Excerpt: "Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos and others want to talk about what they call the failed war on drugs, as President Obama tries to focus on economic ties."
President Obama speaks during a joint forum with Brazil's President Rousseff and Colombia's President Santos at the CEO Summit of the Americas, 04/14/12. (photo: Cris Bouroncle/AFP/Getty Images)
Obama Says No to Legalizing Drugs
15 April 12
olombian President Juan Manuel Santos and others want to talk about what they call the failed war on drugs, as President Obama tries to focus on economic ties.
President Obama sought Saturday to emphasize the robust economic relationship between the United States and Latin America, and he flatly ruled out legalizing drugs as a way to combat the illegal trafficking that has ravaged the region.
Facing calls at a regional summit to consider decriminalization, Obama said he is open to a debate about drug policy, but he believes that legalization could lead to greater problems in countries hardest hit by drug-fueled violence.
"Legalization is not the answer," Obama told other hemispheric leaders at the two-day Summit of the Americas.
"The capacity of a large-scale drug trade to dominate certain countries if they were allowed to operate legally without any constraint could be just as corrupting, if not more corrupting, than the status quo," he said.
Obama told Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, host of the summit, that he is willing to discuss whether American drug laws are "doing more harm than good in certain places."
Santos wants the 33 countries participating in the summit to consider alternatives to what many leaders consider the failed war on drugs, possibly including regulating marijuana and even cocaine the way that alcohol and tobacco are.
Other leaders also have urged such a dialogue despite the political discomfort it may cause Obama in an election year.
"In spite of all the efforts, the illicit drug business is still buoyant, drug addiction in all countries is a serious public health issue, and drug trafficking is still the main provider of funding for violence and terrorism," Santos said. "An in-depth discussion around this topic is needed, without any biases or dogmas, taking into consideration the different scenarios and possible alternatives to more effectively face this challenge."
The focus on drug trafficking - as well as a scandal involving alleged misconduct by Secret Service agents and military personnel - threatened to overshadow Obama's main mission in Colombia: touting the benefits of a strong economic relationship across the hemisphere.
"I think that oftentimes in the press the attention in summits like this ends up focusing on, 'Where are the controversies?'" Obama said during a morning session.
Some of those issues seem "caught in a time warp, going back to the 1950s and gunboat diplomacy and Yanquis and the Cold War, and this and that and the other," he said. "That's not the world we live in today."
He praised a recently negotiated trade agreement with Colombia as a "win-win."
He did not say whether Colombia has met the terms of a labor rights plan that Congress set last year as a condition of passage of the agreement. The trade accord was strongly opposed by union leaders, who complained of the dangerous conditions facing members of organized labor in Colombia.
Obama avoided confrontations with the region's most anti-American leaders. Cuba's president, Raul Castro, was not invited to the summit. And Venezuela's president, Hugo Chavez, who is highly critical of U.S. policy, abruptly canceled plans to attend.
Chavez, who suffers from cancer, will travel to Cuba instead for radiation therapy, Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro said on state TV.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Just like Prohibition, earlier...
'Prohibition is an awful flop
We like it.
It can't stop what it's meant to stop.
We like It.
It's left a trail of graft and slime,
It's filled our land with vice and crime.
It don't prohibit worth a dime.
Nevertheless, we're for it.'
anonymous of 1930 quoted from Molly Ivins column
Yep!...Let's keep that ol' drug war going...so the drug lords can make more money; buy more weapons; kill more users and innocent people; infight for more territory.
Is it possible that Bush and Obama look at "War" as Gen. George Patton did when he said: “Compared to war, all other forms of human endeavor shrink to insignificance. God help me, I do love it so.”
If that's the case we shall all die with our boots on.
If drugs were legal, their price would immediately drop by about 99%. The drug trade would die overnight.
But there would be political prices to pay, and that's not OK with Obie.
This is a black budget for the CIA they make literally billions off the Drug trade…Every year! That is why they have been guarding and expanding the acreage of opium in Afghanistan. And one of the two reasons we invaded Afghanistan the second was the Unocal Pipeline…(Now Complete)
About the CIA…
By 1960 The CIA became progressively more involved with its mafia partners’ drug smuggling operations. Indeed, by 1960, it had become impossible to make a clear distinction between the two organizations. Many CIA operatives were also foot-soldiers for organized crime. A significant faction in the CIA had taken upon itself the responsibility of reorganizing the international drug traffic to its own advantage.
For more than fifty years the CIA has served as a front for what is now the most powerful drug-traffickin g organization in the western hemisphere. Control of the Drug Operations resided mostly in the Agency’s “Directorate of Operations” and consisted of unofficial "agents" and "assets" as well as career officers. Drugs will never be legalized in the US…there is just too much profit for our government to give up!
Some Democrat you are! We used to rightly accuse the Rethugli ans of supporting Party over Country.. but look at us now!
There's no guarantee, you know, that the right side will win the revolution that's coming.
As you might have guessed many prisoners in jail haven't been convicted of anything. They are supposed to be given facilities to vote, although o.pliance is spotty, at best. Prisoners in prison, who have been convicted and sentenced may or may not have had their right to vote suspended, depending on the State and the seriousness of the crime.
That's to encourage them to continue making money that makes all the profits of huge corporations in the past look like pocket change, take it out of the country, pay no taxes on it, and--right now--pull it out of their offshore accounts (the top few together have over $2.5 Trillion in offshore accounts,waitin g for the class warfare to hit its peak and install fascism in the U.S.
Like Clinton, O is trying to satisfy them by further impoverishing the needy and the workers to "pay down the deficit." Like W, the new GOP/ ALEC president will blow whatever has been saved by squeezing it out of the elderly, the babies, and the ill within three weeks (YES, W BLEW IT ALL IN 3 WEEKS).
Anyone who thinks our "austerity" helps the country, the deficit, or the debt in any way is a sucker.
If you watched the news this week, you know he has gone much farther to analyze the complex marijuana situation and is exploring options. This is different from every single other president, all of whom have met the issue with destructive, politically based emotional garbage.
So back off. We have a problem solver in the WH finally, and he is solving problems at an amazing rate [Imagine what he could do if he had rational, decent people in Congress!]
He has proven over and over that he isn't just pushing difficult issues to a back burner, but is resolving them, so quit whining and watch what happens.
RSS feed for comments to this post