RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "In a startling revelation, it has come to light that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon asked the 'members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) not to take into account the report submitted by the UN Board of Inquiry that accused Israel of targeting UN buildings in Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009.'"

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. (photo: Reuters)
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. (photo: Reuters)


Wikileaks: Ban Ki-Moon Secretly Worked With Israel to Undermine UN Report on Gaza

By Daily Bhaskar

11 August 14

 

n a startling revelation, it has come to light that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon asked the "members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) not to take into account the report submitted by the UN Board of Inquiry that accused Israel of targeting UN buildings in Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009".

Quoting some documents released by WikiLeaks on Friday, TeleSUR English reported, "Ban Ki-moon secretly worked with Israel to undermine UN report into Gaza war crimes."

"Ban wrote a letter to the UN Security Council asking its members not to take recommendations by the UN Board of Inquiry about Israeli bombings in Gaza into account," the report alleged.

In its report, the UN Board of Inquiry had concluded that "Israeli Defense Force (IDF) targeted UN buildings in Gaza Strip in seven of the nine attacks. The report also accused Israel of having "breached the inviolability and immunity of UN premises". Ithad recommended an impartial probe into the bombings at UN facilities.

According to WikiLeaks, White House National Security Advisor Susan Rice spoke four times with Ban Ki Moon "to discuss concerns over the Board of Inquiry's report on incidents at UN sites in December 2008 and January 2009".

"Rice urged Ban not to include the recommendations in the final report's summary, which was supposed to be transmitted to the UN Security Council on May 5," says WikiLeaks.

But the Secretary-General replied he was unable to alter the report and recommendations of the Board of Inquiry as it was independent.

Rice, in the second conversation, "urged the Secretary-General to make clear in his cover letter when he transmits the summary to the Security Council that those recommendations exceeded the scope of the terms of reference and no further action is needed". Ban told her that his "staff were working with an Israeli delegation on the text of the cover letter".

Secretary-General Ban called Rice after the letter had been finalized to "report that he believed they had arrived at a satisfactory cover letter". "Rice thanked the Secretary-General for his exceptional efforts on such a sensitive issue," revealed WikiLeaks.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

We are going to return to our original fully-moderated format in the comments section.

The abusive complaints in the comment sections are just too far out of control at this point and have become a significant burden on our staff. As a result, our moderators will review all comments prior to publication. Comments will no longer go live immediately. Please be patient and check back.

To improve your chances of seeing your comment published, avoid confrontational or antagonistic methods of communication. Really that is the problem we are confronting.

We encourage all views. We discourage ad hominem disparagement.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+25 # Leonard R. Jaffee 2014-08-11 14:57
One ought not feel amazed by Secretary-Gener al Ban's conduct, and certainly not the behavior of Rice (one of Obama's criminal conspirators).

Ban is South Korean. South Korea has been, in more than several ways, a colony of the U.S. since the Korean War armistice.

We MUST vote the Democrats & Republicans out of our politics. See my two most recent articles & my comments posted under them:

RISING FROM A MEEK CREVICE, published at http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/78-78/25072-rising-from-a-meek-crevice

And HOW NOT TO OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED, published at http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/78-78/24423-how-not-to-overturn-citizens-united

In the latter article's case (HOW NOT TO OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED), see also especially my last two comments posted under that article.

In the former article's case
(RISING FROM A MEEK CREVICE), see also especially my last comment posted under that article
 
 
+20 # Leonard R. Jaffee 2014-08-11 19:57
The Ban Ki-Moon/White house conspiracy-docu mentation justifies consideration of impeaching Obama (if Obama initiated, authorized, or knew of & approved or did not protest the White House's part of the conspiracy). Such conduct is a "High Crime or (High) Misdemeanor" & would support the Senate's removing Obama from office (and, later, support his criminal prosecution). And I am not talking through my hind-side orifice, but from legal knowledge. See my essay published at http://www.usalone.com/jaffee_on_impeachment2.htm

Surely Rice must be fired ignominiously. And surely, the firing must be reported so that the public will understand the heinousness of her conduct and so that the public will wonder whether Obama is more guilty and ought to be condemned.

Surely, Ban Ki-Moon must be removed from office ignominiously & prosecuted in the International Criminal Court.

South Korea is a Rome Statute party (subject to jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States_parties_to_the_Rome_Statute_of_the_International_Criminal_Court

The court has jurisdiction of acts of nationals of nations that are such parties. Ban Ki-Moon's conspiracy involvement was aiding & abetting Israel's war crimes & crimes against humanity & especially Israel's genocidal conduct. So, the Court could judge him guilty & punish him.

Alas, the U.S. is not a Rome Statute party. So, the Court does not have jurisdiction of Rice's or Obama's conduct.
 
 
+28 # Leonard R. Jaffee 2014-08-11 20:45
I am remiss. I failed to add that all U.S. Senators & all members of the U.S. House of Representatives deserve being removed from office, for their recent (unanimous) Resolutions supporting everything Israel does, all of Israel's war crimes and crimes against humanity, even its crime of genocide. See the Resolutions cited in http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/78-78/25072-rising-from-a-meek-crevice

But, surely, they will not remove themselves. We need to remove them at the ballot box. See http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/78-78/25072-rising-from-a-meek-crevice and my last comment posted under that article
 
 
-21 # MJnevetS 2014-08-11 22:33
Did we read the same article?! Assuming everything in the article is 100% accurate, the note states "But the Secretary-Gener al replied he was unable to alter the report and recommendations of the Board of Inquiry as it was independent." So what was the heinous crime of San Ki Moon? Oh, I see, you're upset because he refused to edit the document and said he wasn't authorized to do so. Next time, before you rant, READ!
 
 
+27 # Leonard R. Jaffee 2014-08-11 23:18
TO: MJnevetS (re: your comment of 2014-08-11 20:33)

YOU did not READ.

Ban said he was unable to alter the report. But he said also that he and his "staff were working with an Israeli delegation on the text of the cover letter." And Ban phoned Rice to "report that he believed they had arrived at a satisfactory cover letter." And Ban asked the "members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) not to take into account the report submitted by the UN Board of Inquiry that accused Israel of targeting UN buildings in Gaza in December 2008 and January 2009."

Those facts show, clearly, that Ban corrupted his office and attempted to corrupt (and perhaps did corrupt) the pertinent deliberations of the UN Security Council — to satisfy the interests of criminal, terrorist Israel & the equally criminal terrorist government of the U.S., which is complicit in Israel's myriad mass crimes.

Ban's office requires that he not favor the interests of ANY nation or (worse) work with two nations (Israel & the U.S.) to cover their crimes against a people (the Palestinian people) they have terrorized with killing, maiming, home-demolishin g, infrastructure/ water/power destroying weapons & with besiegement & apartheid denying basics of life.

Ban favored the interests of the U.S. & Israel and did great harm to the interests of the ordinary Palestinians who are suffering Israel's genocidal terrorism, supported, criminally, by the U.S. and, now, by Ban.
 
 
+18 # roger dittmann 2014-08-11 23:48
Did you miss this?: ""Ban wrote a letter to the UN Security Council asking its members not to take recommendations by the UN Board of Inquiry about Israeli bombings in Gaza into account," the report alleged.
 
 
-4 # bmiluski 2014-08-12 08:10
My dear Leonard......as long as human beings are involved it will always be......"politi cs as usual"....no matter the party.
 
 
+1 # Leonard R. Jaffee 2014-08-12 14:37
I understand your bleak fatalism. But the political/finan cial/big-busine ss monsters depend on the resignation that sad sense engenders.

Elsewhere I observed:

"Recall, that in the 1992 presidential election, Ross Perot got 18.9% of the vote and, very likely, killed the first Bush's chance of re-election. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992

"Recall that a Socialist is now an elected member of the City Council of Seattle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kshama_Sawant

"Recall that thrice a Socialist was elected mayor of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Zeidler

"Right now, a socialist (just nominally Democrat) Mayor runs New York City. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_de_Blasio#Early_career

"And Bernie Sanders is both an independent & a socialist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders#U.S._Senate"

See http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/78-78/25072-rising-from-a-meek-crevice

To render the two now-main political Parties impotent, we need law that bars all candidates' having any private funding & more than a set amount of public finding, so independents & some third-party candidates can be elected.
See
http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/78-78/24423-how-not-to-overturn-citizens-united
AND my bottom two comments published under that article (my comments of 2014-07-20 13:36 AND 2014-08-05 13:45)
 
 
-2 # Leonard R. Jaffee 2014-08-12 14:39
Oh, and do not be rude. Do not address me with my first name. You are not my close relative or long-time close friend or long-time close colleague. Even do you not know me.
 
 
-1 # bmiluski 2014-08-13 09:43
Then my dear Leonard, you should address your posts as Mr. Jaffee.
Also, I am not being bleakly fatalistic. I've just read my species history and it just doesn't change.
 
 
0 # Diane_Wilkinson_Trefethen_aka_tref 2014-08-13 11:50
Quoting bmiluski:
Then my dear Leonard, you should address your posts as Mr. Jaffee...


That is bullshit. You were/are rude. Use his ENTIRE posting name or Mr. Jaffee.
 
 
-1 # Leonard R. Jaffee 2014-08-13 12:29
TO: bmiluski (2014-08-13 07:43)

Consider having your infantile ego enrolled in a remedial education program.
 
 
0 # bmiluski 2014-08-13 15:31
Lets go together....... .After all, you're the one having the problem with addresses.
As for using your first name, I'm just following established protocol. When there is a first name MOST people use that when addressing someone whose posting.
If you have a problem with what I posted then say so instead of using this faux excuse to change the subject. What I posted was fact. Read your history. Man has behaved in the same infantile way all the way back to Cain and Abel. You must agree....murder is the height of politics.
 
 
-2 # Leonard R. Jaffee 2014-08-14 02:13
bmiluski (2014-08-13 13:31)

This deserves being repeated: Consider having your infantile ego enrolled in a remedial education program.

Consider also that often such egos reside in utterly ego-syntonic psyches.
 
 
0 # bmiluski 2014-08-15 08:43
My God Leonard but you're boring. Always the same old blah song. If you want people to respect you then leave off with the name calling. Unless your ego is incapable of doing that.
 
 
+21 # Kwelinyingi 2014-08-11 15:31
Criminals propping fellow criminals. Russia and China should do everything to oust this criminal who is undermining international law and the course of justice.
 
 
-3 # bmiluski 2014-08-12 08:15
I'm sorry Kwelingyingi... ...Russia and China???? Are you kidding me? Do the words GULAG AND LAOGAI mean anything to you?
 
 
-25 # Barbara N Shabo RN 2014-08-11 17:35
OBVIOUSLY SUSAN RICE KNOWS PROPAGANDA WHEN SHE SEES IT. SHE'S THE SMARTEST "GUY" IN THE ROOM.
 
 
+25 # Activista 2014-08-11 22:12
Ban Ki-Moon is USRAELI pawn - where is UN to stop the Apartheid Jewish State of Israel Gaza genocide.
 
 
-1 # angelfish 2014-08-11 22:48
Never mind.
 
 
+12 # heraldmage 2014-08-12 00:37
It's time to dissolve the UN and establish a new international body where all nations are equal. All committee must be committees of the General Assembly. No committee should have authority to pass binding resolutions or sanction nations there purpose must be advisory. Instead of 1 head a new body should have a triumvirate. Only resolutions passed by the majority of a General Assembly should be binding.
While the Security Council was necessary in the pre-digital world in the 21st century it is outmoded & corrupt. It must be eliminated to never again be resurrected.
Ideally a new international body should have its own island. Maybe Britain could take Diego Garcia back from the USA, allow what's left of its people host the new world body of international laws.
The last 2 failures of international bodies was because they were established by the major winners of a world war. We need a new body to be established in relative peace by nation not involved including funding in conflict anywhere on the planet.
Member nations must accept all provisions of the body including elimination of WMD & ICC. We could eliminate rogue states through international boycott. All nuclear weapons nation must comply with the terms of the NPT & eliminate their nukes!
 
 
+12 # aljoschu 2014-08-12 01:42
Two things must be actioned:
1. Ban Ki Moon must be impeached.
2. The UN has to be moved away from New York. I recommend Bangladesh.

And to recommend a third action: Ambassador Rice should be taken out of office.
 
 
+17 # tedrey 2014-08-12 07:02
4. And Wikileaks should be recognized and protected as a highly useful journalistic organization (and Julian Assange allowed to go freely.)
 
 
+15 # RMDC 2014-08-12 07:09
Almost all US Secretaries of State have said at one time or another that the UN is an instrument of US foreign policy. That is what the UN was created for in the eyes of US government officials and why the UN office remains in New York.

The world needs a truly independent UN. It must move out of NY and its charter needs to be re-written so that the Big Five colonial powers do not have contol of the Security Council. France, US, UK, Russia, China simply do not have the moral credibility to run the UN. There's really great work done in the General Assembly among all the nations of the world. In the General Assembly votes are often against the great colonial powers.
 
 
+4 # Aliazer 2014-08-12 12:43
The whole world, unfortunately, with the exception of a few countries who continue to resist the onslaught by the globalist "West", have been thoroughly bribed, paid off and otherwise suborned by Imperial Amerika. o

The new Amerika could not care for its people one whit, served as it is by criminals and traitors.
 
 
+1 # Archie1954 2014-08-12 16:14
So the scummy neo-cons. Left in the US State Department got to the UN Secretary General did they? Just more evidence of the evil that pervades Washington. Why doesn't the US government just admit they work for the Devil?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN