Hartman writes: �The FBI and police in Southern California opened a hate-crime investigation into the vandalism of two mosques in Hawthorne, California.�
Law enforcement officials investigate the scene of suspected arson at the Islamic Society of Palm Springs on Dec. 11, 2015, in Coachella. (photo: Gina Ferazzi/LA Times)
Hate Crime Investigations Opened in Vandalism of California Mosques
14 December 15
he FBI and police in Southern California opened a hate-crime investigation into the vandalism of two mosques in Hawthorne, California. Worshippers arrived at Ahmadiyya Muslim Community Baitus-Salaam Mosque early on Sunday and found "Jesus" written on the fence, along with other religious graffiti on an outside wall. Then they spotted what looked like a hand grenade in the driveway, but police determined it was "a plastic replica," according to a spokesperson for the Los Angeles County Sheriff�s Department. A short time later, the words "Jesus is the way" were found spray-painted on the Islamic Center of Hawthorne.
"All evidence will be reviewed by state and federal prosecutors to determine whether a violation under federal civil rights statutes occurred," the FBI said in a statement on Sunday evening. Hawthorne is located about 75 miles west of San Bernardino, where a couple inspired by Islamic extremists killed 14 people earlier this month.
On Friday, a fire was set at another mosque near the site of the shooting, the Islamic Society of Coachella Valley, in Coachella. A handful of people were inside as firefighters arrived on the scene and quickly put out the fire in the lobby. No one was injured, but there was smoke damage throughout the building. Carl Dial, 23, was arrested that night and charged with five felonies, including commission of a hate crime, arson, maliciously setting a fire, and second-degree burglary, the L.A. Times reports.
"It's horribly lamentable that we would paint any group as undesirables based on the actions of an extremely small number of radical folks that don't represent the religion in any way," Riverside county supervisor John Benoit said after visiting the mosque. "If in fact it was done with the mosque as a target ... it's reprehensible, and the people who perpetrated that act should be treated the way we would any other terrorist."
There have been a rash of apparent anti-Muslim crimes across the country following the San Bernardino shooting and the Paris terrorist attack, and even non-Muslims have mistakenly been targeted. Earlier last week a Sikh temple was vandalized in Buena Park, California. "The graffiti had gang codes and a racial slur and profanity in reference to ISIS and Islam, which was misspelled," said Jaspreet Singh, a temple board member.
Council on American-Islamic Relations spokesperson Ibrahim Hooper said Islamophobic rhetoric from some on the right is making things even more difficult for Muslims in America. "Right after 9/11, anti-Muslim hate was on the fringes of society, and now it has been brought right into the mainstream," he said. "It's almost acceptable now to hate Islam and Muslims, and now we see the results."
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
People like Taibbi are a thorn in our conscience.
but not the critical one, it seems to me.
What's most important is that Manning is being punished
for revealing at least one blatant war crime.
Had he done ONLY that, does AlWight think the military
would have behaved more gently? Or confessed?
But in reality, Manning did a huge document dump
that may or may not have included the sorts of information
that AlWight worries about. At this point, it's not clear
that anyone in the world has done that analysis,
which would be challenging, but is doable.
To date, there is apparently NO evidence that the doc dump
seriously compromised anything that should not
have been compromised. So while it remains possible that
Manning actions may have been mixed,
there's nothing to justify his lynching --
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/282-98/17803-us-army-court-martials-constitution
NOT releasing the information for review and expected criminal investigation is a military crime under section 499 of the Army Field Manual.
I've never been to Wikileaks to examine the "evidence", but have seen "Colateral Murder" on YouTube. I was appalled, considering that it wasn't mere actors and fake bullets. Those civilian Reporters are REALLY DEAD now.
You completely miss the point. Manning disclosed criminal acts that the government has attempted to hide from the U.S. public. "Criminal Acts" do not deserve to be safeguarded; they deserve to be exposed and their perpetrators deserve punishment.
This government has expanded the use of the 'classified' label beyond any conceivable legitimate use. Don't be a sucker and fall the ploy that because somebody put a 'classified' stamp on a criminal act, that act should be kept secret to 'protect us'.
We should never be protected from the truth of these atrocities.
(Bring on the NOBEL Prize!)
"..a war that history has revealed to have been a grotesque policy error."
Invading countries IS the policy and the course chosen and taken by the Gov't.
Where's the error? THE ERROR IS IN THE POLICY. The Irak war is the correct result for an erroneous policy. I'll agree if the very much appreciated Mr. Tabbi means: "..a policy that history has revealed to be a grotesque error." or simply: "This is a 'grotesque policy.'"
Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant. Matt, as usual, you hit the nail on the head while everyone else was busy examining the hammer.
(*) I Am Bradley Manning!
The military system is allowed blatancy in denying citizens their rights, under the rationale they are not subject to the same laws, nor even "free" citizens, by dint of having enlisted. However, "Homeland Security" teaches us we are one nuclear "accident" away from becoming subject to that selfsame system of government, enlisted or no.
Does their right to our ignorance trump our right to know of atrocity? There has not been a definitive answer since Nazi Germany.
Then, Lind has this she added to the Law Review in 2000, MEDIA RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO PROCEEDINGS, INFORMATION, AND
PARTICIPANTS IN MILITARY CRIMINAL CASES
1. An unstable person should not have access to critical information, and anyone who has such access should be loyal. Manning is on trial for leaking documents as an unstable person. The charge is valid. The seriousness of the consequences is yet to be determined.
2. It is the government and those in charge of the crimes revealed that should be on trial. The seriousness of these crimes is unquestionable.
Tabbi is correct that the attempt will be made to focus on the most narrow of these concerns and to ignore the rest of it. It is up to the citizenry to force this issue; I do not trust either political party to handle this correctly; both have dirty hands.
Fear prevents us from acknowledging the import of such strong decisions. Don't be a dinosaur.
I hope they rot in prison.
It must be very hard to be an american with brains nowadays :(
Steele worked directly for Petraeus, Rumsfeld and Cheney who he had met while training death squads in el Salvador. They admired his work and brought him back as an advisor when they invaded Iraq.
His work there building up the death squads in Iraq would generate 3,000 corpses a month and uncounted victims of torture as it peaked during "the Surge."
For the Bradley Mannings, the Daniel Ellsburgs, the Berrigan Bros., and so many others, I am humbled, and am learning as I age to not fear those who thrive on fear. Fear and abuse of those who reveal their crimes is all they really have in their arsenal. if we can learn not to fear them, to look them in the eye, humbly, but honestly and with meaning, then this country may still have a chance. If not, then we'll receive what we have earned in our apathy and comfort.
I salute Bradley Manning, and vow to continue to work toward not fearing the machinery that strives for Total Power.
Thank you Bradley manning, for reminding me how to live my life... again.
till this hour has come around
and I'm gone on the rising tide
gone to face Van Diemen's land
It's a bitter pill I swallow here
to be rid from one so dear
we fought for justice
and not for gain
but the magistrate
sent me away
"He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my
contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the
spinal cord would fully suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be
done away with at once. Heroism at command, senseless brutality, and all the
loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism, how violently I hate
all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to
shreds than be part of so base an action! It is my conviction that killing
under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder."
- Albert Einstein
.....
True. Because there are, essentially, NO headlines about the Manning trial ... the Snowden issue has managed to eat them all up.
James Bond it is not. At least, not James Bond as Hollywood-adver tised heterosexual.
See Ian Fleming as a British homosexual intell operative--then you are a bit closer to the truth.
It appears fascism in our day is bi-sexual in its smear tactics and innuendo.
I might think the President is more worried about the ramifications-- than Mrs. Clinton--truth be told.