RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Funes writes: "In certain countries, attempting to protect the environment can be a death sentence."

A deforested section of the Atlantic Forest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in June 2017. (photo: Getty)
A deforested section of the Atlantic Forest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in June 2017. (photo: Getty)


Nearly 200 Activists Were Killed Defending the Environment This Year

By Yessenia Funes, Earther

29 December 17

 

n certain countries, attempting to protect the environment can be a death sentence. Take Brazil, where at least 132 “environmental defenders” have been killed since 2015. This year has seen the deaths of 185 environmental defenders worldwide, according to The Guardian.

The Guardian’s been trying to track all these deaths for the first time this year in partnership with Global Witness, a nonprofit that works with locally-based groups around the world to expose environmental and human rights abuses. The two groups document people who have taken peaceful action (voluntarily or professionally) “to protect the environment or land rights,” per the publication’s words. While some are indigenous people protesting to protect their ancestral lands, others might be journalists who write about environmental movements. Park rangers and environmental officers fending off poachers and loggers have made the list, too.

Finding out about these killings isn’t easy work because they tend to happen in remote places: think the Amazon rainforest, or indigenous communities in the small Latin American country of Honduras. Honduras—where the renowned indigenous environmental activist Berta Caceres lived and was killed in 2016—is among the most dangerous places to be an environmentalist, according to The Guardian’s analysis. More people died here per capita since 2015 than anywhere else on Earth.

After hearing about a death, Global Witness must verify it. The group looks for local news reports or relies on local organizations’ investigations. Details on how a person was killed, where, and when are all important steps before the organization can confirm a death. Then, The Guardian adds the death to its database. Sometimes, weeks or months pass after someone is killed before it is made public.

While 185 might sound like a lot of killings, 2016 was even worse: 201 environmental defenders died. Although it only has three years of data, Global Witness believes the number of killings is on the rise, a trend The Guardian attributes to increased conflict between environmental defenders and industry. Mining, logging, and agribusiness drive these violent deaths when, for example, industries invade indigenous lands without consulting local tribes. When indigenous people protest, industry groups often respond by threatening them or involving the authorities.

As Global Witness puts  it:

Across continents—from Brazil, to South Africa, to the Philippines—many of these killings have common characteristics. As companies and investors go in search of land to grow crops, mine minerals or feed cattle, many are doing business where the rule of law is weak and corruption rife. Made financial offers they can’t refuse (often including bribes and kickbacks), governments are handing land to industry without first getting the permission of those who live on it.

Just earlier this month, tribal leader Datu Victor Danyan died in the Philippines after soldiers shot him for “defending ancestral land from coffee plantations,” as The Guardian described it. In other cases, the culprit wasn’t coffee; but palm oil or bird poaching. Some people have been shot during protests, others by “hired hitmen,” according to Global Witness. The list goes on.

The way things are going, four environmental defenders are expected to die this week. And remember, these figures are based on the deaths one organization discovered. The actual number could be much higher.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+4 # indian weaver 2017-12-29 11:49
This is a fight for our lives, and all life on earth. Time to start shooting back for survival against the enemy, and we can easily see who they are. It is war time.
 
 
+3 # Working Class 2017-12-30 11:17
Killing people to take their land is in the longest tradition of history. Just ask the Native Americans of North America. You would think that it would no longer be tolerated, but the pursuit of short term wealth still seems to trump humanity. Sad.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN