and if we don't do something about this enormous inequality, we're going to wind up like Mexico, Russia, Brazil.
I hope I'm wrong. If we can, I mean, there's enormous resiliency in the American people. We're the richest nation in the world still. China is going to catch up with us, but we have enormous resources. Except that our political system is not just broke. It is dysfunctional.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Re. hope and change, OhBombAh's kicked us more than twice, so shame on him.
If he does veto it, my guess is that he is pretty sure his veto will be voted down and it will go on the books as Law -- to threaten us all until God himself takes this horrid Congress down. Where IS conscience in everything he has done in the past three years? And if he is indeed threatened, or in fear for his family -- not at all surprising -- then why does he not just say so and step down? Must he take America with him?
IMO, there's not a sincere bone in his body. Either he says he won't sign it but will, or will oppose it for the wrong reasons, (to make it worse) or to make himself look good (to the hopelessly naive) for awhile, so they can go back to sleep.
Don't buy any of this. Its a psy-opps, a distraction. The state wants these powers and its going to get it unless we give them something else to think about, (and no, not elections... sigh).
Thank you all for willingness to care to see through the garbage. With people like you amongst us, there's still hope.
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN !!
This is a craven ploy, plain and simple.
Read Glenn Greenwald at salon.com.
According to Greenwald, Obama's objections have nothing to do with Constitutional issues over the rights of U.S. citizens.
Obama's argument is, essentially, that: it is not the role of Congress to legislate the President's authority to designate non-U.S.-citize ns AND/OR U.S. Citizens as terrorists or enemy combatants, to be detained indefinitely and without due-process by the military apparatus, because the President, without Congressional legislation, already has that authority.
His issue against this legislation, just as it would be for GW Bush/Cheney, is because of the idea that the President's existing executive power precludes -- or renders superfluous -- statutory authority, so he is making this threat as negotiating leverage for that concession.
Obama takes his blind, ignorant, apologist, fool supporters for granted.
He (and rightfully so) gives them no credit for intellectual capacity to realize the irrelevance of their opinions by standing by him and/or supporting (or not supporting) his decisions.
They are all mindless numskulls with nothing to say, nor do they stand for anything.
CTPatriot also uses a word that I have been meaning to use, but I keep forgetting -- to describe the Obama apologist's reaction to anything that triggers their Republican-fear ing (and I would say, lack of) sensibilities; the word is reflexive.
So even a Republican can occasionally do something correctly.
Or do you just so reflexively support him that you could care less about the actual meaning or outcome of his actions? If Obama does it, it must be good, right? How are you different from what we once called "Loyal Bushies"?
Not only do the GOP/TP want President Obama out of the W.H. BECAUSE he's a Democrat -- but there is no doubt in my mind that the GOP has racism in their agenda. Newt came right out and said he wanted to put the children in "those" districts (the working poor) to work as janitors helpers bc they have no role model! Other examples are clear.
When the African Americans fought for equal rights - they did not come in under "equal right protection" - but under something called "equal social right protection" - and you're smart enough to figure out the difference!
The war on drugs is designed to punish the black/Hispanic districts because I know white districts where the users/dealers are not told to empty pockets and even the drugs targeted by police are different (White = cocain) (Black=crack cocain)
Although we know the minorities have suffered more than other groups (e.g. jobs & houses especially) - they will not be the only groups to lose under GOP leadership - all of the 99erswill lose. That is 100% for sure because the GOP candidates have told us so. You just have to listen to them.
The GOP priority is not jobs
2012 - register early + mail-in ballots VOTE DEM VOTE OBAMA (BarbaraK)
Neither one of these corrupt parties is going to change that dynamic. The day you recognize that is the day you will stop spouting bullshit about "the art of the possible".
"It would require that terrorism suspects be held by the military, and either be tried by US military commissions or in some cases be held indefinitely.
The White House sees the provisions as a constraint on the administration' s ability to transfer prisoners from Guantanamo Bay to the United States, try them in civilian court, or even transfer them to foreign countries."
So they're blowing smoke, really. No veto for detention, just veto "if you don't play ball ABOUT HOW to detain" my way.
This passive-aggress ive stuff is what we have been used to getting from Obama. I saw the movie "Blow" last night for the first time, and it reminded me about how people in power play both ends against the middle, gerrymander their propaganda to look like they're gonna do something FOR the people, but...NAH...not happening.
Article a day or so again on RSN said it all: Obama' just not into us...for real.
N.
But the herd will buy anything if the $multibillion-p rofit news media says its so.
However this all represents hills and valleys of degree in the advance of the Police State -or Corporate ditto- it's all the same.
Ob's real test if he survives to be president with a decent majority, will be how he conducts his second term (Gawd forbid any of the current crop of chowder-heads on the right even comes close to being elected -but never underestimate the "Idiotocracy" quotient of the American once-every-four -years electorate!
Those who end their comments with 'Never Vote Republican' do not address the real problem. The real problem is and has been the uselessness and cowardice of the Democrats in Congress who are apparently just as corrupt as their G.O.P. counterparts. Only THREE Democratic Senators voted against the final bill here. The rest, including my own state's Boxer and Feinstein, voted with those who would throw away my constitutional rights.
I'm not voting for any Republican I can see at this point, but I am also never again voting for Democrats who betray our trust, and there are a lot of them.
"Sophistry" which Socrates used in his famous dialogues(writt en by Plato) to demonstrate the antithesis of Greek Ethics which is based on Universal Truth.
He's doing the daddy act. He's telling the country he can either make your life h*ll or he can give you paradise-and you'd BETTER choose the right side or he will punish you.
Obama is a slave that thinks he's the slavemaster.
Twenty dollars says there will suddenly be (Israel placed) an "uprising" here in America that makes obama reconsider.
Then he will drag this act back out, tell us we were naughty, and punish us.
Roosevelt,Kansa s City Star, May 7,1918
Remember who elected you and why.
We don't care if you're sincere or agree with us. We just want you to do the job you were hired to do. The repug party didn't hire you. We did. Do you want us to show up at the polls next year?
Stand OUR ground. This is bigger than you.
Nay IA Harkin, Thomas [D]
Nay UT Lee, Mike [R]
Nay OR Merkley, Jeff [D]
Nay KY Paul, Rand [R]
Nay VT Sanders, Bernard
Nay OR Wyden, Ron [D]
www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2011-218&sort=vote
When there is a clause, as was in this defense bill, that Americans can be held without charge or trial threatened one of our basic fundamental rights promised in our Constitution.
But should read: It would require that terrorism suspects be held by the military, and either be tried by US military commissions or in most cases be held indefinitely if desired by the captors, all without the (supposedly) Contstitutional guarantees of Due Process of Law.
Never Vote Republican.
Mr. President Veto this Bill.
If you don't want a complete police state then get over your anger at Obama.
Him staying in office and voting out the republicans in house and senate is our only hope.
Give the guy some credit for trying. He is our only hope.
You don't think one of those bozo candidates would be better do you?