RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Renowned journalist Eva Golinger spoke to teleSUR about the alleged assassination of Hugo Chavez."

Venezuelan-American lawyer Eva Golinger. (photo: Meridith Kohut)
Venezuelan-American lawyer Eva Golinger. (photo: Meridith Kohut)


Eva Golinger: There Is a Very Strong Possibility That President Chavez Was Assassinated

By Eva Golinger, teleSUR

16 June 17


According to the Iawyer and journalist, "there is a very strong possibility that President Chavez was assassinated."

enowned journalist Eva Golinger spoke to teleSUR about the alleged assassination of Hugo Chavez.

Do you think that Hugo Chavez was murdered and, if so, who do you think might have been involved?

I believe there is a very strong possibility that President Chavez was assassinated. There were notorious and documented assassination attempts against him throughout his presidency.

Most notable was the April 11, 2002 coup d’etat, during which he was kidnapped and set to be assassinated had it not been for the unprecedented uprising of the Venezuelan people and loyal military forces that rescued him and returned him to power within 48 hours. I was able to find irrefutable evidence using the U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), that the CIA and other U.S. agencies were behind that coup and supported, financially, militarily and politically, those involved.

Later on, there were other attempts against Chavez and his government, such as in 2004 when dozens of Colombian paramilitary forces were captured on a farm outside of Caracas that was owned by an anti-Chavez activist, Robert Alonso, just days before they were going to attack the presidential palace and kill Chavez.

There was another, lesser-known plot against Chavez discovered in New York City during his visit to the United Nations General Assembly in September 2006. According to information provided by his security services, during standard security reconnaissance of an event where Chavez would address the U.S. public at a local, renowned university, high levels of radiation were detected in the chair where he would have sat. The radiation was discovered by a Geiger detector, which is a handheld radiation detection device the presidential security used to ensure the president wasn’t in danger of exposure to harmful rays. In this case, the chair was removed and subsequent tests showed it was emanating unusual amounts of radiation that could have resulted in significant harm to Chavez had it gone undiscovered. According to accounts by the presidential security at the event, an individual from the United States who had been involved in the logistical support for the event and had provided the chair was shown to be acting with U.S. intelligence agents.

There were numerous other attempts on his life that were thwarted by the Venezuelan intelligence agencies and particularly the counterintelligence unit of the Presidential Guard that was charged with discovering and impeding such threats. One other well known attempt was in July 2010 when Francisco Chavez Abarca (no relation), a criminal working with Cuban-born terrorist Luis Posada Carriles, responsible for bombing a Cuban airliner in 1976 and killing all 73 passengers on board, was detained entering Venezuela and later confessed he had been sent to assassinate Chavez. Just five months earlier, in February 2010, when President Chavez was at an event near the Colombian border, his security forces discovered a sniper set up just over a quarter of a mile away from his location, who was subsequently neutralized.

While these accounts may sound like fiction, they are amply documented and very real. Hugo Chavez defied the most powerful interests, and he refused to bow down. As head of state of the nation without the largest oil reserves on the planet, and as someone who openly and directly challenged U.S. and Western domination, Chavez was considered an enemy of Washington and its allies.

So, who could have been involved in Chavez’s assassination, if he was assassinated? Certainly it’s no far stretch to imagine the U.S. government involved in a political assassination of an enemy it clearly - and openly - wanted out of the picture. In 2006, the U.S. government formed a special Mission Manager for Venezuela and Cuba under the Directorate of National Intelligence. This elite intelligence unit was charged with expanding covert operations against Chavez and led clandestine missions out of an intelligence fusion center (CIA-DEA-DIA) in Colombia. Some of the pieces that have been coming together include the discovery of several close aides to Chavez who had private, unobstructed access to him over prolonged periods, who fled the country after his death and are collaborating with the U.S. government. If he were assassinated by some kind of exposure to high levels of radiation, or otherwise inoculated or infected by a cancer-causing virus, it would have been done by someone with close access to him, whom he trusted.

Who is Leamsy Salazar and how is he connected to the U.S. Intelligence Agencies?

Leamsy Salazar was one of Chavez’s closest aides for nearly seven years. He was a Lieutenant Colonel in the Venezuelan Navy and became known to Chavez after he waved the Venezuelan flag from the roof of the presidential guard’s barracks at the presidential palace during the 2002 coup, as the rescue of Chavez was underway. He became a symbol of the loyal armed forces that helped defeat the coup and Chavez rewarded him by bringing him on as one of his assistants. Salazar was both a bodyguard and an aide to Chavez, who would bring him coffee and meals, stand by his side, travel with him around the world and protect him during public events. I knew him and interacted with him many times. He was one of the familiar faces protecting Chavez for many years. He was a key member of Chavez’s elite inner security circle, with private access to Chavez and privileged and highly confidential knowledge of Chavez’s comings and goings, daily routine, schedule and dealings.

After Chavez passed away in March 2013, because of his extended service and loyalty, Leamsy was transferred to the security detail of Diosdado Cabello, who was then president of Venezuela’s National Assembly and considered one of the most powerful political and military figures in the country. Cabello was one of Chavez’s closest allies. It should be noted that Leamsy remained with Chavez throughout most of his illness up to his death and had privileged access to him that few had, even from his security

Shockingly, in December 2014, news reports revealed that Leamsy had secretly been flown to the United States from Spain, where he was allegedly on vacation with his family. The plane that flew him was said to be from the DEA. He was placed in witness protection and news reports have stated he is providing information to the U.S. government about Venezuelan officials involved in a high level ring of drug trafficking. Opposition-owned media in Venezuela claim he gave details accusing Diosdado Cabello of being a drug-kingpin, but none of that information has been independently verified, nor have any court records or allegations been released, if they exist.

Another explanation for his going into the witness protection program in the United States could include his involvement in the assassination of Chavez, possibly done as part of a CIA black op, or maybe even done under the auspices of CIA but carried out by corrupt elements within the Venezuelan government. For example, the Panama Papers exposed another former Chavez aide, Army Captain Adrian Velasquez, who was in charge of security for Chavez’s son, Hugo. Captain Velasquez’s wife, a former Navy Officer, Claudia Patricia Diaz Guillen, was Chavez’s nurse for several years and had private, unsupervised access to him. Furthermore, Claudia administered medicines, shots and other health and food-related materials to Chavez over a period of years. Just one month before his deadly illness was discovered in 2011, Chavez named Claudia as treasurer of Venezuela, placing her in charge of the country’s money. She was dismissed from the position right after Chavez passed away.

Both Captain Velasquez and Claudia appeared in the Panama Papers as owning a shell company with millions of dollars. They also own property in an elite area in the Dominican Republic, Punta Cana, where properties cost in the millions, and they have resided there since at least June 2015. The documents show that right after Chavez passed away and Nicolas Maduro was elected president in April 2013, Captain Velasquez opened an offshore company on April 18, 2013 through the Panamanian firm Mossack Fonesca, called Bleckner Associates Limited. A Swiss financial investment firm, V3 Capital Partners LLC, affirmed they manage the funds of Captain Velasquez, which number in the millions. It’s impossible for an Army Captain to have earned that amount of money through legitimate means. Neither him nor his wife, Claudia, have returned to Venezuela since 2015.

Captain Velasquez was especially close with Leamsy Salazar.

Can you explain the suspicious circumstances under which Salazar was flown out of Spain to the safety of the United States on a plane belonging to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)?

Of course it was highly suspicious that Salazar was flown out of Spain, where he was allegedly on vacation with his family, and taken to the United States on a DEA plane. There is no question that he was collaborating with the U.S. government and betrayed his country. What remains to be seen is what his exact role was. Did he administer the murderous poison to Chavez, or was it one of his partners, such as Captain Velasquez or the nurse/treasurer Claudia?

While this all may sound very conspiracy theory-ish, these are facts that can be verified independently. It is also true, according to declassified secret U.S. documents, that the U.S. Army was developing an injectable radiation weapon to use for political assassinations of select enemies as far back as 1948. The Church Commission hearings into the Kennedy Assassination also uncovered the existence of an assassination weapon developed by CIA to induce heart attacks and soft-tissue cancers. Chavez died of an aggressive soft-tissue cancer.

By the time it was detected it was too late. There is other information out there documenting the development of a “cancer virus” that was going to be weaponized and allegedly used to kill Fidel Castro in the 1960s. I know most of that seems like science fiction, but do your research and see what really exists. I don’t believe everything I read either. As a lawyer and investigative journalist, I need hard evidence, and multiple, verifiable sources. Even if we just go on the official U.S. Army document from 1948, it’s a fact that the U.S. government was in the process of developing a radiation weapon for political assassinations. More than 60 years later we can only imagine what technological capacities exist.

On a personal note, would you please tell us what the loss of Hugo Chavez has meant to you and how his death has impacted the people of Venezuela?

The loss of Hugo Chavez has been crushing. He was my friend and I spent nearly ten years as his advisor. The void he has left is impossible to replace. He had a huge heart and genuinely dedicated himself to build a better country for his people, and a better world for humanity. He cared deeply about all people, but especially the poor, neglected and marginalized.

There is this picture taken of Chavez by a bystander, when he had been at an event in the center of Caracas and was walking through a large plaza that had been cleared by security. All of a sudden, he saw a young man, disheveled and seemingly on drugs, barely able to keep himself upright, wearing ragged clothes. To the horror of his security guards, Chavez went over to him and lovingly put his arm around him and offered him a cup of coffee. He didn’t judge the poor guy or reprimand him, or show disgust. He treated him like a fellow human being who deserved to be seen with dignity. He stayed there with him for a while, just telling stories and chatting like old friends. When he had to go, he told one of his guards to offer the man whatever help he needed.

There were no cameras there, no TV, no public. It wasn’t a publicity stunt. It was genuine, sincere care and concern for a fellow human in need. Despite being president and a powerful head of state, Chavez always saw himself as an equal to all people.

His unexpected death has had a tragic toll on Venezuela. Sadly, the country is going through extremely difficult times. A combination of corruption and external sabotage by opposition forces (with foreign support), together with the sharp drop in oil prices, have crippled the economy. U.S. agencies and their allies in Venezuela have seized the opportunity to further destabilize and destroy all remaining remnants of chavismo. Now they are trying to tarnish and erase Chavez’s legacy, but I believe this is an impossible task. Chavez’s memory in the millions of people he impacted and improved the lives of, will weather the storm. “Chavismo” has become an ideology founded on principles of social justice and human dignity. But do people miss him terribly? Yes.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
-15 # Caliban 2017-06-16 23:10
There is no doubt that Hugo Chavez was an effective and valuable leader and that his left wing political philosophy would have made him an occasional irritant to US rightists.

But was he murdered by the Obama administration with a cancer vaccine? Sorry, but I see no evidence here that Chavez died of anything other than the terrible but naturally contracted disease -- cancer -- that takes far too many valuable people every day all over the world.
 
 
+6 # Johnny 2017-06-17 16:15
But was he murdered by the Obama administration with a cancer vaccine? Sorry, but I see no evidence here that Chavez died of anything other than the terrible but naturally contracted disease -- cancer -- that takes far too many valuable people every day all over the world.
But if you are not just supporting the U.S. regime that admittedly has murdered heads of state all over the world, including Patrice Lumumba, Saddam Hussein, and Moamar Gadhafi, Salvador Allende, then you must admit also that you see no evidence that Chavez "naturally contracted" the cancer.
 
 
-7 # Caliban 2017-06-18 00:42
In my comment, I said simply that this article presents NO evidence that the Obama administration murdered Hugo Chavez.

I have just reread the piece and arrive at the same conclusion.
.
Am I saying that US agents had nothing to do with Chavez's death? No. I have no idea who was behind it. But Golinger's piece does list a lot of potential suspects, most of whom no connection to the Obama government or any US agency.

To #Johnny, I'd suggest better research. Patrice Lumumba, Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi were all killed by their own countrymen, and Salvador Allende committed suicide.
 
 
+5 # Glen 2017-06-18 11:44
These leaders were killed by locals who were supported by the U.S. The CIA has fingers in every action world wide. Any who stand up to the U.S. or who are leaders in a country the U.S. wants to control will be punished. Period. Even if old, diabetic, bedridden - remind you of anyone?
 
 
-4 # Caliban 2017-06-18 15:18
Supporting one side or the other in politics is not the same as murder; nor is the US the only country that does it. This should be obvious to anybody with an ounce of common sense.
 
 
-2 # Glen 2017-06-19 11:55
Depends on what type of support we are including here. My definition of support means up front and personal, not political. Assisting in murder is part of the definition of support. The U.S. has even trained individuals to fight and kill for them as well as tipping off the killers ahead of time with intel.
 
 
+29 # mashiguo 2017-06-17 02:31
The operating presumption should be that any South American leader who builds a state independent of US influence is going to be assassinated.
US has made it clear that it will be the only power in the world and that it can force its will wherever it likes in any way it likes.
Nothing should be presumed innocent until US is proving guilty. US has already confessed to all future crimes against humanity.
 
 
+9 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2017-06-17 11:14
mash -- this is exactly what John Perkins said in his book, Confessions of an Economic Hitman. Perkins should know. He participated in many such assassinations, though he only worked directly on the economic side.

The US CIA and its various mercenary groups and assassinate and overthrown so many leaders in Latin America that it is nearly impossible to count. And now this same gang of assassins is working to overthrow Trump. If Trump is assassinated, I'm quite sure the mass media will say he died of natural causes.
 
 
+4 # ericlipps 2017-06-17 12:50
"Already confessed to all future crimes"? How very Orwellian--or Dickian. (Ever see the movie "Minority Report"?)
 
 
+22 # Scott Griffith 2017-06-17 03:19
Reassuring, Eva, to read you again after a seeming silence until recently. I've been certain since the start that the death of Hugo Chavez was brought about by neo-con-control led US official or unofficial schemers. Stay safe.
 
 
+24 # Glen 2017-06-17 06:13
Of course Chavez was assassinated. That is par for the course in any country with any resources other countries want, especially the U.S. Remember when Chavez sent gas during times of trouble in the U.S. Remember the gas stations with lower prices, thanks to Chavez?

There is an excellent book on the subject and plenty of information concerning the U.S.'s involvement in Venezuelan elections, including the attempt on Chavez's life at that time. Jimmy Carter went down there in help insure that last election was legal.
 
 
+14 # discus 2017-06-17 07:28
Evo, be cautious!
 
 
+22 # ericlane 2017-06-17 08:28
The sad part is that Chavez was democratically elected by the people of Venezuela. The US government hated him because he wasn't a capitalist. It is obvious that the United States does not stand for democracy worldwide but the interests of the 1%. And as far as the assassination, if it looks, walks and quacks like a duck, well, maybe it just might be a duck.
 
 
+11 # Johnny 2017-06-17 16:06
"It’s impossible for an Army Captain to have earned that amount of money through legitimate means. Neither he nor his wife, Claudia, have returned to Venezuela since 2015."
"The working class? I'm not afraid of the working class. I can pay half of the working class to kill the other half." Jay Gould
That's how capitalism works.
 
 
-11 # Jacob Freeze 2017-06-18 00:02
Eva Golinger bases this essay on very flimsy material, really nothing beyond a few groundless innuendos about Chavez' inner circle, like someone accusing Kenny O'Donnell and Larry O'Brien of assassinating JFK.

Was Chavez assassinated? I don't know, but this essay is bullshit.
 
 
0 # tgemberl 2017-06-19 19:51
I do not know a lot about Venezuela, but this seems pretty dubious to me. Venezuela has an economy that depends too much on one commodity, oil. As the old rock song said, "die young, stay pretty." She seems to be saying that if Chavez were still alive, Venezuela wouldn't be struggling. This strikes me as an idealization of the past. We see the same with John F. Kennedy. He is presented as some sort of absolute saint, but if he had lived, I think there's a good chance he would've fallen into the same troubles Johnson fell into. People claim he wanted to deescalate Vietnam, but I haven't seen good evidence for that. Not that there weren't lots of good things about Kennedy, but I doubt he was quite the hero he's depicted as.

I don't believe Chavez should have been overthrown or murdered. He was the legitimately elected leader of Venezuela. But people like Golinger seem to not want to believe he could do wrong.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN