Excerpt: "You didn't elect me to tell you what you wanted to hear. You elected me to tell you the truth. And the truth is, it will take more than a few years for us to solve challenges that have built up over decades."
President Barack Obama accepted his party's nomination at the Democratic National Convention. (photo: NYT)
Barack Obama: Let's Finish What We Started
07 September 12
President accepts Democrats' nomination for second term with frank speech acknowledging that challenges remain.
arack Obama has made his pitch for a second White House term, pleading in his keynote address to the Democratic convention for more time in spite of the slow economic recovery and warning of the dangers posed by a Mitt Romney presidency.
Employing sombre pragmatism in place of the soaring optimism of the 2008 campaign, he told 23,000 people in the arena in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the tens of millions watching at home: "I won't pretend the path I'm offering is quick or easy.
"You didn't elect me to tell you what you wanted to hear. You elected me to tell you the truth. And the truth is it will take more than a few years for us to solve challenges that have built up over decades.
"But know this, America: Our problems can be solved. Our challenges can be met. The path we offer may be harder but it leads to a better place. And I'm asking you to choose that future."
Throughout the week Obama campaign officials had been briefing that he would lay out a "roadmap" for the next four years to secure economic recovery.
He did hold out the prospect of a program that would reverse US decline, hinting at embarking on an ambitious and bold Franklin Roosevelt-style New Deal if re-elected. But he failed to offer much in the way of detail, focusing instead on telling the activists in the hall and the millions watching at home that it was up to them to choose which future they wanted for the country.
Obama's formal acceptance of the party's nomination to face Romney for the White House on 6 November was greeted with deafening applause from delegates.
The speech had been moved from a 73,000-seater football stadium to the much smaller Time Warner Cable arena, leaving disappointed ticket-holders, mainly party volunteers, to line up for seats at a screening in the nearby convention centre. The thunderstorms that party officials had cited as the reason for the venue change failed to materialise.
The tone of Obama's message - delivered a few hours before the release of the latest monthly job figures - was subdued compared with the sense of euphoria he created at the Denver convention four years ago. He also struck a very different note from Bill Clinton the night before.
The more sober approach was deliberate, a recognition of the mood of disenchantment among some voters, tired of fine oratory and and more interested in his plans for a second term.
So Obama was careful to recognise his own shortcomings, at one point telling the crowd that one of the difference from 2008 was that he was "far more mindful of my own failings, knowing exactly what Lincoln meant when he said: 'I have been driven to my knees many times by the overwhelming conviction that I had no place else to go.'"
Over the course of the 47-minute speech there were occasional flashes of the old idealistic language. "If you turn away now - if you buy into the cynicism that the change we fought for isn't possible … well, change will not happen," he pleaded.
In a direct call to voters who backed him in 2008 he acknowledged that the challenges are harder this time around. "Our road is longer - but we travel it together. We don't turn back. We leave no one behind. We pull each other up. We draw strength from our victories and we learn from our mistakes, but we keep our eyes fixed on that distant horizon."
He portrayed the election as the most important facing the US for generations, offering a clear choice between those who wanted a government actively engaged in trying to make life better, the Democratic view, and those who favoured small government, the Republicans.
"When all is said and done - when you pick up that ballot to vote - you will face the clearest choice of any time in a generation. Over the next few years big decisions will be made in Washington, on jobs and the economy; taxes and deficits; energy and education; war and peace. Decisions that will have a huge impact on our lives and our children's lives for decades to come.
"On every issue the choice you face won't be just between two candidates or two parties. It will be a choice between two different paths for America."
Though the main focus of the speech was the economy, Obama delivered an extremely effective swipe at Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan's inexperience over foreign policy.
"My opponent and his running mate are new to foreign policy, but from all that we've seen and heard they want to take us back to an era of blustering and blundering that cost America so dearly," he said.
He cited Romney's criticism of British preparations for the Olympics. "You might not be ready for diplomacy with Beijing if you can't visit the Olympics without insulting our closest ally."
Drawing parallels between his goals and those of FDR, he said the kind of America he wanted to create would take more than a few years to achieve. "It will require common effort, shared responsibility and the kind of bold, persistent experimentation that Franklin Roosevelt pursued during the only crisis worse than this one," he said.
Obama promised to create a million new manufacturing jobs by the end of 2016. The president also promised to double exports by the end of 2014 and cut net oil imports in half by 2020.
Romney, who is at his home in New Hampshire, told reporters he would not be watching the speech but his campaign manager, Matt Rhoades, said: "Tonight President Obama laid out the choice in this election, making the case for more of the same policies that haven't worked for the past four years."
The reaction among Democrats was less ecstatic than the reception they accorded to Clinton or even Obama's wife, Michelle, on Tuesday night. James Carville, a Democratic strategist, described the speech as "muscular".
The final night of the convention had a Hollywood flavour with speeches by Scarlett Johansson and the Desperate Housewives start Eva Longoria.
There were also emotional moments, with the delegates rising to their feet to welcome to the platform Gabby Giffords, the former congresswoman recovering after being shot in the head in an assassination attempt in Arizona last year.
One of the strongest speeches came from John Kerry, lambasting Romney for his lack of experience or knowledge of foreign policy.
A teary-eyed Joe Biden also accepted the nomination to stand again for the vice-presidency with a speech heavy on auto bailouts and the killing of Osama Bin Laden, designed to appeal to wavering white working class male voters who supported Obama last time.
The Democrats paraded Charlie Crist, the former Republican governor of Florida, as evidence that the Tea Party-infused Republican party had become so extreme that moderates such as Crist had been forced out.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
How about a real "vision" and plan to get us there; one that would truly address the twin ongoing economic and environmental crises this country is still facing?
1 million manufacturing jobs and 100,000 new teachers (union public school or privatized non-union charter school teachers?)? While both are a good thing they hardly even make a dent in our employment/unem ployment problems.
And, while it was good to hear from him that climate change "isn't a hoax" there was nothing about how he wants the country to actually confront this either.
There was also nothing about the ongoing housing/foreclo sure crisis....how many more millions will be foreclosed on in the next four years absent real change in gov't policies and practices (much if not most of the foreclosures at this point are on gov't backed i.e., fannie or freddie mortgages)?
The country now has the highest poverty rate since the Great Depression with (by 1 measure) 50% of the country being in poverty or "near poverty". Is it too much to expect from our President (let alone candidates) to at least speak to this one?
I won't even get into questions about foreign policy or domestic civil liberties.
"honest and realistic"?
since there was virtually nothing in the speach about what his vision of change is and how he would get us there i found the speach to be neither.
"Inspiration" just isn't enough.
Anyway, let's mobilize now and see that he gets a second term in spite of what the Tbaggers and thugs want. We need to keep going, he has us started in the right direction and it makes no sense to put the people back in charged that caused the problems in the first place. How nutty would that be? Great job, Mr. President, we cannot go backward now. DON't Vote Republican at any level, we need to clean out some states too.
DO VOTE: OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
I would agree that his stance on Gay Marriage, repealing "don't ask don't tell", supporting a woman's right to choose, preventing insurance companies from denying people with pre-existing conditions are all good things...on the twin economic and environmental crises we continue to face (not to mention foreign policy and domestic civil liberty issues) in what sense are we now moving in the right direction. Millions were foreclosed on (and millions more in the pipe line); we now have the highest poverty rate since the great depression; 1 million new manufacturing jobs in the face of 25 million unemployed or underemployed will barely make a dent in this.
On the environment, while i was glad to hear Obama say it "isn't a hoax" he continues to push "clean coal" (now there's an oxymoron) and natural gas (interesting how he didn't mention nuclear last night nor Fukashima).
To be clear, if i was in a "swing state" i would vote for Obama...being in NY i believe progressives need to "vote strategically" and try and build a real progressive wing that has some leverage over the dems as a whole and so i will vote "green" but even if i voted for him i would not pretend that his "vision" (which he does not even really explain) is indeed really moving us in "the right direction"
I agree that we need to vote strategically. It amazes me how many people don't really understand how the Electoral College process works.
However, I think your criticism of Obama's speech is a bit unfair. You are looking for a list of details that normally is presented the State of The Union address. This was a campaign speech. It's the part of a job review where you get to tell your boss(es) why they should keep you on the job.
Here is the bottom line. "Willie & Paul, The RR Boys" will do the exact same bad shit that Obama is doing, and none of the good stuff. I cannot think of a single issue where The RR Boys are better. Can you? This is not the lesser of two evils, the choice is between a sinking ship and one that floats.
thanks for the thoughtful reply. It's nice to know that there are still at least a few people on this board (and in the country as a whole) that aren't totally mindless zombies and either totally critical or totally uncritical of either party or who have completely lost (if they ever had them) all powers of critical thinking.
I hear ya and perhaps you are right in terms of expecting too much from a campaign speach. On the other hand, i don't think we got much more by way of specifics in any of Obama's speaches while in office (e.g., the State of the Union speaches).
Particularly after Clinton's speach (which, though i do not like Clinton was a very good speach) i think Obama missed a real opportunity to lay out a concrete vision and plan for how to get us there.
Doesn't mean i have any illusions about how difficult it would be to make this vision a reality (given the current state of both parties) but at least make the case for it. This has been my main complaint of Obama. At least make the case (and we know he can make it given his oratory skills) so that people at least that have that Arsenio hmmmmm moment and actually might think "hey, there is an alternative."
As i said, if i were in a swing state i would vote for Obama for sure but luckily i am not and so i can vote for a truly progressive alternative without risking a democratic loss in the state.
Thanks. I do identify myself as a Left Wing Progressive Liberal Libertarian. Even though I despise the false equivalencies so prevalent in the MSM, I don't agree with everything that spills out of the mouths of Liberals.
I too would love to hear a detailed plan, and while I also have many issues with the Clintons;, Bill was always great at producing a checklist of details. Obama works at a different level by setting goals. It often sounds fuzzy, but if the Republicans were capable of compromise and negotiation it may have produced incredible results. We will never know, because the deck was stacked from day one. However, I have hope for Obama, since he has been slow to accept the obvious, but I see a willingness to get stubborn as of late and along with that a desire to delineate a full blown agenda. At least his boat floats and there will still be hope for the future.
Oh honey, that dog don't hunt.
Yes, we're not QUITE Nazi Germany yet. There are one or two minor liberties that Obama has not completely destroyed.
I never imagined that any President could be even WORSE than Bush, but I have to give the devil his due.
I don't believe Obama would know the "truth" if it bit him on the behind.
sj
I think you need a nice dose of reality. It's the Rethugnicans who are the enemy of freedom and civil rights. They have always been and will always be. Wake up and face the truth.
I'm no democrat and believe dems need to be critical and honest about their own party but that goes for your types as well.
The unions have been been decimated, they have very little power even over their rank & file. Why are you so afraid that there is group that represents workers? People are on food stamps because of two reasons, first stagnating wages because unions are not an available option to most workers. Second, the public sector; the part that pays for teachers, police, highway maintenance, public utilities, etc. are being laid off across the country. We can afford them, but we rather the money goes to a safe in the Cayman Islands instead. Romney has actually destroyed American businesses, Obama has not. Romney has made millions on shifting the assets of businesses by paying off their executives, then diverting the assets to himself. All without putting his own fortune at risk.
The best way to help American business is to help American people. Provide training (teach them to fish!), assure them of health care and an even playing field no matter who your daddy is and the people will do well. By definition, if the people are doing well, then so aren't American businesses.
Obama has further legitimized war and dumped even more $ into the military than the astronomical amount already placed there. Obama is worse than Bush on Monsanto and huge agribusiness being allowed to flood our markets with pesticides and untested products. He exports this poison through Free trade agreements that sell out our workers and enslave foreign workers.
Romney actually already employed Obama's corporate healthcare plan and it failed. It was written by and helps insurance companies stay in our pockets. The American people overall will get no better care. Obama, despite his talk about standing up to big oil, has permitted them to drill in the arctic and let BP completely off the hook.
On gay rights and abortion, Obama is preferrable, but these only serve to fool us into thinking there is a difference between the two parties.
So were the "founding fathers" (given that they were rebelling against "their country" and "their king).
Is not "blowing the whistle" on illegal government activities (particularly war crimes) one of if not the most patriotic acts?
The truth, as usual, lies somewhere in between. i would agree that there is no substantive difference between the two parties. but, this has always been so. dems who are now somehow mytologizing the past and longing for the good ol' days of yesteryear have no real understanding of history. The dems have always represented 'wall street' or the ruling class or however you want to put it. This goes as much for FDR as it does for Clinton or Obama.
The real difference today (say compared to the 1930 under Roosevelt) is that there is no mass movement with the power to make the dems to what we want (at least somewhat as they did under FDR...which only happened precisely because there was a mass, radical, movement).
so, before simply dismissing both parties as being totally the same think about the millions of unemployed that would have lost their benefits had the repubs had their way and not extended unemployment benefits or the half of the country (women) that would lose health care insurance coverage for reproductive health issues/problems . These differences may be quantitative and not qualitative but in the real world this still matters to millions of real people.
He said it four years ago, and then led us down the garden path, continuing the Bush legacy of War and of stripping Civil Liberties from citizens.
The Democrats are really no different from the Republicans anymore. They both serve Wall Street and the War machine.
The rights and well-being of the working people are always placed second to serving the rich.
And Obama has rubber-stamped and continued the policies of the Bush administration in stripping Americans of their Constitutional rights, while continuing to overspend on War and make our foreign policy contingent upon the orders of Israel.
I will be voting Third Party from now on.
After all, that is how America elected Lincoln.
Please explain "the plan of action". i would love to hear it (seriously). i was hoping for it last night but sadly i don't think we got it....1 million new manufacturing jobs in the face of at least 25 million unemployed and underemployed. no discussion of how he or what this country needs to do to address climate change. nothing on the next wave (millions) of foreclosures that continue unabated (and which are now largely being done by the gov't itself i.e., fannie and freddie mortgages). I hate the rethugs to and Obama is the only choice but let's at least be honest and have a serious critique.
Regardless, are you listening? Obama has explained his plan many times and described how congress is obstructing any proposal unless it contains tax breaks for the rich and relaxed envornmental and work place safety regulations.
In 2010, American voters foolishly aided and abetted the Republicans by giving them control of Congress.
[snip]
Returning the Democratic Party to the glory days of house and senate control that it had until Obama and the party were unable to convince enough people that their batsh*t crazy drive for bipartisanship with batsh*t crazy republicans was the only way to go, is the only way to go. There is no other reasonable way to go.
MORE:
Keep On Rockin' In The Free World: Give Obama and the Dems Some Credit For A Change
http://antemedius.com/content/keep-rockin-free-world-give-obama-and-dems-some-credit-change
Sigh...
This could even have been done with tax credits thus avoiding any outlay of money from the fed.
It would have restored the value behind the CDO mortgage backed securities that wall street got themselves into so much trouble with, and thus saved Wall Street while tremendously boosting the consumer driven economy, as the money would have gone directly to the mortgage holding banks while at the same time effectively doubling the amount of bailout money by lifting a enormous debt weight from all those homeowners who would then have had an equivalent amount of disposable funds to spend any way they chose.
...
Obama campaigned for the restoration of Glass-Steagall, and then put in place all the same people who'd destroyed it. He'd been made an insider.
...
It was the same pattern Obama followed in every department: Where he didn't leave Bush's people in charge he brought back Clinton's. Anything to be an insider.
http://antemedius.com/content/reminder-wall-streets-mercenaries-ride-donkeys
To many on this board act like there is no alternative and nothing that Obama can or could do other than what he is doing. This kind of thinking is self-defeating and self-destructiv e at best and just aids the ongoing shift of the democratic party as a whole further and further to the right (such that someone like Clinton is now the "new normal" "centrist".
We've got (potentially) still millions of additional foreclosures coming down the pike and so we need to keep raising the alternatives so your comment here is right on target.
They represent the moneyed classes, the 1%.
And they are all complicit in the biggest transfer of wealth and property in history taking place right now from the average man or women to the top of the pyramid.
Capitalism has run it's course. The economy globally is a resource to be pillaged now. We are not in a recession or a depression, but instead are collapsing utterly both economically and environmentally.
The top of the pyramid knows this and is out to protect and enrich themselves, and the members of both major partys are complicit, hoping their masters will save them along with themselves while everything collapses.
The two party system is a circus show put on to con the peasants into feeling that they are participating, while they are being sheared.
'Advanced' Civilization: The Long Party is Over
http://antemedius.com/content/advanced-civilization-long-party-over
I have no illusions as to the republican opposition but it is "REASONABLE" to expect a democratic president to have a real vision and plan for how to deal with the twin ongoing economic and environmental crises.
Or to put it another way....
“Where there is no vision, the people perish.”
Proverbs 29:18
“A map of the world that does not include Utopia is not worth even glancing at…” Oscar Wilde
If you don’t know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else
Yogi Berra
It is one thing to be thoroughly critical of Obama (as i have been from day 1) but that does not mean we have to lapse into meaningless and totally distorted hyperbole in saying there is no difference at all. there may be no qualitiative difference between the two parties (i would agree on this one) but there is and has always been a quantitative difference that in the real world impacts millions, if not tens of millions of real people every day.
To say there is no difference at all is as callous as Romney telling people to simply borrow money from their parents to start a business as if this is any solution to the country's seious economic problems.
Oh boy. That's bipartisanship taken to fanatical extremes. Over the edge.
Time to renew the passport.
..........
About 7,910,000 results
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&site=&source=hp&q=obama+ready+to+compromise&oq=obama+ready+to+compromise&gs_l=hp.3...1072.19549.0.20694.29.14.0.0.0.0.2866.3671.6-1j9-1.2.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.TQ-y0OrAdLI
You are right mister President, You
haven´t finished what you started.
So we will vote for you so we can
have four more years with
indefinite detention
violation of 1st Amendment
drones
kill list
taxcut for the rich
tar sand pipeline
arctic drilling
what a pity that Clinton couldn´t
dismantle these issues in his speech
and you not either in yours !
Not even close.
He's far, far and away better than any republican could ever be.
No republican could ever hope to have put over all the con jobs on people that Obama has managed to put over on them and still have them cheering and believing they'd supported something even remotely progressive or good for them.
But no one likes to admit they were taken to the cleaners by a skilled con artist, so they'll hand over their money again, and they'll vote for him again.
Maybe someday they'll realize that the two party con job is the biggest lie there is.
Maybe... but not likely.
Yep,and Romney and the republicans keep telling us that Obama has done nothing to spruce up the economy and on and on with all of the same old.What we dont hear much is that the economy is the way it,and there's more poor americans,becau se of 8 years of the terrorist numero uno George W. Bush.Obama is just another corporate puppet and i think it's sad that we have only two choices....both puppets.Truly i believe things will get worse if Romney wins,but Obama is not the answer to our woes...he is part of the problem.Until we get money out of the campaigns there's no hope for this once great country.I too will be voting green in NY.
Now, after almost four years of proving his blank resume was an accurate description of his qualifications & after running out of ways to blame Bush & anyone or anything else for his incompetence he has gone back to square one. Dazzle them with BS.
All the things he was going to fix in his first term that didn't get fixed were Bush's fault of course but, still in all, there are the non-believers who will say that it makes no difference - he was the President & he said he would fix them & he didn't. No problem. They bought in once. They'll do it again. This time Barry wants us to turn to page 47 in the hymnal - "I may be divine but I need more time".
Seems the problem isn't just Bush - it goes back for decades. Of course that means that not only the Republicans but also the Democrats were screw-ups & Divine Barry's task is even greater than he had realized.
The faithful acolytes in the Divine Barry Adoration Society will believe.
There were quite a few that announced just within a month after he became president that his methods were failing. Now folks this is within a few days to a few months after he was on the job.
Yes they were giving him 4 years. Yes there is a Easter bunny,too.
RSS feed for comments to this post