RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Levin writes: "Women have allegedly talked about feeling unsafe around male managers and facing sexist remarks from superiors. Women talked about being dismissed and talked over in meetings with no other female employees, and asked questions about diversity in hiring and the lack of women in leadership positions."

AJ Vandermeyden sued Tesla for discrimination and sexual harassment. She believes her firing was retaliation for raising concerns about workplace conditions. (photo: Rami Talaie/Guardian UK)
AJ Vandermeyden sued Tesla for discrimination and sexual harassment. She believes her firing was retaliation for raising concerns about workplace conditions. (photo: Rami Talaie/Guardian UK)

She Took on Tesla for Discrimination. Now Others Are Speaking Up. 'It's Too Big to Deny'

By Sam Levin, Guardian UK

05 July 17

A female engineer who came forward with claims of harassment says she was fired in retaliation. But now other women have voiced similar concerns

he theme for this year’s International Women’s Day was “be bold for change” in the fight for a “more gender inclusive world” – but some at Tesla had a different plan for the day.

It was an opportunity for women to discover essential oils. A “health and wellness group” at the electric car company invited female staff members to an 8 March “lunch ‘n learn” about oils and how they can help improve people’s “health and happiness”, according to emails seen by the Guardian, which reveal that the proposed event was quickly met with vocal criticism. It was particularly offensive to some given that a week earlier, AJ Vandermeyden, a female engineer, had publicly accused Elon Musk’s company of sexual harassment and discrimination.

Tesla postponed the oils session. The company organized a town hall meeting on diversity for that day, which included six male executives and one woman, according to multiple attendees. At the crowded meeting at the Fremont factory, women took the microphone one-by-one and shared stories of sexual harassment, mistreatment by male managers, unfair promotion decisions and more, sources said.

Vandermeyden, who attended the meeting, thought the outpouring of comments validated her own story. But soon after, Tesla fired her, accusing her of pursuing a “miscarriage of justice” by filing a lawsuit that alleged “pervasive harassment” and pay discrimination. Testimony from the town hall – along with internal emails from Musk, and Vandermeyden’s first interview since her termination – paint a picture of a company that has struggled to respond to mounting complaints about gender discrimination and has aggressively attempted to discredit a woman who publicly criticized it .

“They just want to absolutely crush anyone who speaks up,” said Vandermeyden, 33, seated inside her attorney’s San Francisco office on a recent afternoon. “I spoke up, and I was made a sacrificial lamb for it. It’s a scary precedent.”

Vandermeyden detailed the painful experience of losing a job she loved while facing harsh personal attacks by Tesla in the media. She has come forward at a time when the tech industry is grappling with high profile sexual misconduct scandals at Uber, a prominent venture capital firm and a popular startup incubator.

Tesla, known internationally for its battery-powered vehicles and self-driving car technology, has strongly rejected Vandermeyden’s claims, saying she was terminated for “falsely attacking our company in the press”. But the flurry of criticisms that emerged at the town hall suggests that her complaints are not unique.

‘Predator zone’

Musk was not at the meeting, which was attended by roughly 70-100 people, and featured comments from more than 20 women, according to Vandermeyden and another attendee. One woman described parts of the factory as a “predator zone” for harassment. When the moderator asked women in the room if they had ever been catcalled, a significant number of women raised their hands, according to Vandermeyden.

Other women allegedly talked about feeling unsafe around male managers and facing sexist remarks from superiors. Women talked about being dismissed and talked over in meetings with no other female employees, and asked questions about diversity in hiring and the lack of women in leadership positions.

Some of the executives seemed genuinely concerned and taken aback by the women’s comments. One male leader said it was unacceptable, noting that he had daughters, said Vandermeyden.

One female manager, who was present but no longer works for Tesla, told the Guardian she was offended by that comment: “It’s insulting. You shouldn’t have to have daughters to know this.” She said executives’ responses to questions about diversity were generic and filled with corporate jargon.

Tesla said in an email that a Women in Tesla group hosted the event and that “executives attended because they wanted to hear directly from employees about their experiences and learn about how to improve the workplace”.

The company disputed the Guardian’s characterization of the meeting, saying: “Employees stood up to ask the executives questions, share their experiences at Tesla – both positive and negative – while others spoke of things that they believed Tesla was doing right and some came with suggestions. In some instances, employees were only looking for better collaboration with their HR business partners in general and had nothing to do with any allegations of harassment.”

The company statement said that when an employee referenced an area of the factory as a “predator zone”, it “surprised many in the room who had never heard of this term”. Immediately after the meeting, Tesla said it sent a factory-wide message to supervisors about its “strict policy against any kind of harassment”, adding, “Any complaints of catcalling in the factory are thoroughly investigated and action is taken where necessary.”

Tesla also said that at the meeting, “there was a lot of energy around ensuring we are proactively sourcing diverse talent and ensuring that we have an interview and assessment process that is free from bias”.

Vandermeyden said she talked briefly about her experience at the meeting, adding: “It was finally giving women a venue to voice what was going on. It felt like Tesla had been saying I’m making all this up. And here were all the women saying, ‘No, it’s happening.’ It’s too big to deny.”

‘They were trying to intimidate me’

Her lawsuit, filed last year, alleged that after she was hired in 2013, she was promoted to a manufacturing engineering position in a department that consisted mostly of men and where she was paid less than male engineers whose work she directly assumed.

Men were also granted positions over her, and she and other women were denied promotions despite their equal or superior qualifications, the complaint said. She also said that Tesla retaliated against her after she raised concerns about sexual harassment and catcalls she routinely faced on the factory floor.

Vandermeyden went public with her story in an interview with the Guardian in February, prompting Tesla to vehemently deny her allegations, claiming that an internal investigation concluded that there was no harassment, discrimination or retaliation.

On 23 May, Tesla announced the hiring of Gaby Toledano as the new chief people officer to oversee HR amid growing concerns about unsafe working conditions at the factory. Toledano joined as the only woman in the “c-suite”, meaning group of chief executives.

One of her first major acts was to fire Vandermeyden.

Toledano asked Vandermeyden to meet for coffee one-on-one without lawyers on 29 May, the Memorial Day holiday. Vandermeyden said she thought it was an opportunity to discuss ways to improve the workplace and address her concerns, but instead she was told she could resign and get a severance package or she would be terminated immediately and should not show up for work the next day.

“It felt like they were trying to intimidate me. I’m the one who spoke up, and they’re saying, ‘One way or another, you have to leave.’ How is that right?” Vandermeyden recalled in the recent interview. Toledano’s message to her was clear, she added: “‘You can end this now or this is going to be litigation going on for years.’”

She refused to resign and was fired, she said. She has yet to return to Tesla to clean out her desk.

Tesla disputed Vandermeyden’s account of the meeting, saying: “Gaby did not intimidate Ms Vandermeyden. She disagrees that there was any intimidation, nor did Ms Vandermeyden ever express feeling intimidated during the meeting. In fact, they both had a positive rapport and expressed mutual support, as Gaby was new to her role at Tesla and was attempting to resolve the matter in a positive and mutually supportive manner for the company and for Ms Vandermeyden.”

Vandermeyden struggled to process the news and was further shocked when Tesla released a 430-word statement to the Guardian justifying the termination.

“Vandermeyden was given special treatment and opportunities for advancement that were unwarranted based on her qualifications, and that negatively impacted other more qualified individuals,” the statement said, saying that she behaved in a “fundamentally false and misleading manner”. The company said she “falsely attacked” Tesla in the press, amounting to a “miscarriage of justice”, adding: “It is impossible to trust anyone after they have behaved in such a manner.”

Her lawyer, Therese Lawless, well known for fighting discrimination in Silicon Valley, said the statement was clear evidence that Tesla’s termination was retaliation for raising concerns about workplace conditions, which is her legally protected right.

In addition to saying she was not qualified for her job, Tesla has also repeatedly noted that Vandermeyden did not have an engineering degree, a fact many tech journalists have repeated in articles. But according to Vandermeyden and another Tesla employee, this is not uncommon; she said she knew of at least two male engineers in her department without a degree.

Musk’s warning to employees: don’t sue Tesla

Musk also appeared to reference Vandermeyden in a company-wide email sent two days after her termination. In the email – with the subject “Doing the right thing”, sent at 2.29am – Musk lamented the scrutiny that his company faces, saying, “The list of companies that want to kill Tesla is so long, I’ve lost track.”

As as a result, he continued, employees must work harder and faster than competitors, adding they can’t be a “jerk” in the process.

Musk did not name Vandermeyden, but went on to offer what seemed to be a thinly veiled attack on her lawsuit: “If you are part of a less represented group, you don’t get a free pass on being a jerk yourself. We have had a few cases at Tesla where someone in a less represented group was actually given a job or promoted over more qualified highly represented candidates and then decided to sue Tesla for millions of dollars because they felt they weren’t promoted enough. That is obviously not cool.”

Vandermeyden, who had not seen the email until the Guardian provided it to her, said it was painful to read: “It’s saying everything I’ve done at Tesla, all the hard work, it’s dismissing it all. It hurts because there are going to be some people who believe that.”

She also noted that she has consistently received positive performance evaluations and called his email “defamatory”.

Asked about the email, Tesla said in a statement: “This email in fact did not reference Ms Vandermeyden or her case.”

Vandermeyden said she wished that Musk would consider that “dissent isn’t disloyalty” and that her love of Tesla drove her to advocate for better working conditions. “I was never your enemy,” she said, adding: “I still believe in the importance of transitioning the world to sustainable energy, but now I don’t get to be a part of it.”

She recalled getting a T-shirt with Musk as a superhero when she first joined Tesla, and that it was hard to realize that “sometimes your superheroes aren’t always super”. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

-12 # Old School Conservative 2017-07-05 16:10
I would have fired her also. I don't condone sexual harassment, but this woman is just a whinny B----. She claims discrimination for being a woman, but then goes on to say she was promoted shortly after being hired to an engineering position and she doesn't even have an engineering degree. She then goes on to bitch about not getting paid as much as the person who's work she took over. If she is new in the position and taking over for someone who has left then they obviously have more experience than she did, hence the person may have been paid better. She then goes on to affirm her discrimination position by saying that the department she worked in was mostly men. Men engineering students outnumber women engineering students by more than 5 to 1, I am sure every engineering department in every company is the US is dominated by men. As the Tesla representative said she was given special treatment probably because they were trying to embrace diversity. Then to top it all off she goes public with her complaints rather than addressing them with the human resources department. I would have fired her on that alone. I hope she has difficulty finding another job because nobody wants someone like that working for them.
+8 # Brice 2017-07-05 23:27
>> but this woman is just a whinny B---

Living in Silicon Valley and actually knowing WTF I am talking about, lots, if not most SV engineers do not have degrees. Your points are obtusely expressed and illogical.

There is nothing obvious about the tricks companies use to cheat people out of money. Instead of just stating you think companies should be able to intimidate employees any way they see fit, you use obtuse good ole boy arguments to defend the patriarchy.

What you are sure about really seems to be about what you hope or would like to see and believe ... not real good ways to construct an argument.

They pretty much did fire her on the spot, that is the choice they gave her. As a man I have not faced what this woman has faced, but in an unregulated workplace there are some pretty nasty means to coerce and control people that is not good for anyone.

You defend the last century's social constructs, you probably just never thought about it or considered anything different or better - and that is why antiquated non-optimal and dysfunctional, toxic workplaces exist. You'd just like to dismiss the whole idea ... that qualifies you as closed minded in my book. On top of that you are vindictive. This is the truth of our system now and why it is slow to change.
-8 # Old School Conservative 2017-07-06 08:23
I am commenting on this particular situation, not on work place environment in general. Why don't you address my comments and tell me where I am missing the point. I doubt you can.
0 # Brice 2017-07-07 02:31
>> but this woman is just a whinny B

You want me to address that ... it is a name-call, not a comment, as most of your flaming rhetoric is. You can always find faults in regulations and protections and claim they are exaggerated, but you fail to remember that regulations are there for a reason, and that reason is that in almost all cases the damage done before the regulation for profit is far more than the damage done by the wrongful use of the regulation.

You seems to have lots of confidence in the strength of an argument you really did not even make and dismiss holes blown through it ... but then as you say you are an old school conservative and that's the way you roll.
-3 # Old School Conservative 2017-07-07 09:11
Just exposing her false claim of sexual harassment, based on the information provided. Didn't think you would be able to dispute anything I said. That is how liberals roll, when you can't make an intelligent argument you just start vomiting out useless rhetoric. I didn't say one word about work place regulations, I commented about how her claims have no basis.
0 # Brice 2017-07-07 11:49
> Just exposing her false claim of sexual harassment

your claim is not supported by your facts and you have no evidence, just your opinion expressed rather obnoxiously with the name-calling and all.
-3 # Old School Conservative 2017-07-07 12:50
Her claim is she was discriminated for being a woman. She bases this on she received less money than the person who's work she took over, the department is mostly male, and that she got fired for bringing up the discrimination claim. I say she is full of crap and a whiner because she was hired and promoted, she was new in the position which makes perfect sense why she was paid less than the person she replaced, all engineering departments are predominantly male and that she got fired because she publicly and falsely attacked the people employing her rather than going through the normal channels at work.
+6 # bubbiesue 2017-07-06 07:36
Old School, you should be ashamed of yourself. There's no call for name-calling nor dismissing a woman because she does not have academic credentials. People learn in different ways and at different times. Competence counts, not only experience.

Women have been held down long enough. It's time the country took as much advantage of womanpower as it does manpower. We're just as smart and sometimes express those skills differently. I raised three competent daughters who got to where they are now by different means. One did software engineering and was paid accordingly because of her ability to do the job, not because of the degree she didn't have. She also had other skills that contributed to her success, skills the others (mostly men) in her department either didn't have or didn't use.

A second became clergy--and a mother. So, she does what in my generation were both a man's job and a woman's job simultaneously. The third is an independent contractor. She can organize the heck out of any chaos.

"Wake up and smell the coffee." (Ann Landers)
-6 # Old School Conservative 2017-07-06 08:29
Again, not commenting on women or their ability to do any job. If this was a man I would have fired his ass just the same. It would be like a male certified nurse assistant complaining that he doesn't make the same as the nurses, and claiming the hospital was sexist because most of the nurses were women at the hospital he worked at, and then went out and made a media spectacle about it.
+6 # Floe 2017-07-05 22:41
Male entitlement. Women are foolish to try to succeed in this deranged male framework. Women who do only show they have abandoned their womanhood and sided with the misogynists. Isn't it funny that men don't even notice the consistently skewed gender ratio? Where it reversed, women would notice it right away. Men should not rule, they should just bud out. They have had the power for so long, we're all blind to it. Men wrote all the ancient books (because they prevented women from an education) Men have raped and pillaged and murdered their way through history. And who are the most numerous carers? It is so obvious that testosterone makes one have bouts of insanity and always wanting sex like that must distort your mind. Women need to have their own vision and systems and sever all supposed agreements with man-made law including the political system. Women can start a new currency and grow hemp and design a totally egalitarian digital democracy and bring the world into the 21st century at last.
-5 # Old School Conservative 2017-07-06 09:47
Floe you may want to see a shrink to talk about your hatred of men, not a healthy outlook to go through life with.
+1 # Brice 2017-07-05 23:15
First, I support this woman's effort,
but second, all of us need to understand that her effort whatever the results will be will be minimal until we realize that the real motive behind all of theses kinds of actions is to make the requirement that all of us must submit to, to have to work for our survival be a fair, equitable, democratic system, NOT like Noam Chomksy tells us a humiliating, dehumanizing, undemocratic and tyrannical process of what is nearly slavery the way we have the USA defined and working today. We cannot all just think of ourselves or our groups. We must envision a way to hire and work that brings the maximum respect and empowerment and path to betterment to all individuals.
+2 # davehaze 2017-07-06 11:01
As a property manager in the late 80s I hired a woman house painter. My boss remarked, you hired her because you want To fuck her. I said I hired her because she was qualified.

I could give other examples. Some men do not want an even playing field, never did, it annoys the hell out of some men so they retaliate whether they are aware of their behavior or not. And they are personally offended when they are called out on their misogynist behavior.

And as for old school conservatives remarks, the article does not have enough information to make a determination on her accusations or Telsa's defense. A reasonable person would wait for the outcome of her lawsuit before characterizing her has anything and, a reasonable person would refrain from calling any woman a bitch.

And I imagine that a reasonable conservative would be annoyed if someone characterized him as a dick.

0 # davehaze 2017-07-06 11:02
Oh I meant to write old s%chool conservative instead of as I wrote a reasonable conservative.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.