RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Fears writes: "A federal appeals court ruling stripped wolves of their protections in Wyoming on Friday, which could allow them to be shot on sight."

A gray wolf. (photo: Shutterstock)
A gray wolf. (photo: Shutterstock)


After Court Ruling, Wolves Could Soon Be Shot on Sight in Wyoming

By Darryl Fears, The Washington Post

04 March 17

 

federal appeals court ruling stripped wolves of their protections in Wyoming on Friday, which could allow them to be shot on sight.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided in favor of Wyoming’s wolf management plan, which treats the animals as vermin. The court’s decision overturned a lower-court ruling that sided with conservationists who fought a state law that allowed the unlimited slaughter of wolves in a “predator zone that extended through most of the state,” the environmental groups said.

The court stayed its decision pending an appeal.

“Wyoming’s plan to shoot wolves on sight throughout most of the state was a bad idea when it was proposed, and it’s a bad idea now,” said Rebecca Riley, a senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the groups that fought the plan. “The court’s decision to lift federal protections for wolves in Wyoming will be a step backward for wolf recovery in the West.”

Wolves were hunted to near extinction in the lower 48 states. Following a slight recovery after federal protections were granted in 1978, they exist on only 10 percent of their historic range. Many of the wolves that could lose their protection live outside the borders of Yellowstone National Park, where hunting is prohibited and where the wolves have been reintroduced.

Environmental groups earlier convinced a lower court that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Obama administration should not have moved to remove endangered-species protection for wolves based on promises from Wyoming that it would not harm them in certain areas.

The appeals court essentially ruled that the federal agency had reason to trust Wyoming’s word.

Wyoming’s “promises to protect wolves don’t amount to much” in a state that allows aggressive hunting, said Noah Greenwald of the Center for Biological Diversity. Wolves trying to make it to the southern Rocky Mountains to mate or establish territory “have to make it through the shoot-on-sight zone,” a deadly journey that could once again lower their population, he said.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+11 # Activista 2017-03-04 19:28
Indiscriminate killing these intelligent/pac k-family oriented animals in their original environment by ignorant humans is a crime.
Let the wolves roam free out and in from Yellowstone Park -
Let people move free in North America - America del Norte
 
 
+11 # AJNorth 2017-03-05 02:39
It would be far, far better for these "Real Americans" with their lust for blood and military-style weapons to simply shoot each other.
 
 
+2 # dandevries 2017-03-05 11:37
And, of course, they do, from time to time, but not nearly often enough.
 
 
+6 # kpsk 2017-03-05 08:51
I guess the true "vermin" in this case would be those who think wolves do not deserve to be part of the environment we all share. "Sharing" is not something many white folks are used to doing. Since the first white settlers colonists came over from Europe it's been one long monologue of "I, me, mine" and devil take the defenseless. I'd enjoy seeing some of the shooters leave their guns at home and try and survive in Wyoming's wilderness with just what they were born with at hand.
 
 
0 # Adoregon 2017-03-05 22:57
I'm with you 100% kpsk.
Those who would shoot wolves on sight are the true vermin in this scenario. It is the humans who are unable to control their numbers.

To the tough hunters: try to take down a wolf with your bare hands. Bet you can't.

Boycott Wyoming for vacations.Skip Jackson Hole.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN