RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Damron and Powers report: As many as 49,000 people across Central Florida were discouraged from voting because of long lines on Election Day, according to a researcher at Ohio State University who analyzed election data compiled by the Orlando Sentinel."

Lines of two hours or more frustrated some voters in Florida. (photo: AP)
Lines of two hours or more frustrated some voters in Florida. (photo: AP)



Long Poll Lines Caused 49,000 to Not Vote in Central Florida

By David Damron, Scott Powers, Orlando Sentinel

30 December 12

fter working a 10-hour shift on Election Day, painter Richard Jordan headed to his east Orange County polling place at about 4:30 p.m. Based on more than a decade of voting, he expected to be in and out in minutes.

Three hours later, Jordan's back ached, he was hungry, thirsty -- and nowhere near a voting booth. So he left. As it turned out, his Goldenrod Road precinct didn't close until 11 p.m.

"The line just wasn't moving," said the 42-year-old Democrat, who added that he now regrets not voting. "It was so depressing."

Like Jordan, as many as 49,000 people across Central Florida were discouraged from voting because of long lines on Election Day, according to a researcher at Ohio State University who analyzed election data compiled by the Orlando Sentinel.

About 30,000 of those discouraged voters -- most of them in Orange and Osceola counties -- likely would have backed Democratic President Barack Obama, according to Theodore Allen, an associate professor of industrial engineering at OSU.

About 19,000 voters would have likely backed RepublicanMitt Romney, Allen said.

This suggests that Obama's margin over Romney in Florida could have been roughly 11,000 votes higher than it was, based just on Central Florida results. Obama carried the state by 74,309 votes out of more than 8.4 million cast.

Allen's first analysis of the impact of long lines at the polls was done in 2004, when he estimated that more than 20,000 voters in Franklin County, Ohio, where Ohio State is located, were discouraged from casting ballots in the razor-close contest between President George W. Bushand Democrat John Kerry. He has continued his research in every election since.

His analysis of Central Florida results compared precinct closing times, Election Day turnout and results in the presidential race -- which attracted the highest vote totals of any race on the ballot -- for all Lake, Orange, Osceola and Seminole county precincts.

His review indicated that for every additional hour that a precinct stayed open past 7 p.m. -- a good indicator of line length throughout the day -- turnout dropped by as much as 4.8 percent. The precincts with the longest lines, he found, had some of the lowest turnouts, a fact he attributed mostly to a record-long ballot that, in Orange County, ran to six pages.

As Allen put it in a report to the Sentinel: "Without understanding the importance of ballot length as a variable, it would be surprising to see from the data from 2012 in Central Florida that lower turnout was recorded in the locations with the longest waits. This is because longer ballots (not higher turnout) likely caused the longer lines which, in turn, suppressed the turnout."

Florida's long lines and late results have drawn unfavorable comparisons to the Sunshine State's 2000presidential election problems, and state and federal lawmakers are pledging again to address it.

"Look, people are frustrated in our state," Gov. Rick Scott said recently on CNN. "Some of our counties, we have very long lines. You know, we've got to restore confidence in our election."

A previous Sentinel analysis of precinct-closing times and demographic data found that thousands of Central Florida voters waited in line at their polling places for three or more hours -- some as long as five hours -- after the 7 p.m. official closing time. Even longer waits were reported around the state.

There were few long lines in Lake and Seminole counties. But in Orange and Osceola, where lines were longest and voting ran latest, precincts with high percentages of Hispanic voters were most likely to be open late, the previous Sentinel analysis found. Allen's findings mirror that, he said.

Allen said that his Ohio analyses found that both Hispanics and blacks were disproportionately more deterred because of the longer lines in their communities. However, few black Central Florida precincts stayed open late.

Elections officials blame the lines on several factors, from a ballot that included 11 constitutional amendments to fewer early-voting days and an outsized turnout of 67 percent or more in all four counties. But there are also indications that new state rules about address changes and the ballot layout in Orange County were factors.

Allen suggested that expanding early-voting and mail-in ballot options and steering more machines and resources to communities with longer ballots could ease long lines. Even enabling people to preview ballots while they stand in line would save time in the voting booth, he said.

"A $100 poster could be worth two voting machines," Allen said.

Democratic activists such as Orlando's David Rucker said he saw a fierce devotion among voters to weather long lines to counter efforts by Republicans to limit early voting.

"They had to stay in those lines," Rucker said.

But many Central Florida voters faced unyielding work schedules, child-care issues or other demands. They could not wait out lines that sometimes stretched around blocks.

Carol Dishong went to her east Orange County precinct at 7:30 a.m. on Election Day, saw a long line and no empty parking spaces, and decided to come back after work. But the Republican loan underwriter and single mom said it was even worse when she returned. Next time, she said, she'll vote early or absentee.

"My days are full as it is," Dishong said.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+40 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-04-12 12:47
This is an excellent article. It frames the problem very well. Whistleblowers are protected when they expose fraud, waste, crimes and abuse in government. Manning did exactly that. Assange published the materials exactly as the NYT and others would have done and did so with the Pentagon Papers.

"Revealing War Crimes Is Not a Crime." John Kiriakou has written often that the law says revealing torture is not a crime and that torture is a crime. But in practice he went to jail for revealing CIA torture and none of the CIA officers who did the torture ever were indicted or prosecuted. In fact, one of them Jina Haspel was promoted by Trump to be the director of the CIA.

Law enforcement in the US is totally backward. The real criminals walk free and are rewarded, while those who report the crimes are imprisoned.

Last night, Hillary was on TV saying "Assange must answer for what he has done." Well, what has he done? He has given Americans information they both need and have a right to. When will Hillary answer for what she has done -- in Libya, Hondouras, Haiti, or with her office as Sec. of State? How many deaths is Hillary responsible for? How many is Assange responsible for?

It can and should be different but it will take a massive strike by the US population. Just stop being complicit with the criminal regime in Washington. Civil disobedience to all federal laws, don't pay taxes, don't lend any legitimacy to the criminal regime in Washington .
 
 
+24 # Anne Frank 2019-04-12 14:05
Revealing war crimes is not a crime, but embarrassing the ruling military dictatorship is.
 
 
-13 # logical1 2019-04-12 14:47
Amazing, how screwed up our government has become. Obama let Chelsea Manning off and out of prison, but would not let Edward Snowden off for revealing information that the public should know.
We put these soldiers in a place where we should not be. Where governments operate without humanity, and expect soldiers to be humane and decent.
Nonetheless, it seems Assange is scum. He is willing to assist Russians in interfering with our elections for his news business.
I am pro freedom of the press, but not for using a news media for personal expression of ideologies under the guise of "news".
 
 
+10 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-04-13 05:58
logic -- "He [Assange] is willing to assist Russians in interfering with our elections for his news business."


What is your basis for saying this. It is just not true. Assange has never worked with Russians. In fact, Wikileaks has published many leaked documents from Russia, embarrassing government and corporate leaders there.

You are only citing US elite media and the Mueller Probers. They are lying to you. Be careful about what you believe.
 
 
+17 # Salus Populi 2019-04-12 16:47
Assange, in order to ensure greater coverage of the evidence of criminality -- and arguably even crimes against humanity -- gave the material to El Pais in Spain, Le Monde in France, Der Spiegel in Germany, the Guardian in the UK, and the New York Times. The Guardian, while having over the years published many smears of Assange, has now come out strongly and forthrightly against extradition to the U.S., making the point more strongly by putting it in the headline of the editorial. The New York Times, in the meantime, judiciously ponders whether putting Assange away may lead to further attacks on institutions of journalism such as itself. Its reluctance to defend Assange, the greatest investigative journalist of our era, is palpable.

Our local paper, the Albuquerque Journal, has as far as I know not even commented on the case, and it would scarcely be surprising if this were true of most other regional and local papers.

Meanwhile, in the early edition of Google's news wrap up, it featured five stories that slimed Asssance [CNN, the Chicago Tribune, and a couple of others], and one, from USA Today, that more or less defended him. By the time I next looked at the list, the USA article was no longer there, and its place taken by an article quoting Hellspawn Hillary as Simpich notes above.

If your local paper has not both covered the outrageous charges and the threatened extradition and editorialized against it, it is up to us to do so, and to spread the word.
 
 
+6 # Tina Will 2019-04-13 01:36
 
 
+3 # Kootenay Coyote 2019-04-13 08:39
Is there not a legal principle that there is not fault in the commission of a minor crime in order to prevent a greater crime? That should assuredly apply in these cases. & to deny the Whistleblower defence is a very peculiar argument indeed.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN