MacAskill writes: "The GOP not long ago stood to take control of the Senate, but key races are slipping away as party's top candidate stumbles."
If Romney's campaign doesn't turn around soon, donors may choose to divert their money to House and Senate races. (photo: Brian Snyder/Reuters)
Romney Dragging Down Republican Congressional Candidates
29 September 12
�
The GOP not long ago stood to take control of the Senate, but key races are slipping away as party's top candidate stumbles
itt Romney's collapsing campaign is beginning to hurt Republican chances in key congressional races, risking their hopes of taking the Senate as a bastion against a second-term Barack Obama presidency.
More and more Republican congressional candidates are distancing themselves from their party's White House ticket as they are hit by ads from their Democratic opponents linking them to Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan.
With Romney still reeling from one bad poll after another in swing states, the Obama campaign opened up a new front on Friday, sending vice-president Joe Biden on a two-day visit to Florida to warn the elderly that a Romney-Ryan victory would mean new taxes on their social security benefits.
Biden, in excerpts from his speech released in advance, said: "Right now, the majority of seniors don't have to pay taxes on their social security benefits � But if governor Romney's tax plan goes into effect, it could mean everyone, everyone, would have to pay more taxes on the social security benefits they now receive."
Creating fear among the elderly is a potent message not only in Florida, a state with a high proportion of retirees, but in other swing states. A new poll, by the Washington Post and the health group the Kaiser Foundation, by Ryan to reform Medicare, the healthcare programme for those 65 and over, has alienated potential Republican voters..
The poll found that in three battlegrounds - Florida, Ohio and Virginia - the changes to Medicare proposed by Ryan have tilted the elderly towards Obama. The issue ranked with them as high as the state of the economy.
Sixty-five percent of those polled in Florida want to keep Medicare as it is. In Ohio, Obama held a 19% advantage over Romney among voters asked who they trusted most with the health programme, 15% in Florida and 13% in Virginia.
Romney's lacklustre campaign, compounded by the threat to social security and Medicare coming on top of last week's secret video of a Romney speech, appears to be pulling down Republicans in congressional races. Candidates can usually count on receiving a boost in their districts and states from a successful presidential campaign.
Stu Rothenberg, editor of the Rothenberg Political Report, told the Washington Examiner: "Republicans still have a chance, but it's not what it was six months ago or a year ago. And if you had to weigh the two parties' chances, you would have to say the Democrats have a better chance of holding the Senate."
The Republicans hold the House and had high hopes of adding the Senate too. With control of Congress, they would be able to throw up a formidable barrier to Obama implementing new domestic policies.
The Democrats hold only a four-seat majority in the Senate and had looked vulnerable. But the disarray in the Romney campaign has thrown those hopes into doubt. The Democrats are threatening to win seats the Republicans had been expected to win easily, such as Virginia. The Democratic candidate in Virginia, Tim Kaine, is up 3% on his Republican opponent, George Allen.
The one remaining opportunity for Romney to turn the presidential campaign round is the first presidential debate on Wednesday in Denver, Colorado. Tens of millions are expected to tune in for the first opportunity to see Obama and Romney one-to-one in a debate in which issues such as tax, health care and the secret video of Romney disparaging 47% of the population as freeloaders are all likely to figure.
Debates usually end in draws that are quickly forgotten, as in 2008, but they can make a difference, as in the classic one between Kennedy and Nixon in 1960 and more recently George W Bush and Al Gore in 2000, in which Gore annoyed lots of voters by rolling his eyes while Bush was speaking.
Both the Obama and Romney campaigns on Friday talked up expectations for their opponents while downplaying their own candidate's chances. The Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod predicted Mitt Romney would be a "prepared, disciplined and aggressive debater".
Fears that the White House may be beyond the Republican party this year has already seen fighting start among conservative commentators.
The conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer, rounded on Romney, saying he had "fumbled" the opportunity offered by the Middle East crisis.
He argued that it is not too late for Romney. "Make the case. Go large. About a foreign policy in ruins. About an archaic, 20th century welfare state model that guarantees 21st century insolvency. And about an alternate vision of an unapologetically assertive America abroad unafraid of fundamental structural change at home. It might just work. And it's not too late," Krauthammer wrote in the Washington Post.
Jennifer Duffy, who covers the Senate races for the independent Cook Political Report, which had leaned a year ago to the Republicans taking the Senate, now argues that the range of possible outcomes goes from the Republicans picking up two or three seats - not enough for a majority - to actually losing a seat or two.
Charlie Cook, writing in the National Journal, said that if Romney does not pick up in the polls in the next week to 10 days, he faces "the very real prospect that Republican donors, Super Pacs and other parts of the GOP support structure will begin to shift resources away from helping him and toward a last-ditch effort to win a Senate majority - which once seemed very likely - and to protect the party's House majority."
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
That's a neat trick if you're going abroad.
Power corrupts... Czech this:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110920121608.htm
Too bad that we don't have any leaders in congress who would put a stop to the TSA by legislation and defunding. We don't need any TSA. As things exist now, any terrorist who really wanted to bomb a plane still could. TSA is only about harrassing, terrorizing, and intimidating ordinary americans or foreign travellers. A real terrorist could get around them with very little problem.
Why do our elected officials allow this to continue. They should all be voted out in 2012.
This woman is from my state and if it was my grand daughter, one of these fat ass TSA Employees would have ended up in a trash bin. We don't treat our children as terrorists in Montana. And we do not expect it from any other state.
The best thing we can do is boycott air travel. The airline industry can't survive on business travel alone.
I don't fly anywhere now, I drive if it takes me a week to get there...
but it has also been going on in the court systems now for years and there are no pat downs there!
The question for us, is all of this really making us safer? Are porno scanners useful when you can shove a weapon up a secret, undisclosed body cavity like drug runners do?
Americans are a complacent lot. Some like to rant and rave on blogs but don't get involved past that, but most are totally clueless or willfully ignorant.
Airports I've passed through in Europe don't do any of this. You put your stuff in the tray and pick it up after if goes through the xray thingy and that's it. And you don't have to remove your shoes and walk on filthy, unsanitary floors and then put the shoes back on.
Only in Amerika. Teaching people to line up, take orders and keep their mouths shut.
Get a good look at the attitude of the TSA jerk in the photo above. Wouldn't you love to slap this creep's face?
You might also read "1984" by George Orwell. I'm pretty sure that is the instruction book that has been used since at least 2000 here in Amerika.
So anytime an adult tries to control a child is that terrorizing the child too?
Come on RSN, you're better than this.
If I were Janet or one of her goons, I'd be busy planning my exile/political asylum in some country with no extradition agreements.
Customer service representative? A customer is one who VOLUNTARILY engages in a transaction, usually monetary, for a good or service. Fliers are not "customers", they are victims of TSA. More 1984 Speak from our fascist government.
(Note to NSA snoop reading this: Fuck you. Get a Life.)
I agree with other posts here. Drive,take the Amtrak, or take a Greyhound bus if you have to travel. Do not submit to these horrendous invasive, mind control, fear instilling practices.
One bit of good news is only the US likes football not soccer, so our football stadiums haven't been suggest to attack like a group of people watching a TV screen in Pakistan
Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Honduras, all wars in South America,current ly the Mid East, Libya, Sudan, Congo etc.....
Our infant mortality rate is nothing to brag about. Last I heard we were right next to Poland's. How about pedophilia running rampant as well as missing children and kids being sold into sexual slavery?
How about how we treat children with "behavior problems"?let's just drug them to death why don't we? Let's just dumb down all of those poor Black and Brown kids who attend public school by vaccinating them with toxic chemicals that ruin their developing brains. Let's feed them USDA food laced with MSG, hydrogenated fat, high fructose corn syrup & pink slime so they become obese and develop diabetes. Let's bring crack cocaine and heroine into our neighborhoods along with the guns so kids can kill each other and end up as part of the PIC. I hear private prisons are raking in the profits. Since there are no jobs lets have our kids join the MIC and come back in body bags after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. Al Q v/s USA on how it treats children? I'd say they are both atrocious!
Adoregon,
I am glad you did some research . However research Al Qaeda trains children as young as five as suicide bombers, and also remotely designated suicide bombers that includes the mentally and physically challenge, Actually I was amazed by the number.
To exploit children like that is beyond imagining to most people. To screen for children packing explosives shouldn't be too difficult given the technology in use at U.S. airports. With their small body mass, any anomalies should show up.
However, the TSA needs to use some discretion as does Israeli security . Terrifying innocent children (in the name of security)is hardly better than corrupting innocent children to unwittingly perform hideous acts.
The crushing irony in all of this is how 9/11 and its fallout has resulted in an increase in fear and a loss of privacy and freedom. The fact that the actions of the (not "our") corporate controlled government has provoked peoples without sophisticated military technology to strike out at us as a society is never discussed. Creating and exacerbating a situation like this is a set-up to give free rein to global surveillance and repression.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism
or
http://essays.ssrc.org/10yearsafter911/the-psychology-of-terrorism/
Now think Dresden.
And so it goes.
Were the celebrants with knives and sticks celebrating a soccer match in Egypt al Qaeda in Disguise?