Bello & Fitrakis write: "A more important story, however, is the fact that Bain alumni, now raising big money as Romney bundlers are also in the electronic voting machine business."
An eSlate touch-screen voting machines manufactured by Hart InterCivic. (photo: Austin Chronicle)
Vote Counting Company Tied to Romney
29 September 12
everal Tanker trucks full of political ink have been spilled on Mitt Romney's tenure as a vulture capitalist at Bain Capital. A more important story, however, is the fact that Bain alumni, now raising big money as Romney bundlers are also in the electronic voting machine business. This appears to be a repeat of the the infamous former CEO of Diebold Wally O’Dell, who raised money for Bush while his company supplied voting machines and election management software in the 2004 election.
In all 234 counties of Texas, the entire states of Hawaii and Oklahoma, half of Washington and Colorado, and certain counties in swing state Ohio, votes will be cast on eSlate and ePollbook machines made by Hart Intercivic. Hart Intercivic machines have famously failed in Tarrant County (Ft. Worth), adding 10,000 non-existant votes. The EVEREST study, commissioned by the Ohio secretary of state in 2007, found serious security flaws with Hart Intercivic products.
Looking beyond the well-documented Google choking laundry list of apparent fraud, failure and seeming corruption that is associated with Hart Intercivic, an ongoing Free Press investigation turned its attention to the key question of who owns the voting machine companies. The majority of the directors of Hart come from the private equity firm H.I.G. Capital. H.I.G. has been heavily invested in Hart Intercivic since July 2011, just in time for the current presidential election cycle. But who is H.I.G Capital?
Out of 49 partners and directors, 48 are men, and 47 are white. Eleven of these men, including H.I.G. Founder Tony Tamer, were formerly employed at Bain and Company, and two of those men, John P. Bolduc, Douglas Berman, are Romney bundlers along with former Bain and H.I.G. manager Brian Shortsleeve.
Additionally, four of these men were formerly employed at Booz Allen Hamilton. Booz Allen, now owned by the Bush family friendly Carlyle group, also made voting machines for the United States military. Booz Allen was also the key subcontractor for the controversial PioneerGroundbreaker program, an NSA data mining operation that gathered information on American citizens until it was shut down and replaced with even more invasive successor programs like MATRIX and Total Information Awareness.
H.I.G. Capital employees have given $338,000 to Mitt Romney's campaign. That amounts to over $1500 per employee. Bain Capital, Mitt's former company, by comparison, only gave him $268,000. H.I.G. is the 11th largest donor to the Romney Campaign. Clearly they are working really hard for their man. It appears that they will work even harder on election night. Although not boisterously promising to deliver states where their machines are to Romney as Wally O'Dell of Diebold did for Bush in 2004, they can launder hundreds of thousands of votes and swing the vote in the crucial swing state Ohio.
Will Mitt's cronies steal our democracy the way they stole our jobs? Time will tell, but they have certainly positioned themselves to do so if they choose.
In our first investigative article Who owns Scytl? George Soros isn’t in the voting machines, but the intelligence community is.
the Free Press revealed that Scytl, a Spanish-based company now contracted to count 25% of the U.S. presidential vote, has ties to Booz Allen. Scytl's start up funding comes from three European Venture Capital Firms, Balderton Capital, Nauta Capital, and Spinnaker SCR. The director of Nauta's American operations is Dominic Endicott, who went from Cluster Consulting to Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE: BAH) where he oversaw wireless practice. He then rejoined his former colleagues from Cluster Consulting at Nauta. In his capacity as a Nauta partner Endicott also sits on the board of CarrierIQ.
Scytl has emerged as the most mysterious election counting company in this presidential election. Scytl claims to have a Scytl USA division located in Glen Allen, Virginia. The following is a photo of the Scytl USA national corporate offices at 6012 Glen Allen Drive. The land deed records show that the ownership of the property at that address is Hugh Gallagher, now listed as the managing director of Scytl USA. The deed, which was prepared in Ohio by a relocation firm in 2002, pre-dates the creation of Scytl USA. A Scytl USA sales office is located in Baltimore, Maryland, and appears to be a Rent-an-Office, often referred to as a "virtual" office with a shared secretary that serves as a mail drop.
The ties of Hart Intercivic to Romney fund-raisers and Bain alumni should cause concern in the Obama re-election campaign. So, should the mysterious Spanish owned company, Scytl, with a U.S operation that seems to be an illusion.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
When the GOP "won" the election in 2004 they gained control of the apparatus for investigating fraud.
Do you really expect them to investigate the corporations that stole the election for them when somewhere out there an unwed mother got an extra $10 in food stamps she wasn't supposed to get?
Remember the infamous Georgia election where the machine results contradicted both pre-election polls and exit polls that the Democratic candidates for Governor and US Senate would win. It just so happened that technicians from Dibold had put a "patch" on the machines to fix a clock malfunction a few days before the election. And, oh yes, the "patch" didn't fix the clock problem.
Software from Smartmatic and Sequoia created here in the USA, machines made by Olivetti in Rome-Courtesy of Hugo Chavez.
"Former President Jimmy Carter has praised Venezuela for a touch-screen voting system that both stores votes electronically and via paper ballots, allowing easier verification of the election results."
"As a matter of fact, of the 92 elections that we've monitored, I would say the election process in Venezuela is the best in the world," Mr. Carter said, noting the center's extensive work monitoring elections around the globe.
More:
http://www.globalatlanta.com/article/2578
8/
The system is touchscreen. The voter enters the booth after it has been activated by the voter personnel who verify registration, etc.
The voter makes his selections on the screen and can change his selections, page forward, backward and review his vote until satisfied. He then presses the "Vote" box and his paper ballot is printed out from his machine.
The voter takes the paper and- confirms that the questions and the votes registered are correct. He folds the paper in half to guarantee privacy, returns to the voting table, and puts the paper ballot in the ballot box in front of the table members and witnesses.
AND WE ARE TOLD IT CAN'T BE DONE!
Do you think there's any chance he has found a way to subvert this system? (yes, I am being sarcastic)
And, yes, I understand that such action would require the imposition of some level of martial law, but our entire political system is at stake. If we allow groups of people ---independentl y or in concert ---to steal this election and, consequently, our Federal Judiciary, the Constitution will become nothing more than a quaint historical document - essentially a bird cage liner.
ALL voting machines, and any related software, should be OWNED by the government, Federal, State and/or local and put into place for each election. A government employee should guard these machines from any unauthorized access and secure them back to a bonded warehouse, privatizing our elections does not, will not work!
How about this, just use paper ballots and count them by hand; let the delay be in the announcement of the results, rather than in the postponement of the election. We could have public school students count the votes -- it really shouldn't be that difficult to get a decent count.
As for my proposed delay, though unconstitutiona l, I see it as a lesser of two unconstitutiona l evils ... the greater being the disenfranchisem ent of a large segment of our electorate by reactionary, racist legislators. This truly un-american activity hat has progressed to a point at which more time will be necessary to reverse the damage that has already been done.
Having school kids count paper ballots as opposed to using hackable electronic voting machines? What a novel, new idea. Get the little boogers involved in hands-on Democracy early. Only from a ptalady! Brava.
Here in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin, we use the Eagle scanning machine for tallying paper ballots which are of course retained, and also the Edge touch-screen machine made by Sequoia. The Edge simultaneously prints a paper record which is secured for possible review ( as happened after our last state supreme court election)
Both D's and R's set up and close down the machines in courteous, clean collaboration. The system works here.
Even then, the safest way to run an election is paper ballots counted entirely by hand, as they do in Canada, Germany and many other countries.
I understand that in the US you vote for many positions from dog catcher on up and the ballots are much more complicated, hence harder to count by hand.
'lost' thousand of votes (in a Repub.'s computer!) in Waukesha County last election??
OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
The alternative is unbearable
Correction made. You are welcome.
Joe Stalin said, "I don't care who votes. I care who counts the votes."
Any questions?
AUDIT the vote -- not only because the machines can be hacked, but because the code in the machines is written by people and cannot be expected to always work correctly.
This has already gone too far; now this. So we have a redux of a private company supporting the GOP/Romney campaign and are a part of counting the votes? How more biased and devious can this get? And it's repeating itself.
Quoting: "The Free Press revealed that Scytl, a Spanish-based company now contracted to count 25% of the U.S. presidential vote, has ties to Booz Allen. Scytl's start up funding comes from three European Venture Capital Firms, Balderton Capital, Nauta Capital, and Spinnaker SCR."
WTF. On top of a GOP-supporting entity to potentially rig the vote, now we have an assorted connection of private, foreign companies taking part in the scam? So we're supposed to have a right for the public to vote, but it's looking almost like a privatized election? For the GOP, etc., these bastards want everything/ever yone to become a commodity. I hope the blowback is thorough and irreversible.
It's gonna take a lot of vigilance to head off the Rove-slime tactics.
I used to enjoy this country and it's diversity, creativity (whilst being well aware of the fate and plight of it's indigenous peoples) but hate what is happening to it as the Rethugs strive for a one-party state.
Honestly, I feel relatively untainted by this in Oregon -where voting by mail is available and where the Right is pretty well out of the box- but I'd gladly offer be a monitor somewhere else where things are shaky or downright threatened. It's the least I can do.
Does it really matter? Nothing has changed in four years from Bush, so the country is really lost anyway.
-So just give up and let the one-party system roll over you eh!?
Remember "Give me freedom or give me death"? Your freedoms are indeed being eroded away; if Twit is "selected" they'll be swept away as if a Tsunami took them. Then fall America.
Get up and get active laddie or capitulate, which is what THEY want.
I totally agree with you. We HAVE to have paper to ensure that we can check the legality of our votes. If voting machines can deliver a receipt to the voter and keep one to be counted, if needed....It can be used if not, we will have to use paper ballots.
We can not have a repeat of the swindle in 2004 particularly Ohio i 2004.
We should also have BOTH republican and democratic monitors checking the votes on the machines. There can NOT be any doubt about the legality of our votes.
If that is NOT possible, the paper ballots ALONE should be used. We really look like some banana republic in the eyes of the world and OF OURSELVES.
The problem with voter ID obviously needs to be changed but could take a long time. The question is, what do we do now--for this election?
There are enough of people out of work who could drive others to get their non-driver ID. There are lawyers out of work who could volunteer. I would gladly invite some of them to lunch! Let's Occupy the voting process.
1) they should say get an ID and show your ID.
2) if you do not have an ID then your vote should still be counted, but the numbers of people should be counted, and then helped to get one by the next election.
3) if greater than 95% of the voters do not have ID then the next election should do the same thing until we have almost all people with ID.
4) finally when almost everyone, whatever 93-98% of people have ID then make it mandatory, when there is due process, otherwise this is wrong and onConstitutiona l.
If the state doesn't do that then they should lose the right to require it.
I love that statement, may I use it?
I've left it in a few spots around the net so it's free to wander now!
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/01/company-connect/
In 1964 I was a Republican poll watcher and was the first in Illinois to call in the # of votes for Margaret Chase Smith. I was kind of proud of that. But that's neither here nor there. When the voting was finished we had to count the paper ballots about a dozen times, every time with different results. Now, I wasn't supposed to be a counter, but they finally turned to me to do the counting and I nailed it on the first try, simply by putting the Republican and Democratic presidential votes into separate piles.
No system is perfect, but paper allows you to recheck as many times as possible. In Ireland after using computers to tally the votes they banned them and went back to paper. Countries that only allow paper get the results just as quickly and far more accurately.
votes i.e., for RON PAUL, etc.!
After 2000 election this household went to permanent absentee balloting. Paper ballot only for that. We need to get away from polling places and get a system like Oregon.
Voting fraud has been a staple of every election since the first election was disputed. Technology only makes it easier to do and harder to disprove.
I have predicted that, within 50 years, the USA will have broken up into several mutually-antago nistic countries. At least one will be a totalitarian theocracy. WHat is disturbing is they will all likely have nuclear weapons. For certain, the theocracy will have no reservations about using them to "accomplish god's work."
gore1-2000
2030 will be next.
short video version of the case: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhS0Mogy19o&feature=relmfu
But when people go off and make claims they can't prove about "stolen elections due to the machines" it damages their credibility. It makes them look like conspiracy theorists.
Unfortunately that will NOT be enough. In 04, the exit polls clearly said that Kerry had WON, But the Diebild machines and their maker, said the opposite.....an d they PREVAILED.
We are All wringing our hands and fuming over the republican attempt to steal THIS election. They will definitely do it if they can get away with it.
WHAT CAN WE DO TO PREVENT IT???
Several of you commenting here are lawyers, please can you tell us what we can do. I am thinking of the people living in Swing states. Here in California I don't think we are in danger.
this is Federally, State, locally called conflict of interest It is a Law. Caught people before doing this crap and they had to back down, or off votes.
Now how many Readers do you have, How many Media of Free Press are you involved with?
Time has come today that if this is true article, for the Lawyers or said to be, that come here, this is a Conflict of Interest and Illegal I do not care who SCOTUS is if they are a Lawyer, Judge than if they allow this...they can be held for Crimes...Federa l to say the Least. I want to see you all do something because I AM ASKING MEDIA IN PA. What are You gonna do You talk but do you walk the walk
http://blackboxvoting.org/
They have been following election fraud since the first theft, when Gore won the election; followed by the second theft, Kerry vs. Bush. We are about to witness the third... Mitt Romney the third president select.
Also, watch for a Carter style coup like the Iran/Contra scam that manipulated the election for Reagan.
Voting machine fraud by the corporate powers that be has been going on for a long time, ever since we went to computers.
Demand a paper ballot when you go to vote and get a receipt and keep it.
What more evidence do you need to see that the Republicans cheat; they cannot help themselves, as they think that society runs on the same rules as their business - every man for himself and buyer beware.
The ONLY fair way to vote is on paper, tangible tallies of who wants what.
You MUST stop this or watch your democracy fade into obscurity ...
- Printed ballot
- Signed by voter
Without that, any numbers can be changed without possibility of detection.
There have been instances of that over the whole USA. Don't tell me no one can make changes to these machines without someone else knowing it.
All of your "precautions" are aimed at preventing tampering after the votes are entered. The machines could be programmed to convert say, 10% of the voted for one candidate to another candidate. That would be enough to win and not attract undue attention.
RSS feed for comments to this post