RSN May Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Popper writes: "The report...points to the problems at HSBC, Europe's largest financial institution, as indicators of a broader problem of illegal money flowing through international financial institutions into the United States."

The logo on the front of a branch of HSBC. (photo: Getty Images)
The logo on the front of a branch of HSBC. (photo: Getty Images)


FOCUS: Scathing Report Details Money Laundering at HSBC

By Nathaniel Popper, The New York Times

17 July 2012

 

he global bank HSBC has been used by Mexican drug cartels looking to get cash back into the United States, by Saudi Arabian banks that needed access to dollars despite their terrorist ties and by Iranians who wanted to circumvent United States sanctions, a Senate report says.

The 335-page report released Monday also says that executives at HSBC and regulators at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ignored warning signs and failed to stop the illegal behavior at many points between 2001 and 2010.

In one case, an HSBC executive successfully argued that the bank should resume business with a Saudi Arabian bank, Al Rajhi Bank, despite the fact that Al Rajhi's founder had been an early benefactor of Al Qaeda. HSBC's American branch ended up supplying a billion dollars to the bank

The report is the product of a yearlong investigation by a Senate subcommittee, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It points to the problems at HSBC, Europe's largest financial institution, as indicators of a broader problem of illegal money flowing through international financial institutions into the United States.

"Banks that ignore money laundering rules are a big problem for our country," said Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who leads the subcommittee. "Also troubling is a bank regulator that does not adequately do its job." He called HSBC's compliance culture "pervasively polluted for a long time."

HSBC executives are expected to apologize for shortcomings in the bank's internal controls in a hearing of the subcommittee on Tuesday. The company said in a statement on Monday that "we will apologize, acknowledge these mistakes, answer for our actions and give our absolute commitment to fixing what went wrong."

Mr. Levin, however, said on Monday that HSBC had promised to fix similar problems in years past and failed. "While the bank is saying all the right things, and that is fine, it has said all the right things before," he said.

The hearing is unlikely to be the end of HSBC's problems. The bank has disclosed in regulatory filings that the issues with money laundering are also being investigated by the Department of Justice and could lead to criminal charges and "significant" fines, which analysts have said could reach $1 billion.

The report on HSBC is the latest of several scandals that have recently rocked global banks and highlighted the inability of regulators to catch what is claimed to be widespread wrongdoing in the financial industry. The British bank Barclays recently admitted that its traders tried to manipulate a crucial global interest rate, and multiple major banks are under investigation. JPMorgan Chase disclosed last week that its employees may have tried to hide trades that are likely to cost the bank billions of dollars.

Mr. Levin said that wrongdoing in the financial world has been exacerbated by the relatively light touch of government regulators. "As long as a bank just sees that it is going to be dealt with kid gloves, I think we are going to continue to see these shortfalls that have been so endemic," Mr. Levin said.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has come under particularly harsh criticism for showing too much deference to the banks it regulates. The new leader of the agency, Thomas J. Curry, has promised a stricter approach since he took over in April.

Mr. Curry said in a statement on Monday that members of his staff "fully embrace" the subcommittee's report, and he is expected to testify Tuesday that the agency is already carrying out many of the report's recommendations.

Regulators have been paying close attention to the willingness of global banks to facilitate illegal flows of money from outside the United States. The Treasury Department announced last month that ING Bank had agreed to pay $619 million to settle charges that it moved money into the United States from Cuba and Iran, despite sanctions against those countries, for nearly two decades. Since 2009, there have been five similar settlements between American regulators and other banks, including Barclays and Credit Suisse, over illicit transactions.

In the Senate report, HSBC is facing accusations that it helped its clients circumvent rules intended to stop transactions from countries facing international sanctions, and in some cases flouted laws in pursuit of profits.

While HSBC is accused of moving money into the United States from North Korea and Cuba, the most extensive problems involved accounts in Iran. An independent audit, paid for by HSBC, found that the bank facilitated 25,000 questionable payments involving Iran between 2001 and 2007. In some cases, HSBC executives counseled Iranian financial institutions on how to evade the filters of American regulators, the report says.

When the bank developed a way to process transactions for Iran's largest retail bank, an HSBC executive wrote an e-mail to his colleagues that said, "I wish to be on the record as not comfortable with this piece of business." None of his colleagues responded and the deal went ahead, according to the report.

The subcommittee also found evidence of widespread wrongdoing in HSBC's failure to stop money laundering through accounts tied to drug trafficking in Mexico. The bank is accused of shipping $7 billion in cash from Mexico to the United States in 2007 and 2008 despite several warnings that the money was coming from cartels that needed a way to return their profits to the United States.

In many of the cases detailed in the report, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is said to have spotted the problematic behavior. But in nearly every case, the subcommittee found that the agency gave HSBC only a warning or mild punishment and did not push the bank to make large-scale changes.

The agency ultimately issued a cease-and-desist order against HSBC in 2010 after other law enforcement agencies began looking into the problems. Mr. Levin, though, said that his subcommittee found that some of the problems had not been fixed by the time the subcommittee began looking into them over the last year.

A new chief executive took over at HSBC early last year and he has committed to making sweeping changes at the company. In its statement, the bank laid out several steps it had recently taken to increase oversight of international flows of money.


 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+23 # danigo 2012-07-17 10:58
Funny how it is always the foreign banks that get caught. First UBS and now HSBC. Does it have something to do with FATCA or is it a way to extort money from them? Hard to say but surely the foreign banks will rue the day they invested heavily in the US as HSBC has done.
 
 
+33 # John Locke 2012-07-17 12:58
danigo: I would not be surprised if the US banks are also involved! It seems to be international banks and all our major banks are international...

Think of The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI)scandle which was also laundering drug money: and alot of it CIA drug Money!

in the 1980s due to concerns that it was poorly regulated. Subsequent investigations revealed that it was involved in massive money laundering and other financial crimes, and illegally gained controlling interest in a major American bank.

BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and on July 5 of that year customs and bank regulators in seven countries raided and locked down records of its branch offices.

Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been "set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection."

The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency held numerous accounts at BCCI!!!!

I can't find where any of the bank officers or controllers actually ever went to jail!

Bank Fraud is big business! Until some of these criminals actually see the inside of a prison cell it will never stop!
 
 
+8 # 666 2012-07-18 04:20
There are two solutions to this and many other problems:
1) banks are people too (according to the USSC). Therefore we should execute all involved banks for treason.
2) seize their assets and nationalize them
 
 
+11 # ruttaro 2012-07-18 05:11
Back in 1984, when Jesse Jackson was running for President, he said something that I've never forgotten. He said "If we want to end the drug problem in the United States, go after the banks." I knew then he was right and he is still right. What ignites my fury is that if I were caught laundering drug money - even $10000 - I would be arrested, tried, convicted and thrown in jail for a number of years. If I was caught laundering terrorist money I would be in Gitmo or thrown into detention somewhere facing a life term. HSBC (now Capital One "What's in Your Wallet? is a good question) gets to apologize like they did before, will probably pay a done because they and the banks bought this Congress, and continue to do what should amount to treason. If this does not make the case for a system of government free from the influence of money I don't know what does. Rage against the system; bury these SOBs in the dung they were spawned! They are treasonous criminals who should all be arrested, tried and if convicted, jailed. Since they were engaged in the illicit drug trade their personal assets should be seized and auctioned off. The proceeds could be invested in building new infrastructure and creating jobs.
 
 
+1 # John Locke 2012-07-18 22:09
ruttaro: Thank you...Banks will never be controlled and their officers will never spend one day in a jail cell! They control this government. The only way to make a difference is to begin a real Third party with a platform of nationalizing ALL Banks! and Prosecuting the Criminals... Regulations simply won't work, the banks MUST be nationalized!!!

the criminals should spend the rest of their lives in a Federal Prison!

I Thank Matt Tibbi for staying on the Banks and now the NYT for exposing more!

If anything is to be done about the corruption that is rampant throughout our Government and its controlling force "the Banks" it will have to be done by the people when they have had enough...

I suspect that time is coming close.
 
 
+31 # walthe310 2012-07-17 11:16
An apology is insufficient.
 
 
0 # Texas Aggie 2012-07-18 20:25
Today on the radio I heard two of their apologies. They sounded so sincere about how in hindsight they realize that there were deficiencies and about how they would correct those deficiencies. No where did they mention that people had been screaming bloody murder about it for years and instead of cleaning up the mess, they fired the whistle blowers.

If I had been there when they were talking, I would have just lost every bit of control I had and punched them in their smarmy mouths. It was totally disgusting. It was as bad or worse than that smarmy jerk who was patronizing Rachel about women getting paid the same as men for the same work.
 
 
+52 # MEBrowning 2012-07-17 11:20
From 9/11 to the Catholic church to the banking industry and beyond, ignoring warning signs appears to be business as usual these days. And still, we continue to shoot the messenger and hobble the watchdog. This is what comes of allowing the lunatics to manage the asylum.
 
 
+11 # John Locke 2012-07-17 12:58
MEBrowning: or Bankers to control our Government!
 
 
+41 # harbormon 2012-07-17 11:30
Bank of America has to be a close second to HSBC in its Laundering skills, and quite frankly, there probably isn't one of the Top 20 US Banks that haven't been utilized to launder money for a variety of people, and even some of our elected officials!
 
 
+17 # AMLLLLL 2012-07-17 11:48
No kidding! We citizens have gone from, "Oh, noooo!" to "Yeah, yeah". It's time we let them know we're not quite down the drain yet.

If you were on the Titanic, would you lie in your bed, knowing of your impending doom, or would you fight for your life?
 
 
+4 # ruttaro 2012-07-18 05:12
I'd seize the wheel after taking over the pilot house and steer the ship out of the ice fields.
 
 
+21 # giraffee2012 2012-07-17 12:07
What rules did the CEO, CFO, etc break and what is the punishment for breaking said rule. If no rule was broken, then why isn't a rule in place to prohibit said action.

This posturing (Oh I'm sorry - you're living on the street bc I lost YOUR money, etc) is absurd.

Do we pay our Congress to hear apologies? Apologize for what? Breaking a RULE/LAW? Or for some moral infraction - which then leads to the above: What are the laws and punishments and if there are none - then we'd better TAKE OUR MONEY OUT of these "banks" and open new ones or use local banks/credit unions.

What is going on here? Is Congress complicit? Aren't they the "rule makers" -- don't we hear how they vote 57-43 in Senate and 227 - 333 (don't know the numbers) on making laws?

Is the Supreme Court complicit in this behavior by NOT taking any "banking issue" - to rule on? Where were they in 2008 when Goldman Sachs (etc) were caught "inside trading" (whatever)?

I am angry - aren't you? Call your Congress people and demand to SEE the rules for bankers who are stealing our money and making deals because there are no rules.

VOTE DEM, Vote Obama - or move off-shore so you can get one of those jobs that are trickling off-shore
 
 
+7 # Gwat 2012-07-17 16:56
Unfortunately voting will do nothing. They are all complicit. "They" have demonstrated an unwillingness to prosecute, unless of course you are a whistleblower. The debate belongs outside of the two parties.
 
 
-13 # auduson2 2012-07-17 12:09
This report stinks!
 
 
+22 # g2g 2012-07-17 12:10
This seems like exactly the type of activities that should be prosecuted under RICO. Holder, are you listening?
 
 
0 # 666 2012-07-18 15:00
He doesn't have to listen, it's not OUR govt anymore
 
 
+18 # bmiluski 2012-07-17 12:31
To whom does the money from these fines go?
 
 
+4 # indio007 2012-07-17 12:45
The funny thing is the gov't has been whining about bitcoin being used for money laundering.

Criminals obviously don't need bitcoin at all.
 
 
+17 # vicnada 2012-07-17 12:51
Quoting MEBrowning:
From 9/11 to the Catholic church to the banking industry and beyond,

...to the Leaning Tower of Fukashima. How can we be considering licensing new nuclear plants when all lights are blinking red 'round the world?
 
 
+5 # av.gris 2012-07-17 12:53
Here is a tale....
My father in Law was a Western Auto retailer in the 1950s to 1970s. (Western Auto was a chain of hardware ahd automotive stores in the US.)
He acquired stock in the company.
Western Auto stock became Beneficial Finance.
Beneficial became Household Finance.
Household was acquired by HSBC.
So now all these years later, my wife and I find ourselves as HSBC stockholders from her parents' estate.
The stock is a good producer! Always hoped the bank as a UK based bank had more ethics than the big US banks like Bank of America et al.
I'm not happy about these revelations but as a tiny stockholder (of something called US ADRs, not even "real" HSBC shares) I wonder how much guilt I should feel over this.
By the way form the same estate of wife's parents, we also own a small amount of JP Morgan Chase stock. Happy days!!
 
 
+16 # Brooklyn Girl 2012-07-17 12:54
Oh, so the new CEO is going to make changes. Uh-huh.
 
 
+2 # John Locke 2012-07-19 06:41
Brooklyn Girl: NO he will make changes, He will hide their scams and fraud better and pay off the right people to turn a blind eye to the Banks corruption, each CEO learns from the failed actions of his predecessor! This whole thing probably came about because they didn't pay off enough people?
 
 
+33 # DPM 2012-07-17 13:00
Criminals are running the country. Criminals in the government. Criminals in business. Criminals in banking. "Things" didn't just "go wrong". The system isn't "broken". The system works just fine, for a criminal enterprise. We need "heads". Heads on poles. Bodies hanging from trees (metaphorically speaking, Homeland Security). Until ALL of the people directing banking, business and politics have either been removed and jailed or subject to public scrutiny with much of their monetary incentives reduced or removed, this type of behavior will continue. Our republic needs to be remade. How long will the people of this country continue to allow, even encourage, their own rape?
 
 
+4 # John Locke 2012-07-18 06:32
DPM: Until they open their eyes and actually stop wearing blinders!

We should have already witnessed a second revolution in this country but for the media and its dummying effect on the population...it is amazing how many people still believe what they see or read in the mainstream media!!!

This didn't just start; it has been going on since the beginning of Banking. Banks control governments and have always been used for criminal activity...and have throughout time and in every nation! Think Rothschild’s who controlled 5 countries and even the US through their associations here! They financed both sides of the European wars!

In a democracy Banks CAN NOT and MUST never be operated by private individuals they MUST be owned and operated by the Government otherwise you will continue to see these same criminal acts over and over and the government never doing anything to curtail the Fraud! …

If our Republic is to be saved… The Banks MUST be nationalized!
And campaigns for political offices must be publicly funded!!!
 
 
0 # Texas Aggie 2012-07-18 20:35
Forever. There is a large contingent who believe that they should submit to what they consider legitimate authority. These people with authoritarian leanings compose the Tea Party and the right wing fundamentalist churches. At heart they are the same people who supported the fascist movement (Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal) in Europe that led to WWII. They're the ones who think that there should be a strong man to save the country from decadence and disruption, and to blazes with democracy, which they consider to be something that worthless people use to live off the real people.

http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/TheAuthoritarians.pdf

The above book is the distillation of decades of research on how the authoritarian mind works. Read it and weep.
 
 
+23 # Papá Kokopelli 2012-07-17 14:13
Am I missing something? If the drug cartels are in Colombia, Mexico, etc., why would they need to bring their money BACK INTO THE USA? Could it be that these drug cartels are headquartered here? Is that possible?
 
 
+4 # John Locke 2012-07-18 06:17
Papá Kokopelli: I will answer your question this way...Where is the CIA Located!

The CIA Partnered with the medellin cartel, and Noriega from Panama! and I am sure they are partnering with all the Drug operators, so Langly Virginia! That is in the USA and where the control of the money ends up!
 
 
0 # Texas Aggie 2012-07-18 20:39
It may be possible, but it isn't the case. The leaders of the cartels are quite comfortable in Mexico, and if they went to the US, they would be effectively abdicating and would lose their positions to those who stay behind. Which isn't to say that if any of them actually retire, they don't go to the US. And the Sinoloa Cartel is rumored to have subsidiaries in dozens of countries throughout the world.
 
 
+12 # mdhome 2012-07-17 14:40
All this makes me want to vomit all over those banksters
 
 
+8 # dick 2012-07-17 14:43
ALL the major banks engage in ongoing criminal activity that undermines US. They are Criminal Enterprises & should have execs prosecuted, cartels broken up. Wait. Never mind. I want to see that Obama kiss-cam video. THAT'S the big story.
 
 
+18 # JSRaleigh 2012-07-17 15:19
Launder money for drug cartels and terrorists & what happens? No one from HSBC is going to jail, and if there's any fine it will be just a token amount compared to the crimes they committed.

But get stopped by the cops & their drug sniffing dog don't like your looks you can lose your car, your money and your home without ever being charged with a crime.
 
 
+5 # John Locke 2012-07-18 06:33
JSRaleigh: Absolutely right! The Banks should be comfiscated under the same laws!
 
 
+14 # carolsj 2012-07-17 16:44
Absolute power corrupts absolutely! And that goes for big money twice. These guys should be prosecuted and everything they own should be confiscated, just as is done to petty criminals. They have stolen from whole countries and thousands (maybe millions) of people. Fines, even a billion, are meaningless on this scale. The punishment needs to be as huge as the crime.
 
 
+9 # MidwestTom 2012-07-17 16:52
Quantitive Easing has created enormous amounts of cash in the world. This cash eventually finds it's way into the high-roller communities of Hollywood, bankers and politicians. Banks are in the business of handling cash. Drug sales in North America probably exceed the sale of our five largest corporations combined. I guarantee you that every bank with assets of over #5 billion has handled drug money, whether they knew it or not. If the western banks will not handle the drug empires funds, middle eastern banks will.
 
 
+8 # Ellioth 2012-07-17 19:39
Is anyone really shocked by this? If so, I suggest you wake up. This is simply another form of "bsnksterism". Raise your hand if you think any senior level executive will be held accountable - fired, jailed. Just another ho hum day at the office of "Crooked, Corrupt, Greedy and Sleezey. Is it time for the revolution yet?
 
 
+3 # cordleycoit 2012-07-18 17:27
How quickly we forget BNCC and all the crooks that walked on that go round. Or Savings and Loan where the Bush boys get their money to buy the White House for twelve years.
 
 
0 # erogers 2012-07-19 05:31
How quickly we forget the Wells Fargo-Wachovia money laundering investigation that seems to have gone away. It is not just foreign banks. Every major US bank is just as bad.
 
 
0 # dkonstruction 2012-07-19 05:53
If we legalized the drugs there would be no "drug money" to launder.

Watching the hearing (i'm a late night cspan junkie) it was truly amazing to see that note even the "better" democrats went after any of these guys at HSBC for criminal activity. While some of the questions were certainly tougher than the recent Jamie Dimon congressional "lovefest" it was pretty amazing to see no one talk about HSBC's actions (and if you think they were the only ones please send me some of whatever you are smoking) as being criminal acts that should be prosecuted.

It seems as if almost every day now there is some new revelation about a criminal conspiracy at one of the major financial institutions. Little punks are busted and jailed for this stuff all the time and their businesses and assets seized. when do we start demanding that criminal businesses like these be put out of business for good?
 
 
0 # Holmes 2012-07-21 02:24
After watch on TV about 30 sec of the banks spokes persons responses to questioning, I wonder why Bradley Manning is in jail and these people are still free. Many terrorists have done much less to destroy the interests of the people of the USA. So why were thy not arrested on the spot and sent to Guantanamo? Bradley did not cause any more than some severe embarrassment of some US policies and actions which were not supportable any way. Are not these people part of the cause of the GFC and the loss of at least $50,000/30% of my superannuation, as well as decline in real estate values.

Or has the counter revolution after the french revolution which over threw the aristocracy final won?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN