RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Williams reports: "Were hundreds of millions of your tax dollars offered to Volkswagen -- and then pulled back -- to try to keep the United Auto Workers out of Chattanooga?"

Gov. Bill Haslam at the VW grand opening. (photo: NewsChannel 5)
Gov. Bill Haslam at the VW grand opening. (photo: NewsChannel 5)


Tennessee Governor Used Public Funds to Bust Autoworker's Union

By Phil Williams, NewsChannel 5

07 Apri 14

 

ere hundreds of millions of your tax dollars offered to Volkswagen -- and then pulled back -- to try to keep the United Auto Workers out of Chattanooga?

For months, Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam has denied any connection.

But documents leaked to NewsChannel 5 Investigates offer conclusive proof that the Haslam administration wanted a say in the automaker's deal with organized labor -- in exchange for $300 million in economic incentives to help VW expand its Chattanooga operations.

Volkswagen opened the Hamilton County facility in May 2011 with great fanfare.

Initially producing the midsize Passat, there were hints of more to come. It was located on a 1,400-acre site with plenty of room for expansion.

Last year, when Volkswagen began talking about adding a midsize SUV to its product line, the Haslam administration began discussing financial incentives to convince the company to build it in Chattanooga.

At the same time, VW began talks with the UAW about creating a workers council to help run the plant.

Yet, the governor had emphatically denied rumors heard by Democratic lawmakers that state incentives were tied to Volkswagen rejecting the UAW.

"This is exactly what we was looking for," said House Democratic Caucus Chair Mike Turner when we showed him the evidence.

But while the state refused to give the documents to the Nashville Democrat, NewsChannel 5 Investigates obtained a summary from last August for what the Haslam administration called "Project Trinity."

Marked confidential, it offers Volkswagen incentives of some $300 million -- in exchange for 1,350 full-time jobs at a new SUV facility.

The catch?

"The incentives � are subject to works council discussions between the State of Tennessee and VW being concluded to the satisfaction of the State of Tennessee."

Turner's response: "Looks like to me they put a gun to their head and said, 'Look, this is what we are going to give you if you do it our way and we are going to jerk it away if you don't.'"

"Do you feel like the governor lied?" we asked.

"I'm reluctant to call anybody a liar without talking to them," he answered, "but the proof's in the pudding."

Department of Economic and Community Development spokesperson Clint Brewer said in an email statement that the administration was concerned about the process, claiming that "the offer did not preclude the creation of a works council or union representation as a condition of the incentives."

But as workers prepared to vote back in February on whether to join the UAW, the governor sent a letter to Volkswagen, accusing it of "favoring the UAW."

Republican lawmakers also held news conferences, threatening to kill any incentives if the UAW won the election.

In fact, the Haslam administration now concedes that it had formally notified Volkswagen in January, as its talks with the UAW progressed, that it was withdrawing that confidential $300 million incentive offer.

That withdrawal, they said, came before the vote was formally announced.

"Due to the importance of the Volkswagen project, the state kept its incentive offer on the table for almost two months longer than the standard 90 days," Brewer's statement continued. "The administration has been consistent in saying that the state has a vested interest in the VW plant in Chattanooga."

However, the incentive offer obtained by NewsChannel 5 Investigates contains no reference to any sort of 90-day deadline.

In fact, during an interview with Fox News in February, U.S. Senator Bob Corker had also hinted that he knew those incentives had become a subject of concern for the Haslam administration.

"I know you know the state has concerns about any kind of incentives in the event the company -- and I'm not part of that. That's a separate government, as you know. But they have concerns about the UAW," Corker said.

NewsChannel 5 Investigates recently asked Corker, "Did you know that the Haslam administration had taken incentives off the table while the vote was pending?"

"I was aware," the senator replied, "that there were some concerns about incentives being on the table while the vote was taking place."

Corker also made headlines when he announced in February that he had learned that the SUV deal would go through within two weeks if workers voted down the UAW.

That would appear to conflict with the Haslam administration's admission that it had withdrawn the incentive offer that would have made the deal possible.

After seeing the confidential documents, UAW organizer Gary Casteel argued that they show the Haslam administration was part of a coordinated anti-union campaign doing exactly what they had denied -- using hundreds of millions of dollars from taxpayers as leverage.

"I think since this document is public, and I appreciate you bringing it forward, that it's obvious that the state was threatening or at least intimidating Volkswagen [that], to get the incentives, they had to change their business model," he said.

NewsChannel 5 Investigates asked Casteel, "Is this incentive document a game changer?"

"To me," he answered, "it puts pressure on the state to do what they should have done in the first place -- and that's give the incentives with no strings attached, just like they would any other company, union or non-union."

The Haslam administration declined to provide anyone to go on camera to answer questions about the documents.

But we also obtained emails that show that Senator Corker's chief of staff was in direct contact with anti-union organizers who were brought in to fight the UAW. He then shared those emails with people in the Haslam administration who were in charge of the incentives.

The union has asked the National Labor Relations Board to order new elections, citing interference by Tennessee political leaders.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-4 # PhiloKvetch 2013-05-13 22:18
Come on, Matt. The saying is "When you mess with the bull, you get the horns." Deer have antlers, bulls have horns.
 
 
+11 # dickbd 2013-05-14 14:58
I think that was deliberate, as it was the kind of thing Friedman would use. (I don't know why everyone is giving you a thumbs down!)
 
 
+1 # Skyelav 2013-05-16 13:31
I think that was his point!
 
 
+5 # xAlger 2013-05-14 01:34
Matt=Kudos to "Debbie Does Davos". At least on a par with my BRE* plot to relocate SALT II Talks to Deseret's SaltPalace.
Best/Noel [ xAlgerine.Noel@AOL.Com ]
*"Before Romney Era"
 
 
+27 # Artemis 2013-05-14 02:43
Just another day with Matt Taibbi raising the spirit of cool, never forgetting the fire in the lake.
 
 
-4 # WestWinds 2013-05-14 04:22
Sorry, guess I'm too straight to get this.
 
 
+19 # IAMMe 2013-05-14 05:01
You friggin rock n roll, Matt Taibbi.
 
 
+14 # RLF 2013-05-14 05:14
Ick! I feel all dirty just reading that little Freidman passage!
 
 
+14 # Robert Berner 2013-05-14 07:58
Matt--How about a contest for the best David Brooks Moral Scolding?
 
 
+21 # librarian1984 2013-05-14 08:16
Matt, how awesome are you? Not only do you often fill me with informed rage, but you also make me laugh heartily, and oh! does this world need both! Thank you so much for fighting the good fight. Your mother must be very proud.
 
 
+1 # humanmancalvin 2013-05-14 08:20
This ain't yogurt...on my hand. It is a specimen of some type of seed that appeared after viewing the referee & the midwife while in Syria.
 
 
-12 # mvb 2013-05-14 14:28
I was revolted by Matt Taibbi's Friedman porn article, and am considering stopping my small monthly contribution to RSN. This is not censoring; it's just that RSN seems to have decided it no longer wants to be what it originally promoted itself to be--a source of intelligent, substantive reporting and analysis on current issues, from a variety of open-minded, liberal sources. I had thought that was the purpose of RSN. Taibbi's article is neither substantive reporting nor analysis, and it will neither educate nor change anyone's mind about anything (except, perhaps, mine as I re-consider my support for RSN); actually, other than vitriol (your word, and I thought you were against that), I don't even find a point of view spelled out in this piece. An unfortunate, unenlightened choice by RSN.
 
 
-7 # Henry 2013-05-14 16:32
Yes, it is crass. But it looks as if some people here think it's REALLY clever! Bubbas.
 
 
-14 # Henry 2013-05-14 14:48
This is the stupidest idea & story EVER. Lame lame lame. Worst of all (nearly) there's nothing funny here.
 
 
-5 # Beckett 2013-05-15 07:45
I've consulted with several of the local church ladies and they agree with you completely. Thomas Friedman went to the same Christian university my son did and he's a fine upstanding boy. I wish he'd get rid of that mustache though. But if he did he wouldn't have much of a face, would he? Bless you all, even the heathen liberals. P.S. I will not be withholding my donation because I didn't make one in the first place.
 
 
+4 # anna shane 2013-05-15 13:57
I have a brag. I once figured out Tom's nyt email address, it was something like tfried@nytimes.com, took me quite a few tries to get it, and after that I would email him after his most offensive columns, chewing him out, particularly for his support of invading Iraq, he'd said something like, if we had only a 51 percent chance of winning, it would be worth it. This went on for a few months and I never heard back from him, but then he changed his email address and wrote a column about how depressing it was to get unsolicited emails and what a bother it is to change an email address (me, yeah yeah yeah).

I could not figure it out again, he must use his dog's name? (anyone know his dog's name?)
 
 
0 # frederico 2013-05-20 22:08
Matt, Have I missed it, or did you already have a Chris Wallace Famous Interruptions and Non Sequiturs Contest? This guy makes me physically sick. He's at least as obnoxious as Limbaugh. And what ever happened to Michael Savage? These three, and many others too numerous to mention, are the result of human GMO experiments gone awry. They drank too much Roundup and Atrazine. Too bad they missed out on the Kool Aid.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN