RSN June Fundraising
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos and others want to talk about what they call the failed war on drugs, as President Obama tries to focus on economic ties."

President Obama speaks during a joint forum with Brazil's President Rousseff and Colombia's President Santos at the CEO Summit of the Americas, 04/14/12. (photo: Cris Bouroncle/AFP/Getty Images)
President Obama speaks during a joint forum with Brazil's President Rousseff and Colombia's President Santos at the CEO Summit of the Americas, 04/14/12. (photo: Cris Bouroncle/AFP/Getty Images)



Obama Says No to Legalizing Drugs

By Christi Parsons, Matea Gold, Los Angeles Times

15 April 12

 

olombian President Juan Manuel Santos and others want to talk about what they call the failed war on drugs, as President Obama tries to focus on economic ties.

President Obama sought Saturday to emphasize the robust economic relationship between the United States and Latin America, and he flatly ruled out legalizing drugs as a way to combat the illegal trafficking that has ravaged the region.

Facing calls at a regional summit to consider decriminalization, Obama said he is open to a debate about drug policy, but he believes that legalization could lead to greater problems in countries hardest hit by drug-fueled violence.

"Legalization is not the answer," Obama told other hemispheric leaders at the two-day Summit of the Americas.

"The capacity of a large-scale drug trade to dominate certain countries if they were allowed to operate legally without any constraint could be just as corrupting, if not more corrupting, than the status quo," he said.

Obama told Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, host of the summit, that he is willing to discuss whether American drug laws are "doing more harm than good in certain places."

Santos wants the 33 countries participating in the summit to consider alternatives to what many leaders consider the failed war on drugs, possibly including regulating marijuana and even cocaine the way that alcohol and tobacco are.

Other leaders also have urged such a dialogue despite the political discomfort it may cause Obama in an election year.

"In spite of all the efforts, the illicit drug business is still buoyant, drug addiction in all countries is a serious public health issue, and drug trafficking is still the main provider of funding for violence and terrorism," Santos said. "An in-depth discussion around this topic is needed, without any biases or dogmas, taking into consideration the different scenarios and possible alternatives to more effectively face this challenge."

The focus on drug trafficking - as well as a scandal involving alleged misconduct by Secret Service agents and military personnel - threatened to overshadow Obama's main mission in Colombia: touting the benefits of a strong economic relationship across the hemisphere.

"I think that oftentimes in the press the attention in summits like this ends up focusing on, 'Where are the controversies?'" Obama said during a morning session.

Some of those issues seem "caught in a time warp, going back to the 1950s and gunboat diplomacy and Yanquis and the Cold War, and this and that and the other," he said. "That's not the world we live in today."

He praised a recently negotiated trade agreement with Colombia as a "win-win."

He did not say whether Colombia has met the terms of a labor rights plan that Congress set last year as a condition of passage of the agreement. The trade accord was strongly opposed by union leaders, who complained of the dangerous conditions facing members of organized labor in Colombia.

Obama avoided confrontations with the region's most anti-American leaders. Cuba's president, Raul Castro, was not invited to the summit. And Venezuela's president, Hugo Chavez, who is highly critical of U.S. policy, abruptly canceled plans to attend.

Chavez, who suffers from cancer, will travel to Cuba instead for radiation therapy, Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro said on state TV.

 

Comments   

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+14 # Art947 2012-04-15 21:07
Unfortunately, this is another one of the areas where Mr. Obama has failed his base. The "War on Drugs" has been a failure since its inception. The refusal of his administration to creatively address the problem of drug abuse, its duplicity on the issue of medical marijuana, and his support for Big Pharma are easy reasons for progressives to be concerned about Mr. Obama's leadership.
 
 
+4 # Carl Caswell 2012-04-15 21:12
Obama Says No to Legalizing Drugs. It look like he thinks it better to have crime controlling the drugs that millions of people use. Drug addiction in all countries is a serious public health issue and he thinks its really help the people keeping it all illegal so people can’t see what they can do with these people that they help get addicted with crime in control of the drugs . What about freedom of choice to offer safe use. People use drugs no matter what laws they make. Obama says "The capacity of a large-scale drug trade to dominate certain countries if they were allowed to operate legally without any constraint could be just as corrupting, if not more corrupting, than the status quo. Operate legally without any constrain ? Obama got it backwards. Having it illegal they don’t have constraint if you made it legal you would have the control. So what and why are you having laws that give crime controlling the drugs that a culture of people use ? What about political right for a culture of people and laws to help them not against them . Political rights political freedom for a culture of people for those who have control our number will grow. The spark of liberty will turn into a flame and light the way to better days join in the political party and feel the warmth of freedom lightVote for a better way Carl Caswell jest write the name in Political offices 174 Pleasant St. Marblehead MA 01945 USA call 781-771-4360 for appointment No walk in taken.
 
 
+7 # Montague 2012-04-15 21:32
Gunboat diplomacy is EXACTLY the world we live in today. Legalise drugs, regulate them, use the revenue for treatment of addicts? Big daddy USA says no.
 
 
+10 # nealjking 2012-04-15 21:48
Some of us believe that the anti-drug laws are doing more harm than good in the US!

Just like Prohibition, earlier...
 
 
0 # Anarchist 23 2012-04-17 17:43
Quoting nealjking:
Some of us believe that the anti-drug laws are doing more harm than good in the US!

Just like Prohibition, earlier...

'Prohibition is an awful flop
We like it.
It can't stop what it's meant to stop.
We like It.
It's left a trail of graft and slime,
It's filled our land with vice and crime.
It don't prohibit worth a dime.
Nevertheless, we're for it.'

anonymous of 1930 quoted from Molly Ivins column
 
 
+7 # tm7devils 2012-04-15 23:50
Well, well! Welcome to the planet of human beings...where the smartest brains make the dumbest decisions.
Yep!...Let's keep that ol' drug war going...so the drug lords can make more money; buy more weapons; kill more users and innocent people; infight for more territory.

Is it possible that Bush and Obama look at "War" as Gen. George Patton did when he said: “Compared to war, all other forms of human endeavor shrink to insignificance. God help me, I do love it so.”

If that's the case we shall all die with our boots on.
 
 
+5 # jlohman 2012-04-16 00:09
There's a lot of campaign money to be had with this War on Drugs thingy. From minimum sentencing to three strikes laws, the private prison companies and guards unions are willing to pay big bucks. Until we get a congress willing to say STOP!!! THIS will work and we are moving forward without you, we are screwed.
 
 
+4 # jlohman 2012-04-16 00:28
There's a lot of campaign money to be had with this War on Drugs thingy. From minimum sentencing to three strikes laws, the private prison companies and guard unions are willing to pay big bucks. Until we get a congress willing to say STOP!!! THIS will work and we are moving forward without you, we are screwed.
 
 
+6 # dfvboulder 2012-04-16 01:12
Oh come on. Of course legalization is the answer -- if not, then name the answer.

If drugs were legal, their price would immediately drop by about 99%. The drug trade would die overnight.

But there would be political prices to pay, and that's not OK with Obie.
 
 
+9 # SouthBrun 2012-04-16 03:53
Legalize the growing of HEMP. Hemp is not a drug, you can't get a buzz. It would become a cash crop for farmers. No one can say why we don't repeal the law. Yet no one wants to appear soft on the issue.
 
 
+4 # Capn Canard 2012-04-16 06:07
Obama is hamstrung, he is looking more and more like Mussolini hanging like a side of beef. It would be nice to see him step up and behave like a man and poke the complete failure of conservative policy in the eye. Legalize all drugs. Let the market determine who wins and who fails. The losers will use deadly and dangerous poisons like Alcohol, cocaine, heroin, meth, and huffing. And the winners will either not use any drugs or will use natural intoxicants like MJ or Shrooms, or explore more trippy intoxicants like LSD, MDMA, DMT, et al and live to tell the tale.
 
 
+1 # Michael_K 2012-04-17 16:29
He isn't "hamstrung" at all.. It's just that his agenda isn't at all what you think it is (or what I thought it was when I stupidly campaigned for him)
 
 
+15 # John Locke 2012-04-16 06:20
Of course Obama would be against legalizing drugs...That would take the profit out of it like when we ended prohibition of liquor did.

This is a black budget for the CIA they make literally billions off the Drug trade…Every year! That is why they have been guarding and expanding the acreage of opium in Afghanistan. And one of the two reasons we invaded Afghanistan the second was the Unocal Pipeline…(Now Complete)

About the CIA…
By 1960 The CIA became progressively more involved with its mafia partners’ drug smuggling operations. Indeed, by 1960, it had become impossible to make a clear distinction between the two organizations. Many CIA operatives were also foot-soldiers for organized crime. A significant faction in the CIA had taken upon itself the responsibility of reorganizing the international drug traffic to its own advantage.
For more than fifty years the CIA has served as a front for what is now the most powerful drug-traffickin g organization in the western hemisphere. Control of the Drug Operations resided mostly in the Agency’s “Directorate of Operations” and consisted of unofficial "agents" and "assets" as well as career officers. Drugs will never be legalized in the US…there is just too much profit for our government to give up!
 
 
-3 # Fiona Mackenzie 2012-04-17 13:05
And who, John, was the CIA for decades, that employed clandestine and illegal and treasonous methods? Oh, right--Reagan, Nixon, Bush41, Cheney, ... And YOU didn't care, not until you were feeling around under your bed for something to bash a Dem president with.
 
 
+3 # Michael_K 2012-04-17 16:41
"Bash a Dem President"??? Does it not bother you that this poor beleaguered Dem President has continued and even expanded almost all of the most heinous and criminal Bush/Cheney policies?

Some Democrat you are! We used to rightly accuse the Rethugli ans of supporting Party over Country.. but look at us now!
 
 
+2 # John Locke 2012-04-18 07:49
Fiona: In Response to your "attempt" to critize my comment. Here are the facts about me, I was a Radio Talk Show Host from 1994 to 2003...My co host was Ted Gunderson (rip) Ted Outed much of this as he was very much involved in the FBI as The "agent in charge" of field offices in both Los Angeles and in Dallas Texas. and also had interaction with the CIA....I have also...So two things here...1. What I say is FACT... and 2. I have been trying to wake people up to this criminal agency and have attacked the "Presidents" of BOTH parties who allow it. Including Clinton and Carter along with your Saint Obama...So no, I don't have to look under the bed, My file cabinet will do very nicely... I can look Obama directly in the eye and make the same comment...
 
 
+5 # brotherdb 2012-04-16 11:50
I am a viet nam vet some of my friends who were in the battle zones told me the only way they kept their sanity was smoking pot during those days
 
 
+2 # Dave_s Not Here 2012-04-16 13:19
Too many government and prison piggies (who also vote) with their snouts buried in the trough on this one, folks, to ever see substantive change. Maybe after the revolution, depending on which side wins.

There's no guarantee, you know, that the right side will win the revolution that's coming.
 
 
-1 # Fiona Mackenzie 2012-04-17 08:49
Prisoners vote? Who knew?
 
 
0 # Michael_K 2012-04-17 16:46
Quoting Fiona Mackenzie:
Prisoners vote? Who knew?


As you might have guessed many prisoners in jail haven't been convicted of anything. They are supposed to be given facilities to vote, although o.pliance is spotty, at best. Prisoners in prison, who have been convicted and sentenced may or may not have had their right to vote suspended, depending on the State and the seriousness of the crime.
 
 
+1 # jwb110 2012-04-16 19:49
If the Federal Gov't is not going to consider legalizing drugs the they should just stop the finding of the War on Drugs, a huge waste of people, time and money, and use the money to pay down the deficit.
 
 
-2 # Fiona Mackenzie 2012-04-17 08:55
There is no "paying down the deficit." If you believe that, you are amazingly gullible. Every cent taken from our roads, bridges, children, environment, everything is going directly to mega-corporatio ns and mega-rich Americans through subsidies and tax cuts.

That's to encourage them to continue making money that makes all the profits of huge corporations in the past look like pocket change, take it out of the country, pay no taxes on it, and--right now--pull it out of their offshore accounts (the top few together have over $2.5 Trillion in offshore accounts,waitin g for the class warfare to hit its peak and install fascism in the U.S.

Like Clinton, O is trying to satisfy them by further impoverishing the needy and the workers to "pay down the deficit." Like W, the new GOP/ ALEC president will blow whatever has been saved by squeezing it out of the elderly, the babies, and the ill within three weeks (YES, W BLEW IT ALL IN 3 WEEKS).

Anyone who thinks our "austerity" helps the country, the deficit, or the debt in any way is a sucker.
 
 
-3 # Fiona Mackenzie 2012-04-17 09:15
And oh, right, he hasn't said no yet. But let's beat him up because he hasn't solved permanently and perfectly an issue that has plagued many administrations , none of which has taken any responsibility for solving it intelligently.
 
 
-3 # Fiona Mackenzie 2012-04-17 12:55
As you know if you were listening, it has already been demonstrated that just pulling back--even on a state-to-state basis--has produced chaos. You also know that they ARE considering decriminalizing , if not legalizing it. Keep your pants on.
 
 
+2 # John Locke 2012-04-18 08:03
Fiona: FYI there has been a movement within the Legal profession to leagalize drugs for three decades... even Judges are for this, its the Government who won't legalize it because of the profit it brings into our secretive agencies mainly the Intelligence community...and its not just us...the Israelis and French and British Intelligence agencies also deal in drugs...and always have! The French were dealing in drugs in Viet Nam exporting them to europe...
 
 
+2 # John Locke 2012-04-18 07:57
jwb: They should, but look at what has been accomplished since we "began" the war on drugs...Drug Traffacking has increased... and the Government takes down the street operatives and they forfeit homes, cars, Jewelry and money...Like Porsche's and Mercedez...High end cars that they sell and of course Bank accounts and Cash found at the site...The war on drugs is very very profitable for our Government. and when they want to expand the drug trade they invade countries like Vietnam and Afghanistan...
 
 
-4 # Fiona Mackenzie 2012-04-17 08:45
Notice that we have opinions, but President Obama has responsibility. Notice also his pattern of thorough study and evaluation before making what has generally turned out to be excellent, successful moves.

If you watched the news this week, you know he has gone much farther to analyze the complex marijuana situation and is exploring options. This is different from every single other president, all of whom have met the issue with destructive, politically based emotional garbage.

So back off. We have a problem solver in the WH finally, and he is solving problems at an amazing rate [Imagine what he could do if he had rational, decent people in Congress!]

He has proven over and over that he isn't just pushing difficult issues to a back burner, but is resolving them, so quit whining and watch what happens.
 
 
+2 # Anarchist 23 2012-04-17 17:52
Unfortunately we have already got plenty of excellent studies on the matter; we have police chiefs saying it should be legalized. The time is now. We are reaching a point where we are running out of 'tomorrows' to solve our national and social problems. 'Bedford Falls' America took the wrong turn towards Potterville shortly after WWII ended, and there is really not time to waste.
 
 
+3 # Michael_K 2012-04-17 11:17
I have to laugh when Obama says, with all the fake "authority" he can muster that "legalisation is not the answer".. Of course it is! As illustrated in a number of countries not enslaved by US policy, and of course by history, as illustrated bt the Volstead Act. I understand, however, his reluctance to abandon such a selective enrichment/sele ctive enforcement method of funding black budgets and creating myriads of "collateral new crimes" such as "laundering" etc.. What a hypocritical knave!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN