RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Ordonez writes: "The unexpected departure of a top ranked diplomat is shaking up an already unsteady diplomatic corps and raising questions about who will be next to leave."

President Donald Trump boards Marine One as he leaves Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., Friday, Jan. 12, 2018. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)
President Donald Trump boards Marine One as he leaves Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., Friday, Jan. 12, 2018. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)


Morale Disintegrates at State Department as Diplomats Wonder Who Will Quit Next to Escape Trump

By Franco Ordonez, McClatchy DC

14 January 18

 

he unexpected departure of a top ranked diplomat is shaking up an already unsteady diplomatic corps and raising questions about who will be next to leave.

News of John Feeley�s resignation�s Friday sent shock waves through the State Department where the ambassador of Panama was seen as a rising star and a potential future assistant secretary � and more than a dozen State staffers said it caused them to question their own commitment to an administration they feel is undercutting the department�s work and U.S. influence in the world.

�Given what happened in the last few days, people are wondering how are they going to be effective in an environment like this,� said a U.S. official who works regularly with the State Department. �It�s one thing for us to go in and slam our hands on the table and say this is what we want ... It�s another to denigrate them and make it crystal clear this is what our leadership thinks about them in the vulgarest of terms.�

U.S. officials said dozens of email messages were flying around the State Department about Feeley�s decision to leave. They were a mix of disappointment, concern and admiration for the ambassador who served as a mentor to many of the current diplomats who specialize in the Western Hemisphere.

The U.S. State Department, which called Feeley one of the leading Latin American specialists, confirmed he is leaving his post on March 9, explaining he has opted to "retire for personal reasons."

The resignation comes as the State Department undergoes a massive personnel shift. State has been shedding diplomats rapidly; 60 percent of the State Departments� top-ranking career diplomats have left and new applications to join the foreign service have fallen by half, according to recent data from the American Foreign Service Association, the professional organization of the U.S. diplomatic corps.

Colleagues said the feelings Feeley expressed in his resignation letter about not being able to work under President Donald Trump reflect sinking morale within a diplomatic corps that has lost confidence in the administration�s approach toward diplomacy.

The news hit the department particularly hard Friday, as many officials were also learning from published reports that Trump, in a White House meeting with congressional leaders, called El Salvador and African nations �shithole countries� and questioned why the U.S. admits immigrants from Haiti.

Feeley had actually sent his resignation letter at the end of December, well before this latest presidential controversy. But those who know him say the administration�s similar words and approach toward foreign partners played a role in his decision to leave.

Some of Feeley�s colleagues have stuck it out at the State Department, saying they feel an even greater responsibility to defend the ideals of diplomacy. �There is a sense of duty to carry out what we�ve been trained,� said one State Department official.

But others have wrestled with staying, feeling unsure whether they�re protecting U.S. influence or contributing to its erosion. Many diplomats had never contemplated leaving State, always intending instead to make U.S. diplomacy their life�s work and long-term career track.

Feeley is not the first high ranking State Department official to leave his post rather than remain with the Trump administration. In November, foreign service officer Elizabeth Shackelford, who worked in Nairobi for the U.S. mission to Somalia, quit, writing a letter slamming the administration for abandoning human rights policy and its �stinging disrespect� of the foreign service.

Colleagues said Feeley is not the kind of leader to leave without having wrestled with the decision � especially considering the trajectory he was on. He dedicated his career to public service first as an active-duty military helicopter pilot for the Marine Corps before joining the State Department in 1990.

�John was born for the foreign service,� said the U.S. official. He served as the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. embassy in Mexico City, and was the second most senior official in the Western Hemisphere Affairs bureau before becoming ambassador to Panama.

He remained busy under Trump. He arranged an Oval Office meeting with Trump and Panama's president. He later helped organize Vice President Mike Pence�s visit to the Panama Canal.

�He was the most respected Latin America expert in the Foreign Service and doubtlessly headed for senior leadership positions,� said Benjamin Gedan, who was National Security Council director for Latin America during the Obama administration and worked with Feeley at State.

Mark Feierstein, the White House National Security Council�s senior director for Western Hemisphere affairs under President Barack Obama, said he�s surprised more haven�t left considering Trump�s behavior and policies.

�Trump has given ambassadors over the last year many reasons to resign,� Feierstein said. �Yesterday was only one. There were plenty others. And there will be more.�



U.S. Ambassador to Panama John Feeley has resigned, saying he no longer felt able to serve President Donald Trump. U.S. Embassy in Panama. (photo: U.S. Embassy in Panama)


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+6 # phrixus 2013-03-30 09:11
" In reality, the FDA, the drug companies and the psychiatrists are all working in collusion, knowingly pushing dangerous, deadly drugs onto families for the sole purpose of generating profits. While children suffer and die, they cash in on the ADHD delusion, first by promoting a fictitious disease and then later through high-profit pharmaceutical quackery."

These are VERY serious accusations of criminal misconduct. The article also presents itself with some rather hysterical overtones. I would like to see significant amounts of empirical data supporting your statements before drawing any conclusions.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." ~ Carl Sagan
 
 
+9 # D Duran 2013-03-30 10:15
If you Google "The Citizens Commission on Human Rights" you will find towards the top a link to Wikipedia. The first few sentences say enough: The CCHR was founded in 1969 as an arm of Scientology to fight psychiatry and psychiatrists.
 
 
-5 # shraeve 2013-03-30 14:04
So what? Are we supposed to automatically assume anything associated with Scientology is evil? Psychiatry has done far more damage to human beings than has Scientology.
 
 
+4 # phrixus 2013-03-31 20:26
"CCHR also blames psychiatry for school shootings, the 9/11 attacks on America, the German Holocaust, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Jonestown massacre."

So much for their credibility.
 
 
+7 # 666 2013-03-30 16:29
Frankly this article is a total load of crap; they get RSN to run an anti-ADHD article every 6mos or so (so much for editing). I took these meds, my kids took/take them. If you don't have ADHD, you wouldn't understand (like this author). For many kids, it's the difference between 1) being labelled a disruption and finding oneself on the public-school expressway to prison and 2) living a productive and meaningful life. People who don't have ADHD and who aren't specialists involved with it (and not on the take of religious groups or big pharma) ought to shut up and not criticize those who do and know. I thank god every day that my kids have these meds. it would be interesting to find out how many 3-strikers are suffering something like this...

That said, are there mis-diagnoses? abuses? sure. Is it easy to get these meds? absolutely not. Every year they get more tightly controlled. I'm probably on a watch list just because I get these for my kids (no shit)... (and that's from a pharmacy with an rx)...
 
 
+4 # JJS 2013-03-31 18:50
THank you 666. "Mom, it is so much easier to behave now. I can think." Said by my then 8 yr old son after his first dose of Ritalin. Now 6'2", twenty something. Smart but has issues with attention. He decided to stop Ritalin during middle school years but we maintained counselling
 
 
+8 # DaveM 2013-03-30 10:35
Given the choice between an organization founded by Scientology and the modern psychiatric/pha rmaceutical complex, which is crazier?
 
 
+3 # pamelawy 2013-03-30 11:19
That's not a choice I'd like to have to make. Can I have a third please?
 
 
-7 # shraeve 2013-03-30 14:22
The psychiatric establishment has far more power and does far more damage. I suspect most homeless people are victims of psychiatric drugs.

In previous eras of American history we had dire economic conditions, but we didn't have huge numbers of people being homeless for decades like we have in the modern era. Don't say it is the result of de-institutiona lization. State mental hospitals with large patient populations were a relatively short-lived phenomenon of the first half of the 20th century. Where were all these homeless people (who were supposedly born with "bad brains") before then?
 
 
+11 # ghostperson 2013-03-30 12:12
Having an adopted child with true ADHD and deferring medication until it could not be avoided, we were prescribed medication that I didn't previously believe in by a very conservative physician. I also didn't believe in ADHD.

Medication controls but does not prevent symptomatology. We hung on for years before resorting to medication. Without it, my child would be non-functional academically and failing in school.

She goes off medication in the summer. We see the doctor every 3 months to monitor dosage and effectiveness as well as side effects which are none to date.

I want to see the studies, who the study group was and the conditions under which the studies were performed, before I walk away from the obvious personal benefits she gets from the medication.
 
 
+1 # karlseidel 2013-03-30 13:38
@phrixus - here's a good link with the facts organized by researcher I've read & trust: http://robertwhitaker.org/robertwhitaker.org/Depression.html

I find it interesting to see people commenting on Scientology and their efforts against psychiatry. Is the fact that Scientology seems zany and dangerous any worse than philandering pastors in the Catholic Church? How about corrupt legislators taking your money and the money of corporations but only serving corporate interests?

Stick to the facts - they are abundant - Big Pharma kills - they're corrupt and their corruption affects doctors and psychiatrists which in turn harm your children.

Get a reality check - stop drinking the Kool-Aid charade called Health Care - it's neither healthy or caring!
 
 
+7 # phrixus 2013-03-30 20:57
I don't see how the existence of pedophile priests and corrupt legislators in any way validates the broad, unsupported charges levied against psychiatry in this rant of an article.
BTW: For my money anyone that believes in Scientology NEEDS a psychiatrist.
 
 
+4 # DerHermanator 2013-03-30 15:31
By the pricking of my thumbs
The stench of Scientology this way comes.
[With apologies to Macbeth]

In over 30 yrs of prescribing Ritalin I havent had a patient's parents alert me that their child had dropped dead.

Its dysinformation like this article from a journal I've never heard of, Natural News, which keeps parents frightened and treatment withheld resulting in less medication prescribed [there are several others] than the occurance of the disabling condition merits.

Boo hiss. Its flattering that RSN relies in the sophistication of their readers to assign this to the dump heap of medical meddling.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN