Popper writes: "The report...points to the problems at HSBC, Europe's largest financial institution, as indicators of a broader problem of illegal money flowing through international financial institutions into the United States."
The logo on the front of a branch of HSBC. (photo: Getty Images)
FOCUS: Scathing Report Details Money Laundering at HSBC
17 July 2012
he global bank HSBC has been used by Mexican drug cartels looking to get cash back into the United States, by Saudi Arabian banks that needed access to dollars despite their terrorist ties and by Iranians who wanted to circumvent United States sanctions, a Senate report says.
The 335-page report released Monday also says that executives at HSBC and regulators at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ignored warning signs and failed to stop the illegal behavior at many points between 2001 and 2010.
In one case, an HSBC executive successfully argued that the bank should resume business with a Saudi Arabian bank, Al Rajhi Bank, despite the fact that Al Rajhi's founder had been an early benefactor of Al Qaeda. HSBC's American branch ended up supplying a billion dollars to the bank
The report is the product of a yearlong investigation by a Senate subcommittee, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It points to the problems at HSBC, Europe's largest financial institution, as indicators of a broader problem of illegal money flowing through international financial institutions into the United States.
"Banks that ignore money laundering rules are a big problem for our country," said Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who leads the subcommittee. "Also troubling is a bank regulator that does not adequately do its job." He called HSBC's compliance culture "pervasively polluted for a long time."
HSBC executives are expected to apologize for shortcomings in the bank's internal controls in a hearing of the subcommittee on Tuesday. The company said in a statement on Monday that "we will apologize, acknowledge these mistakes, answer for our actions and give our absolute commitment to fixing what went wrong."
Mr. Levin, however, said on Monday that HSBC had promised to fix similar problems in years past and failed. "While the bank is saying all the right things, and that is fine, it has said all the right things before," he said.
The hearing is unlikely to be the end of HSBC's problems. The bank has disclosed in regulatory filings that the issues with money laundering are also being investigated by the Department of Justice and could lead to criminal charges and "significant" fines, which analysts have said could reach $1 billion.
The report on HSBC is the latest of several scandals that have recently rocked global banks and highlighted the inability of regulators to catch what is claimed to be widespread wrongdoing in the financial industry. The British bank Barclays recently admitted that its traders tried to manipulate a crucial global interest rate, and multiple major banks are under investigation. JPMorgan Chase disclosed last week that its employees may have tried to hide trades that are likely to cost the bank billions of dollars.
Mr. Levin said that wrongdoing in the financial world has been exacerbated by the relatively light touch of government regulators. "As long as a bank just sees that it is going to be dealt with kid gloves, I think we are going to continue to see these shortfalls that have been so endemic," Mr. Levin said.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has come under particularly harsh criticism for showing too much deference to the banks it regulates. The new leader of the agency, Thomas J. Curry, has promised a stricter approach since he took over in April.
Mr. Curry said in a statement on Monday that members of his staff "fully embrace" the subcommittee's report, and he is expected to testify Tuesday that the agency is already carrying out many of the report's recommendations.
Regulators have been paying close attention to the willingness of global banks to facilitate illegal flows of money from outside the United States. The Treasury Department announced last month that ING Bank had agreed to pay $619 million to settle charges that it moved money into the United States from Cuba and Iran, despite sanctions against those countries, for nearly two decades. Since 2009, there have been five similar settlements between American regulators and other banks, including Barclays and Credit Suisse, over illicit transactions.
In the Senate report, HSBC is facing accusations that it helped its clients circumvent rules intended to stop transactions from countries facing international sanctions, and in some cases flouted laws in pursuit of profits.
While HSBC is accused of moving money into the United States from North Korea and Cuba, the most extensive problems involved accounts in Iran. An independent audit, paid for by HSBC, found that the bank facilitated 25,000 questionable payments involving Iran between 2001 and 2007. In some cases, HSBC executives counseled Iranian financial institutions on how to evade the filters of American regulators, the report says.
When the bank developed a way to process transactions for Iran's largest retail bank, an HSBC executive wrote an e-mail to his colleagues that said, "I wish to be on the record as not comfortable with this piece of business." None of his colleagues responded and the deal went ahead, according to the report.
The subcommittee also found evidence of widespread wrongdoing in HSBC's failure to stop money laundering through accounts tied to drug trafficking in Mexico. The bank is accused of shipping $7 billion in cash from Mexico to the United States in 2007 and 2008 despite several warnings that the money was coming from cartels that needed a way to return their profits to the United States.
In many of the cases detailed in the report, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is said to have spotted the problematic behavior. But in nearly every case, the subcommittee found that the agency gave HSBC only a warning or mild punishment and did not push the bank to make large-scale changes.
The agency ultimately issued a cease-and-desist order against HSBC in 2010 after other law enforcement agencies began looking into the problems. Mr. Levin, though, said that his subcommittee found that some of the problems had not been fixed by the time the subcommittee began looking into them over the last year.
A new chief executive took over at HSBC early last year and he has committed to making sweeping changes at the company. In its statement, the bank laid out several steps it had recently taken to increase oversight of international flows of money.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Think of The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI)scandle which was also laundering drug money: and alot of it CIA drug Money!
in the 1980s due to concerns that it was poorly regulated. Subsequent investigations revealed that it was involved in massive money laundering and other financial crimes, and illegally gained controlling interest in a major American bank.
BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and on July 5 of that year customs and bank regulators in seven countries raided and locked down records of its branch offices.
Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been "set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection."
The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency held numerous accounts at BCCI!!!!
I can't find where any of the bank officers or controllers actually ever went to jail!
Bank Fraud is big business! Until some of these criminals actually see the inside of a prison cell it will never stop!
1) banks are people too (according to the USSC). Therefore we should execute all involved banks for treason.
2) seize their assets and nationalize them
the criminals should spend the rest of their lives in a Federal Prison!
I Thank Matt Tibbi for staying on the Banks and now the NYT for exposing more!
If anything is to be done about the corruption that is rampant throughout our Government and its controlling force "the Banks" it will have to be done by the people when they have had enough...
I suspect that time is coming close.
If I had been there when they were talking, I would have just lost every bit of control I had and punched them in their smarmy mouths. It was totally disgusting. It was as bad or worse than that smarmy jerk who was patronizing Rachel about women getting paid the same as men for the same work.
If you were on the Titanic, would you lie in your bed, knowing of your impending doom, or would you fight for your life?
This posturing (Oh I'm sorry - you're living on the street bc I lost YOUR money, etc) is absurd.
Do we pay our Congress to hear apologies? Apologize for what? Breaking a RULE/LAW? Or for some moral infraction - which then leads to the above: What are the laws and punishments and if there are none - then we'd better TAKE OUR MONEY OUT of these "banks" and open new ones or use local banks/credit unions.
What is going on here? Is Congress complicit? Aren't they the "rule makers" -- don't we hear how they vote 57-43 in Senate and 227 - 333 (don't know the numbers) on making laws?
Is the Supreme Court complicit in this behavior by NOT taking any "banking issue" - to rule on? Where were they in 2008 when Goldman Sachs (etc) were caught "inside trading" (whatever)?
I am angry - aren't you? Call your Congress people and demand to SEE the rules for bankers who are stealing our money and making deals because there are no rules.
VOTE DEM, Vote Obama - or move off-shore so you can get one of those jobs that are trickling off-shore
Criminals obviously don't need bitcoin at all.
...to the Leaning Tower of Fukashima. How can we be considering licensing new nuclear plants when all lights are blinking red 'round the world?
My father in Law was a Western Auto retailer in the 1950s to 1970s. (Western Auto was a chain of hardware ahd automotive stores in the US.)
He acquired stock in the company.
Western Auto stock became Beneficial Finance.
Beneficial became Household Finance.
Household was acquired by HSBC.
So now all these years later, my wife and I find ourselves as HSBC stockholders from her parents' estate.
The stock is a good producer! Always hoped the bank as a UK based bank had more ethics than the big US banks like Bank of America et al.
I'm not happy about these revelations but as a tiny stockholder (of something called US ADRs, not even "real" HSBC shares) I wonder how much guilt I should feel over this.
By the way form the same estate of wife's parents, we also own a small amount of JP Morgan Chase stock. Happy days!!
We should have already witnessed a second revolution in this country but for the media and its dummying effect on the population...it is amazing how many people still believe what they see or read in the mainstream media!!!
This didn't just start; it has been going on since the beginning of Banking. Banks control governments and have always been used for criminal activity...and have throughout time and in every nation! Think Rothschild’s who controlled 5 countries and even the US through their associations here! They financed both sides of the European wars!
In a democracy Banks CAN NOT and MUST never be operated by private individuals they MUST be owned and operated by the Government otherwise you will continue to see these same criminal acts over and over and the government never doing anything to curtail the Fraud! …
If our Republic is to be saved… The Banks MUST be nationalized!
And campaigns for political offices must be publicly funded!!!
http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/TheAuthoritarians.pdf
The above book is the distillation of decades of research on how the authoritarian mind works. Read it and weep.
The CIA Partnered with the medellin cartel, and Noriega from Panama! and I am sure they are partnering with all the Drug operators, so Langly Virginia! That is in the USA and where the control of the money ends up!
But get stopped by the cops & their drug sniffing dog don't like your looks you can lose your car, your money and your home without ever being charged with a crime.
Watching the hearing (i'm a late night cspan junkie) it was truly amazing to see that note even the "better" democrats went after any of these guys at HSBC for criminal activity. While some of the questions were certainly tougher than the recent Jamie Dimon congressional "lovefest" it was pretty amazing to see no one talk about HSBC's actions (and if you think they were the only ones please send me some of whatever you are smoking) as being criminal acts that should be prosecuted.
It seems as if almost every day now there is some new revelation about a criminal conspiracy at one of the major financial institutions. Little punks are busted and jailed for this stuff all the time and their businesses and assets seized. when do we start demanding that criminal businesses like these be put out of business for good?
Or has the counter revolution after the french revolution which over threw the aristocracy final won?
RSS feed for comments to this post