RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Marte writes: "The Obama administration is unveiling a new rule that would make millions of middle-income workers eligible for overtime pay, a move that delivers a long-sought victory for labor groups."

Labor Secretary Thomas Perez and President Obama will announce a new rule Wednesday that will expand the number of workers eligible for overtime pay. (photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)
Labor Secretary Thomas Perez and President Obama will announce a new rule Wednesday that will expand the number of workers eligible for overtime pay. (photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)


Millions More Workers Would Be Eligible for Overtime Pay Under New Federal Rule

By Jonnelle Marte, The Washington Post

18 May 16

 

he Obama administration will unveil a new rule Wednesday that would make millions of middle-income workers eligible for overtime pay, a move that delivers a long-sought victory for labor groups.

The regulations, which were last updated more than a decade ago, would let full-time salaried employees earn overtime if they make up to $47,476 a year, more than double the current threshold of $23,660 a year. The Labor Department estimates that the rule would boost the pay of 4.2 million additional workers.

The change is scheduled to take effect Dec. 1.

The move caps a long-running effort by the Obama administration to aid low- and middle-income workers whose paychecks have not budged much in the last few decades, even as the top earners in America have seen their compensation soar. The last update to the rules came in 2004, and Wednesday’s announcement is the third update to the salary threshold for overtime regulations in 40 years.

“Along with health care reform, this is one of the most important measures that the Obama administration has implemented to help middle-wage workers,” said Jared Bernstein, a former chief economist for Vice President Biden and a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

About 35 percent of full-time salaried employees will be eligible for time and a half when they work extra hours under the new rule, up significantly from the 7 percent who qualify under the current threshold, according to the Labor Department.

The shift was swiftly criticized by small business owners, nonprofit groups and universities that say they may have to switch some salaried workers to hourly positions to afford the new threshold. And instead of seeing bigger paychecks, some salaried workers may be assigned fewer hours, they said.

“For many of these types of employees they’re going to be viewing it as a demotion,” said David French, senior vice president of government relations for the National Retail Federation. “They’re going to have to clock in and clock out. They’re no longer going to have flexibility at work.”

But some labor groups and unions said the change was long overdue. Many people putting in 50 to 60 hours a week without overtime are actually earning less than the minimum wage when all of their hours are taken into account, they said.

“The current level isn’t even enough to keep a family of four out of poverty,” said Judy Conti, federal advocacy coordinator for the National Employment Law Project, a nonprofit organization that advocates for workers. “It is not at all reflective of somebody who is an executive or a professional.”

President Obama first announced his plans to update the rules two years ago, but some consumer groups say they have been pushing him to alter the rules since he took office. On Tuesday, during a conference call with reporters, Biden said the move matched the president’s other efforts to bolster the middle class.

“The middle class is getting clobbered, although I think we’re making some progress here,” Biden said. He added that the administration has also called for equal pay and for raising the federal minimum wage.

But some companies said they may struggle to afford vital staff under the new rule. Employers may decide to scale back some workers’ hours and spread out some of their responsibilities among part-time workers, said French of the National Retail Federation. Other workers may not see bigger paychecks if their base pay is cut to make up the difference, the group estimates.

Some colleges said they worried they might have to cut services or raise tuition to keep up with the guidelines. Linda Harig, vice president of human resources for the University of Tennessee, estimates that the university would need to spend an additional $18 million to afford overtime pay for employees who would become eligible under the new guidelines, such as admission staff, hall directors and people with post-doctoral positions. That is the equivalent of a 4.3 percent increase in tuition, Harig said.

“We agree that there needs to be a change,” she said. “But we believe due diligence has not been done on the impact for higher education institutions.”

But supporters of the rule say companies that want to avoid paying overtime may boost workers’ pay up to the higher income threshold. Some workers may still be better off if their schedules are scaled back to 40 hours a week.

The administration’s rule would benefit women, minorities and young workers the most, according to estimates from the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+3 # PeacefulGarden 2016-05-18 16:07
The middle class is getting clobbered, end of story. This is the Federal Government coming up with a stupid idea-- again.

We cannot afford anything. All we do is go deeper into debt. Open up your eyes. Look at the IRS data. Look at us... stop talking about your stupid political bullshit and look at us. You took 12K away from me in federal, state, and local taxes and I earned around 50K. We, my wife and kids, have no money, for anything. And I get nothing for my taxes, nothing. Open up your freaking eyes and look at the middle class instead of glancing at us, squinting at us, and for christ sake, shitting on us.

You are sucking the life out of us.
 
 
+6 # RLF 2016-05-19 04:59
I was recently in Denmark and the taxes there are around 50-60% but the people weren't angry...because they get alternative energy, comprehensive, common sense health care, clean, beautiful cities, good roads, the best trains and subways I know,etc...they get something for it. problem with paying taxes in the US is the big business steals all of the tax money. Who in his right mind thinks we need to subsidize the oil companies? Who in his right mind thinks we should be giving GE money back! Who in their right mind, even if they love the military, thinks we are saving any money with subcontractors rather than use grunts! The theft is rampant and not just in the banks!
 
 
-4 # PeacefulGarden 2016-05-19 05:59
Well, we need to bomb the hell out of Denmark. Have the CIA go in there a screw everything up! And my taxes can go for that...
 
 
-1 # PeacefulGarden 2016-05-19 11:45
Please, really. Minus signs? Does RSN have a robotic account that scans for bad comments, yet cannot recognize sarcasm?

Or do you all think I want to destroy Denmark?
 
 
+2 # lfeuille 2016-05-19 17:15
Sarcasm is not always obvious without the verbal and visual cues of face to face contact.
 
 
+2 # PeacefulGarden 2016-05-19 11:48
We are talking about taxing people that make minimum wage here. That is the fucking question! Wake the fuck up. Forget about GE, that is a distraction. Think really hard, they tax people making a wage of poverty, hell they might as well simply bring back slavery.
 
 
+3 # RLF 2016-05-19 04:53
What they need to do is make a salary contract for 40 hours and any more is overtime...for all pay grades! Time we get back to the 40 hour work week...we fought for it before and have had it taken away in slow motion!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN