RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "The emails show that police monitored Keep it in the Ground participating groups such as 350.org, Break Free Movement, Rainforest Action Network, and WildEarth Guardians, while relying upon intelligence gathered by Anadarko, one of the largest oil and gas producers in the region."

Anti-fracking protest. (photo: Christian O'Rourke/Survival Media Agency)
Anti-fracking protest. (photo: Christian O'Rourke/Survival Media Agency)


Federal Agents Went Undercover to Spy on Anti-Fracking Movement, Emails Reveal

By Lee Fang and Steve Horn, The Intercept

20 July 16

 

hen more than 300 protesters assembled in May at the Holiday Inn in Lakewood, Colorado � the venue chosen by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for an auction of oil and gas leases on public lands � several of the demonstrators were in fact undercover agents sent by law enforcement to keep tabs on the demonstration, according to emails obtained by The Intercept.

The �Keep it in the Ground� movement, a broad effort to block the development of drilling projects, has rapidly gained traction over the last year, raising pressure on the Obama administration to curtail hydraulic fracturing, known as fracking, and coal mining on federal public lands. In response, government agencies and industry groups have sharply criticized the activists in public, while quietly moving to track their activities.

The emails, which were obtained through an open records act request, show that the Lakewood Police Department collected details about the protest from undercover officers as the event was being planned. During the auction, both local law enforcement and federal agents went undercover among the protesters.

The emails further show that police monitored Keep it in the Ground participating groups such as 350.org, Break Free Movement, Rainforest Action Network, and WildEarth Guardians, while relying upon intelligence gathered by Anadarko, one of the largest oil and gas producers in the region.

�Gentlemen, Here is some additional intelligence on the group you may be dealing with today,� wrote Kevin Paletta, Lakewood�s then-chief of police, on May 12, the day of the protest. The Anadarko report, forwarded to Paletta by Joni Inman, a public relations consultant, warned of activist trainings conducted by �the very active off-shoot of 350.org� that had �the goal of encouraging �direct action� such as blocking, vandalism, and trespass.�

The protesters waved signs and marched outside of the Holiday Inn. The auction went on as planned and there were no arrests.

�I believe the BLM reached out to us,� Steve Davis, the public information officer for the Lakewood police, told The Intercept about preparations for the protest. He added that the protest was �very peaceful.�

�Our goal is to provide for public safety and the safety of our employees,� says Steven Hall, the BLM Colorado Communications Director, when asked about the agency�s undercover work. �Any actions that we take are designed to achieved those goals. We do not discuss the details of our law enforcement activities.�

BLM reimbursed the Lakewood police for costs associated with covering the protest, the emails and a scanned copy of the check show.

(photo: The Intercept)

Aggressive Stance

Despite a relatively uncontroversial protest, the tactics revealed by the emails, recent public statements, and other maneuvers suggest that the federal government is beginning to take a more aggressive stance toward the Keep it in the Ground movement.

�I�m really wondering what more the BLM is up to,� said Jeremy Nichols, a climate and energy program director for WildEarth Guardians. �Some of the emails indicate more extensive intel gathering on their end.�

�Why are climate activists, who are only calling on the BLM to follow President Obama�s lead and heed universally accepted science, facing this kind of uphill response?� Nichols asked rhetorically. �It�s a shame that the BLM has turned climate concerns into a law enforcement issue instead of a genuine policy discussion.�

During a congressional hearing in March, Neil Kornze � the agency�s Director and former senior policy advisor for U.S. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid � appeared to compare the anti-fracking activists to the armed anti-government militia members who occupied the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon.

�We have had a situation where we have had militia; we�ve had people raising arms at different times. We are on heightened alert and we are concerned about safety. And so a situation that we are not used to, separating out who is a bidder and who is not, gives us pause,� Kornze said, explaining to GOP congressman that his agency faced �abnormal security� concerns.

The bureau maintains its own force of special agents to investigate crimes committed on public lands. The website for the agency notes that �investigations may require the use of undercover officers, informants, surveillance and travel to various locations throughout the United States.�

Broader Trend

In recent years federal and private sector groups have poured resources into surveilling environmental organizations.

In 2013, The Guardian revealed that the FBI had spied on activists organizing opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline. The agency �collated inside knowledge about forthcoming protests, documented the identities of individuals photographing oil-related infrastructure, scrutinized police intelligence and cultivated at least one informant.� The FBI later confirmed that the investigation violated its own guidelines.

In 2011, an executive with Anadarko boasted that his company was deploying military-like psychological warfare techniques to deal with the �controversy that we as an industry are dealing with,� calling the opposition to the industry �an insurgency.�

Online Auctions to �End the Circus�

The focus on preventing the leasing of public lands for fracking gained national headlines in 2008 when activist Tim DeChristopher successfully bid on 22,000 acres of oil and gas land in Utah. DeChristopher, who served two years in prison, did not intend to pay but won the bid in order to disrupt the auction and call attention to the leasing program. That pricing regime allows private corporations to pay deeply discounted rates � as little as $1.50 per acre � for drilling rights.

In 2009, the U.S. Department of Interior�s Office of Inspector General released a report calling on the bureau to do a study on �which auction process is best suited for oil and gas leases� in order to prevent the next Tim DeChristopher, whose action landed an explicit mention in the report�s introduction. An email exchange from the day before the Lakewood Holiday Inn action shows both a Lakewood police officer and BLM officer on high alert about the possibility of another DeChristopher-type action taking place. Among the choices laid out in the report as a possible new bidding method was online bidding.

Just days after the Lakewood protest, Kathleen Sgamma � a lobbyist for industry-funded group Western Energy Alliance � advocated for online bidding as a means to �end the circus.� In a May 18 email, BLM Office of Law Enforcement Special Agent-in-Charge Gary Mannino thanked Lakewood Police Chief Kevin Paletta for his department�s help and conveyed that public auctions could soon become a thing of the past.

Congress has followed suit. On June 24, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, D-Calif., and Rep. Garret Graves, R-La., introduced Innovation in Offshore Leasing Act (H.R. 5577), which calls for online bidding for oil and gas contained in waters controlled by the federal government. On July 6, the U.S. House Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources held a hearing on the bill and it has since passed out of the House Natural Resources Committee.

While the oil and gas industry has come out in support of online bidding, and one contractor in particular named EnergyNet stands to profit from such an arrangement, several environmental groups issued a statement decrying the shift toward online bidding. EnergyNet, whose CEO testified at the June 24 congressional hearing, will oversee a September 20 BLM auction originally scheduled to unfold in Washington, D.C.

Two recently-released studies concluded that phasing out fossil fuel leases on public lands is crucial for meeting the 2� C climate change temperature-rise goal, with one concluding that even burning the existing fossil fuels already leased on public lands would surpass the 2� C goal. After the release of those two studies, environmental groups filed a legal petition with the Interior Department calling for a moratorium on federal fossil fuels leases.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+26 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-05-19 18:57
Once again, Sanders nails it: the American Oligarchy. The trouble is that the oligarchs "own" or control both political parties and they will do what ever is needed to be sure no progressive ever is elected to the presidency. A few in the congress is not a problem, but never the majority.

The second problem is that so few Americans understand what an oligarchy is or how they operate. They only understand that they are "billionaires," which is sometimes true but there are also oligarchical families.

Oligarchies work through institutions they control. These are the media, the intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies like the FBI, think tanks. They control social organizations and advocacy organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations or the Federalist Society or the Heritage Foundation. These groups are were people with social power meet and exchange ideas and take back plans of action to their own spheres.

The oligarchy is also deeply embedded into the military through weapons contractors and retired generals who retain a lot of influence over active generals.

Bezos' wealth is not particularly important. He's just a robber baron as capitalism has always hosted. His ownership of the Washonton Post is much more important.

Of all the politicians named above, probably Sanders is the only one who is not "wholly owned" by the oligarchs. The rest are probably just career climbers. They will do or say what is needed in order to get the next job.
 
 
+1 # tedrey 2018-05-19 23:10
Surely you mean "NOT wholly owned," Rodion! Please!
 
 
+1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-05-20 18:03
yes, I fixed it. Thanks. Typo!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 
+1 # draak 2018-05-20 01:47
Quoting Rodion Raskolnikov:
... probably only Sanders is the only one who is now "wholly owned" by the oligarchs....

Did you mean 'not "wholly owned"'? Otherwise this doesn't make sense.
 
 
+5 # Carl 2018-05-19 19:51
The oligarchy as you describe it is the way it works in Russia. It works somewhat differently in the US.
 
 
+1 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-05-20 18:12
Paul -- How so? I think it is much different in Russia. The oligarchs there do not control any of the institutions -- universities, federal police, courts, media (well, almost), and so on. They control all of these here.

In Russia, straight up bribery is still the most common way to influence government. In the US bribery is seldom needed. It is about networks and relations. It is about the people who belong to the right group. It is about institutions promoting their own.


How do you think the oligarchy works in the US? I'd be interested.
 
 
+11 # chapdrum 2018-05-19 22:24
Right, and with help from the Democratic Party leadership too.
 
 
+3 # boredlion 2018-05-19 23:20
Correct, Rod !
 
 
+20 # Verify 2018-05-20 07:09
Only this week there have surfaced the following major new scandals:
the Indonesian Trump golf course-amusemen t park China government ZTE scandal, involving the apparent of half a billion to a billion dollars; the Quatar blockade-Saudi- UAE-Michael Cohen-Kushner-6 66 5th Ave scandal involving a similar amount; the Russian oligarch-Michae l Cohen- oh I can't even remember. And the Trump Postmaster General attempted shakedown of Bezos. And of course Stormy Daniels. The point is that the M.O. is always the same: to Stormy, "cute little girl you got here, shame if anything happened to her mother". To Qatar: "nice little country you got here, shame if anything happened to it..." To China: "nice little economy you got here, shame if we had to put on tariffs or sanctions". That shakedown lasted throughout the election campaign, and ended in 3 days after the Chinese investment in Trump-Indonesia . The fact that Qatar is an important ally, that Palestinians deserve a homeland and that Kushner-Netanya hu-Adelson's policy is also terrible for Israel, that ZTE phones are a security risk, that ZTE violated Iran and North Korea sanctions, that the Iran deal was working and is infinitely better than anything Trump can hope to achieve with N Korea, that Putin kills journalists... carries no weight, when profits are involved. The tax cuts have almost sealed our fate, for that is a bribe to all the very wealthy to not let progressives threaten Trump's kleptocracy.
If Dems ignore this..
 
 
+19 # economagic 2018-05-20 08:51
Right on, Bernie. They only call it "class warfare" when we fight back, and we're not even there yet. The choir has heard you all along, but most Democratic voters have yet to outgrow their acceptance of the pallid excuse for education that has always prevailed in "Exceptional America." It might be good to include a little history in these speeches (such as a couple of quotes from the Powell Memo), and perhaps a little political geography (e.g., income distribution and living standards, especially health care, in other countries), and maybe a little domestic economics (who benefits and by how much).
 
 
+6 # NAVYVET 2018-05-20 14:56
Not "most" Dem voters, and certainly not most of the future ones, the young! Bernie was winning state after state until the Dem Establishment (unfortunately including Rep. John Lewis, a leading civil rights activist) began lying about Hillary Clinton's wonderful accomplishments , and putting down Bernie's.

Yet--Bernie, a white kid who had been speaking out for human rights since high school, was arrested for civil rights activities in the early 70s when Hillary was primping as a Goldwater Girl to attend the 1964 Republican convention. (When I watched that on TV I was so nauseated I resigned membership in the Republican party!)

And Congressman Lewis had the gall to campaign for Hillary Clinton and say he didn't think much of Bernie. SHAME, Mr Lewis. SHAME. Until you apologize I will always wonder who got to you.
 
 
+1 # economagic 2018-05-21 20:47
Hey, I'm a "Democratic voter" (though definitely NOT a registered Dem, having reached voting age in 1968), and I outgrew it, having completed the first few installments of my schooling prior to the time it really became debased! I reconnected with a HS classmate a few years ago, and we often discuss how fortunate we were in the caliber of education we received in the public schools in OKLAHOMA ferpetesake in the 50s and 60s!
 
 
0 # chapdrum 2018-05-21 17:58
econo...spot on.
 
 
+13 # Allears 2018-05-20 09:32
The more and more one man has the less and less do more and more others. The planet is mathematically finite in its resources. It is staggering how much suffering goes on because the investor and CEO classes or categories of humans must have more than their share-a word the meaning of which they have turned on its head. The concept of sharing in its original form is lost completely on those who think they must have more and more and more, no matter the consequences to others outside their circle, and sometimes inside it as well.
 
 
+5 # ericlipps 2018-05-20 10:09
Despite the hype, some of it in the comments section of this very site, I doubt Bernie Sanders will run in 2020. He'd be 78 years old; he might not even be alive, or might be in poor health.

So when Republicans run blogs bearing his picture, it's to convince voters that the Sanders movement has taken over the Democratic Party, which Bernie supporters can only wish were true.
 
 
+4 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-05-20 18:56
eric -- you may be right. The important thing is to recognize that Sanders is only a standard bearer for the resurgence of the progressive/pop ulist/socialist faction in the democratic party. There are others.

The center-right or neo-liberal/neo -conservative wing of the democratic party is dying. It is hated and distrusted. It will hang on with all its might, but it is not the future of the democratic party. What Sanders represents is the future. We should be grateful for his efforts in propelling the progressive/soc ialist/populist faction to the forefront.
 
 
+5 # PCPrincess 2018-05-20 22:48
Which is damn near the same age as Trump, who would be his opponent. Why are you not complaining about Trumps age? Hmmm?
 
 
+2 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-05-21 11:27
eric -- your dreams may be coming true. I read that Hillary is considering a run for president in 2020. She told some demo party leaders that she just can't give up the defeat of 2016. Running and winning in 2020 would put her mind at ease. She's out making speeches and recruiting supporters.

You'd get your Hillary v. Trump rematch.

Me, please pass the oxycontin. I want to be comfortably numb for the whole election season.
 
 
0 # Robbee 2018-05-20 10:41
 
 
+18 # PABLO DIABLO 2018-05-20 11:09
Run Bernie, RUN.
 
 
0 # chapdrum 2018-05-21 21:21
And on second thought...in my lifetime, progressive policies have been permitted introduction, but NEVER have they been adopted. Anything one centimeter left of center is verboten.
 
 
+1 # SOF 2018-05-22 20:39
Let's just come up with a great name for a new party -with great acronym. Bernie - With Elizabeth Warren as V.P. A dynamic duo which should take care of the fear of Bernie dying. (Haven't we witnessed the man's health, vigor, and mental sharpness?) What is the alternative? At least there will be a spokesperson, or two, who could frame the problems and put forth reasonable visionary solutions to the problems... which we share with conservatives, 'Christians', the poor, middle class, the young, and upper wannabes... (whether they know it or not), and much of the the world. I also think we need to pay attention to the mouthpieces of evil wreckage on FOX radio in order to counter their spin. Already they're making 'Progressive' a dirty word. Lets get the message out and the show on the road.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN