Gibbs writes: "Last month, Gov. Rick Scott (R-FL) signed a controversial update to the 'Stand Your Ground' law, which put the full impetus on prosecutors to disprove a self-defense claim during a pre-trial hearing."
In this September 13, 2016 file photo, George Zimmerman looks at the jury as he testifies in a Seminole County courtroom in Orlando, Florida. (photo: Red Huber/Orlando Sentinel/AP)
Court Rules Florida's New Stand-Your-Ground Law Is Unconstitutional
04 July 17
A major defeat for the NRA.
ast month, Gov. Rick Scott (R-FL) signed a controversial update to the �Stand Your Ground� law, which put the full impetus on prosecutors to disprove a self-defense claim during a pre-trial hearing.
The updated legislation was supported and promoted by the National Rifle Association, who said that it was merely a clarification on the true intent of the �Stand Your Ground� law when it was enacted in 2005. Previously, it was up to defendants to prove that they used force in self defense.
But on Monday, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Milton Hirsch ruled that the update was unconstitutional, because of the process used to update the law?�?it should have been done through the Supreme Court, not the legislature according to Florida�s constitution.
�As a matter of constitutional separation of powers, that procedure cannot be legislatively modified,� Hirsch wrote.
The �Stand Your Ground� law has been controversial since it was first passed. It was central to the jury�s not-guilty verdict in the case of George Zimmerman, a former neighborhood watchman who was acquitted of the murder of Trayvon Martin, the unarmed black teenager who Zimmerman shot and killed in 2012.
The ruling by Hirsch is considered a victory for prosecutors and gun control advocates, who believe that the updated law Scott signed last month forced prosecutors to essentially try the case twice, once at the pre-trial hearing and then again during the trial. The law requires prosecutors to prove that the defendant was not acting in self defense by showing �clear and convincing� evidence.
The ruling is based on two cases in Hirsch�s court?�?that of Liletha Rutherford, a woman who pulled a gun on a couple during an argument and is now accused of aggravated assault; and the case of Omar Rodriguez, who shot and killed a neighbor after an argument over dog poop.
Both trials will continue, but Rutherford and Rodriguez will have to prove that they used force in self defense.
Hirsch�s ruling is expected to be challenged in appellate courts and will likely head to the Florida Supreme Court.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |