Pilkington reports: "Rupert Murdoch faces a growing legal challenge in the heart of his global media empire as lawyers representing alleged victims of phone hacking on US soil begin gathering evidence ahead of possible court action."
Rupert Murdoch's Fox News is in danger of becoming a part of the NewsCorp phone-hacking scandal. (photo: Reuters)
Fox News May Be Implicated in Murdoch Hacking Scandal
20 April 12
upert Murdoch faces a growing legal challenge in the heart of his global media empire as lawyers representing alleged victims of phone hacking on US soil begin gathering evidence ahead of possible court action.
Mark Lewis, the English lawyer who has been a driving force behind phone-hacking revelations in the UK, and his American legal partner Norman Siegel, have revealed that they have been approached by at least 10 people bearing complaints relating to Murdoch's News Corporation.
The complaints relate largely to alleged hacking by News of the World journalists into phones in the US, but also extend to other News Corp holdings including Fox News.
Lewis said that he had been contacted by a number of people since he arrived in the US last weekend "raising issues against other [News Corp] titles or Fox News, not necessarily about hacking but about other untoward dark arts to obtain information that should be private." He added that the new complaints were unproven allegations.
Lewis told reporters that he had taken on a fourth case of alleged phone hacking in the US. Previously, it had been known that he was representing three individuals, one of whom is an American citizen and two of whom are Europeans who believe their phones were hacked while visiting America.
In addition, Siegel, a former head of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said he had been contacted by six individuals raising complaints about News Corp outlets. "My experience in these sorts of cases is that when people sense you are serious and balanced in your approach, they begin to come out of the woodwork," he said.
The lawyers are refusing to name the four firm cases of alleged phone hacking inside America they are pursuing, saying that to identify them would be to further breach their privacy. So far all that is known of the original three is that one is a soccer figure, another from Hollywood and a third an American.
Lewis and Siegel said they had begun to compile evidence relating to the cases, and lawsuits could flow when they were ready. At the heart of the three initial cases are notes kept by Glenn Mulcaire, the private detective used by News of the World to carry out illegal hacking of the phones of potentially thousands of people.
Lewis claimed he had "substantial and substantiated" evidence relating to Mulcaire's notes that pointed to phone hacking on US soil between the years 2001 and 2006.
News Corporation said only that they had "no comment" on Lewis's American visit, but the stakes are potentially very high for the company. Both federal and individual state law takes a severe view of alleged hacking into a person's stored communications.
Under federal law, an individual who violates telecoms privacy for the purposes of commercial advantage can face five years in prison, or 10 years for a subsequent offence. Civil courts can also set damages measured against the profits gained by the violators.
Punitive damages can be imposed on any person or company found guilty of "wilful or intentional" violations of the law.
The new legal challenges may have particularly serious implications for James Murdoch, Rupert's youngest son, who recently relocated to New York from London, where he was chairman of the beleaguered UK newspaper group News International. Lewis indicated that he was exploring the possibility of deposing the younger Murdoch should any of the cases come to court.
"James Murdoch is now in the US rather than in England, and we have to look at that," Lewis said. "It becomes relevant to all sorts of issues in respect to knowledge in terms of punitive damages."
Asked whether Rupert Murdoch might also be deposed, he replied: "You go whereever the evidence takes you. We don't rule anything in or out."
Both Murdochs have been called to give evidence at the Leveson inquiry into phone hacking and media ethics in London next week.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |













Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Do you realize what an EVIL half-vast gradeschool argument that is?
Please tell me you do...and soon, too.
Thank you Lewis, Seigel, Mulcaire, et all for bringing this out of the nether regions and into the light of day.
maybe roger ailes will be pilloried. wait'll the "flame-stream" media (like you basic supermarket, check-out line fare)gets a load of this.
it couldn't happen to nicer, faux folks. i can't wait 'til bill o'reilly takes the stand.
Please note: I don't opine that Tputzes are INTENTIONALLY subversive and traitorous.
I believe that most of them think they are patriotic. A also believe they are mostly ignorant or dumb, but 've only met a hundred or so.
I DO believe that if the Tputzes ever learn...or figure out...to what dastardly uses they have been put, they will hang Limpy and Koch and quite a few others.
Although I favor guillotines for traitors.
I almost feel Surprised...!
Also concerning left vs right, in general dialogue, the left lacks the prominence of manipulators of psychology and verbiage like Frank Luntz and Karl Rove...what is your take on their very public admissions and admonitions of changing the very language and thinking of the American political dialogue using twists like SSI, social security INSURANCE, becoming an 'entitlement', implying that I/we should be getting nothing from that social security insurance pool we all have paid into our entire working lives?
Just one example of how dishonesty in thought and expression reigns on the right.
Seriously Robert Eagle, I and I'm sure most commenters here are curious as to your take...ey?
George Bush is to blame, he ruined this country!!
I look for the truth, but I know Im not going to find it watching Fox News or following the republicans.
It is disgusting to hear all the crap they serve up. I see smaller clips of the programs on other shows, for watching an entire program would make me violently ill, and I might kick in the screen on my TV.
I hope your health is good. I am grateful to you for the tip about the Prickly Pear juice. I enjoy it very much.
By the way, 'to balm' probably means to put a healing ointment on a wound...perhaps a decent metaphor...but methinks most of us would rather use 'BOMB', particularly on Bush's works in undermining America.
Just wondering if you had any idea of what you meant, or if you were a reep or TPutz...?
Paul Harris
Author, "Diary From the Dome, Reflections on Fear and Privilege During Katrina"
What Murdoch and Fox does, is LIE and DISTORT the dialog in this country, and England too. They poison the air waves.
They PAY politicians and give them a BIG microphone on Fox. Gingrich, Kasick, Palin, to name a few.
They lie about everything the President says and does. They are misinforming the schmucks who watch their programs. They are plain and simple, just the mouthpiece for the right wing and all republicans.
Unless the DOJ is bought and sold...which is a distinct possibility...
when you think of ALL the Goldman perps who have been arrested...? none... I guess the fix is in someplace.
According to Common Cause, SCOTUS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of that slick Koch. Welkom to Amerika.
FOR GOD'S SAKE DON'T VOTE REPUBLICAN
But when they got the power, it was obvious, that they could NOT GOVERN, for you are not good at something you hate.
They only want the power to help the people and corporations who bankroll them, and then they become lobbyists and make tons of money when they leave office.
It should be illegal to become a lobbyist until 5 years after leaving office.
That goes for democrats too. Nobody should be able to lobby their friends.
Wikipedia says :-
Elisabeth Murdoch, born 1968 at Sydney, NSW, Aus., television executive, manager of Fox TV in USA. Married (1) Los Angeles, Cal., 1993, sep. 1998, husband Elkin Kwesi Pianim and Cornelia .
Daniel......thi s story does not have "two sides". George Soros is doing nothing at all comparable. He may contribute to various left leaning sources, but he doesn't own a media empire like News Corp.
I beg to differ, Fox news took the news out of the news and replaced it with spin and opinion. They twist things until they are unrecognizable. Its a right wing spin machine that brain washes people with lies. Then says the other side is doing everything they are doing. That just isnt so, Murdoch and Fox News are crooked and have broken the law. For some reason republicans want to blame all their crooked parties crap on the dems and then say we are just as bad...NEWS BULLETIN: We arent as bad as the liars on Fox News and just because you say we are, it doesnt mean we are.
Here is an FYI they actually say people who dont watch the news are better informed then people who watch Fox news...what does that tell you?
RSS feed for comments to this post