Blake writes: "If the underside of the bus outside the White House weren't already so conspicuously crowded, you might say Bannon was tossing his old boss under it."
Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon
delivers remarks during the Value Voters Summit in Washington, D.C., Oc.
14. (photo: Mary F. Calvert/Reuters)
ALSO SEE: Several States Vow to Sue Trump
Administration
Over Obamacare Sabotage
Steve Bannon Just Totally Contradicted Trump's Claim About Canceling Obamacare Payments
16 October 17
he White House said it was acting on the recommendation of the Justice Department � that it was canceling illegal federal subsidies that helped sustain the Affordable Care Act. President Trump said what he was doing would hurt the insurance companies only: �That's not going to people; that's making insurance companies rich,� he said, adding: �That money is going to insurance companies to prop up their stock price.�
But former top Trump White House aide Stephen K. Bannon told a very different tale this weekend. And it will confirm what every opponent of the move already suspected: that Trump was trying to cause Obamacare to fail.
In the midst of playing up Trump's accomplishments Saturday at the �Values Voters Summit� in Washington, Bannon turned to Trump's controversial Obamacare executive order the day before.
�Then you had Obamacare,� Bannon said. Trump is �not gonna make the [cost-sharing reduction] payments. Gonna blow that thing up. Gonna blow those exchanges up, right?�
If the underside of the bus outside the White House weren't already so conspicuously crowded, you might say Bannon was tossing his old boss under it.
Trump's decision to cancel about $7 billion in annual federal payments to subsidize the policies of low-income Americans will clearly test the resilience of the already-strained Obamacare marketplaces. Whether that was the intention is for all of us to speculate upon. At the very least, it seems to be a perhaps-intentional side effect for a president who ran hard against the Affordable Care Act and has lashed out at the Republicans who were unable to repeal and replace the law.
Less convenient for Trump, of course, is the possibility that voters will punish him for hurting the most vulnerable Americans for purely political reasons � an eventuality of which I'm more skeptical than many critics of Trump's move.
But the idea that this was a craven political move to actually cause Obamacare to fail � rather than a move just abiding by the law and/or that only hurt insurance companies � is completely confirmed by Bannon's commentary.
I'm not sure Bannon didn't intend to make that contradictory implication � no matter how unhelpful it might seem to his former boss. Bannon, after all, no longer works for Trump, which means anything he says carries with it the kind of plausible deniability for which the White House has already shown a huge affinity. Bannon can tell the GOP base that Trump just �blew up� Obamacare, and it's not clear that this is a sanctioned message from the White House.
But if the Affordable Care Act does implode, and especially if Congress doesn't pass something to help stabilize it, Bannon's comments would seem to complicate things for Trump. Here we have one of the president's top allies promoting the idea that Trump just acted deliberately to undermine the insurance policies that many poor Americans have come to rely upon.
However you feel about the law, that's a pretty brazenly dangerous way of doing business. And even if you think that was just acting according to the law, it completely flies in the face of Trump's pledge that this would hurt insurers rather than regular people. If those marketplaces do indeed �blow up,� real people's lives will be affected � not just the insurers. Trump himself has suggested that won't be the case, but Bannon clearly disagrees.
It at the very least behooves the administration to try to square those versions of events. If Bannon is a rogue actor and they don't agree with his assessment of how this will affect Americans relying on Obamacare policies, by all means say that. But if this wouldn't, in fact, �blow up� Obamacare, then the White House should explain why Bannon is wrong.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
It is not unusual to see people in a McDonalds with a pistol strapped to their belt.
I personally do not believe anyone should bring a gun to a demonstration. But I'm pretty sure many in Richmond will just to prove that they can legally carry a gun at all times.
I think it mostly up to the cops. They will start the violence as most often happens at demonstrations, including Charlottesville .
--- If there is violence, Northam's gun ban and the anti-gun legislators will be proven right.
--- If there is no violence, then the gun advocated will be proven right.
The governor and anti-gun forces in the VA legislature have an incentive to see violence break out. That was the same for Charlottesville .
Today, we will see what happens.