RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Israel announced on Sunday a land appropriation in the occupied West Bank that an anti-settlement group termed the biggest in 30 years and a Palestinian official said would cause only more friction after the Gaza war."

Palestinians hold a mock rocket and a model of a Hamas-made drone during a rally in the West Bank. (photo: Reuters/Ammar Awad)
Palestinians hold a mock rocket and a model of a Hamas-made drone during a rally in the West Bank. (photo: Reuters/Ammar Awad)


ALSO SEE: Israeli Fire on Gaza Town Raises War Crimes Claim

Israel Plans Largest West-Bank Settlement Expansion in '30 Years'

By Reuters

31 August 14

 

srael announced on Sunday a land appropriation in the occupied West Bank that an anti-settlement group termed the biggest in 30 years and a Palestinian official said would cause only more friction after the Gaza war.

Some 400 hectares (988 acres) in the Etzion settlement bloc near Bethlehem were declared "state land, on the instructions of the political echelon" by the military-run Civil Administration.

Israel Radio said the step was taken in response to the kidnapping and killing of three Jewish teens by Hamas militants in the area in June. The notice published by the military gave no reason for the decision.

Peace Now, which opposes Israeli settlement activities in the West Bank - territory Palestinians seek for a state, said the appropriation was meant to turn a site where 10 families now live adjacent to a Jewish seminary into a permanent settlement.

Construction of a major settlement at the location, known as "Gevaot", has been mooted by Israel since 2000. Last year, the government invited bids for the building of 1,000 housing units at the site.

Peace Now said the land seizure was the largest announced by Israel in the West Bank since the 1980s and that anyone with ownership claims had 45 days to appeal. A local Palestinian mayor said Palestinians owned the tracts and harvested olive trees on them.

Israel has come under intense international criticism over its settlement activities, which most countries regard as illegal under international law and a major obstacle to the creation of a viable Palestinian state in any future peace deal.

Nabil Abu Rdainah, a spokesman for Western-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, called on Israel to cancel the appropriation. "This decision will lead to more instability. This will only inflame the situation after the war in Gaza," Abu Rdainah said.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu broke off peace talks with Abbas in April after the Palestinian leader reached a reconciliation deal with Hamas, the Islamist movement that dominates the Gaza Strip.

In a series of remarks after an open-ended ceasefire halted a seven-week-old Gaza war with Hamas on Tuesday, Netanyahu repeated his position that Abbas would have to sever his alliance with Hamas for a peace process with Israel to resume.

Israel has said construction at Gevaot would not constitute the establishment of a new settlement because the site is officially designated a neighborhood of an existing one, Alon Shvut, several km (miles) down the road.

Some 500,000 Israelis live among 2.4 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, territory that the Jewish state captured in the 1967 Middle East war.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+23 # pappajohn15@Gmail.com 2014-01-07 18:11
1984 anyone?

The Art of Sophistry lives in Washington DC.
 
 
+13 # Mrcead 2014-01-08 04:07
Agreed. The sad part is that many in time grow to believe their own rhetoric as truth. Like a method actor who loses his identity in the role, they need to be coaxed back to reality.

With a hammer.
 
 
+1 # RLF 2014-01-09 07:30
Pappa...You forgot to begin your sentence with 'Only'.
 
 
+55 # gd_radical 2014-01-07 18:13
I'm trying to be polite here but these greedy bastards want as much as they can get even if it means doing the vilest of things... And for what, dare I say? Power, fortune, how about both? Look, these people will do anything, say anything, do anything to anybody just to get a step closer to what they seek. The rest of us have to understand that we cannot reason with these types. There is no negotiation because it's always going to end up being lose-lose. The longer we continue to play along with them in their game, the more we lose. Now is the time to cast them out. Quit playing their game and start a new one by playing our own damn rules.
 
 
+11 # Holy Cow 2014-01-07 21:41
So true, jgorman. Full of courage and determination we have to be, and active plus, in order to bring about the soooooo needed change that ain't gonna be politely and negotiatingly acquired.
 
 
+4 # Holy Cow 2014-01-07 21:41
So true, jgorman. Full of courage and determination we have to be, and active plus, in order to bring about the soooooo needed change that ain't gonna be politely and negotiatingly acquired.
 
 
+12 # David Starr 2014-01-08 10:48
@jgorman: Don't worry about being polite in this case. You told it like it is. They are, indeed, greedy bastards.
 
 
+7 # Cassandra2012 2014-01-08 11:04
Lust for power in the case of the Koch Bros,
 
 
+32 # perkinsej 2014-01-07 18:32
What I need to hear from these experts is why states like West Virgina, with small minority populations continue to vote Republican. Guess farther south it's basically racism, but still hard to understand why the states with lowest household inome are not in Democratic camp.
 
 
+14 # reiverpacific 2014-01-07 18:58
Quoting perkinsej:
What I need to hear from these experts is why states like West Virgina, with small minority populations continue to vote Republican. Guess farther south it's basically racism, but still hard to understand why the states with lowest household inome are not in Democratic camp.


I think that this is what the article is trying to explain in part (and don't forget the former "Dixiecrats").
It doesn't help that what passes for news rather than public education for poor folks, is sucked up from the flick'rin' screen owner-media's shallow focus, personality cultism, sound-byte short, detail-lite major issue avoidance, fear and hate-mongering, especially of "the other" -and a long simmering residual resentment over the Civil War from what I've seen of the South, that they've never gotten over.
I mean, they still have heavily-attende d Civil War "re-enactments" for Gawd's sake!
I don't mean to seem simplistic and of course it's never just that easy but then I'm not even a citizen, certainly not a pundit; just an observer writing from personal experience which is all I can offer.
 
 
+28 # zornorff 2014-01-07 19:20
1.Unfortunately , those with lower incomes don't really see themselves as lower income, they think they are just temporarily "un-millionaire s. 2.The right wing rhetoric resonates with their values,if not their wallets.3. There is always the underlying racism that attracts them to these evil white men like flies are attracted to dung.
 
 
+8 # Rain17 2014-01-07 21:27
The problem with these voters is that they honestly believe that the Democratic Party offers nothing but higher taxes for social programs that don't benefit them. They think that the Democrats don't care about their issues. I honestly don't know how to win these voters back. And to be honest, given how Obama won in 2008 and 2012, the Democrats may not need their votes anyway.
 
 
+1 # bigkahuna671 2014-01-09 13:19
But the Dems can't expect a repeat of Obama's successes. His charisma swept up people in a tidal wave of hope for change. Now, with all the problems he's faced with a Congress that refuses to do anything, it's going to be harder to get people excited. In addition, the GOP has been able to push through restrictive voter suppression laws in a number of states, laws that will make it nigh impossible for the Dems to pull in states like Florida. The only positive the Dems can hold onto is that the GOP continues to produce "stars" like Christie, Paul, and Cruz. Cruz, by federal law, cannot run - he was born in Canada and is ineligible, Christie keeps getting into trouble of his own making even as he tries to pretend he's a moderate, and Paul is just Paul - a total phony who is as easy to see through as a pane of glass. As for their titular leader, Reince Priebus, his leadership could cost them everything....W e can only hope and pray.
 
 
+17 # TCinLA 2014-01-07 19:45
You're right, it's racism. Plus, the "Democrats" of the South 50 years ago are the "Republicans" of today. What they really are is "Southernists." Throughout the history of this country, the national progressive party and the national conservative party, whatever their names, have been in approximate balance. The Southern Party has aligned itself with whichever of the national parties would allow the South to maintain its "peculiar institutions," which is basically an aristocracy, originally based in slave riches, now based in riches that come from prostituting the South to corporations as a source of low-cost labor. When the Democrats - who had been allied with the Southernists ever since Jefferson - committed "treason" over civil rights, the Southernists looked elsewhere and were welcomed by the Republicans under Nixon. Only this time the parasite decided it would cure any potential "treason" by taking over the host, which is how we have Southernist far right politics now nationalized.

So far as the South is concerned, all that changed in the past 50 years is the name of the White People's Party the idiots knuckle their brows to, to be loyal to "ol' Massa."
 
 
+6 # WestWinds 2014-01-07 22:03
Quoting perkinsej:
What I need to hear from these experts is why states like West Virgina, with small minority populations continue to vote Republican. Guess farther south it's basically racism, but still hard to understand why the states with lowest household inome are not in Democratic camp.


--- If the Right-wingers are willing to spend billions getting candidates into office, do you really think they stop there? Or is it possible you need to be a registered Republican just to get a job. One of my favorite conspiracy theories is that the NeoCons keep online lists of people who are not of their ilk and when there is a job opening or any other kind of opportunity, those who have the job or whatever consult this list and if they find your name you get zero.

Continued
 
 
+8 # WestWinds 2014-01-07 22:04
I went to my bank to ask for a loan to buy a car. This is a secured loan; secured with the vehicle and secured with my house in which I had full equity. I have no bad history of non-payment or causing any other trouble so from the bank's standpoint, I should have been a prime borrower; especially in light of the sub- prime borrowing they were engaging in at the time.

When I went into the loan officer's office, he was effusive. Then he excused himself for a few minutes. When he came back his demeanor had totally changed; he was cold, short and rude. He all but threw me out of his office. You can't tell me they don't have a data base somewhere that allows them to pick and choose who they will do business with or advance. Don't forget, these people are as dishonest as the day is long and for us to trust them is totally foolish. We need to get RID of them and put the rest under strong and severe regulation if we are going to survive.

PS Read the Chris Hedges recent article on just this subject:
http://www.truthdig.com/chris_hedges/
 
 
+7 # tpmco 2014-01-08 02:42
The banks invented the concept of metadata, and metadata analysis. They know more about your likes and dislikes than anyone else. They know who were your employers, how much you saved, where you spent your money, and even who you may have donated to.

The power companies know whether or not you conserve energy, the telephone company knows who you talk to, and the oil companies know how much you drive. At some point, someone knows about your social life, like how often you go out to dinner.

For whatever reason, the analysis drives the decisions to approve your requests for financing, and the salesman is not the decision maker. We're just "at the mercy" , and until someone like Glenn Greenwald gets into this cross-conflagra tion, we will remain at the mercy.
 
 
+6 # Mrcead 2014-01-08 03:57
Southerners are really susceptible to double binds and logical fallacies. And if that fails, they are simply bullied.
 
 
+13 # wrknight 2014-01-08 10:44
Could there be any connection between that and the fact that public education in the South lags behind the rest of the country?
 
 
+5 # Cassandra2012 2014-01-08 11:06
Plenty of racism in W.Va. too , especially as regards native Americans...
 
 
+8 # mdhome 2014-01-07 18:49
 
 
+17 # mdhome 2014-01-07 18:50
The list could go on and on. But because of its pervasive material impact, Reagan's embrace of supply-side ("voodoo") economics remains the central defining act of his radicalizing legacy - apart from his role in energizing, supporting and legitimating the growth of a far-flung self-conscious conservative establishment, all of which was also lavishly supported by the floods of cash his tax cuts generated. Prior to Reagan's embrace of supply-side, every four-year presidential term but one since World War II had seen the federal debt decrease as a percentage of GDP. The only exception (Nixon-Ford) had seen a modest 0.2 percent increase. For all the complaining conservatives might do, there simply was no problem of "government living beyond its means" until Ronald Reagan came to town, and created the very problem that conservatives claimed was most dire. Under Reagan, the debt-to-GDP ratio rose 21 percent, plus another 13 percent under Bush, before Clinton sharply reversed the trend, only to see Bush II begin increasing the debt ratio once again.

This doomed the country to haves and have-nots, regardless of how hard a person worked.
 
 
+17 # bingers 2014-01-08 04:12
Any way you choose to look at him, Reagan was a stumblebum treasonous bastard and one of the worst presidents we have ever had.
 
 
+17 # Vardoz 2014-01-07 19:04
They have secured the nanny state for them at our expense as we are being impoverished.
 
 
+18 # A Different Drummer 2014-01-07 20:08
We are a nation of idiots easily fooled by empty promises and scared silly of the unknown. No wonder sound bite politics works so well to cause so, so many of my fellow citizens to vote against their own self interests.
 
 
+5 # Rain17 2014-01-07 20:53
"Vote against their own self interests". This is a phrase that I wish liberals and progressives would stop using. I hate that phrase because, when trying to communicate to other people, they is what they hear:

"We think you're too stupid to figure out the issues on your own. We know what's best for you because you are clearly unable to determine your own interests yourself. We think you're too stupid to understand issues.

The phrase may work well with the already-convert ed, but it almost certainly turns off other people.
 
 
+14 # WestWinds 2014-01-07 22:16
It may turn off other people, Rain17, but it happens to be the truth. Any group of people that votes itself into subsistence, joblessness and subservience is voting against its own best interest. You trust the rhetoric of the Right and the whole country has ended up in the toilet because of it. At what point do you on the Right wake up and stop dragging the rest of us to the bottom of the barrel???
 
 
+12 # davidr 2014-01-08 01:00
 
 
+3 # Ronzer 2014-01-08 18:02
Mass marketing is an art and science that has developed to an incredible level - getting people to do as the marketer desires, often due to fear or greed, unaware of the unknown or unintended consequences.
 
 
+4 # Kootenay Coyote 2014-01-07 20:41
Etymological note: radix - root, & it's Latin, not Greek
 
 
+3 # cwbystache 2014-01-08 08:17
"This calls for subterfuge, Sherman, pure ... undadulterated ... subterfuge."
--Peabody and Sherman
 
 
+7 # RMDC 2014-01-08 08:20
There really seems to be a downward spiral in the republican party leadership. Nixon was the best of the group named and maybe Paul Ryan is the worst by far. Republicans are getting worse and worse every year.

the Republican party was created to represent the interests of big business and big money in the 1850s. It has always represented only big corporations and banks.

95% of mass media in the US is owned by about 6 huge corporations. They only report favorable things about the republican party movement because that is the kind of political culture that corporate media wants.

It is really weird that Paul Ryan is such a moron and yet he is taken seriously on budget issues. He worships Ayn Rand. He's been a moocher off of public money for his whole life and made millions of dollars at it. But this is not reported. Instead he is made to seem like an economic genius. In reality, he's the only one who is stupid enough to make the insane and audacious proposals that he is making.
 
 
+4 # bingers 2014-01-08 10:03
Not always. You might make a case for Lincoln doing so in a small way, as well as Eisenhower, but no way did Teddy Roosevelt represent big business over the little guy, which is why I've always considered him the best Republican ever.
 
 
0 # dbrize 2014-01-09 16:25
Quoting bingers:
Not always. You might make a case for Lincoln doing so in a small way, as well as Eisenhower, but no way did Teddy Roosevelt represent big business over the little guy, which is why I've always considered him the best Republican ever.


Ha! TR was put in by the JP Morgan banking interests and pledged allegiance all the way. To the extent that he understood economics at all, he is best described as a mercantilist.

Mark Twain, who knew a thing or two about people, met him twice and called him "clearly insane".

He never met a war he didn't want to pursue, was an imperialist at heart and if that's not enough for you...he was Richard Nixon's favorite president.
 
 
+3 # fredboy 2014-01-08 08:47
While this deserves a huge AMEN, let's see this objectively and include the last term of the Clinton White House. They set in motion the tools that almost destroyed our economy and that still haunt our economy today. And sold us out to Wall Street. As did Obama.

To be honest, I've had it. I awoke a Democrat, but will end the day as a registered Independent. I simply can't tell the two major parties apart any more.
 
 
+5 # bingers 2014-01-08 10:04
If you can't tell the parties as different, you simply aren't looking.
 
 
+4 # Ronzer 2014-01-08 17:54
Yes, the parties are different, but what may be most telling is how they are alike. when politicians are bought, does it matter how or by how much they are bought by the big money?
 
 
+6 # Ronzer 2014-01-08 12:06
While we can talk about political positions, power & money - all very real and important - the underlying issue is Sociopaths, which can show up in any group of people. Sociopaths are driven to succeed regardless of the damage done to other people. They are ruthless and they very often succeed. Every instance of the people taking over government has been followed by a co-option of the power by the sociopaths. The real question is how can the people possibly prevent the sociopaths from ruling?
 
 
+3 # mjc 2014-01-09 11:15
Know that Reagan and Nixon and Gingrich are labelled "conservative", even radical conservatives but in essence they were/are really opportunists looking for a wealthy and confident element in American society that will fund their particular power plays. There are many Americans who truly believe that a government, ANY American government in particular, has no business providing a social safety net and some of these particular people are quite wealthy, but most of us know the working class, middle class Americans who can't fathom helping any class, gender, age or ethnic group. These folks are sociopaths in many ways, as Ronzer mentioned.
 
 
+1 # bigkahuna671 2014-01-09 13:20
Great point!!!
 
 
0 # EmilyCragg 2014-01-09 16:02
Don't you understand, the radical-right NEOCONS are straight out of the Communist Party, the Progressive Left having reFRAMED itself as "conserving
American greatness"??? I mean, honestly, were you guys born yesterday?? Didn't you real Peggy Dennis' [widow of the CPUSA's General Secretary] Autobiography of an American Communist, after she fled to Reaganist "Conservatism"? The entire NEOCON strategy is straight out of Marx and Lenin!

EEWC
 
 
0 # Jingze 2014-01-10 17:14
The problem is not these yahoos who care nothing for the plight of their fellow americans (who they do not believe exist). The problem are the millions of Americans afraid or unwilling to stand up and say there will be no more nonsense. This "Silent Majority" could bring an end to the failure of the two parties that theoretically, but not actually, represent them. The laxiness of most Americans to act is the problem.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN