Excerpt: "Since her initial allegation on May 14, the accuser has repeatedly lied, one of the law enforcement officials said. Senior prosecutors met with lawyers for Mr. Strauss-Kahn on Thursday and provided details about their findings, and the parties are discussing whether to dismiss the felony charges."
Dominique Strauss-Kahn arrived at Manhattan Criminal Court for his arraignment in New York, 06/06/11. (photo: Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)
Strauss-Kahn Rape Case on Verge of Collapse
�
Unbelievable. -- ma/RSN
�
he sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her in his Manhattan hotel suite in May, according to two well-placed law enforcement officials.
Although forensic tests found unambiguous evidence of a sexual encounter between Mr. Strauss-Kahn, a French politician, and the woman, prosecutors do not believe much of what the accuser has told them about the circumstances or about herself.
Since her initial allegation on May 14, the accuser has repeatedly lied, one of the law enforcement officials said.
Senior prosecutors met with lawyers for Mr. Strauss-Kahn on Thursday and provided details about their findings, and the parties are discussing whether to dismiss the felony charges. Among the discoveries, one of the officials said, are issues involving the asylum application of the 32-year-old housekeeper, who is Guinean, and possible links to criminal activities, including drug dealing and money laundering.
Prosecutors and defense lawyers will return to State Supreme Court in Manhattan on Friday morning, when Justice Michael J. Obus is expected to consider easing the extraordinary bail conditions that he imposed on Mr. Strauss-Kahn in the days after he was charged.
Indeed, Mr. Strauss-Kahn could be released on his own recognizance, and freed from house arrest, reflecting the likelihood that the serious charges against him will not be sustained. The district attorney's office may try to require Mr. Strauss-Kahn to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, but his lawyers are likely to contest such a move.
The revelations are a stunning change of fortune for Mr. Strauss-Kahn, 62, who was considered a strong contender for the French presidency before being accused of sexually assaulting the woman who went to clean his luxury suite at the Sofitel New York.
Prosecutors from the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., who initially were emphatic about the strength of the case and the account of the victim, plan to tell the judge on Friday that they "have problems with the case" based on what their investigators have discovered, and will disclose more of their findings to the defense. The woman still maintains that she was attacked, the officials said.
"It is a mess, a mess on both sides," one official said.
According to the two officials, the woman had a phone conversation with an incarcerated man within a day of her encounter with Mr. Strauss-Kahn in which she discussed the possible benefits of pursuing the charges against him. The conversation was recorded.
That man, the investigators learned, had been arrested on charges of possessing 400 pounds of marijuana. He is among a number of individuals who made multiple cash deposits, totaling around $100,000, into the woman's bank account over the last two years. The deposits were made in Arizona, Georgia, New York and Pennsylvania.
The investigators also learned that she was paying hundreds of dollars every month in phone charges to five companies. The woman had insisted she had only one phone and said she knew nothing about the deposits except that they were made by a man she described as her fianc� and his friends.
In addition, one of the officials said, she told investigators that her application for asylum included mention of a previous rape, but there was no such account in the application. She also told them that she had been subjected to genital mutilation, but her account to the investigators differed from what was contained in the asylum application.
A lawyer for the woman, Kenneth Thompson, could not be immediately reached for comment on Thursday evening.
In recent weeks, Mr. Strauss-Kahn's lawyers, Benjamin Brafman and William W. Taylor III, have made it clear that they would make the credibility of the woman a focus of their case. In a May 25 letter, they said they had uncovered information that would "gravely undermine the credibility" of the accuser.
Still, it was the prosecutor's investigators who found the information about the woman.
The case involving Mr. Strauss-Kahn has made international headlines and renewed attention on accusations that he had inappropriate behavior toward women in the past, while, more broadly, prompting soul-searching among the French about the treatment of women.
The revelations about the investigators' findings are likely to buttress the view of Mr. Strauss-Kahn's supporters, who complained that the American authorities had rushed to judgment in the case.
Some of Mr. Strauss-Kahn's allies even contended that he had been set up by his political rivals, an assertion that law enforcement authorities said there was no evidence to support.
Mr. Strauss-Kahn resigned from his post as managing director of the International Monetary Fund in the wake of the housekeeper's accusations and was required to post $1 million bail and a $5 million bond.
He also agreed to remain under 24-hour home confinement while wearing an ankle monitor and providing a security team and an armed guard at the entrance and exit of the building where he was living. The conditions are costing Mr. Strauss-Kahn $250,000 a month.
Prosecutors had sought the restrictive conditions in part by arguing that the case against Mr. Strauss-Kahn was a strong one, citing a number of factors, including the credibility of his accuser, with one prosecutor saying her story was "compelling and unwavering."
In the weeks after making her accusations, the woman, who arrived in the United States from Guinea in 2002, was described by relatives and friends as an unassuming and hard-working immigrant with a teenage daughter. She had no criminal record, and had been a housekeeper at the Sofitel for a few years, they said.
Mr. Strauss-Kahn was such a pariah in the initial days after the arrest that neighbors of an Upper East Side apartment building objected when he and his wife tried to rent a unit there. He eventually rented a three-story town house on Franklin Street in TriBeCa.
Under the relaxed conditions of bail to be requested on Friday, the district attorney's office would retain Mr. Strauss-Kahn's passport but he would be permitted to travel within the United States.
The woman told the authorities that she had gone to Mr. Strauss-Kahn's suite to clean it and that he emerged naked from the bathroom and attacked her. The formal charges accused him of ripping her pantyhose, trying to rape her and forcing her to perform oral sex; his lawyers say there is no evidence of force and have suggested that any sex was consensual.
After the indictment was filed, Mr. Vance spoke briefly on the courthouse steps addressing hundreds of local and foreign reporters who had been camped out in front of the imposing stone edifice. He characterized the charges as "extremely serious" and said the "evidence supports the commission of nonconsensual forced sexual acts."
Mr. Strauss-Kahn's lawyers, Mr. Brafman and Mr. Taylor, declined to comment on Thursday evening.
The case was not scheduled to return to court until July 18.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Should the postal service be eliminated or totally privatized, see what your delivery costs do. And, if you live in a rural area, you will really be in for "sticker shock".
We must stand together, get rid of onerous laws and return our postal service to future viability.
DPM is not exaggerating at all when he says that absent the USPS there will be serious sticker shock. It costs $40 to send an overnight shipment from South Texas to Washington, D.C. by FedEx. The same thing can happen with the USPS for a fraction of that.
The only reason I even think of using an inept outfit like FedEx is that the people I send to require it and are paying for it. And FedEx won't even deliver to your house! You have to go to their station if you want to get your package.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/consumerawareness/a/Postal-Service-Bonuses-End.htm
So, where are you getting your information that contradicts this information?
Frankly, I think you just assumed it.
This is just more smoke and mirrors. Just google "post office executive bonuses" to get to the truth. MSM, your listening to too much Rush Linbaugh!!
"The U.S. Postal Service suspended bonuses and other incentives for its top managers and executives in summer 2011. The Postal Service said it took the action as a result of its "dire financial situation," the loss of $8.5 billion in fiscal year 2010 and expected deficit of $8 billion more in 2011.
"We must continue to identify opportunities to reduce spending where possible, and eliminate costs which are not deemed essential for the continuation of our operations," Anthony J. Vegliante, the Postal Service's chief human resources officer, said in a memo distributed in summer 2011. Vegliante earned a salary of $240,000 in 2011."
See also: Highest Paying Postal Jobs
The suspension of bonuses and other incentives for top Postal Service managers and executives was described as a "temporary policy change" that was to remain in place "until further notice," the Postal Service said. It did not effect Postal Service clerks, mail handlers and union workers.
This link gives at the very end postal salaries of upper management.I worked for the post office and while I was aware of bonuses I wasn't aware of how much postal management's salaries were until I wandered into this video.
Instead, since most of us hate the big private banks, with good reason, why not create public non-profit banks, at either the state or county level and let them operate mini-branches out of the existing post offices? That would provie more than enough revenue to balance the U.S. Postal Service budget.
There might even be enough money left over to gift those damn lobbyists with a free, one-way ticket to Mars. Perhaps that is not far enough away, but it would be a good start.
Clearly, UPS and FedEx have been
bribing/lobbyin g/pressuring etc. congressmen and Senators in order to take away business from the Post Office.
Thanks!
Unless you do X. Y is going to happen for these reasons and then why, ought to be the format- not bassakwards.
Thanks for the info Matt, but you should have been asked to do it over before it was published.
Instead, since most of us hate the big private banks, with good reason, why not create public non-profit banks, at either the state or county level and let them operate mini-branches out of the existing post offices? That would provie more than enough revenue to balance the U.S. Postal Service budget.
There might even be enough money left over to gift those damn lobbyists with a free, one-way ticket to Mars. Perhaps that is not far enough away, but it would be a good start.
The United States Postal Savings System was established in 1911 but was discontinued on March 28, 1966. Google
postal savings system for websites with more details.
Republicans get next day service.
Democrats get next week service
Liberals get next month, if any, delivery. :-)
Has anyone really considered why the founders wanted to guarantee a postal service's existence by mandating it in the US Constitution? I would like to see the US Postal Service become a more central part of the government's structure. Its budget should be independent of revenue and the department take on responsibility for any broad based mass communications. At the time the Constitution was written the mail was the only mass media available. Could the intent of naming the USPS in the Constitution was to assure that mass media would be available to everyone? By outsourcing this critical function we diminish our democracy. Closing down local post offices puts millions of rural and poor Americans at a greater of being under the control of the Corporations that by their networked connected nature cannot be impartial when deciding delivery routes, times, and office locations.
"UNPROFITABLE. So what? When has the Pentagon ever made a profit? Never, nor does anyone suggest it should. Neither has the FBI, Centers for Disease Control, FDA, State Department, FEMA, Park Service, etc. Producing a profit is not the purpose of government-- its purpose is service."
I only know this because an old friend is a postmaster. I printed out and gave that office the Jim Hightower article. The employees were grateful to read something that supports their efforts. There is way too much propaganda out there, as you know. Your comments are pertinent and I plan to quote you when speaking with my old friend.
He might even be technically correct, and this is the reason we should worry.
Have we lost all sense of logic in the face of unmitigated greed?
No, I'm sure the Republicans didn't consider this when voting on it.
Finally, as for the comment of the post office being the only meeting place in town, why not have the post office take up lodge at the local Wal-Mart?
Nowadays all we get are the crumbs that spill from the tables of the very rich--those who profit from the misfortunes of others and laugh all the way to the bank
The only way open to us at present is to turn out the vote as we turn out the scum who do the bidding of the corporatists. Turn out Scott Walker; turn out Rick Perry, and Rick Scott; turn out Christy and Kasich. When the 99% awaken to the colossal scam that they have been subjected to, the 1% had better hide under their beds. They'd better get out of the country before they're found by those carrying torches and pitchforks.
Just a note: Fedex is non-union while UPS is unionized.
Another question: the Postal Service is in the Constitution? Wouldn't an amendment be needed to privatize it?
They can decide under one of their felonious laws to not allow you to have mail. IRS will be direct depositing...so me ways good but then again Big Brother is in your business. I believe one should set up separate account for such transactions and go to Credit Unions or out of Country. Canada gives a crap about their people...USA doesn't
Republicans want no min wage. Want us working for food..pink slime and monsanto poison. GOP been destroying Unions since ReaGun, and you are the ones that must change it
You can argue the fairness or whether such payments are or are not deserved, but it's there, in black and white on a Postal Service UNION site.