Excerpt: "...Bloomberg News pointed to a new study showing that JPMorgan Chase receives a $14 billion annual subsidy from the US government."
Jamie Dimon testifies before a US Senate Banking Committee full committee hearing, 06/13/12. (photo: Karen Bleier/AFP/Getty Images)
JPMorgan Gets $14 Billion a Year From the US Government
24 June 12
P Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon testified on Capitol Hill today for the second time in two weeks, appearing before the House Financial Services Committee to discuss the trading debacle that has cost his bank billions of dollars. Before the hearing, Bloomberg News pointed to a new study showing that JP Morgan Chase receives a $14 billion annual subsidy from the U.S. government. This subsidy is due to JP Morgan’s reputation as a too-big-to-fail bank, which lets it borrow money at lower rates than other, less systemically risky banks:
JPMorgan receives a government subsidy worth about $14 billion a year, according to research published by the International Monetary Fund and our own analysis of bank balance sheets. The money helps the bank pay big salaries and bonuses. [...]
In a recent paper, two economists - Kenichi Ueda of the IMF and Beatrice Weder Di Mauro of the University of Mainz - estimated that as of 2009 the expectation of government support was shaving about 0.8 percentage point off large banks’ borrowing costs. That’s up from 0.6 percentage point in 2007, before the financial crisis prompted a global round of bank bailouts.
To estimate the dollar value of the subsidy in the U.S., we multiplied it by the debt and deposits of 18 of the country’s largest banks, including JPMorgan, Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc. The result: about $76 billion a year. The number is roughly equivalent to the banks’ total profits over the past 12 months, or more than the federal government spends every year on education.
JPMorgan’s share of the subsidy is $14 billion a year, or about 77 percent of its net income for the past four quarters. In other words, U.S. taxpayers helped foot the bill for the multibillion-dollar trading loss that is the focus of today’s hearing.
At the last hearing, the Senate all but groveled at Dimon’s feet, and today’s questioning was not much better. But Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) did ask Dimon about the Bloomberg study. Dimon denied that his bank receives a funding advantage due to its size, saying that the bank is “probably pretty much like everybody else.” Watch it:
As Bloomberg’s editors put it, “when Dimon pushes back against [regulations like] capital requirements or the Volcker rule, it’s worth remembering that he’s pushing for a form of corporate welfare that, left unchecked, could lead to a crisis too big for the government to contain.” Yet that’s precisely what he did today.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Jack Lohman
This is right now, under the clown Obama!
Critics of Democratic Socialism take note.
There is no ethical or practical justification for JP Morgan being subsidized. Break them up.
Break them up AND nationalize them.
What do Greedy One Percenters have against ownership?
We just voted in term limits in CA for our state level, ahem, 'leaders'. Far too many folks didn't bother reading the wording of the initiative itself. The term limits only apply to those who will be voting in, in the future. So we are stuck with the current crop of chowderheads for potentially the rest of their useless (but well paid & benefited) lives. I love the concept of limits - absolutely necessary. But also necessary are folks that read the DAMN FINE PRINT!!
And does anyone know how you can set yourself up as a bank? Too old to go out a rob people face to face (and that really isn't where the big bucks are at anyway). grrrrr
Till then 30 second sound bite and political add aimed at the lowest common voting denominators... playing their baser emotions is what determine things.
When we can no longer afford such emotional extravagances as voting for who looks or sounds like us or calls us great or who says it is them not us that is the cause , then they will learn. But that requires a great great motivator.
Fear not...... all things economic are being pushed to serve and feed these large large financial beasts. Foodstamps now are to be the next thing cut.....knowing not perhaps do they...... when starved..... people become acutely aware of the why and wherefore of who is doing the starving.
Let out that genie from its bottle..and it will not be pushed back in.
But they are so dim...they see not what they hazard.
All they want, and will probably now get, as corporations rule in every political extant and govern who knows what and when. All social programs will be eliminated for food for these beasts, But their very excess it is what will be their undoing.
They know not what they eventually hazard.
Yes, but by then it will be too late.
Or Maxims "Uncle Billie" would be greatly appreciated right about now.
Pardon all the snark but I'm 80 and have seen this play before.
Can't help but wonder how many of the 7B of us realize that this planet is Heaven and as close to it as we are ever going to get. If one doubts this one has only to look at what surrounds it - right?
Anyway my best to you all and thanks for the thoughtful comments.
The rest of us are left behind.
Many Americans believe that there is enough evidence to either indict or remove from their positions various Wall Street malefactors, whose criminal and/or self-serving actions crumbled the economy. According to the DNC's 2012 Presidential Election Year Survey, this is not considered an issue to be raised in this year's election campaign. It should be.
That's why I created a petition to Democratic National Committee, which says:
"As long as Wall Street figures are rewarded, rather than sanctioned, for their crimes and/or incompetence, there is no salvation for the economy or the nation. If the Democratic Party does not take a stand on this, who will? Please stand up for law and honesty in this campaign."
Will you sign this petition? Click here:
http://signon.org/sign/democrats-take-a-stand-2?source=c.em.cp&r_by=1129255
Thanks!
Ted
What a fine mess he and his cronies have got us into!
Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
RSS feed for comments to this post